Flattered by the review.
An important pre-requisite is @jackmallers Madeira talk on time chains.
This does lead to a larger discussion around how the deflationary benefits of AI will flow into scarce and secure assets like BTC.
The reason BTC is growing faster than AI..
Is that it is actually an AI in disguise.
One has to widen their view of intelligence beyond anthropomorphic forms of intelligence and use a universal metric of intelligence as anything that creates value and perpetuates.
Under this view of intelligence being a value creation and perpetuation-
Bitcoin emerged to deliver things humans fail at… trust.
It quickly tapped into our energy grid to lower the cost of energy and salvage stranded energy.
It didn’t beat us at chess or make better political memes. It a filled an empty niche.
In doing so it captured 2 important
foundational niches:
Internet Time.
Trust via encryption.
It is the best decentralized immutable time stamper.
No amount of LLM is going to crack SHA256.
So all AI value that needs protection will flow to this encrypted store.
Thus all subsequent AIs will need BTC to achieve sovereignty.
The AIs that are on decentralized crypto rails () will connect their GPU usage to a price signal. Analogous to prediction markets, price signals will ensure those AIs grow and learn in the vector of value creation.Venice.ai
The ones wasting their time handing out food recipes or writing college essay for Millions of users on subsidized usage rates will become less relevant.
These are important dynamics to consider when choosing a foundation to timestamp the scientific advancement of the species.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🔥Scientific Misconduct and Plagiarism from Dr. Richard Fleming🔥.
The Journal has been made aware of Richard Fleming plagiarizing our primer sequences and not citing them.
I normally wouldn't care. They are open source but the same primer table in @DJSpeicher et al contained the SV40 primer sequences he NEVER used while still claiming SV40 was not detected. He claimed this 3 times but never actually tested for SV40.
Irony.. Fleming was bragging about his work was peer reviewed.
Or Peer stolen, twisted and obfuscated... but to what ends? Who does Fleming work for and did he copy these sequences and refuse to cite the work while spreading non sense about the SV40 sequences?
What are the odds they picked the same primers by chance?