🧵I wanted to re-read a section of Brennan's testimony to HPSCI and ended up re-reading the entire thing. There's a whole lot of lying going on!
2/ Holy crap! Brennan says there were "two" products produced--but there were three and the third one was the only one that included referenced to the Steele dossier and other fake intel!
3/ Wasn't intel less conclusive? And YIKES...
4/ They didn't notify RNC of a hack did they?
5/ More lies: "Very clearly"
6/ More BS
7/ 💀💀💀
7/ More on ICA. Liar, liar, pants on fire.
9/ Oh, this is rich!! Clearly he means "we" as in the deep state sees fit!
10/ Keep in mind Brennan said this after saying there were 2 versions of the IC, when there were 3 and the third was the one that relied on the Steele dossier.
11/ "For good reason". . . Umm, I wasn't involved production and review process? Didn't Brennan trump analysts?
12/ Weird, Brennan didn't mention the Presidential Daily Brief that was prepared and then pulled!
13/ From earlier in report: Obama directed Brennan to call the Russians after they discovered Hillary plan. After that "warning" all the intel IC pulled from Russia re interference dried up.
14/ Brennan testified he brief gang of 8 from Aug. to Sept. that intel was Putin wanted to help Trump. There was no evidence of this at the time or even as of Dec. 9, when leaks began per recent DNI releases. So made up that "fact" in briefing Gang of 8.
15/ Another key point is Brennan testified he passed on info to FBI of contacts between Russia officials and U.S. persons involved in Trump campaign. Very important for @CIADirector to investigate what info Brennan passed on here. Did it include Dearlove or Halper's statement re Flynn? Halper re Page?
@CIADirector 16/ Finally, important for the classified transcript of the closed session to be declassified to see what other lies Brennan told in closed session. Full Transcript. docs.house.gov/meetings/ig/ig…
@CIADirector 17/17 Biggest "finds" to me are Brennan in lying about Steele dossier also lied about how many versions of ICA there were--there were 3 and third is what mentioned Steele dossier. Also, Brennan's lies re how ICA drafted/reliability is much more blatant than I realized.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREADETTE: ⬇️is my play-by-play of 9th Cir. decision. Top-line: Loss to Trump AND horrible opinion b/c law is clear that "reasonable suspicion" depends on totality of circumstances & yet court prevents ICE from considering totality of circumstances. 1/
2/ District court had actually allowed for that by including "expected as permitted by law," which the 9th Cir. struck. 9th Cir. THEN, after saying ICE could consider other circumstances, actually altered injunction's language of "presence at a particular location"
3/ THIS is what 9th Cir. said was enjoined: that "whether that be a random location . . . or a location selected 'because past experiences have demonstrated that illegal aliens utilize or seek work at these locations, . . ." That ADDED a limitation of a circumstance ICE CAN consider in totality of the circumstances.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: 9th Cir. denies Trump Administration stay regarding district court's efforts to micromanage ICE "except as to a single clause" but that single clause is what allowed ICE to do it's job! Still reading so clarity to follow. 1/
2/ As I noted before one of the problems with the court's injunction is that you can't enjoin a situation where the situation depends on all of the facts and circumstances, for instance, if a voluntary encounter which needs no reasonable suspicion.
3/ On that point: That is exactly what the training is. You can see from this language the specific details needed to know whether there is or isn't reasonable suspicion.
Also, I've gotten the question of is Trump going to SCOTUS? I thought they would because d.ct.'s ruling was sooooo nutso, but the appellate court stayed the lower court's holding IJ had to give him a hearing on avoiding removal on alternative grounds. 1/
2/ IJ held removable for lying on visa application and Khalil sought a hearing on whether IJ should waive that based on loving husband/father. New Jersey judge said IJ had to give hearing on that argument. Appellate court stayed that. So he is still removable based on that.
3/ I think Trump Administration decided it wasn't worth rushing & seeking SCOTUS involvement because SCOTUS wouldn't see a "rush" risk b/c alternative basis allows it to percolate for some time. Given timing & desire to not push too much, I get it.
🔥Below is play-by-play 🧵of quick once-over of Appendix. My big picture take-away is this: The details reveal how corrupt the investigation into Trump was! They opened Crossfire Hurricane on the Presidential candidate with nothing, continued it with that nothing disproven AND 1/
2/ continued it during President's first term with more nothings and evidence that it was all fake. I care more about that fact and fact that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Mueller, and more conspired to further hoax, along with media than that they ignored Clinton plan.
3/ This new evidence is damning of FBI's failure to investigate Lynch, Clinton, and others, and that's bad. But what's worse is what they did--target Trump to destroy his candidacy and then his presidency. It's also damning on Think Tanks & legacy media's involvement.
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Exclusive. Scandal re Obama-ordered fake Intelligence Community Assessment or ICA on Russia election meddling just keeps getting worse. Documents reveal Brennan's buddy threatened to w/hold promotion to get him to go along with fake ICA. 1/
2/2 Why? Because DOD's DIA trusted the senior intelligence official and if he agreed with assessment, DIA would have signed on with CIA & FBI. @FDRLST with @MZHemingwaythefederalist.com/2025/07/30/exc…