"the FBI had no intelligence about Trump or others associated with the Trump campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign"
"Moreover, significant intelligence information that first became available for the FBI to review in 2018 showed that the Russians had access to sensitive U.S. government information years earlier that would have allowed them to identify Steele's subsources."
"Indeed, an experienced FBI analyst assessed that as a result of their access to the information, Steele's subsources could have been compromised by the Russians at a point in time prior to the date of the first Steele dossier report."
From the Classified Appendix to the Durham Report, beginning on page 4.
An excerpt from the March 2016 Russian memoranda:
"Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations" re: Trump.
"special services" could be taken to mean the FBI or CIA
Or, more broadly speaking, it could mean the intelligence and law enforcement communities.
But it could also refer to the opposition research that Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS were already doing at the time of this memo.
This is the same report that indicated that Hillary was being protected by AG Lynch and the "threat" to her from the FBI's investigation of her email server was "minimal."
So minimal that her victory was certain.
So, the Russians, believing that Hillary was going to evade criminal liability over the server, that Hillary was going to win, and knowing that Hillary had hired FusionGPS plus Christopher Steele to do opposition research on Trump as part of a plan to smear him, and knowing who Steele's sources were...
Could EASILY have compromised those sources, fed them garbage, and played a game whereby they HELP Hillary smear Trump
And provide the FBI with the "oil" for the "fire."
Why would the Russians do this?
Because all of these people think Hillary is going to win.
They never thought she would lose.
The weight of the blackmail that Putin would have had against Hillary could be measured in square kilometers of Ukraine and Georgia, in the lifting of sanctions on Nord Stream, and who knows what else.
He would have all of these emails, he would know the sub-sources for Steele, he would know it was disinformation, he would know Hillary paid for it, he would know about the Clinton Plan, he would know about AG Lynch leaking to Amanda Renteria...
He would know it all.
So playing into the Clinton Plan, even just a little, was in his interests.
And the cost was cheap.
Feed some rumors to Peskov, Dolan, Danchenko, maybe others. They'll eat it up.
So will Steele.
After all, he's being paid to by Hillary.
So folks, who was REALLY colluding with the Russians in 2016?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @USAO_SDFL "is recruiting prosecutors and restructuring its chain of command in preparation for a grand jury investigation expected to target former Justice Department officials and others involved in cases against President Donald Trump." 1/n
"The exact scope of the grand jury effort—which one of the individuals described as “special counsel oversight”—remains unclear."
I think it's worth providing some background on what's going on here, so I'll start there, but if you want to skip the background, go to post number [21] in this thread for a breakdown of what happened yesterday.
2/n
Background
Nachmanoff is the district judge assigned to this case.
Nachmanoff ordered that all Rule 16 discovery material be provided to the defense by Oct 13.
85k pages of discovery was eventually turned over, but not all of it because...
‘A federal judge on Wednesday ordered prosecutors to turn over key evidence in the criminal case against former FBI Director James Comey, expressing concern that the [DOJ] may have “indicted first and investigated later.”
I have a thread on the motion seeking grand jury materials here
Today, DOJ defended the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. Attorney for EDVA.
In an order signed on Halloween, @AGPamBondi retroactively made Halligan a "Special Attorney, as of September 22, 2025" and gave her the "authority" to conduct legal proceedings in EDVA.
The order also says...
"[S]hould a court conclude that Ms. Halligan's authority as Special Attorney is limited to particular matters, I hereby delegate to Ms. Halligan authority as Special Attorney to conduct and supervise the prosecutions in United States v. Corney (Case No. 1:25-CR-00272) and United States v. James (Case No. 2:25-CR-00122)."
Halligan's appointment is the basis of motions to dismiss in both the James Comey and Letitia James criminal cases.
Judge Cameron McGowan Currie, a senior judge out of South Carolina who isn't assigned either the Comey or James case, is handling the matter.
The above exhibit is attached to the gov't's filing in opposition to the motions to dismiss in both cases.
Prosecutors in the criminal case against Fmr FBI Dir James Comey have filed a response to defense's opposition to implementing a filter team.
Prosecutors want that team to review privileged materials seized from Daniel Richman during the Arctic Haze media leak investigation.
The filing says that Comey has asserted privilege (atty-client) over five text threads of communications between him and Person 3 from the indictment, Daniel Richman, who was counsel to Comey at the time of the communications.
A filter team is the appropriate method of handling this issue.
The remaining evidence HAS ALREADY BEEN FILTERED and was provided by Richman.
The defense has argued in their opposition that, while they are not opposed to a filter team being used, they want to challenge the underlying search warrants first and also want prosecutors to be more specific about what exactly they are seeking to extract from the seized material.
Prosecutors repond here:
"The government is not asking to look at the raw returns from prior search warrants. The government is simply asking for a judicially approved filter protocol as to a small and specific subset of evidence that was lawfully obtained consistent with the terms of a federal search warrant."
Defense files motion seeking disclosure of grand jury transcripts and audio recordings.
"The record in this case raises a significant risk that irregularities in the grand jury process may have influenced the grand jury to return an indictment...
Those irregularities may create a basis for dismissing the indictment."
"Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(ii), a court may order the disclosure of grand jury materials “at the request of a defendant who shows that a ground may exist to dismiss the indictment because of a matter that occurred before the grand jury.”"