Why Media Highlights Fake Lynchings but Ignores Real Hindu Murders?
Read this Article : 🧵
If a Hindu is murdered, it’s silence.
If someone from a minority dies, it’s front page, breaking news, political outrage, global headlines.
Why this difference?
Intro: When truth dies quietly, and lies become loud
Imagine this:
A Hindu sadhu is beaten to death by a mob.
Another Hindu tailor is beheaded in broad daylight.
A young man is stabbed for supporting a festival.
And yet - no hashtags, no outrage, no media panels.
But if there’s even a rumour of a Muslim man being attacked -
Media, Bollywood, political parties, and global papers all scream “Hate crime!”
Why this one-sided anger?
Why are real Hindu deaths ignored, but fake or twisted stories glorified?
This is not an accident.
It’s a design.
Let’s understand the full truth.
1. Kanhaiya Lal was beheaded on camera - no headlines, no justice cries
In June 2022, Kanhaiya Lal, a Hindu tailor from Udaipur, was brutally beheaded in his shop.
The killers recorded a terror video, proudly declaring their act as “punishment” for supporting Nupur Sharma.
- It was a religiously motivated Islamist murder.
- A direct attack on freedom of speech.
- An act of terror.
But mainstream media softened the story.
- Words like “terror” were avoided.
- Debates were shifted to “why did he support Nupur?”
- No one lit candles. No one cried for justice.
If roles were reversed, would the silence be the same?
2. Kamlesh Tiwari was killed for his words - no one said “freedom of expression”
Kamlesh Tiwari, a Hindu leader, was stabbed and had his throat slit by men who came as visitors in 2019.
His crime?
- Making a comment on the Prophet, for which he had already gone to jail.
- He had apologised.
- He was living a quiet life with his family.
Still, Islamist radicals planned and murdered him.
Yet the media said:
“Tiwari killed over remarks.”
Not: “Islamic fundamentalists murder man for speech.”
No international journalists spoke.
No Bollywood tweets.
No “Not In My Name” marches.
3. Sadhus lynched in Palghar - but no one blamed the religion of the killers
April 2020. Maharashtra.
Two Hindu saints and their driver were lynched by a violent mob.
They were accused of child kidnapping - completely false.
Even the police stood silently while they were beaten with sticks and stones.
The killers were not RSS, not VHP - but local tribals.
Still, the media muted the religious identity.
No one said:
“Hindu saints lynched by a mob.”
“Religious intolerance in tribal areas.”
Imagine if two minority religious clerics were lynched by villagers.
The headlines would have exploded.
4. Tabrez Ansari case - from theft suspect to victim of “Islamophobia”
Tabrez Ansari, a young Muslim man, was caught in Jharkhand while trying to steal a bike.
He was beaten by villagers - a crime, yes.
But the next day, he died - possibly from an earlier heart condition.
Media turned it into a Hindu lynching story.
- Videos were selectively edited.
- Mob identity was never verified.
- His own family admitted his illness.
But suddenly, India was labelled “lynchistan” by international papers.
5. Legal terms changed based on religion
Look at any news headline:
- If a Hindu kills a minority ➝ “HATE CRIME”
- If a Hindu is killed ➝ “COMMUNAL CLASH” or “DISPUTE”
- If a Hindu sadhu is lynched ➝ “mob violence”
- If a Muslim man dies in custody ➝ “state oppression”
Same crime. Different vocabulary.
Why?
Because there is a clear narrative to paint Hindus as oppressors, and others as victims.
6. Bollywood, media, and intellectuals speak for one side only
- Bollywood stars tweet for George Floyd in America
- They post for Palestine
- They light candles for minority deaths
But when Hindus are killed?
Nothing.
Not even one post for Kanhaiya Lal.
Not even one line for sadhus in Palghar.
Not one word for Kamlesh Tiwari’s son, who begged for justice.
This is not lack of awareness.
This is willful silence.
7. Why does this happen? Follow the money, the vote, the global pressure
Media runs on funding and TRP.
Bollywood survives on international applause.
Parties need vote banks.
And let’s face it:
There is no gain in speaking for Hindus.
- Hindus don’t riot
- Hindus don’t boycott
- Hindus don’t issue fatwas
- Hindus don’t burn buses
So silence is safe.
8. But this silence is dangerous. It creates a false picture of India
Every fake lynching headline, every ignored Hindu death,
slowly paints a picture that:
- Hindus are violent
- Minorities are always victims
- India is unsafe only for one group
This leads to global shame, diplomatic issues, and attacks on Hindu culture.
It’s not just unfair.
It’s intentional injustice.
9. Justice must be equal. Pain is not communal. Grief has no religion.
The murder of a Hindu father hurts as much as the murder of a Muslim boy.
