[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]

[Supermarket Name]
[Supermarket Address]

Dear [DPO's Name/Customer Service],

I am writing to request the erasure of my facial data which I believe may be stored in your database as part of your facial recognition
system. I did not provide explicit consent for the collection and processing of my facial data, and I am concerned about the potential risks associated with this technology.

I would like to exercise my right to erasure under Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation
GDPR). I request that you delete any facial data associated with me, including any images or biometric data, from your systems and databases.

Please confirm in writing that you have received my request and inform me of the actions you will take to comply with my request.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with LynneN 🌸✝️ https://www.youtube.com/watch

LynneN 🌸✝️ https://www.youtube.com/watch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nightsong53

Dec 28, 2024
Haste work hand in hand with 0ct0pus attempting to get an illegal warrant of Entry, Courts who grant such have broken the legislation by awarding the Warrant to a 3rd party Ltd Co that is not registered as a supplier or an operater (bear in mind that energy co's aren't
suppliers
The Act cited on the warrant requires info in writing to be given to the JP (magistrate) so the first question to ask the court Mr X and Mr Y are listed as being magistrates at the court.
Haste Ltd are Domestic Appliance Support/Maintenance and therefore Warrants don't apply
Haste cannot make application for WofEpursuant to s.2 of the Act Rights of Entry (Gas+Electricity Board 1954) where it because it is only the supplier or an employee of a gas/electricity operator that can that can provide sworn information to be given to the JP on safetygrounds
Read 4 tweets
Dec 13, 2024
2. Ashwaganda: where you've been conned: this is marketed as reducing anxiety again at huge cost 4 what it is. The active ingredients are alkaloids and witanolides, the latter is found in tomatoes and potatoes but clever marketing deceived many and they believed that potatoes
were fattening when their resistant starch prevents that. Potatoes help increase the brain chemical serotonin which is the 'feel good, sleep better' chemical.
PPl however would rather support the profits of supplement companies rather than buy potatoes and tomatoed+ help farmers
Alkaloids are found in most fruit/veg including potatoes, tomatoes,coffee. Buying these + producing a good home cooked meal helps the farmers far more than buying strange sounding cleverly marketed supplements which won't do half of what a good plate of mashed potato'll do 3)
Read 4 tweets
Dec 13, 2024
Where marketing is conning u.
Gingko Biloba is marketed at a huge price as it MAY improve blood circulation and make blood less sticky, may help dementia, memory,cognition However, magnesium and vitamin E, C and B complex do that which would be found in a normal healthy diet.
Ur body does not run on strange sounding heavily marketed products, it runs on simple vitamins minerals and macromolecules like carbs, protein and fat. It does not run on fad diets where one or more of the essential components for health are withdrawn or 'new' ones introduced
like inflammatory veg oils, sugar substitutes, milk substitutes or folic acid instead of the naturally occurring folate or where it is thought that if u reduce cholesterol levels u will be somehow healthier or if u lower blood pressure further it will be better for u instead
Read 5 tweets
Oct 18, 2024
Part 2 of legal docs made simple
A deed has slightly different requirements from a contract. If these are not fulfilled then the assignment of rights and responsibilities from Octopod to Sharks just doesn't happen.
The Deed of Assignment does not need any consideration but it
does need to be witnessed and signed
In practice Sharks are unlikely to have a DofA because Octopod did not have a valid agreement in the first place with Mr D.
Lord Denning says that Mr D is entitled to see that DofA to ensure its validity.
Until it is produced then no valid
debt exists.
However Octopod and Sharks make great theatre.

When a valid Dof A is formed then Mr D should be informed by Notice of Assignment that this has occurred. it is just good manners is it not? Sharks do not like to do this, they like to surprise Mr D by turning up on
Read 7 tweets
Oct 18, 2024
A little revision on legal docs:
With debt claims two legal docs are generally involved.
Agreements (contracts) and Deeds.
I will use Octopod as an eg of an energy broker and Sharks as examples of Debt Collectors. The alleged Debtor will be known as D.

For there to be any
obligation between Octopod and D there must be a valid agreement (contract). D must know what he is signing up for; he must offer some consideration, that is something of value that matches the value of whatever Octopod is bringing to the table. eg Payment for the same value
in energy. The contract must be signed. There are no 'deemed contracts'. This is just meant to fool u.
The 'agreement' between Octopod and Mr D has already fallen flat on its face.
No contract is signed.
The energy 'supplier' doesn't supply any energy. They forgot to tell u
Read 5 tweets
Apr 30, 2024
The ANSWERS (second part of the pleadings) are followed by AFFIRMATIVE DEFENCES and are really part b) of the ANSWERS demanding a little more application than the ANSWERS alone. Wikipedia has a good definition of AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES so it is below.
An affirmative defense to a civil lawsuit or criminal charge is a fact or set of facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor which, if proven by the defendant, defeats or mitigates the legal consequences of the defendant's otherwise unlawful conduct. Wikipedia
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENCES can be another piece of law/legislation such as the Statute of Frauds, a plea of insanity (criminal) estoppel, accord and satisfaction (parties have eventually worked it out to their satisfaction), lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Statute of Limitations
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(