Just Human Profile picture
Aug 1 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
From the Durham Report beginning on page 107

"the FBI had no intelligence about Trump or others associated with the Trump campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign" Image
"Moreover, significant intelligence information that first became available for the FBI to review in 2018 showed that the Russians had access to sensitive U.S. government information years earlier that would have allowed them to identify Steele's subsources." Image
"Indeed, an experienced FBI analyst assessed that as a result of their access to the information, Steele's subsources could have been compromised by the Russians at a point in time prior to the date of the first Steele dossier report." Image
From the Classified Appendix to the Durham Report, beginning on page 4.

An excerpt from the March 2016 Russian memoranda:

"Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations" re: Trump. Image
"special services" could be taken to mean the FBI or CIA

Or, more broadly speaking, it could mean the intelligence and law enforcement communities.

But it could also refer to the opposition research that Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS were already doing at the time of this memo.Image
This is the same report that indicated that Hillary was being protected by AG Lynch and the "threat" to her from the FBI's investigation of her email server was "minimal."

So minimal that her victory was certain. Image
So, the Russians, believing that Hillary was going to evade criminal liability over the server, that Hillary was going to win, and knowing that Hillary had hired FusionGPS plus Christopher Steele to do opposition research on Trump as part of a plan to smear him, and knowing who Steele's sources were...
Could EASILY have compromised those sources, fed them garbage, and played a game whereby they HELP Hillary smear Trump Image
And provide the FBI with the "oil" for the "fire." Image
Why would the Russians do this?

Because all of these people think Hillary is going to win.
They never thought she would lose. Image
The weight of the blackmail that Putin would have had against Hillary could be measured in square kilometers of Ukraine and Georgia, in the lifting of sanctions on Nord Stream, and who knows what else.
He would have all of these emails, he would know the sub-sources for Steele, he would know it was disinformation, he would know Hillary paid for it, he would know about the Clinton Plan, he would know about AG Lynch leaking to Amanda Renteria...

He would know it all.
So playing into the Clinton Plan, even just a little, was in his interests.

And the cost was cheap.

Feed some rumors to Peskov, Dolan, Danchenko, maybe others. They'll eat it up.

So will Steele.

After all, he's being paid to by Hillary. Image
So folks, who was REALLY colluding with the Russians in 2016?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Dec 21
🧵The same phenomenon of perception exists in politics and so much else.
We rarely perceive a person, idea, or event exactly as it is/they are—we instead make a near-automatic inference based on context, emotions, the social status we attach to it/them, and the narratives that surround it (or don't).
We make these calculations instantaneously, without prompting.

Just like we all did when we first glanced at the example above and perceived the batteries to be of differing sizes, we do the same thing to people, ideas, and events. Right? : )
Read 7 tweets
Dec 19
🧵Former Special Counsel Jack Smith wants video of his 8-hour deposition released and continues to ask for the opportunity to testify in a public hearing.

This has been Smith's repeated request since October. Image
The reason it wasn't public is because House Judiciary Committee chair Rep. Jim Jordan declined to make it so.

Though he didn't rule out a future public hearing. Image
It would be great to get the video of the 8-hour closed-door session released and also have a public hearing.

Both sides will use it for political gain and reinforcement of their preferred narratives, so it will be annoying in that way but could also be useful...
Read 9 tweets
Dec 18
United States v. Cole
(J6 Pipe Bomber case)

Cole Jr. is currently in the Rappahannock Regional Jail.

Yesterday, his counsel filed for permission from the court for two "in-person mental health evaluations" to be conducted today and tomorrow. Image
The magistrate judge granted the motion. One doctor will visit him today and another tomorrow. Image
I'm not 100% positive on this, but I think this may be the Dr. Clifford Sussman from the filing.

He is a child/adolescent psychiatrist and psychotherapist with a focus on "recognizing and treating internet and video game addiction."

cliffordsussmanmd.com/about/
Read 17 tweets
Dec 17
Fmr Special Counsel will be limited in what he can say to lawmakers when the question him in a closed door session today.

A setup that favors the politicians.
They’ll be able to later say things like “Jack Smith refused to answer my question blah blah blah”
But the limitations are real.

He can’t disclose information from sealed grand jury materials or proceedings.

He can’t disclose information that DOJ restricts prosecutors from discussing. Image
Read 7 tweets
Dec 17
🧵Richman v. United States
(Arctic Haze search warrant material case)

DOJ opposes deleting and/or handing back to Richman the materials seized from him years ago pursuant to four Arctic Haze search warrants. Image
They argue Richman's "is improper multiple times over," and "[his] Rule 41(g) motion is not a valid or meritorious motion for return of property, but instead a transparent effort to suppress evidence in the Comey matter." Image
"Richman does not genuinely want any property back—after all, the government merely has copies of his data." Image
Read 13 tweets
Dec 17
🧵Just days after United States v. Comey was dismissed for Interim U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan being unlawfully appointed, Daniel Richman, who is Person 3 from the indictment in the Comey case, filed a civil case against the DOJ. Image
Richman wants the property seized pursuant to the four Arctic Haze search warrants that were executed on him years ago returned and/or deleted and the government to be restricted from using any of it. Image
The materials gathered during that investigation became the source of much of the evidence in the now dismissed Comey case, and if prosecutors are going to refile that case, they will need these materials. Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(