But if one is nationalised and the other is silenced,
then media is not journalism. It is propaganda.
We must ask:
- Why such hypocrisy?
- Why are Hindu victims denied voice?
- Why are their families left alone?
Justice cannot be selective.
10. What can we do as ordinary people?
We don’t control big media.
But we control memory.
- Speak their names
- Share their stories
- Question fake headlines
- Support truth-based platforms
- Raise voice with dignity, not hate
If we stay silent today,
tomorrow your own pain may be ignored too.
A society that chooses victims based on religion…
A media that hides murders based on identity…
An industry that sells lies and buries truth…
Is not “secular”.
It is broken.
Let us rebuild it - not with hate,
but with honesty, voice, and courage.
Because if Hindu blood is cheap today,
then justice is already dead.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New Age Conversion via Influencers - A Hidden Weapon
Read this Article :
There was a time when missionaries knocked on doors with Bibles in hand.
There was a time when loud preaching happened in tribal belts and slums.
There was a time when conversion looked like force, money, and tricks.
But that time is gone.
Today, conversion wears a new face - young, polished, soft-spoken, and “modern”.
It hides in Instagram reels.
It speaks through YouTube motivation talks.
It smiles in WhatsApp groups.
It uses words like “healing”, “love”, “peace”, “universal faith” - but slowly… it disconnects you from Sanatan Dharma.
This is the new age of conversion.
No violence. No shouting.
Just psychological and emotional manipulation.
And it’s more dangerous than ever.
How it starts
The conversion doesn’t begin with religion.
It begins with emotion.
A 19-year-old student is depressed.
A housewife feels ignored.
A Dalit man is angry about caste insult.
A tribal family is struggling to feed children.
They go online.
They search for answers.
They find someone saying:
- “God loves you.”
- “Are you feeling empty?”
- “Come, let’s pray together.”
- “Your old ways didn’t work. Try something new.”
And slowly, Sanatan looks like the past.
This new voice looks like light.
That’s how it begins.
Who are the influencers?
These are not pastors wearing robes.
These are:
- YouTubers who used to post self-help but now talk about Jesus.
- Instagram creators who say “All religions are same”, but only promote Christianity.
- Motivation coaches who invite youth to “healing retreats” and end with gospel prayers.
- Women vloggers who do cooking, then share how Jesus helped their family.
- Pages that post quotes in Hindi, but always point to church-based healing events.
These influencers do not say “convert”.
They just create doubt about Hinduism.
And then offer answers through their own version of “truth”.
Why Western Platforms Ban Hindu Content as “Dangerous”?
Read this Article :
Even truth, when spoken by a Hindu, gets flagged.
A child saying “I love my Dharma” is called communal.
A YouTube video explaining the Gita is demonetised.
A post about a Hindu temple is labelled “hate speech”.
But a person mocking Sanatan openly? No problem.
We’re told:
“Freedom of speech exists.”
But somewhere between algorithms and global politics, freedom for Hindus disappears.
Why is this happening?
Why are Western social media platforms banning, limiting, and censoring Hindu voices in the name of “safety”?
Let’s understand.
1. Because Hindu identity doesn’t fit their Left-Liberal framework
In the Western world, if you say:
“I’m Christian” → Normal.
“I’m Muslim” → Protected.
“I’m Black/Queer/Atheist” → Celebrated.
But if you say:
“I’m Hindu and proud” → Problematic.
Because their worldview says:
→ Hindus are upper caste oppressors
→ India = caste, cows, and superstition
→ Ramayan is myth, not culture
→ Sanatan = majority = dangerous
So when a Hindu explains Dharma, culture, or truth…
It doesn’t match their framework.
So they label it “extremism”.
2. Because their content policies are not made by people who understand Sanatan
Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter - their policy teams sit in the US/UK.
They consult NGOs, “human rights” bodies, UN-based reports.
Guess who writes those reports?
The same groups that call Hindu festivals “environmental threat”,
That call Sadhus “fake godmen”,
That call Vedas “violent”,
That call Ghar Wapsi “forced conversion”.
So platforms act based on twisted narratives written by anti-Hindu lobbies.
Bollywood turns Hindu kings into villains, Mughals into lovers – Why this distortion?
Read this Article :
A king who fought invaders is shown as cruel.
A ruler who looted temples is shown as romantic.
Hindu warriors are twisted. Mughal emperors are glorified.
This is not just cinema.
It is rewriting history - in front of our eyes.
Let’s talk about what’s really happening.
They don’t “just make films” - they shape memory
Most people don’t read history books.
They remember what they saw on screen.
