“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”
Trump is preparing to thread the needle to END the war between Russia and Ukraine.
The ONLY path forward is PEACE—and this could become the GREATEST deal he’s ever closed.
Then Rubio dropped a MASSIVE reveal:
“For the first time… we have concrete examples of the kinds of things that Russia would ask for in order to end the war.”
🧵 THREAD
The news hit like a shockwave just before 3:30 p.m yesterday.
Steve Witkoff, President Trump’s special envoy, had been in Moscow meeting with Vladimir Putin...but no one expected what came next.
Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum broke the story live on air:
“Thank you for being with us. We’ve got some breaking news we want to get to.”
“We want to get this in, it’s a HUGE breaking story. President Trump reportedly set to meet face-to-face with Russian president Vladimir Putin as early as next week.”
“This comes right off of Steve Witkoff’s meeting with Putin.”
Was this be the beginning of a peace deal?
According to Fox’s Peter Doocy, Putin didn’t just meet with Witkoff, but he gave him a direct message for Trump: he wants a sit-down.
A face-to-face. Wow.
“Earlier today in Moscow, Steve Witkoff was told by Vladimir Putin that Putin wants to meet at some point with Trump.”
“Witkoff then relayed that message to the president who is open to it, the possibility of a meeting as soon as next week, if the result of that meeting will be an end to the war in Ukraine.”
Doocy also said that Trump had already briefed Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and several European leaders during a phone call earlier in the day.
“We know that President Trump was on a phone call with Volodymyr Zelenskyy and some European leaders. He shared this with all of them."
“We don’t know exactly where in the world that would be. It could be anywhere.”
The stage was being set.
Moments later, Secretary of State Marco Rubio joined Larry Kudlow on Fox Business to confirm the news.
It was real and it was happening.
Kudlow asked, “What can you tell us, Mr. Secretary?”
Rubio laid it out: “Well, Steve went over to Moscow yesterday, Steve Witkoff—and had a productive meeting in terms of what was discussed, details that perhaps hadn’t been shared before in terms of ideas about how to bring this war to an end.”
He doubled down on the administration’s sole objective:
“Let’s remind everybody that’s the goal here, the president wants to end the war.”
Rubio said that after getting the update, President Trump immediately looped in European leaders.
“The president after getting that update today convened several leaders from Europe, updated them on what happened in ‘the talks.’”
“We’re going to be having talks with our European allies and the Ukrainians as well over the next couple of days just to see what progress we can make on that side of it, and then hopefully, if things continue to progress an opportunity will present itself very soon for the president to meet both with Vladimir Putin and with President Zelensky at some point here, hopefully in the near future.”
Rubio made it clear that they weren’t there yet....peace talks take time.
“But obviously a lot has to happen before that can occur.”
He explained that if the two sides can get close enough, he believes that there’s only one man that can get them both to sign: President Trump.
“But I’ve always believed, I’ve always said this—I think the deal, there’s going to be a deal to end this war and it’ll have to require the president to come in at the end and close on it, as I’ve seen him do numerous times on trade deals as an example.”
The question now is: how close can they get both sides?
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
Then came a major reveal.
Rubio confirmed that for the FIRST time, they now understand what Russia actually wants to end the war.
“I think what we have is a better understanding of the conditions under which Russia would be prepared to end the war,” he said.
The challenge now is bridging that gap.
“We have to compare that to what the Ukrainians and our European allies are willing to accept.”
“If we can get those two positions close enough… then I think there’s the opportunity for the president to have a meeting that includes both Putin and Zelenskyy to try to close this thing out.”
He added, “For the first time, perhaps since this administration began, we have some concrete examples of the kinds of things that Russia would ask for in order to end the war.”
Then he said what many had already been thinking:
“We’ve got to bring the two sides and the positions close enough so that the ultimate closer, President Trump, can get involved and make it happen.”
A deal might be closer than anyone expected.
Back at the White House, President Trump was in the Oval Office with Apple CEO Tim Cook, celebrating Apple’s historic $600 billion investment into the U.S. over the next four years.
