Why Media Highlights Fake Lynchings but Ignores Real Hindu Murders?
Read this Article : 🧵
If a Hindu is murdered, it’s silence.
If someone from a minority dies, it’s front page, breaking news, political outrage, global headlines.
Why this difference?
Intro: When truth dies quietly, and lies become loud
Imagine this:
A Hindu sadhu is beaten to death by a mob.
Another Hindu tailor is beheaded in broad daylight.
A young man is stabbed for supporting a festival.
And yet - no hashtags, no outrage, no media panels.
But if there’s even a rumour of a Muslim man being attacked -
Media, Bollywood, political parties, and global papers all scream “Hate crime!”
Why this one-sided anger?
Why are real Hindu deaths ignored, but fake or twisted stories glorified?
This is not an accident.
It’s a design.
Let’s understand the full truth.
1. Kanhaiya Lal was beheaded on camera - no headlines, no justice cries
In June 2022, Kanhaiya Lal, a Hindu tailor from Udaipur, was brutally beheaded in his shop.
The killers recorded a terror video, proudly declaring their act as “punishment” for supporting Nupur Sharma.
- It was a religiously motivated Islamist murder.
- A direct attack on freedom of speech.
- An act of terror.
But mainstream media softened the story.
- Words like “terror” were avoided.
- Debates were shifted to “why did he support Nupur?”
- No one lit candles. No one cried for justice.
If roles were reversed, would the silence be the same?
2. Kamlesh Tiwari was killed for his words - no one said “freedom of expression”
Kamlesh Tiwari, a Hindu leader, was stabbed and had his throat slit by men who came as visitors in 2019.
His crime?
- Making a comment on the Prophet, for which he had already gone to jail.
- He had apologised.
- He was living a quiet life with his family.
Still, Islamist radicals planned and murdered him.
Yet the media said:
“Tiwari killed over remarks.”
Not: “Islamic fundamentalists murder man for speech.”
No international journalists spoke.
No Bollywood tweets.
No “Not In My Name” marches.
3. Sadhus lynched in Palghar - but no one blamed the religion of the killers
April 2020. Maharashtra.
Two Hindu saints and their driver were lynched by a violent mob.
They were accused of child kidnapping - completely false.
Even the police stood silently while they were beaten with sticks and stones.
The killers were not RSS, not VHP - but local tribals.
Still, the media muted the religious identity.
No one said:
“Hindu saints lynched by a mob.”
“Religious intolerance in tribal areas.”
Imagine if two minority religious clerics were lynched by villagers.
The headlines would have exploded.
4. Tabrez Ansari case - from theft suspect to victim of “Islamophobia”
Tabrez Ansari, a young Muslim man, was caught in Jharkhand while trying to steal a bike.
He was beaten by villagers - a crime, yes.
But the next day, he died - possibly from an earlier heart condition.
Media turned it into a Hindu lynching story.
- Videos were selectively edited.
- Mob identity was never verified.
- His own family admitted his illness.
But suddenly, India was labelled “lynchistan” by international papers.
5. Legal terms changed based on religion
Look at any news headline:
- If a Hindu kills a minority ➝ “HATE CRIME”
- If a Hindu is killed ➝ “COMMUNAL CLASH” or “DISPUTE”
- If a Hindu sadhu is lynched ➝ “mob violence”
- If a Muslim man dies in custody ➝ “state oppression”
Same crime. Different vocabulary.
Why?
Because there is a clear narrative to paint Hindus as oppressors, and others as victims.
6. Bollywood, media, and intellectuals speak for one side only
- Bollywood stars tweet for George Floyd in America
- They post for Palestine
- They light candles for minority deaths
But when Hindus are killed?
Nothing.
Not even one post for Kanhaiya Lal.
Not even one line for sadhus in Palghar.
Not one word for Kamlesh Tiwari’s son, who begged for justice.
This is not lack of awareness.
This is willful silence.
7. Why does this happen? Follow the money, the vote, the global pressure
Media runs on funding and TRP.
Bollywood survives on international applause.
Parties need vote banks.
And let’s face it:
There is no gain in speaking for Hindus.
- Hindus don’t riot
- Hindus don’t boycott
- Hindus don’t issue fatwas
- Hindus don’t burn buses
So silence is safe.
8. But this silence is dangerous. It creates a false picture of India
Every fake lynching headline, every ignored Hindu death,
slowly paints a picture that:
- Hindus are violent
- Minorities are always victims
- India is unsafe only for one group
This leads to global shame, diplomatic issues, and attacks on Hindu culture.
It’s not just unfair.
It’s intentional injustice.
