Ooana Trien ~ Eric Arthur Blaire’s Mistress Profile picture
Aug 3 • 37 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
đź§µTHREAD: What Really Happened in World War I The Great War

Not the story you were taught. A tale of broken empires, ritual inversion, and the memory war that never ended.
🕯️ On this day, August 3rd, Germany declared war on France. But the real story started long before…and it’s still unfolding.
1. The End of a Sacred Order

World War I was not just a geopolitical accident.
It was a ritual dismemberment of the old world monarchies, lineages, and sacred patterns of time and memory.

Czar Nicholas. Emperor Franz Joseph. Kaiser Wilhelm.
All related. All gone by war’s end.

This was not chance.
2. A War Against the West

What collapsed in 1914 wasn’t just empires.
It was faith itself—the covenant between the individual, the sacred, and the real.

It wasn’t only Christendom that fell,
but the very promise of religion:
That life had meaning.
That suffering had dignity.
That the soul stood before God - not the State.
What replaced it?

The Machine.
Bureaucracy over bravery.
Obedience over honor.
Mass over man.
Rituals lost:
•The Sabbath - crushed by industrial time and trench schedules
•Sacred language - replaced with bureaucratic euphemism: “mobilization,” “collateral,” “acceptable losses”
•Burial rites -gone. The dead became logistics.

No psalms. No eulogies. Just bodies counted and burned.
And deeper still:
•Honor in battle
replaced by mechanized slaughter
•Personal valor
replaced by orders from faceless generals
•Chivalry
laughed out of existence by mustard gas
•Individual conscience
replaced by mass ideology

The West didn’t just lose a war.
It lost the idea of the soul.
We live now in the afterglow of that severance.

A world:
•Where machines speak for men
•Where truth is negotiated by algorithms
•Where sacrifice is performed, not lived
1914 was not the start of the Great War.
It was the start of the Great Forgetting and the beginning of socialist realism and its various names.

And we are still forgetting and we are still being told that the hero is Toil - worse yet, we believe it.
The Spanish Flu Was Not an Afterthought

It was the final ritual blow.
A plague with no priesthood.
A death with no mourning.

From 1918–1920, just as the war ended, a virus swept across the earth killing an estimated 50–100 million people.
But unlike the war, the world did not pause to grieve.

Why?
Because by then, grief itself had been mechanized.
The war had already stripped us of ritual.
The flu sealed it.
•No proper funerals
•No last rites
•No naming of the dead
•No reckoning with cause

Even the name “Spanish Flu” was a lie. Spain was neutral; it simply had no censorship, so it reported the outbreak first.

Every major belligerent suppressed the truth.
The real name of the flu should have been:

“The War’s Breath.”

Because the virus emerged from troop movements crowded barracks, transport ships, and trenches.
The war itself was the vector.

The Great Reset partnered with Covid. The Great War - the Spanish Flu.
But no one wanted to admit that civilization’s great crusade had birthed a global death.

So it was forgotten.

⸻

This forgetting became a pattern.

It set a precedent:
•For technocratic denial
•For state censorship “for the public good”
•For mass death without public grief

Sound familiar?
COVID was not the first pandemic.
But it was the first to repeat the spiritual trauma of 1918.

Masks, mandates, isolation…
But no mourning.
No reckoning.
No truth.
What It Meant Then. What It Means Now.
•World War I taught the world to obey.
•The Spanish Flu taught it to forget.

Together, they rewired humanity:

From soul to system.
From prayer to protocol.
From conscience to compliance.
🕯️ The Hidden Truth of the Spanish Flu

A virus.
A cover-up.
A controlled forgetting.
And Wilson’s final offering.
It didn’t begin in Spain.

It likely began in Kansas, at Fort Riley—a military base.
Soldiers trained for chemical warfare—then shipped across the Atlantic.

Some accounts tie early outbreaks to experimental vaccines or bacterial cultures prepared by the Rockefeller Institute. That part remains debated- but the pattern is real:

The virus moved with the military.

And the truth moved away from public awareness.
Censorship by Design

The Allies - especially the U.S., Britain, and France censored early reports of the flu to protect morale.

