Trump's trade war probably qualifies as the greatest madness in economic policy in a developed country after WWII: 1. All decisions are made by one single person (Trump). 2. No principles are applied. 3. No economic rationale or theory. 4. All is based on Trump's emotions. /1
5. Many tariffs are very high, so the economic damage will be substantial. 6. There is no coordination of the tariffs so, for example, the US car industry may be decimated (@FT). 7. The only two countries Trump treat with respect are China & Russia, the purported enemies. /2
@FT 8. Trump's extraordinary rudeness to most democratic & friendly countries will have lasting anti-American consequences. 9. So far, the lesson appears to be: Either flatter Trump no end (EU & Pakistan), stand up against Trump (China) or pay him personally (Qatar). /3
@FT 10. Neither prior statements by Bessent or Lutnick or Trump himself serve as prediction. In April, they praised India and Taiwan. 11. Since no agreements are put on paper or being properly concluded, US trade policy will remain an enigma & unpredictable. /4
@FT 12. Because Trump's tariffs are so high, thousands of exemptions are inevitable to somewhat mitigate the damage to the US economy, further aggravating the uncertainty. 13. Few government acts are more likely to attract bribes than the exemption from tariffs. /5
@FT 14. Conclusions:
The damage to the US economy will be great & it is likely to grow over time.
Any serious business - American or foreign - had better avoid investment in US manufacturing.
The US can no longer maintain any friendship. /6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Trump's tariffs are likely to affect US consumer prices.
Trump's tariffs have already started causing higher consumer prices in the US, but only partially.
Importers have purchased large stocks in Q1 & appear to raise prices only for new imports. /1
The evidence from Trump's tariff hikes last time suggests that eventually importers pass on all the cost of the higher tariffs to end consumers.
This means that tariff hikes are not single events but a process of rising prices as previously imported stocks run down. /2
That is a gradual inflationary process.
The goods inflation caused by the tariffs will be balanced by the deceleration in economic activity they will also cause.
Unemployment may rise, but salaries will be supported by the decline in the foreign labor force. /3
Observations on Trump's tariffs: 1. They are completely unjustified. The US balance of payments problem is an excessive US budget deficit. 2. They are completely arbitrary, entirely dependent on Trump's emotions. 3. They are high & will damage the global economy but most the US. /1
4. The Trump tariffs are not reciprocal but unilateral & they are not negotiated. 5. The higher the tariffs are, the more exemptions. The Brazilian 50% tariff is accompanied by 700 exemptions for the main goods traded. 6. The legal basis of these tariffs is dubious (IEEPA). /2
7. Since the only basis for the tariffs are Trump's statements, it is hard to know what the actual tariffs are or for how long they will last. 8. Trump loves to impose uncertainty on business because he breeds fear. Therefore, the uncertainty will remain. No stabilization. /3
Trump's trade policy makes no economic sense & the biggest loser is likely to be the US. 1. Trump only talks about trade deficits, while the relevant measure is current account balance. The US has a big service surplus, though still a current account deficit. /1
2. The US can have its large current account deficit (& also a huge budget deficit) because the rest of the world has been happy to finance it, buying $ & US treasuries, which have been seen as perfectly safe, but now Trump is undermining the credibility of all that. /2
3. First of all, Trump knows nothing of economics & none of his subordinates is allowed to correct him. Trump's stupidity, ignorance & authoritarianism are likely to cause an economic catastrophe in the US sooner or later. /3
A few thoughts about Trump's trade policy: 1. Nothing in his trade policy makes sense. The US has not been ripped off but benefited from its exorbitant privilege that foreigners wanted to invest in the US & US treasuries before madman Trump destroyed it all.
2. Trump insists on extreme protectionism with tariffs up to 50% & probably with an average of 25%, while they used to be 2.5%. This makes no economic sense as pretty much all economists know. Trump is damaging the global economy, but most of all the insular US economy.
3. Worse, Trump focuses on tariffs because there he has complete power. To enforce his power, he changes his policy virtually every day. There will be no stabilization as many have hoped. Thereby, Trump has made it nearly impossible to invest in the US.
Tomorrow on June 24, the NATO summit will start with a dinner & conclude with a minimal session on June 25.
All fear that Trump will declare that he loves Putin - his kleptocracy, autocracy & imperialism. Yes, Trump is awful. State that! /1
Next, the ideologically real NATO members are afraid that Trump will attack Ukraine, while the whole purpose of NATO is to stand up to Russia and defend free democracies, but Trump hates democracies and freedom. /2
So why are the other NATO members sucking up to the US? Because the US has the biggest and finest military resources. That does not matter much to the other NATO members when Trump behaves like an imperialist (=enemy) wanting to seize Greenland & Canada. Trump is the enemy. /3
Trump's economic policy: 1. Wild protectionism = less growth & investment. 2. Changed policy every day = complete uncertainty. 3. Undermining the rule of law & property rights. 4. Driving foreign investors & nationals out of the US. 5. Hindering profitable immigration.
/1
6. Minimizing government support to research. 7. Harming the best US universities. 8. Risking fiscal unsustainability. 9. Harming the poor to cut taxes for billionaires. 10. Blatant personal corruption.
Trump stands for an economic disaster like 1929.
/2
If democracy survives in the US, the consequences will be massive, as in the 1930s: 1. If a budget deficit can no longer be financed, it has to be balanced. 2. Given the minimal US federal expenditures, taxes on the very rich have to rise sharply. They were max 91% until 1962. /3