On Friday, I shared information with a Trump admin official that one of the FBI Special Agent pilots assigned to fly the private jet used by @FBIDirectorKash was THE case agent on the case resulting in the Mar-a-Lago search warrant. 🧵
Special Agent Christopher M Meyer was assigned to Washington Field Office squad CR-15 which was disbanded this year due to investigations into @realDonaldTrump.
Sources tell me Meyer was the case agent. Meyer is now reportedly flying FBI Director Patel in the FBI's Gulfstream 550.
Meyer was responsible for delivering a subpoena to @hw_floyd (Black Voices for Trump) who was arrested for an assault on Meyer and SA Walter Giardino. Per Politico, Giardino participated in the arrest of @RealPNavarro.
Floyd was arrested after being served the subpoena (below).
The FBI's internal directory lists a "Christopher M Meyer" (Official Bureau name) as a Special Agent assigned to "CIRG," the Critical Incident Response Group which manages, among other things, the FBI's fleet of planes including the Gulfstream 550 the Director travels on.
The FAA's Airman Registry lists a Christopher Mark Meyer as living near the hangar the G550 is parked at, and within a short commute to the FBI's Manassas office on Discovery Blvd. The redacted address matches the address of a "Name withheld at request of Owner" notice in the PW County Tax assessor office - a courtesy offered to law enforcement officers in Virginia.
These documents are public record, and have no expectation of privacy.
There are only 4 Christopher M Meyer in the FAA's Airman registry - and Christopher Mark Meyer is the only one with the type certification to fly the G550 AND lives in Virginia. This substantiates multiple FBI sources (current and former) stating Meyer managed to transfer away from CR-15 between the election and inauguration in order to escape consequences.
This database is public.
The involvement with @hw_floyd's case proven by the police report, his name listed in the FAA Registry, the redacted name within PW County's tax registry, substantiates the statements of off-the-record sources within the FBI that Special Agent Chris Meyer went from @POTUS investigator to close proximity to the current FBI Director.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Precedent: Charging FBI Directors with lying under oath.
Outcome: Kash Patel likely faces future charges for his confirmation hearing statements (multiple answers on several topics)
Senator Booker (03:04:21):
Are you aware of any plans or discussions to punish in any way, including termination, FBI agents or personnel associated with Trump investigations?
Kash Patel (03:04:30):
Senator, just to be clear, I did not participate in any of those DOJ investigations-
Senator Booker (03:04:31):
Sir, that's a yes or no question. Are you aware of any plans or discussions to punish in any way, including termination, FBI agents or personnel associated with Trump investigations? Yes or no?
Kash Patel (03:04:31):
I'm not aware of that, Senator.
Senator Booker (03:04:34):
There is no evidence of wrongdoing by FBI employees involved in these investigations. If you do pursue investigations of those involved, will you commit to using standard processes, including a standard review by the FBI inspections division and the Inspector General?
Kash Patel (03:04:53):
Senator, I will honor all those review processes.
Senator Booker (03:04:56):
You'll honor those review processes?
Kash Patel (03:04:58):
Yes, Senator.
Senator Booker (03:04:59):
If there are actions against FBI employees that do not follow those standard process that happen before you get in, will you commit to reversing any decision prior to your arrival so that those standard processes and the standard review by the FBI inspections division will take place?
Kash Patel (03:05:20):
I don't know what's going on right now over there, but I'm committed to you, Senator, and your colleagues that I will honor the internal review process of the FBI.
Senator Booker (03:05:29):
Have you made any commitments to anyone about pursuing any investigations or targets if you are a FBI director?
Kash Patel (03:05:35):
Only violent criminals and terrorists.
Senator Booker (03:05:37):
Have you had any conversations with anyone on the transition team about pursuing any investigations or targets?
Kash Patel (03:05:44):
Only following the constitution.
Senator Booker (03:05:46):
Again, are you certain?
Kash Patel (03:05:49):
That I have told people on the administration-
Senator Booker (03:05:52):
Are you certain...? Have you had any conversations with anyone on the transition team about pursuing any investigations or targets?
Kash Patel (03:06:00):
Senator, to the best of my recollection, I've only said I will use the constitution.
Senator Booker (03:06:04):
Have you discussed specific investigations or targets you would pursue as FBI director with the President of the United States?
Kash Patel (03:06:13):
Senator, to the best of my recollection, no.
Senator Booker (03:06:15):
Are you certain?
Kash Patel (03:06:17):
To the best of my recollection, no.
🧵A bunch of people to include @ASavageNation have asked about the rifle, and what they believe doesn't add up.
The university surveillance cameras seem to show a long item, dark in color, consistent with a towel or cloth covering a rifle as the subject dismounts the building.
Below are grainy screenshots due to the camera distance and the resolution being 1080p.
However, if you view where the arrows - key your eye, you'll see what could be the long gun, wrapped in cloth, carried across the roof, down off the building, and to the road
The impact with the ground looks like the rifle landed butt first which could dislodge a scope from cheaper scope rings that aren't torqued to handle a heavy ground strike.
As the figure crosses the grass, he adjusts this item several times from the left side of his body right.
Some y'all need this:
In 1966, Robert Watts said, "If they ever make me carry a rifle the first man I want to get in my sights is L.B.J." This led to his conviction for threatening the President. But was it a true threat or political hyperbole protected by the First Amendment?
2/ Watts v. United States (1969): Watts, an 18-year-old, made the statement during a Vietnam War protest. He was charged under a federal law prohibiting threats against the President. The Supreme Court reversed his conviction, shaping how we view free speech today.
3/ Key Issue: Did Watts’ statement constitute a "true threat" or was it political hyperbole? The Court ruled it was hyperbole—crude, exaggerated speech meant to express strong political dissent, not a genuine intent to harm President Lyndon B. Johnson.