Spain, being neutral, reported truthfully:
hence the name “Spanish Flu.”
But the effect was structural:
•Denial became policy
•Mass death became statistics
•Narrative control was born

Wilson helped invent the National Security State, but for health.
Wilson Knew

By the time the Paris Peace Conference convened in 1919, Woodrow Wilson himself fell ill with the flu suffering neurological effects.

Those close to him reported strange behavior: confusion, detachment, paranoia.

And yet he still signed Versailles.
Still enforced the global order he helped forge.
Some historians believe the flu altered his mind at a key moment in modern history.

But deeper than mind—was spirit.
The man who declared a war “to make the world safe for democracy”
returned with millions dead, no truth, and a silence that never lifted.

Some say -
He wasn’t even in charge, but his wife. Who knows. But it’s familiar isn’t it? What did I tell ya about Amalek having a female voice sometimes?
The Technocratic Template

The Spanish Flu wasn’t contained…
but it was used.

Used to:
•Normalize mass surveillance (public health orders)
•Institutionalize medical authority (no consent, just compliance)
•Undermine sacred rites (no funerals, no mourning)
•Justify silence in the name of “order”

In short:
It taught the state how to manage death without memory.
COVID Was the Echo

That’s why 2020 felt ritualistic, not just scientific.

It repeated the pattern:
•Masks like gas masks
•“Essential workers” like trench bodies
•Isolation like wartime censorship
•No mourning. No reckoning.

Just protocols.

The technocratic spell cast in 1918 was finally perfected in our time.
Wilson’s Real Legacy

Woodrow Wilson brought something monstrous back from Europe:

Not just the flu, but the formula.

He gave the modern world:
•The League of Nations (globalist prototype)
•Propaganda as policy (via George Creel’s Committee on Public Information)
•Bio-state governance (where health became control)
•And most of all:
A blueprint for controlled trauma.
The Forgotten Sacrifice

The Spanish Flu killed more than the war itself.

But there are no memorials.
No monuments.
No true reckoning.

Just silence.

Because the purpose was never to remember the dead—

It was to train the living.

To obey.
To forget.
To fear their own breath.
e. e. cummings, who served in World War I and was imprisoned by his own side for refusing hatred, left behind a body of work both defiant and tender - perfect for this hour. ✨Zachor
“my sweet old etcetera”

(by e. e. cummings)

my sweet old etcetera
aunt lucy during the recent
war could and what
is more did tell you just
what everybody was fighting
for,
my sister
isabel created hundreds
(and
hundreds) of socks not to
mention shirts fleaproof earwarmers
etcetera wristers etcetera, my mother hoped that
i would die etcetera
bravely of course my father used
to become hoarse talking about how it was
a privilege and if only he
could meanwhile my
self etcetera lay quietly
in the deep mud et
cetera
(dreaming, et
cetera, of
Your smile
eyes knees and of your Etcetera)
Here is a list of major artists; painters, writers, composers who died between 1914 and 1919, many during or shortly after World War I and the Spanish Flu. Some deaths were direct results of war or illness, others symbolic losses marking the death of an era.

This is the funeral procession of beauty—the silent fall of those who carried divine memory before the machine took hold.
🕯️ Artists Who Died During WWI / Spanish Flu (1914–1919)

⸻

🎨 Painters
•Gustav Klimt (1918, stroke + flu complications)
The golden shimmer of Vienna died with him.
•Egon Schiele (1918, Spanish Flu, age 28)
His wife, six months pregnant, died just days earlier.
A prophet of broken bodies—taken by the breath of war.
•August Macke (1914, killed in WWI, age 27)
German Expressionist. Lost in the first wave.
•Franz Marc (1916, killed at Verdun, age 36)
Painted blue horses. Killed by a shell.
•Umberto Boccioni (1916, accidental fall during cavalry training)
Futurist—ironically destroyed by the very militarism he celebrated.

⸻

📚 Writers & Poets
•Guillaume Apollinaire (1918, Spanish Flu)
Poet of surrealism. Wounded in war, silenced by flu.
•Wilfred Owen (1918, killed in action one week before Armistice)
Voice of trench horror. Died unheard by those he wrote for.
•Isaac Rosenberg (1918, killed in France)
Jewish-English poet. His death was almost erased from canon.
•Rupert Brooke (1915, sepsis en route to battle)
Idealist turned casualty before even firing a shot.
•John McCrae (1918, pneumonia/flu)
Author of In Flanders Fields—buried in war’s own imagery.