9. Justice must be equal. Pain is not communal. Grief has no religion.
The murder of a Hindu father hurts as much as the murder of a Muslim boy.
But if one is nationalised and the other is silenced,
then media is not journalism. It is propaganda.
We must ask:
- Why such hypocrisy?
- Why are Hindu victims denied voice?
- Why are their families left alone?
Justice cannot be selective.
10. What can we do as ordinary people?
We don’t control big media.
But we control memory.
- Speak their names
- Share their stories
- Question fake headlines
- Support truth-based platforms
- Raise voice with dignity, not hate
If we stay silent today,
tomorrow your own pain may be ignored too.
A society that chooses victims based on religion…
A media that hides murders based on identity…
An industry that sells lies and buries truth…
Is not “secular”.
It is broken.
Let us rebuild it - not with hate,
but with honesty, voice, and courage.
Because if Hindu blood is cheap today,
then justice is already dead.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bollywood turns Hindu kings into villains, Mughals into lovers – Why this distortion?
Read this Article :
A king who fought invaders is shown as cruel.
A ruler who looted temples is shown as romantic.
Hindu warriors are twisted. Mughal emperors are glorified.
This is not just cinema.
It is rewriting history - in front of our eyes.
Let’s talk about what’s really happening.
They don’t “just make films” - they shape memory
Most people don’t read history books.
They remember what they saw on screen.
And Bollywood knows it. That’s why they show:
- Akbar as peaceful
- Alauddin Khilji as a passionate lover
- Babur as a brave founder
- Aurangzeb as misunderstood
And at the same time…
- Rani Padmavati becomes a silent decoration
- Prithviraj Chauhan becomes a weak character
- Maharaja Suheldev is erased
- Shivaji is hardly shown at all
This is not coincidence.
It’s an agenda dressed as art.
Who gets called “great”?
Let’s look at the films and what they portray:
- Jodha Akbar: Shows Akbar as a secular, romantic king who respects Hindus.
But in reality, Akbar imposed Jizya tax on Hindus, had Hindu temples demolished, and started child marriage alliances to expand his power.
- Padmaavat: Shows Alauddin Khilji as wild and mad for love.
Truth: He raided temples, beheaded thousands, and led one of the bloodiest jihads into Hindu kingdoms.
- Mughal-e-Azam: A grand love story of Salim-Anarkali.
But real Salim (Jahangir) imprisoned Guru Arjan Dev and enforced Sharia.
But what about Hindu kings?
When Bollywood tries to show them, it ends up as:
- Comedy (Bhagwan Ram’s character in some recent OTT shows)
- Weak storytelling (Samrat Prithviraj)
- Full of historical errors (Adipurush)
- Or ignored altogether
Hindu Organisations Need Approval. Madrassas Run Freely - How Is This Equal?
Read this Article :
Intro: The imbalance no one dares to talk about
In the world’s largest democracy, not all citizens are treated equally.
Not all religious groups have the same freedom.
And definitely, not all educational institutions follow the same rules.
Today, if a group of Hindus come together to start a pathshala, gurukul, or dharmic organisation — they must apply for government approvals, prove their curriculum is “secular”, register every activity, submit tax audits, and face media suspicion.
But in the same country, thousands of madrassas operate without any registration, without any inspections, and without following national education norms. Some openly preach religion 24x7. Some receive foreign funds. Some are built on encroached land. Yet, they are allowed to run - with zero fear and full protection.
How did this double standard become “normal”?
How did the very children of this soil, the Hindus, become second-class in their own homeland?
This isn’t just a policy issue.
It’s a dangerous imbalance - and it’s been building quietly for years.
Let’s understand this with truth, clarity, and courage.
When Hindu religious institutions are formed - whether it’s a Ramayan study circle or a small Sanskrit gurukul - the red tape begins. The moment it’s labelled “Hindu”, the system becomes cautious. Suddenly, there are questions:
- “What ideology are you spreading?”
- “Is it inclusive?”
- “Are you following RTE norms?”
- “Are you brainwashing kids?”
There are paperwork demands, trust deed scrutiny, land approval issues, and even harassment in some areas by local authorities.
But on the other side, madrassas can come up quietly in narrow lanes, in rented homes, in villages, on temple lands, or government land - and nobody raises a question. No official shows up. No inspection happens.
The imbalance is not hidden. It’s happening in open daylight.
In Uttar Pradesh, during Yogi Adityanath’s rule, a major survey revealed over 8,000 unregistered madrassas. That’s just in one state.
