"the FBI had no intelligence about Trump or others associated with the Trump campaign being in contact with Russian intelligence officers during the campaign"
"Moreover, significant intelligence information that first became available for the FBI to review in 2018 showed that the Russians had access to sensitive U.S. government information years earlier that would have allowed them to identify Steele's subsources."
"Indeed, an experienced FBI analyst assessed that as a result of their access to the information, Steele's subsources could have been compromised by the Russians at a point in time prior to the date of the first Steele dossier report."
From the Classified Appendix to the Durham Report, beginning on page 4.
An excerpt from the March 2016 Russian memoranda:
"Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations" re: Trump.
"special services" could be taken to mean the FBI or CIA
Or, more broadly speaking, it could mean the intelligence and law enforcement communities.
But it could also refer to the opposition research that Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS were already doing at the time of this memo.
This is the same report that indicated that Hillary was being protected by AG Lynch and the "threat" to her from the FBI's investigation of her email server was "minimal."
So minimal that her victory was certain.
So, the Russians, believing that Hillary was going to evade criminal liability over the server, that Hillary was going to win, and knowing that Hillary had hired FusionGPS plus Christopher Steele to do opposition research on Trump as part of a plan to smear him, and knowing who Steele's sources were...
Could EASILY have compromised those sources, fed them garbage, and played a game whereby they HELP Hillary smear Trump
And provide the FBI with the "oil" for the "fire."
Why would the Russians do this?
Because all of these people think Hillary is going to win.
They never thought she would lose.
The weight of the blackmail that Putin would have had against Hillary could be measured in square kilometers of Ukraine and Georgia, in the lifting of sanctions on Nord Stream, and who knows what else.
He would have all of these emails, he would know the sub-sources for Steele, he would know it was disinformation, he would know Hillary paid for it, he would know about the Clinton Plan, he would know about AG Lynch leaking to Amanda Renteria...
He would know it all.
So playing into the Clinton Plan, even just a little, was in his interests.
And the cost was cheap.
Feed some rumors to Peskov, Dolan, Danchenko, maybe others. They'll eat it up.
So will Steele.
After all, he's being paid to by Hillary.
So folks, who was REALLY colluding with the Russians in 2016?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit AFFIRMS "the dismissal with prejudice of the claims against the other defendants, both sanctions orders, and the denials of the reconsideration and disqualification motions."
"These four consolidated appeals concern five separate orders. In 2022, between his terms of office, President Donald Trump filed a lawsuit against dozens of defendants, alleging several claims, including two under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act and three under Florida law."
"The district court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim. On the defendants’ motions, the district court also entered sanctions against Trump and his attorneys, under Rule 11 and under its inherent authority."
In this video, I take you through Judge Currie's order dismissing the case of United States v. James Comey page by page.
An appeal of the order is a near certainty, but it’s not a given that the case can be refiled even though it was dismissed without prejudice.
We are well past the SOL and the invalid charging instrument did not preserve the option to refile under 18 USC 3288.
If any other prosecutor from EDVA would have signed the indictment, the case would not be dismissed even with Halligan’s appointment being invalidated.
But because Halligan was the ONLY prosecutor to sign it and her appointment is unlawful (according to the order), the case is dismissed.
Another filing from Halligan seeking to clarify the grand jury proceedings that have been the focus of scrutiny over recent days and really, since day one in this case—as the just-filed Transcript of Return of Grand Jury Indictment Proceedings shows.
For reference, here are the "no true bill" 3-count and the "true bill" 2-count indictments.
As you can see, Count Two and, uh, the other Count Two of the 3-count are IDENTICAL to Count One and Count Two of the 2-count.
Both were filed, as both were presented in open court.
The notice accompanying the transcript says
"The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes [the] claim [that there was an issue with the grand jury voting process] and establishes that the grand jury voted on—and true-billed—the two-count indictment."