And Bollywood knows it. That’s why they show:
- Akbar as peaceful
- Alauddin Khilji as a passionate lover
- Babur as a brave founder
- Aurangzeb as misunderstood
And at the same time…
- Rani Padmavati becomes a silent decoration
- Prithviraj Chauhan becomes a weak character
- Maharaja Suheldev is erased
- Shivaji is hardly shown at all
This is not coincidence.
It’s an agenda dressed as art.
Who gets called “great”?
Let’s look at the films and what they portray:
- Jodha Akbar: Shows Akbar as a secular, romantic king who respects Hindus.
But in reality, Akbar imposed Jizya tax on Hindus, had Hindu temples demolished, and started child marriage alliances to expand his power.
- Padmaavat: Shows Alauddin Khilji as wild and mad for love.
Truth: He raided temples, beheaded thousands, and led one of the bloodiest jihads into Hindu kingdoms.
- Mughal-e-Azam: A grand love story of Salim-Anarkali.
But real Salim (Jahangir) imprisoned Guru Arjan Dev and enforced Sharia.
But what about Hindu kings?
When Bollywood tries to show them, it ends up as:
- Comedy (Bhagwan Ram’s character in some recent OTT shows)
- Weak storytelling (Samrat Prithviraj)
- Full of historical errors (Adipurush)
- Or ignored altogether
Hindu Organisations Need Approval. Madrassas Run Freely - How Is This Equal?
Read this Article :
Intro: The imbalance no one dares to talk about
In the world’s largest democracy, not all citizens are treated equally.
Not all religious groups have the same freedom.
And definitely, not all educational institutions follow the same rules.
Today, if a group of Hindus come together to start a pathshala, gurukul, or dharmic organisation — they must apply for government approvals, prove their curriculum is “secular”, register every activity, submit tax audits, and face media suspicion.
But in the same country, thousands of madrassas operate without any registration, without any inspections, and without following national education norms. Some openly preach religion 24x7. Some receive foreign funds. Some are built on encroached land. Yet, they are allowed to run - with zero fear and full protection.
How did this double standard become “normal”?
How did the very children of this soil, the Hindus, become second-class in their own homeland?
This isn’t just a policy issue.
It’s a dangerous imbalance - and it’s been building quietly for years.
Let’s understand this with truth, clarity, and courage.
When Hindu religious institutions are formed - whether it’s a Ramayan study circle or a small Sanskrit gurukul - the red tape begins. The moment it’s labelled “Hindu”, the system becomes cautious. Suddenly, there are questions:
- “What ideology are you spreading?”
- “Is it inclusive?”
- “Are you following RTE norms?”
- “Are you brainwashing kids?”
There are paperwork demands, trust deed scrutiny, land approval issues, and even harassment in some areas by local authorities.
But on the other side, madrassas can come up quietly in narrow lanes, in rented homes, in villages, on temple lands, or government land - and nobody raises a question. No official shows up. No inspection happens.
The imbalance is not hidden. It’s happening in open daylight.
In Uttar Pradesh, during Yogi Adityanath’s rule, a major survey revealed over 8,000 unregistered madrassas. That’s just in one state.
These madrassas:
- Had no educational board oversight
- Were teaching only religious texts
- Had no idea about science, history, or civics
- Some were even receiving funding from foreign countries
And yet - they had been running for decades.
Ask yourself: Would a Hindu gurukul be allowed to run like that for even one year?
New Churches in Every Village - Why Only in Hindu Belts?
It’s not about prayer. It’s about pattern.
Read this Article :
Intro: Something strange is happening silently
Go to a peaceful tribal village in Jharkhand or Chhattisgarh.
Visit a small town in Andhra, Odisha, or Tamil Nadu.
Walk through rural corners of Assam, Nagaland, Punjab, even Kerala.
You’ll notice something quietly rising on the horizon.
Not schools. Not clinics. Not community halls.
But new churches - freshly painted, newly funded, with foreign names.
Not one. Not two.
In some areas, a new church every 2–3 km.
Even in places with hardly any Christian population.
And the question comes naturally:
Why are all these new churches being built only in Hindu-majority areas?
1. Why not in Muslim or Christian belts?
If the goal is spiritual upliftment, moral guidance, or service to the poor -
why are churches not expanding in places like:
- Muslim-majority towns?
- Already Christian areas like Goa or Nagaland?
- Areas where Christian population is already above 60%?
Why only in areas where Hindus are still rooted in tradition?
That’s not outreach.
That’s targeting.
2. Most new churches are built in tribal and economically weak areas
Conversion is not happening in Delhi or Mumbai high-rises.
It’s happening where people are struggling -
for food, job, respect, or identity.
- A family is given ration for 6 months.
- A child is offered free education.
- A patient is helped with medical costs.
And slowly… the visits begin.
The preaching starts.
The festivals change.
The names change.
One house at a time, the soul of the village shifts.