Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jul 31 26 tweets 12 min read Read on X
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING Durham appendix released. 1/
3/ Whoa! Russia hacked Soros' Open Society Foundations! Image
4/ This is getting good! Holy CRAP! No evidence so far because of: "The timely deletion of relevant emails from servers!" Image
Image
5/ "Minimal risk" that they'll get the emails! Image
Image
6/ What's "special services"? What Brennan, Clapper, and Comey call themselves? Image
7/ And there we have it! Image
8/ So they had this in March of 2016, but found it not credible because multiple lawyers. HELLO...DOSSIER! Holy Sh!t! You need more evidence to investigate the AG, but not the frickin' president!!! Image
Image
9/ Note: Here it says late July Clinton approved plan, I thought they gave a specific date? (still reading may answer question): "Disseminated through leading US publications". Yup, legacy media was in on it! Image
Image
Image
Image
10/ Other think tanks hacked? Image
11/ This timing is key...More on that later...but sounds like they were behind the Romney "scandal" Image
Image
12/ Timing again is informative. And wow, they knew they had deep-state in their pockets. Surprise, surprise! And double wow...the media will help! Image
Image
13/ Likely authentic. Also, IDs think tanks in on it! Image
Image
Image
Image
14/ Folks say don't recall or didn't write. Hmmm. Image
15/ Oh, of course not! Image
15/ Hillary: "Looks like Russian disinformation." Image
16/ But they protest too much! Image
Image
Image
Image
17/ Assessment is Russia hacks resulted in a compilation email. Image
Image
18/ CIA concluded NOT product of Russia fabrications! Image
Image
19/ Oh, how nice to give AG a defensive briefing that wasn't leaked! And that they didn't launch an investigation against her (like they did the President). Image
Image
20/ Baker is sus but doesn't do anything! Image
Image
Image
Image
21/ They write a CYA memo, but CIA disagrees. Image
22/ Durham can't reach a definitive conclusion. BUT notes got to Brennan and taken seriously yet FBI dismissed out of hand without doing anything. Image
Image
23/ Plot to try to influence Hillary but FISA delayed because they were scared of her! Image
Image
24/ HA. Durham slams Schiff for lying: Image
Image
25/ Durham also notes CHS lied. But FBI just relied on CHS. Image
Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Aug 2
🧵I wanted to re-read a section of Brennan's testimony to HPSCI and ended up re-reading the entire thing. There's a whole lot of lying going on! Image
Image
Image
2/ Holy crap! Brennan says there were "two" products produced--but there were three and the third one was the only one that included referenced to the Steele dossier and other fake intel! Image
Image
Image
3/ Wasn't intel less conclusive? And YIKES... Image
Image
Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 1
Also, I've gotten the question of is Trump going to SCOTUS? I thought they would because d.ct.'s ruling was sooooo nutso, but the appellate court stayed the lower court's holding IJ had to give him a hearing on avoiding removal on alternative grounds. 1/
2/ IJ held removable for lying on visa application and Khalil sought a hearing on whether IJ should waive that based on loving husband/father. New Jersey judge said IJ had to give hearing on that argument. Appellate court stayed that. So he is still removable based on that.
3/ I think Trump Administration decided it wasn't worth rushing & seeking SCOTUS involvement because SCOTUS wouldn't see a "rush" risk b/c alternative basis allows it to percolate for some time. Given timing & desire to not push too much, I get it.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 31
🔥Below is play-by-play 🧵of quick once-over of Appendix. My big picture take-away is this: The details reveal how corrupt the investigation into Trump was! They opened Crossfire Hurricane on the Presidential candidate with nothing, continued it with that nothing disproven AND 1/
2/ continued it during President's first term with more nothings and evidence that it was all fake. I care more about that fact and fact that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Mueller, and more conspired to further hoax, along with media than that they ignored Clinton plan.
3/ This new evidence is damning of FBI's failure to investigate Lynch, Clinton, and others, and that's bad. But what's worse is what they did--target Trump to destroy his candidacy and then his presidency. It's also damning on Think Tanks & legacy media's involvement.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 30
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Exclusive. Scandal re Obama-ordered fake Intelligence Community Assessment or ICA on Russia election meddling just keeps getting worse. Documents reveal Brennan's buddy threatened to w/hold promotion to get him to go along with fake ICA. 1/
2/2 Why? Because DOD's DIA trusted the senior intelligence official and if he agreed with assessment, DIA would have signed on with CIA & FBI. @FDRLST with @MZHemingwaythefederalist.com/2025/07/30/exc…
@FDRLST @MZHemingway 3/ I see the notes have just been uploaded! dni.gov/index.php/news…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 29
🧵on why I did not release the memo summarizing the Judicial Conference. Apparently some folks are suspicious of why I did not publish the memo, so here's a thread explaining. 1/
2/ As footnote 2 from the DOJ complaint suggests, any summary of the Judicial Conference was lengthy and the memorandum I reviewed was as well, nearly 20 pages of internal discussions, none of which had ANYTHING to do with Boasberg's comments. Image
3/ Those discussions provided neither content or context to Boasberg's comments and were either held no news value or in my judgment and that of my editor, with whom we discussed the issue at length, any slight news value did not justify revealing the internal communications.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 28
🧵So just noddling on what the Durham appendix will include and thinking it will include quite a bit of details on intercepts of Russian Foreign Intelligence
(SVR) Service. 1/ Image
2/ Lots re Clinton: Image
3/ Yup: Image
Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(