Your 401(k) could soon be raided—and you won’t notice until it’s too late.
Trump is planning an executive order to open $12.2 trillion in retirement savings to private equity.
@TheVinoMom says it’s not about “opportunity”—it’s a billionaire bailout to offload toxic assets they can’t sell.
Their fix, she warns, is simple: take your retirement to save themselves.
“They will be hit with an anvil they never saw coming.”
The good news? There’s still time to stop this—but only if we act now.
🧵 THREAD
Tiffany Cianci has been tracking the vultures of private equity for some time now. The last time Tiffany was on our show, she explained how BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, and others were destroying communities by buying up businesses only to commit them to debt they would never pay.
Now, Tiffany comes with a new warning about a planned executive order from President Trump. And it has to do with your retirement.
Tiffany has been warning for months that the private equity industry was creating a massive bubble that was about to pop. It just popped.
And right now, their lobbyists are flooding Washington, D.C. to beg the government for a bailout. And it's happening. Trump is planning to issue an executive order that will take $12 trillion of your retirement savings. Not taxpayer money. Your money. And it will bail out not only the private equity industry, but their biggest investors, too.
Tiffany joins us now to explain what’s happening, why it’s happening, and what we can do to stop it.
@TheVinoMom opened with a gut punch. Private equity firms are drowning in their own reckless debt—and they’re “begging Donald Trump to help them.”
The crisis centers on a looming executive order that could hand Wall Street unprecedented access to your retirement savings. After loading companies with adjustable-rate debt, private equity giants are now sitting on $3 trillion in toxic assets no one will touch—not Harvard, not Yale, not even the big pension funds.
Desperate for a lifeline, they’ve turned to the President. But this bailout won’t come from the government. It’ll come from your 401(k).
“He’s announced that he’s preparing to issue an executive order that would make it impossible for 401k holders to sue their investment managers if they recklessly invest their money with private equity,” Tiffany said.
In other words, your fund manager could gamble away your life savings, and you would have no legal recourse. “They are getting access to $12 trillion of 401k money,” Tiffany warned.
This is your money. Your future. And if this order goes through, it could be gone before you ever get to see it.
#ad: Your health is under attack—from every angle. But you’re not powerless.
The Energetic Health Institute is giving everyday Americans the tools to reclaim their health and fight back.
Explore powerful courses like The Art of Cellular Healing, Cleansing & the Causes of Cancer, and Vaccine Education for Mama Bears.
Don’t miss this opportunity to take charge of your health. Go to myehialoha.org/#vfox and use code VFOX for 30% off now.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Tiffany believes President Trump probably understands exactly what he’s about to do.
To her, this isn’t a last-minute policy shift—it’s part of a long, calculated play. “What scares me the most,” Tiffany explained, “is that private equity has known this day was coming. They saw the writing on the wall years ago. They started lobbying for this executive order seven years ago.”
For nearly a decade, private equity firms have been quietly bankrolling both parties to get this one thing done. It’s not about helping the public—it’s about power.
Tiffany explained that the move to block lawsuits isn’t some unintended side effect—it’s been the goal from the very beginning.
So when Congress wouldn’t play along, they pivoted to executive power. That shift, Tiffany argued, makes the agenda impossible to ignore. “I can't see any way that he doesn't know that,” she said of the President. “But I don't think he knows that we are savvy enough to understand it and to defend ourselves.”
Her message to viewers was urgent: speak up now. This executive order isn’t about protecting Americans. It’s about shielding Wall Street from accountability. “We need to reach out… and demand that he stop this before he puts the ink on the paper.”
#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats?
The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more.
Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world.
Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone.
Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance.
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
One of the most shocking moments of the interview came when Tiffany went after BlackRock CEO Larry Fink—the man who controls more 401(k) assets than anyone else on the planet.
She revealed Fink’s haunting admission. He doesn’t believe Americans have a right to retire at 65.
“In fact,” Tiffany said, paraphrasing him, “if they think they have a right to retire at 65, that’s an idea based in the Ottoman Empire and they’re absolutely crazy.”
Fink believes people should keep working into their 70s—or even into their 80s.
This isn’t just Fink’s outrageous opinion—it’s a warning shot and we need to pay attention. Tiffany said Fink is actively lobbying for control over Americans’ retirement funds so he can use them to prop up his failing private equity empire.
“This is the man that needs his company to maintain control over your 401k,” she said, pointing to the glaring conflict of interest.
“He’s now saying Americans shouldn’t be allowed to access our own 401k money at 65 years old,” she added. “This is one massive pyramid scheme… and we should not be allowing this level of control in any sector of our market.”
They already dominate the system, Tiffany warned—and now, they’re coming for your future.
In this faith-based book, Alin Armstrong explores biblical principles of fair trade, honesty, and sound money.
“Unequal weights are an abomination to the Lord,” he writes, reminding us that since Eden, gold has been God’s standard for honest money—a safeguard no one can print away or corrupt.
Discover these timeless principles for yourself—get your FREE copy now at goldbiblepulse.com.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
According to Tiffany, the warning signs are impossible to ignore, but, “If you need a flashing neon sign—today, something really terrifying happened.”
President Trump just fired two of the DOJ’s top prosecutors—senior officials who were leading antitrust cases against some of the country’s most powerful monopolies, including Google, Meta, Microsoft, and major grocery chains.
And just before that, Trump removed three of the FTC’s most aggressive members—Rebecca Slaughter, Alvaro Bedoya, and Lina Khan—all known for defending small businesses and confronting corporate consolidation.
“He's firing people that his donor class is demanding he fire,” Tiffany said. It’s a dangerous pattern. According to Tiffany, these were the only people left in Washington that are unencumbered and are actually fighting to protect small businesses.
“And he keeps firing them.”
With private equity driving monopolization across nearly every sector—from Big Tech to hospitals to grocery chains—the final line of defense is being torn down in real time.
“That really scares me,” Tiffany said.
And if she’s right, it should scare you, too.
Tiffany ended with a chilling warning. If legal guardrails are removed, your 401(k) could be quietly diverted into risky private equity—without your consent, and without you ever knowing it’s happening.
At first, everything would appear normal. Your balance might even look like it’s growing. “For 10 years they would believe their retirement was safe,” Tiffany warned, “and then suddenly those funds will close out… and they will be hit with an anvil they never saw coming.”
But the real danger isn’t just the shock—it’s the scale of the loss. Private equity firms quietly siphon off profits through hidden fees. “You’re literally giving them 60% of your returns,” she said. “And they’re making that money during the whole period of time.”
She pointed to Yale’s retirement fund as a cautionary tale: $1.4 billion in fees every year, just to earn 5.5–7% returns—while the S&P 500 returned 65% over the same stretch.
It hasn’t happened yet. But it could happen fast. “If he takes off that guardrail,” Tiffany said of Trump, “there is nothing stopping the breaches of their fiduciary obligations to you.”
Her message couldn’t be more urgent: “We need to stop it.” Now.
@TheVinoMom Thanks for tuning in. If this information opened your eyes, don’t miss the full interview below, and be sure to share with a friend.
We’ll be back tomorrow with another new episode, highlighting what the media refuses to cover. See you then.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.