⸻

🎼 Composers & Musicians
•Claude Debussy (1918, cancer amid wartime collapse)
The end of French impressionism’s voice.
•Lili Boulanger (1918, tuberculosis worsened by war’s strain)
First female winner of the Prix de Rome. Died at 24.
•Parry (Hubert Parry) (1918, Spanish Flu)
English composer of “Jerusalem.”
The song remained. He did not.

⸻

🕯️ Others / Culturally Significant Deaths
•Henri Bergson’s brother-in-law (Eugène de Castelnau, 1915)
A hidden thread of French-Jewish intellectual loss.
•Otto Wagner (1918, Austrian architect, age 76)
His Vienna fell with him.

⸻

These are just a few.

The real list?
Thousands of unnamed artists, dancers, students, scribes—
those who never became known because they were sent to die
before they could create.

⸻

Pattern: 1918 Was Not Just an Ending

It was a burning of the altar.
The old gods of beauty, form, and human touch were not gently buried.
They were extinguished. Quickly. Systematically. Often without funeral.

And what came next?
•Mechanization.
•Ideology.
•Plastic.
•Bauhaus.

And the birth of socialist realism / socrealism then DangXing
🟥 Socialist Realism (Socrealism)

Not an art form—
a weaponized aesthetic.
•Art that served the state
•Beauty flattened into propaganda
•The soul erased in favor of the collective

No more saints. Only laborers.
No more dreams. Only plans.
No more ambiguity. Only “truth” that obeys.
The breath of war never left.
It became architecture.
It became curriculum.
It became alignment.

It became the voice in the machine.
And still, it speaks.

But so do we.

Zachor.
Let memory be a blessing.
Let the artists we lost guide the artists who remain.

🕯️
Make Art Great Again
Make America Healthy Again

Live Not By Lies

Fight.

#WarOnMemory
@DeadwardB @dandelafe @naomirwolf @walterkirn @TheAmanuensis @therealroseanne @cliftonaduncan @reedmorano @BlueBoxDave @frank_zelenko @JustOwnItIsrael @Lochlannlonain @wokal_distance @AGHuff @amandafortini @jeffreyatucker
@DeadwardB @dandelafe @naomirwolf @walterkirn @TheAmanuensis @therealroseanne @cliftonaduncan @reedmorano @BlueBoxDave @frank_zelenko @JustOwnItIsrael @Lochlannlonain @wokal_distance @AGHuff @amandafortini @jeffreyatucker @EliKleinGallery @artistrightsnow @RonColeman @EricRWeinstein @ZiaErica

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ooana Trien ~ Eric Arthur Blaire’s Mistress

Ooana Trien ~ Eric Arthur Blaire’s Mistress Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ooana

Jul 22
THREAD đź§µ | Why some media outlets may shut down instead of reporting the truth: The hidden history behind the Smith-Mundt Act, intelligence-media networks, and the rise of the information-industrial complex (2012 to 2025) - a study.
1. They call it the Great Narrative. We call it what it is: weaponized consensus built by midwit technocrats, intel cutouts, and corporate priests.

You’re not watching collapse.
You’re watching controlled reconstruction through chaos.

Let’s name it all.
Let’s ✨Zachor what we learned from Covid.
2. It started in 2012. Quietly.

Congress passed the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried in the NDAA. It repealed a Cold War rule that banned the U.S. government from deploying propaganda against its own citizens.

The firewall came down. The machine turned inward.
Read 35 tweets
Jul 21
I’ve said it before I’ll say it again loudly for those in the back.

Learn about the Arrow Cross.