But reporters weren’t focused on tech...they wanted to know about the potential peace summit.
A reporter asked, “Have Putin and Zelensky agreed to a summit yet? And where and when would that be?”
Trump didn’t dodge. He actually leaned in.
“Well, there’s a ‘very good’ prospect that they will,” he said.
He confirmed the ball was already rolling: “And we haven’t determined where, but he had some very good talks with President Putin today.”
Then came the line that may define this moment:
“There’s a very good chance that we could be ending the, ending the round.”
Trump sees this as his shot to bring the war to a close.
But his optimism is....cautious optimism.
“The end to that road—that road was long and continues to be long, but there’s a good chance that there will be a meeting very soon.”
When asked how close he thought a deal was, Trump didn’t want to overpromise.
“Well, look—I don’t want to say. I’ve been disappointed before with this one.”
This isn’t a man guessing.
This is a man playing his cards close.
Then came the declaration.
A reporter followed up: “What was the breakthrough today? Did Vladimir Putin make some kind of concession that he hasn’t been willing to make before?”
Trump wasn’t ready to call it a breakthrough, but he made one thing clear: this wasn’t sudden.
This did not come out of thin air. It was planned.
He’s been leveraging both sides for months.
“I don’t call it a breakthrough. I mean, we’ve been working on this a long time.”
He pointed to the human cost of delay. Truly tragic.
“There are thousands of young people dying, mostly soldiers, but also, you know, missiles being hit into Kiev and other places. But in terms of soldiers, I think Russia’s lost over 20,000 since the beginning of the year. 20,000! And, I guess the estimate for Ukraine is about 9000.”
“It’s a terrible situation and we want to get it stopped.”
Then he revealed what’s been driving him all along.
“You know, we don’t have American soldiers there, but I feel I have an obligation to get it stopped.”
Trump made it clear: this isn’t his war. It started on someone else’s watch.
“This was not my war. This war would have never started. Not even a chance. And it didn’t start for four years.”
He spelled it out for the media in the room with him.
“But this is Biden’s war. This was was, on his watch. And, you know, it’s funny. We had, no land was taken from Trump. It was taken from Bush, it was taken from Biden. The whole thing would take from Biden if it weren’t for us, but it was, and it was taken by Obama.”
“Take a look at what was taken with all of the land that was taken. Nothing was taken by Russia from us. Not one ounce of land was taken.”
Then he ended with a promise.
“I’m here to get the thing over with. It would have never started if I were president. And we’re here to get it stopped and get the death stopped.”
In his mind, he’s cleaning up a war that never would’ve happened if he were still in charge.
And if this summit and eventual deal become a reality, it could mark one of the most biggest diplomatic breakthroughs in modern history...led by the man who says he feels “obligated” to bring peace.
Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:
For FAR too long, violent crime has been allowed to fester in once-great American cities.
That ENDS TODAY—starting in D.C.
President Trump stood in the White House briefing room and dropped a NUKE on pro-crime Democrat cities:
He’s invoking the D.C. Home Rule Act to take DIRECT federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department
and deploying the NATIONAL GUARD to the streets to SQUASH criminals and protect law-abiding citizens.
“This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we’re going to take our capital back.”
🧵 THREAD
It was a rare sight.
The President of the United States, standing in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House first thing on a Monday morning, flanked by top members of his cabinet.
That alone signaled something BIG was about to drop.
Alongside President Trump were Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other high-profile officials.
Trump wasted no time.
He declared for all of the media to hear:
“This is Liberation Day in D.C., and we’re going to take our capital back.”
The president announced that he would be invoking the D.C. Home Rule Act to place the Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control...an unprecedented move to crack down on crime in the nation’s capital.
“And we’re here for a very serious purpose. Very serious purpose. Something’s out of control. But we’re going to put it in control very quickly, like we did on the southern border.”
“I’m announcing a HISTORIC action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.”
“We’re taking it back under the authority vested in me as the President of the United States, I’m officially invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. And placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control.”
Trump isn’t messing around on crime. No more third-world cities in America.
