George from 🕹prodmgmt.world Profile picture
Jul 30 13 tweets 3 min read Read on X
You've got this brilliant feature idea.

You've done the research, talked to users, even built a prototype.

But when you pitch it to the team, you get:

- "We don't have time"
- "What about technical debt?"
- "How does this fit our roadmap?"

Here's what I learned after 50+ feature pitches that failed:
The biggest mistake I see PMs make:

They think "buy-in" means convincing people their idea is good.

Wrong.

You're not selling a feature. You're selling a story.

And the story isn't about your solution, it's about a problem everyone already agrees exists.
Think of it like chess.

You can't just move your queen and expect to win.

Every move affects the entire board. Every stakeholder has their own pieces to protect.

Engineering wants to maintain code quality.
Design wants UX consistency.
Business wants predictable delivery.

Your job: Show how your move helps everyone win.
Here's the thing that changed everything for me:

You're not asking for permission. You're asking for partnership.

When you frame it as "I need your help to solve this problem," instead of "I want to build this feature," everything changes.

Suddenly you're not the person with the answer, you're the person who needs their expertise.
The pattern I see in successful buy-in:

1. Start with a problem everyone feels
2. Show you understand their constraints
3. Present your idea as a hypothesis, not a solution
4. Ask for their input on how to make it better
5. Build the roadmap together

Notice what's missing: The hard sell.
But here's the brutal truth about roadmaps:

You can't just pitch random ideas and expect them to happen.

Your brilliant feature idea has to fit into an existing roadmap that people have already committed to.

Even if your idea is amazing, stakeholders have agreed to delivery dates and can't just change everything because you had a great thought.
The trickiest part: Starting with "a problem everyone feels."

Reality check: Not everyone feels the same problems equally.

You might say "This is a problem," and people nod... but then comes the objection:

"Is this the main problem to solve, or are there bigger problems we already have a roadmap for?"

This is where most PMs get stuck.
Here's how to handle the roadmap objection:

Don't fight the roadmap. Work with it.

Show how your idea:

- Accelerates existing roadmap items
- Reduces risk for planned features
- Creates optionality for future decisions
- Solves a dependency that's blocking other work

Frame it as roadmap optimization, not roadmap disruption.
Here's my framework for each stakeholder:

Engineering: "Here's what I'm thinking technically. What am I missing?"
Design: "I sketched this user flow. How can we make it more intuitive?"
Business: "Here's the market opportunity. What risks should we consider?"
Users: "I heard this pain point. Does this solution address it?"
Here's how you know you've actually achieved buy-in:

- People start asking "when" not "if"
- They volunteer resources or time
- They bring up your idea in other meetings
- They start thinking about implementation details

If you're still defending your idea, you haven't achieved buy-in yet.
I've been experimenting with my AI prompts for product work to help with this process:


Anyone else using AI to prepare for feature pitches? What prompts have worked for you? prodmgmt.world/products/ai-pr…Image
The next time you have a feature idea:

1. Map out who needs to say yes
2. Understand what they're protecting
3. Frame your idea as solving their problem
4. Ask for their expertise, not their approval

Your idea is probably good. Your pitch just needs to be about them, not you.
If this was helpful, follow @nurijanian for more product management insights.

What's the biggest buy-in challenge you're facing right now? Drop it in the replies 👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George from 🕹prodmgmt.world

George from 🕹prodmgmt.world Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nurijanian

Jul 29
Your technical skills got you the PM role.

But your stakeholder skills will make or break you.

I lost multiple battles as a PM by being "right" but ineffective.

Here's what I’d do differently now:
1/ First, understand why smart people push back against good data:

• They have context you don't
• They're optimizing for different goals
• They see risks you haven't considered
• They have pressure from their stakeholders
• Past experiences are coloring their judgment
2/ The immediate urge is to:

- Gather more data
- Build stronger arguments
- Rally support

Stop.

Your goal isn't to win the argument.
It's to make the best decision for the product AND maintain relationships.
Read 15 tweets
Jul 29
Your engineering background is a superpower for writing PRDs.

But only if you know how to translate technical depth into business impact.

After reviewing probably about ~ 100 technical PRDs last year, here's what separates great ones from the rest 🧠 Image
1/ First, a hard truth:

Your technical expertise can actually work against you when writing PRDs for non-technical stakeholders.

The more you know, the harder it becomes to explain simply.

This is why senior engineers often struggle more than juniors when becoming PMs.
2/ The root cause isn't your technical knowledge.

It's approaching PRDs like technical specifications.

Engineering docs optimize for completeness.
Business docs optimize for decisions.

Different tools for different jobs.
Read 22 tweets
Jul 28
Most PMs burn out... Not from overwork, but misalignment.

They thought they'd build great products.
Instead: endless stakeholder alignment and decks.

After 100+ PM interviews and 200+ JD analyses, I decoded the hidden red flags.

I'll teach you in 5 minutes what took me years:
"Strategic thinking" isn't what you think it is

Most PMs assume strategic work means:
• Vision creation
• Market analysis
• Product direction
But in 70% of companies, "strategic" work actually means:

• Creating alignment decks
• Navigating organizational politics
• Endless stakeholder meetings
• Minimal building, maximum presenting

Test: Ask "What percentage of strategic work involves creating vs. communicating?"
Read 13 tweets
Jul 28
Product Management Maxims: Hard-earned wisdom for the daily work

A thread of practical rules that will save you years of painful lessons. ⚡
1. If you want good requirements, talk to five customers. If you want great requirements, watch five customers struggle with your product.

People lie about what they need. They never lie about what frustrates them.
2. If your product meetings are full of debate, you lack data. If they're silent, you lack trust.

Good teams argue about interpretations, not facts. Silent teams hide disagreement.
Read 17 tweets
Jul 27
How To Get Rid Of Analysis Paralysis Forever, Even If You’ve Tried Everything: 👇 Image
1. Stop using good outcomes to validate your process.

A successful feature ≠ good decision
Failed experiment ≠ bad decision

Track your decisions BEFORE knowing outcomes. Compare your expected probability of success vs actual.

This exposes your true hit rate.
2. Your "high-impact vs low-impact" framework is wrong.

Real framework:
- Is it reversible?
- Does it repeat?
- Are options similar?
- Outside your control?

These determine speed vs quality tradeoff, not just "impact"
Read 11 tweets
Jul 25
The number 1 mistake ex-engineers make in PM roles:

Prioritizing possibility over value.

Let's uncover this fallacy and reverse it in just 3 minutes. 🧵
1/ the engineering brain is wired to ask "can we build this?"

feasibility becomes the primary filter.

technical complexity becomes exciting.

user value becomes secondary.

this creates predictable patterns:
2/ the ex-engineer pm gets excited about machine learning recommendation engines while users abandon the app because basic search returns no results.

they architect elegant microservices while user research sits unread on their desk.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(