"the FBI had no intelligence about Trump or others associated with the Trump campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign"
"Moreover, significant intelligence information that first became available for the FBI to review in 2018 showed that the Russians had access to sensitive U.S. government information years earlier that would have allowed them to identify Steele's subsources."
"Indeed, an experienced FBI analyst assessed that as a result of their access to the information, Steele's subsources could have been compromised by the Russians at a point in time prior to the date of the first Steele dossier report."
From the Classified Appendix to the Durham Report, beginning on page 4.
An excerpt from the March 2016 Russian memoranda:
"Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations" re: Trump.
"special services" could be taken to mean the FBI or CIA
Or, more broadly speaking, it could mean the intelligence and law enforcement communities.
But it could also refer to the opposition research that Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS were already doing at the time of this memo.
This is the same report that indicated that Hillary was being protected by AG Lynch and the "threat" to her from the FBI's investigation of her email server was "minimal."
So minimal that her victory was certain.
So, the Russians, believing that Hillary was going to evade criminal liability over the server, that Hillary was going to win, and knowing that Hillary had hired FusionGPS plus Christopher Steele to do opposition research on Trump as part of a plan to smear him, and knowing who Steele's sources were...
Could EASILY have compromised those sources, fed them garbage, and played a game whereby they HELP Hillary smear Trump
And provide the FBI with the "oil" for the "fire."
Why would the Russians do this?
Because all of these people think Hillary is going to win.
They never thought she would lose.
The weight of the blackmail that Putin would have had against Hillary could be measured in square kilometers of Ukraine and Georgia, in the lifting of sanctions on Nord Stream, and who knows what else.
He would have all of these emails, he would know the sub-sources for Steele, he would know it was disinformation, he would know Hillary paid for it, he would know about the Clinton Plan, he would know about AG Lynch leaking to Amanda Renteria...
He would know it all.
So playing into the Clinton Plan, even just a little, was in his interests.
And the cost was cheap.
Feed some rumors to Peskov, Dolan, Danchenko, maybe others. They'll eat it up.
So will Steele.
After all, he's being paid to by Hillary.
So folks, who was REALLY colluding with the Russians in 2016?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The usual suspects are gearing up to fight the DOJ probe into Fulton County, this time as regards the grand jury subpoena for records of employees and volunteers who worked the 2020 election.
On April 20, 2026, the FBI served a subpoena to the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections for information concerning individuals who worked the 2020 elections in Fulton. (see red box in pic.)
Fulton had until May 5, 2026, to comply but on April 29 asked for a 14-day extension.
🧵United States v. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
NEW SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT
Same charges as in the original indictment:
6 Counts of Wire Fraud
4 Counts of False Statements Bank
1 Count of Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering
Forfeiture
Adds new info to strengthen those charges.
Recall that the theory of this case is that the SPLC solicited donations and told donors that their contributions would be used to "dismantle" violent extremist groups.
But, unbeknownst to those donors, some of the money (millions) went to funding individuals in those groups who then used the money to promote the groups' activities and message.
The SPLC for decades ran a paid informant network that at times took direction from leadership at the SPLC.
This created a circumstance (or setup) where the SPLC, who according to their own website, literature, public-facing resources, and messaging, was working to "take down" these violent extremist groups, was instead directing and paying those same violent extremists to do violent and extreme things.
Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control is abbreviated as OFAC, but when folks get administrative subpoenas from them, they often mispronounce the acronym.
According to CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin, the email from OFAC was sent to the other co-founder, Jodie Evans's, spam folder.
OFAC is seeking a lot of information from Codepink regarding their visit to Cuba.
"Approximately 170 people participated in the convoy and suggested the scope of the inquiry could require organizers to account for the activities of every participant."
It is not known when Rush stopped working for the CIA or why, but we know from the affidavit that he requested and received "a significant quantity of foreign currency and tens of millions of dollars in gold bars for work-related expenses" between November 2025 and March 2026.
So his employment must have run at least until then.
At some point, I'm guessing between March and early May, the CIA began an investigation/review of what Rush was up to.
They were "unable to locate the gold bars or significant amounts of the foreign currency Rush received pursuant to his requests or to identify the intended use of these funds."
The "data center hysteria" is largely a repacking of the "climate change hysteria."
The hysteria is fueled, in part, by bad data, lack of perspective, and influence operations that lead with emotional bait.
Like the 20th-century predictions of climate catastrophes, it is another form of anti-capitalism (pro-communism) propaganda meant to capture your mind through fear.
A teachable moment.
In 2025, a left-wing anti-AI author, Karen Hao, published her non-fiction book 'Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI.'
It's done very well. A NYT bestseller and winner of multiple awards, the book received much praise.
Anti-AI and anti-data center sentiments, which go hand in hand, are now mainstream, and this book boosted them there.
You may have noticed the uptick in opposition to both.
Sometimes the angle of surveillance, aka "Big Brother," is also included.