That all ENDS today.
But the president made clear this was only the beginning.
In addition to federalizing the D.C. police, Trump revealed he was deploying the National Guard to the streets...pointing out that D.C.’s crime rates now surpass those of cities infamous for violence.
Beyond shameful for an American city.
“In addition, I’m deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington, D.C., and they’re going to be allowed to do their job properly.”
Then came the numbers.
“Now, the murder rate in Washington today is higher than that of Bogota, Colombia, Mexico City—some of the places that you hear about as being the worst places on Earth, much higher. This is much higher.”
“The number of car thefts has doubled over the past five years, and the number of carjackings has more than tripled.”
“Murders in 2023 reached the highest rate, probably ever. They say 25 years, but they don’t know what that means because it just goes back 25 years, can’t be worse.”
“Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people. And we’re not going to let it happen anymore. We’re not going to take it.”
Medicine has been standardized, which is unfortunate when each person is different and also surrounded and affected by entirely different variables.
Medicine shouldn’t be one-size-fits all, but that’s exactly how the industry is run because it’s not about healing people. The same treatment that heals one person can completely wreck another.
This is exactly why certain people get completely wrecked by vaccines.
It was a COUP—and Rudy Giuliani just tore the case WIDE OPEN.
He named WHO he believes was behind its origins—and said it has “all the earmarks of a CIA kind of conspiracy.”
But it’s what he said about President Obama that could lead to an INDICTMENT:
“You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president.”
🧵 THREAD
He hit the ground running.
Rudy Giuliani has a unique perspective on the Democrats’ Russia Coup against President Trump.
Not only is he a lawyer and American legal heavyweight, but he’s also experienced Democrat lawfare aimed directly at him.
Now he says Barack Obama will attempt to hide behind “presidential immunity” in the Russia Coup investigation....but there’s one major problem that could open the door to an indictment.
“You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president,” Giuliani said.
Speaking with David Harris Jr., he laid out Obama’s potential legal risk.
“Obama becomes a problem because he will invoke presidential immunity,” Giuliani explained.
“The decision the Supreme Court made that that helped Trump. The acts are kind of different… but there’s a problem for Obama.”
That problem, according to Giuliani, is the timeline.
“It continues after he’s president. So starting on January 1st, 2017, any participation of him in the conspiracy is not immune. You’re not immune for the rest of your life as president.”
In other words, immunity only applies to actions within a president’s term.
“So he’ll be immune if whatever allegations against him are contained within his presidency,” Giuliani said.
“But if he’s helping to assist over that three-year period that they pushed Russian collusion into 2017 and 2018, then he’s… of course, he could be indicted for that.”
Giuliani then pointed out that the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity is not a free pass for criminal conduct...and that Obama’s alleged involvement in the Russia Coup is FAR MORE serious than anything alleged against Trump.
David Harris Jr. pressed the point: “If a president is literally directly breaking the law, he just doesn’t just get to go away with it. Walk away scot-free.”
“I think you’re right, David,” Giuliani replied.
“I think, you know, we’re all talking about an interpretation of the Supreme Court decision. The Supreme Court did not actually—didn’t give ABSOLUTE immunity to a president.”
He added, “And the acts alleged here are far more serious than the allegations against Trump, which were, first of all, false, but even if they were true, they weren’t nearly as serious as this. So I don’t know if it holds up.”
Victor Davis Hanson says Trump has cut off the head of the SNAKE.
The president saw that the emperor had NO clothes.
Hanson laid out the three IRREFUTABLE reasons the entire system is COLLAPSING.
Then came his prediction—one the Left WON’T want to hear:
“Donald Trump is going to win this war to abolish something that has turned NIGHTMARISH.”
🧵 THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson didn’t waste time.
He opened with a direct hit to the “progressive” left:
“DEI, the acronym for diversity, equity and inclusion is dying.”
Just a few years ago these race-based policies were everywhere, pushed by institutions and corporate boards at the peak of their influence.
But Trump’s return to power changed everything.