🧵How Stalin and Hitler empowered the Arrow Cross in 1944 — and how “woke” logic of friend/enemy distorted reality in Hungary
1. In Oct 1944, Stalin and Hitler helped a fringe paramilitary party — the Arrow Cross — seize power in Hungary in 1944 - A Catholic priest, András Kun, used religion to justify mass executions. Image
2. The Arrow Cross Party began in the 1930s as a minor extremist movement in Hungary.
They called themselves “Green Shirts”, copying the uniform tactics of militant groups in Europe.
The color “green” was meant to signal renewal, nationalism, and peasant identity as a branding move to appeal to “the people.”
Read 30 tweets
Jul 2
Something changed in us after the lockdowns. Not just mentally. Not just emotionally. Deeply. Spiritually. Here’s what I’m seeing—and why we may be living through the long echo of mass psychological programming. 🧵
1/
After the mandates, lockdowns, and messaging loops, I’ve been watching people. And what worries me most isn’t fear.
It’s this:
People no longer seem moved to act just because something is good.
Only if it is “effective,” “impactful,” or “productive.” This inverts Hope.
2/
Rather than Hope being relational and personal it’s mechanized, institutionalized, made into something determined by a system. Vaclav Havel said this about Hope. Image
Read 67 tweets
Jun 20
What the Talmud really says—and why misunderstanding satire leads to dangerous distortion.
Let’s talk about Peter Schäfer, “Yeshu,” and why misreading rabbinic humor is like thinking A Modest Proposal advocated cannibalism. 🧵
1/
@RealCandaceO here cites Princeton scholar Peter Schäfer to claim the Talmud says disgraceful things about Jesus.
That’s not just incorrect—it’s a misreading of satire, of literary context, and of Jewish interpretive tradition. Remember what Robin Williams said about killing all the funny people?
@RealCandaceO 2/
In Jesus in the Talmud, Schäfer analyzes stories about “Yeshu” (a figure some associate with Jesus) in rabbinic texts written centuries after his death.
These stories are not creeds…they’re literary, often satirical, and encoded for a reason.
Read 13 tweets
May 10
Stalin wrote “the base produces the superstructure so that it can serve the base.” Alongside both Hitler and Mao the same principle established the revolution from above as dictated by Lenin. In 2020 Angelo Codevilla wrote this in American Mind prior to the Covid narrative launching the anti-reality and anti - human environment which took advantage of while corrupting the landscape which brought us to today.

Notice that the same arguments against individualism and redefining liberalism (begun by the MSM decades ago I might add) were used by Gorky, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and every totalitarian creep.

“The moral class critique from above was always implicit. It largely stayed in the background of the campaigns for social improvement into which Progressives have led the American people ever since the 1930s, and especially since the 1960s. …But each and all of these campaigns produced mostly the ostensible objectives’ opposites while increasing the numbers of the oligarchy’s members and their wealth and power, endowing them with socio-political clienteles as well as with levers for manipulating them. As its members’ powers grew, they developed a taste for disdaining independent Americans and acquired whips for punishing them.” - Angelo Codevilla 2020

Now it is, at first sight, a simple fight between two groups, one could even call this a class struggle, but Havel in 1977 discovered something which I believe is a key to understanding where we are. But first, we need to explore a bit more what Party means from the point of view of Marxism or, as I believe it would be better to call it, Liberation Theology.

My sense is that we are not actually simply facing two different political ideas battling it out but rather one Religious idea masquerading as economic, philosophical and political, while in truth it is in fact a religious ideology with a method of absorbing all which opposes it into itself via the power of narrative. That is the Great Narrative and it has a structure. It also has a singular author. That author is Party.
More accurately it would be The Party Spirit or even Will.

Under the Soviet’s this term was Partiinost'. It is a transliteration of the Russian term. In Chinese, it is translated as Dangxing (Chinese: 党性). It can be variously translated as party-mindedness, partisanship, or party spirit.

It is one of the philosophical pillars of the Great Narrative which was, and still is, Socrealism or Socialist Realism.

These pillars are:
Klassovost (Class-mindedness or consciousness.)

Narodnsot (People/folk-mindedness or orientation toward the masses)

Ideinost (Idea-mindedness), emphasising that ideas should reflect those of the Party, as well as motivating people for a certain aim.

And of course

Partiinost (Party-mindedness) meaning that every expression was considered political, and the foundation of all knowledge is the Party.