These madrassas:
- Had no educational board oversight
- Were teaching only religious texts
- Had no idea about science, history, or civics
- Some were even receiving funding from foreign countries
And yet - they had been running for decades.
Ask yourself: Would a Hindu gurukul be allowed to run like that for even one year?
New Churches in Every Village - Why Only in Hindu Belts?
It’s not about prayer. It’s about pattern.
Read this Article :
Intro: Something strange is happening silently
Go to a peaceful tribal village in Jharkhand or Chhattisgarh.
Visit a small town in Andhra, Odisha, or Tamil Nadu.
Walk through rural corners of Assam, Nagaland, Punjab, even Kerala.
You’ll notice something quietly rising on the horizon.
Not schools. Not clinics. Not community halls.
But new churches - freshly painted, newly funded, with foreign names.
Not one. Not two.
In some areas, a new church every 2–3 km.
Even in places with hardly any Christian population.
And the question comes naturally:
Why are all these new churches being built only in Hindu-majority areas?
1. Why not in Muslim or Christian belts?
If the goal is spiritual upliftment, moral guidance, or service to the poor -
why are churches not expanding in places like:
- Muslim-majority towns?
- Already Christian areas like Goa or Nagaland?
- Areas where Christian population is already above 60%?
Why only in areas where Hindus are still rooted in tradition?
That’s not outreach.
That’s targeting.
2. Most new churches are built in tribal and economically weak areas
Conversion is not happening in Delhi or Mumbai high-rises.
It’s happening where people are struggling -
for food, job, respect, or identity.
- A family is given ration for 6 months.
- A child is offered free education.
- A patient is helped with medical costs.
And slowly… the visits begin.
The preaching starts.
The festivals change.
The names change.
One house at a time, the soul of the village shifts.
Music Videos Are Now Soft Jihad - And Most Hindus Still Don’t Realise It
Read this Article :
They look harmless.
Just another love song.
A catchy tune. A dramatic heartbreak. A dance on the rooftop.
But look closely -
Under that makeup, melody, and romantic drama…
lies a very dangerous agenda.
An agenda that targets young Hindu girls, rewires their thinking, and makes them feel attraction - not caution - towards people who later turn into headlines of crimes and betrayal.
This is not just entertainment.
This is soft jihad - running 24x7 on music apps, YouTube, and Instagram reels.
The formula is simple, repeated, and well-planned:
1.Muslim boy shown as intense, emotional, attractive
2.Hindu girl shown as innocent, confused, but slowly “falling”
3.Parents or brothers shown as villains trying to break their love
4.End the video with tragedy - to evoke sympathy
In this script -
the Hindu girl is always the “victim of family pressure”.
And the Muslim boy is always the “deep lover who just wanted peace”.
It’s the same trick played again and again - and millions are watching.
Why music videos?
Because people let their guard down with music.
You may not watch bold web series.
You may avoid movies.
But music videos?
They come through Instagram reels. WhatsApp status. YouTube auto-play.
And in just 3 minutes - your mind is already fed with a storyline.
No loud messaging. No obvious propaganda.
Just smooth, emotional, and psychologically manipulative content.
Foreign tourists feel more peace in Indian temples - Why?
#longthread 🧵
They don’t know Sanskrit.
They’ve never grown up doing aarti.
They don’t even know the names of the Gods.
And yet… when they sit in an Indian temple, they often close their eyes.
Tears come. A silence enters them.
Something moves in their heart.
While many Indians walk in, click a selfie, ask for wishes, and leave.
Why is this happening?
Why do people from other cultures connect more deeply to our sacred spaces than we do?
This thread is not about foreigners. It’s a mirror for us.
Read slowly👇
1. They don’t treat temples like problem-solving counters.
Foreigners don’t go to a temple to ask for a new job, a foreign visa, or a better marriage.
They go to feel. Just feel. Nothing else.
They don’t expect miracles. They don’t demand answers.
They just sit… and receive.
But we?
We go with a list.
“Bhagwan, bas is baar clear karwa do.”
“Bas yeh rishta fix ho jaaye.”
And when it doesn’t happen, we feel the temple failed us.
But temples aren’t ATM machines. They’re energy spaces.
Foreigners sense that. We often forget.
2. They aren’t in a hurry. We are always checking the time.
Look at a foreigner in a temple.
They sit in one corner quietly for 20, 30, sometimes 60 minutes.
No noise. No movement. Just eyes closed and breath slow.
Sometimes they just watch the priest in wonder, like a child watches fire.
We?
We check how long the queue is.
We ask “Kitne baje tak khula hai?”
We do quick namaste, ring the bell fast, and run.
They give time to the temple.
We try to save time in the temple.