I want to briefly explain this phenomenon, I've seen develop in the last 15 years, certainly within the last 20 years, because I never saw it before then, and I have been walking in the countryside for over 55 years.
1/🧵
Those doing this, seem to have got the idea from commercial music festivals, which I am sure most have been to. Where supermarkets sell cheap tents etc, in the festival season, and where the tradition has developed, where you just leave the tent.
2/
I have encountered groups doing this, talked to them, so it is not pure guesswork. I think it is based on simple economics. None of the people who do this have any interest in camping, so they have no use for this after.
3/
Generally, they are carrying huge boxes of beers etc, which will have cost far more than the cheap camping and outdoor equipment, so it is all disposal to them, and they have no other interest in this except for their one-off social event.
4/
What I believe lies behind this, is that music festivals have got very expensive. People, especially young people have found out, that it is much cheaper to buy the cheap camping/outdoor stuff and booze, and go to a random place in the countryside, for a big social.
5/
This is how I believe this phenomenon developed, and is to some degree maintained. However, this parties in the countryside have developed a life of their own, and like lots of viral things have developed a life of their own.
6/
Unfortunately, journalists, rangers, lacking a term for it, started calling it wild camping, when it is not remotely connected to actual wild camping. I wrote to @patrick_barkham about it, and he came up with the term "fly camping".
7/
You see lots of comments, articles about it, bemoaning it, but there is next to no understanding of the phenomenon. It is almost impossible to police as most of it goes unnoticed, until the aftermath is found.
8/
Also, even if detected, the police, rangers or whoever, would not be able to do anything as it often takes place on public land, or land with public access. What is more, the leaving everything behind, littering, only occurs at the end.
9/
In other words, until they walk away, leaving everything, with no attempt to clear-up, it wouldn't be clear that this is what was going to happen. In fact, it is no clear if those doing it realized what was going to happen.
10/
I think an additional factor in this equipment being abandoned, is that those in these groups, often bought all this communally, so there is no owner of any of it.
11/
I feel the key to addressing this problem is understanding the phenomenon, and perhaps how those involved in it, can be communicated with. Most probably have little experience of camping, other than music festivals, where it's traditional to leave the stuff behind.
12/
So one possible solution, would be involve bands and artists who play music festivals, in an awareness campaign, of not to do it in the countryside, as there is no one there to clear up.
13/
In fact, a lot of littering, was learned because in certain places, say cinemas in the past, people were just encouraged to leave their litter there, and don't realize there is no organized clear up in the countryside.
14/
I suspect very little research has been done into the demographic, and individuals involved in this. Even if you are familiar with the site, the first you know about it is the pile of rubbish, and those who left it there are gone.
15/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's get this clear, being stupid i.e. extremely unwise, is nothing to do with IQ and cleverness. Lots of very clever people, were also monumentally stupid.
I use harsh words for billionaire/oligarchs, politicians, corporations, and the media, which the oligarchs own and control, not out of hatred, but because they stubbornly refuse to moderate their behaviour, or see it as a problem.
1/🧵
In fact, I have suggested outreach to billionaire/oligarchs, to get them to see that it is in their personal interest, to address the many problems they are inducing, which will ultimately impact them i.e. appealing to their self-interest. And I have been criticised for it.
2/
However, it has become very clear, that billionaires don't regulate themselves, and politicians and the media who are supposed to hold them to account, don't, because oligarchs have got politicians in their pockets, and own and control the media.
3/
It was rough and ready, but distilled what I had been thinking for some time. I had meant to write it out a few times, but it seemed so massive, so many aspects, so how would I cover it all?
Just how did we sleepwalk, into this mess?
2/
I am not an ideologue, in fact I reject the whole concept of ideology. It seems a good idea at first, but all ideologies are seriously imperfect, and they get misused.
I identify and explain problems, and faults in the system.
3/
The world is in a complete and utter mess, on every level, due to insane, incompetent, and just evil leadership, and the manipulation by billionaires/oligarchs, pulling the strings of politicians.
It's becoming increasingly difficult for me to say anything constructive.
1/🧵
As most will know, I mainly commentate from the perspective of the climate and ecological crisis. Actually, ecological is every interaction. So when you see a genocide happening in plain sight, ruthless and uncaring politics, that is ecological.
2/
I am able to see the whole big picture, in my mind. This does not mean seeing everything, which is impossible. But seeing the connection between everything, it's possible for a reasonably well-informed person to see, and how it all joins up.
3/
This is merely a placeholder, because I don't want to forget this, and I have to go out. However, I need to put this down, so I don't forget it.
I can explain why people are not taking the climate and ecological crisis, with a simple observable phenomenon.
1/🧵
People take their cues from those around them, especially their leaders. If they don't see other people, and especially their leaders, acting as if we are in a dire crisis, then they are going to find it very difficult to take the crisis seriously.
2/
Especially, when our governments and our leadership, push head with business as usual BaU, which presupposes that the crisis is not real, and promoting the lie that BaU will create a glorious future for us.
3/
One of the biggest problems having any sensible discussion about empathy, is that it is an ill defined term, which actually seems to refer to many different, and possibly contradictory phenomena. I find psychological discourses on empathy, very unhelpful. 1/
Most of the psychological discourses on empathy are very unhelpful, because they are actually talking about a concept, not actual experienced empathy, which does not always lead to compassion. They are too focused on verbal cognition, and concepts.
2/
I have tried to cut through this misunderstanding, and focus on actual empathy, which is a spontaneous, non-verbal insight into others, which is transient and brief. And not necessarily a form of compassion, which can build up in a person.