Through executive orders, Hanson explained, Trump cut off DEI’s lifeline: federal funding.
If an organization wanted to keep getting government money, it had to drop the program.
“And why did Donald Trump not like it? Because he said the emperor has no clothes.”
In Hanson’s view, DEI is nothing more than legalized discrimination, where skin color [not ability] determines who gets hired, promoted, or tenured.
And opposition to it isn’t only coming from one group.
“When you look at the polls, it’s not just that 60% of so-called White people who often feel they’re victimized by DEI oppose it, but Hispanics and Blacks also poll that they are against it and that’s baffled people.”
It’s not baffling at all, he said, when you think about it.
Many minorities don’t want the stigma of being labeled a “DEI hire” when they’ve earned a job through merit and hard work.
Hanson then went on to masterfully break down the three reasons he believes DEI is IMPLODING...and why Trump will emerge victorious in the fight to abolish it.
The first reason, he said, is historical distance.
DEI grew out of affirmative action in 1965, which was meant to address the Jim Crow South and the legacy of slavery.
At the time, America was about 89% white and 11% Black, and African Americans, on average, were far poorer than whites.
The thinking was to boost opportunities based on skin color, even if that meant implementing quota-like systems.
But, Hanson as pointed out, that was three generations ago.
“First of all, from 1965—if you think about it, we're 35 years in the 20th century and 25 in the 21st. We're 60 years behind that.”
“We’ve had three generations who grew up without Jim Crow and no knowledge of systemic racism, essentially.”
Today, he said, young Americans haven’t lived through the era DEI was meant to address.
“But the point is flagrant racial prejudice—three generations haven't seen it, but they have seen bias predicated on race through DEI.”
EXCLUSIVE: Unexpected Move by RFK Jr.'s HHS is Raising Eyebrows
RFK Jr. recently said his “vision” is that “every American” wears a “wearable within four years.”
It’s a shocking pivot for someone who’s spent decades warning about EMF.
On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Kennedy warned EMF “does all kinds of bad things, including causing cancer.”
He added he wouldn’t dare put a cell phone next to his head, and opts to use speakerphone or headphones instead.
That’s why his sudden push for EMF-emitting wearables is raising eyebrows.
Our guest, holistic health expert Inesa Ponomariovaite, warns this isn’t just a bad idea—it’s actually a weapon in disguise.
🧵 THREAD
We often talk about transhumanism and the technocratic agenda on this broadcast while focusing on speech and other fundamental freedoms that are under threat. But one aspect that’s often overlooked is the health impact of the transhumanist agenda.
RFK Jr. recently made a statement that raised a lot of eyebrows. He said it’s his vision for every American to use a wearable device within the next four years.
Beyond the obvious privacy and surveillance concerns of these devices, there’s a deeper question here: What are the health impacts of wearables?
Has this seemingly well-meaning MAHA agenda taken the time to consider what EMFs do to the body, including the potential long-term consequences of continuous exposure?
Inesa Ponomariovaite is an entrepreneur, humanitarian, and holistic health professional who focuses specifically on these issues.
She warns that wearables are just another step in the transhumanist agenda, and that the frequencies they emit are not just harmful—they're about control.
Inesa joins us now.
According to Inesa Ponomariovaite, nearly everyone is walking around with toxic levels of heavy metals in their bodies. It’s a jarring claim that she can back up with personal experience.
“I’ve never seen a single patient or a single human being, including 5-year-old children, not being full of metals,” Inesa said.
But the real danger, she warned, starts when those metals interact with the modern tech that’s all around us. Devices like Fitbits, smartwatches, and phones don’t just interfere with your hormones and your immune system—they set off a harmful reaction inside the body that you can’t feel or see.
“Radiation starts activating that metal inside of you,” Inesa claims. “It’s like putting aluminum in a microwave.” You may not see the sparks, but your body takes the hit.
And no one’s watching out for it. “We don’t have a single independent study proving these devices are safe.” And the few studies that do exist are funded by the same companies selling the devices.
This isn’t a theory, Inesa explained. It’s a warning—and the clock is ticking.