For specific prompts that help with documentation and analysis tasks, I've been testing out "AI Prompts for Product Work" - it has some clever shortcuts for these exact problems.
I don't know if there's a way for product managers to not be obsolete, but we're going to try...
Claude Code can be your superpower (for a bit)
(not sponsored, but Anthropic hit me up)
Here are 10+ techniques that will change how you work with code/eng teams:
1/ Codebase Q&A is your new superpower
Stop asking engineers "where is the login feature implemented?"
Claude Code can:
• Identify where specific features live in the code
• Analyze Git history to understand how code evolved
• Summarize team contributions and recent shipments
• Pull context from GitHub issues and PRs
You get answers in minutes, not meeting requests.
2/ Use it as your planning thought partner
Before writing any requirements, tell Claude Code: "brainstorm ideas and outline a plan for implementing [feature]."
This validates your approach before engineering even sees it.
Pro tip: Ask for multiple options. Engineers appreciate when PMs come with thoughtful alternatives, not just demands.
Most PM learning focuses on frameworks and best practices.
But after 8 years in product, I've learned more from studying what successful PMs actually produce than from any course.
Here's an experiment worth trying (with important caveats) 🧵
The insight: Instead of asking PMs to explain their decisions, study the artifacts they create when making those decisions.
PRDs, roadmaps, customer research notes, stakeholder emails.
But here's what most advice gets wrong about this approach...
Caveat 1: Success in product has massive context dependencies.
A decision that worked brilliantly at a Series A startup might be terrible at a Fortune 500 company. Market timing, resources, team dynamics, and plain luck all matter more than we admit.
"Everyone can now vibe code features - CPO, customer success, data analysts."
PM's immediate reaction: "If everyone's building... what makes me irreplaceable?"
I watched this exact conversation unfold. The conclusion might surprise you: 🧵
The PM's fear is real:
• CPO has strategy vision AND can build
• CX has customer proximity AND can build
• Data analysts have insight depth AND can build
• Engineers have technical judgment AND can build
Where's the PM's unique value?
Standard advice: "Become an amplifier! Be the synthesizer! Orchestrate the chaos!"
But here's the brutal truth:
Engineers can orchestrate features.
AI can synthesize insights.
Anyone can "amplify" with the right tools.