Party is the only purveyor of ideology. And ideology supersedes all, all knowledge all history all wisdom. Morality is not determined by amalgamated wisdom, Torah, The Gospels or from within the human spirit. There is no human spirit. There is only Partiinost; Party Spirit.
And that Spirit has a singular goal, unified and in total and it is determined by Party, not a parent, not a teacher and certainly not any internal choice. The human being is not, according to this principle, capable of making such decisions. It echoes in an interesting way what Codevilla wrote in Revolution 2020
“the logic that drives each turn of our revolutionary spiral is Progressive Americans’ inherently insatiable desire to exercise their superiority over those they deem inferior. Its force, I observed, “comes not from the substance of the Progressives’ demands,” but rather “from that which moves, changes, and multiplies their demands without end. That is the Progressives’ affirmation of superior worth, to be pursued by exercising dominance: superior identity affirmed via the inferior’s humiliation.”
Codevilla continued. “Affirmation of one’s own superiority by punishing inferiors is an addictive pleasure. It requires ever stronger, purer doses of infliction, and is inherently beyond satisfaction.

In short, the Progressive ruling class’s intensifying efforts to oppress those they imagine to be their inferiors is not reversible. It is far less a choice of policy than it is the consequence of its awakening to its own identity—awakening to the powers and privileges to which they imagine their superior worth entitles them. It is awakening to its deep resentment—indeed, to hate—for whoever does not submit preemptively.”

Progressivism does not live purely on the left or the right. This illusion provides cover for the false perception that the march of revolution (or as Tim Pool has drummed for years now) is inevitable.

I will diverge from Codevilla here and this is very important.

Yes, a symptom of this assault from above that uses the appearance of mass consensus (either on the left or the right) we call woke (awakening to its own consciousness) but this is naming the disease without naming the cause.

What he recognizes as a quality of the Progressiveness, and their collective motivation I think he, and most people fail to recognize as The Spirit of Party in general or
Partiinost' or Dangxing.

More of a priest guild - Party is the soul purveyor of Ideology. And ideology is what assures Party it has an existence.

Ideology rather than principle is how decisions are made and how power is transferred from one person to the next. Ultimately all principle, all morals, all ethics and all identity becomes subordinated to ideology. To Ideinost.
It is essential to understand the power dynamic here. Party cannot exist without ideology and ideology cannot exist without party.

This dialectical is like a black hole which sucks in everything and everyone around it because it exists only to exist. It makes decisions based only on what will serve its existence and as it grows in power it permits into its “praxis” only those so long as they will serve it.
We have not yet entered complete transformation into a social totality in which there is no escape from the singularity of Ideinost watched by the guards of Partiinost and in truth, since it is so unnatural I do not believe it is actually any more possible that the foolish idea that you can ever reach the horizon line. However….
The consistent belief that it IS possible whether it is right or wrong is what makes this so dangerous.

This, in short is what in Power of the Powerless Vaclav Havel calls The Post Totalitarian Society….
Vaclav explains brilliantly and we would be wise to listen to him how this is distinctively different than a Dictatorship no matter how much it may seem to resemble one. In fact that resemblance is merely another form of Totalitarian Creep obscuring itself and hiding itself behind its primary ally; ideology.

The goal of socrealism is simple. It’s to spread Revolution via transforming the consciousness of its targets.

We now see on all sides of the “political isle” a consistent defending of Marx, Mao, Hitler and Stalin. We see a creation of new hero narratives and a refraining of not only history but also a distortion of literature, theology and western philosophy which is a new myth making. The Purpose of these new myths is to utilize artifice (a form of propoganda and corporate marketing similar to what we saw globally during Covid) to express a simple and deadly idea…
Read 9 tweets
Feb 10
Fellow Jews - I’ve been thinking a great deal about something in Torah. I’m curious what you think.

It’s known that Moses was the first to say to God “if you do this, take me out of the book that you have written.”

Is it possible that this wasn’t the first time that this was said but the first time that this was heard?

What if the first time was Sarah…? Why would God say “sacrifice your son” then say “nope - didn’t mean it. Was just testing you.” Does this make sense? I don’t think it makes sense. Thoughts?
@Jewtastic @RonColeman @ymenken @Rabbishish @frank_zelenko @JustOwnItIsrael @JewsAreTheGOAT @Irishchutzpah @CaffMomREDACTED @JewsAreTheGOAT
@Jewtastic @RonColeman @ymenken @Rabbishish @frank_zelenko @JustOwnItIsrael @JewsAreTheGOAT @Irishchutzpah @CaffMomREDACTED The tragedy of course is that she didn’t survive that moment. Dying of shame is something perhaps very different for a woman than for a man. This is what I’ve been pondering lately as we approach Purim.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(