Indian banks just reported Q1FY26 results. Nothing blew us away, no surprises, no drama. But if you zoom out just a bit, the bigger picture starts to look... well, a little bleak. The sector has been quietly sliding, not falling off a cliff, but steadily losing its shine.🧵👇
Today, the banking sector looks like it's walking on thin ice. It's easy to be caught off-guard by these results if you haven't been paying attention. Over the last few quarters, banks have been walking a tightrope, and this quarter shows why.
If you're betting on a bank, you're basically betting that it'll keep giving out more loans and making money on them. That's the simplest way to gauge whether a bank is growing, check how much new credit it's disbursing. And that number is not great.
Credit growth across the entire banking system has been steadily slowing for several quarters now. In Q1FY26, overall loan growth came in at just 8.9% YoY. Private sector banks grew slow at 8.1%, while public sector banks were surprisingly stronger at 11%.
Why the divergence? Public banks went all-in on priority sector lending, MSMEs, agriculture, rural loans, sectors that often find it hard to get credit in recession-like situations. These are sectors the government often nudges PSBs to support.
Private banks, on the other hand, stayed cautious on these sectors. They focused on protecting margins rather than chasing loan volume. So PSBs played the volume game, while PVBs played the margin game.
A big part of the slowdown is because large industries aren't borrowing. India's private sector has not been spending a lot on capital expenditure. Lending for large infrastructure projects has been cooling too. Big companies are either flush with cash or hitting the bond market directly.
But while large borrowers are pulling back, MSMEs seem to be stepping up. There's a visible shift toward lending to small and medium enterprises, thanks to government push, formalisation efforts, and credit guarantee schemes like ECLGS and CGTMSE.
However, there's a nuance in this trend, lending to MSMEs may have increased in value, but decreased in volume. That is, only the bigger MSMEs may be getting large-ticket loans, while smaller SMEs are starved for credit.
Another drag on banks' growth has been unsecured personal loans, loans offered without taking any collateral. Credit cards, personal loans, vehicle loans, all are showing signs of a cool-off. It's more about banks pulling back after a rise in loan stress.
Let's talk specific banks. HDFC Bank saw corporate loans remain flat, retail loans recorded just single-digit growth of 8%. The only real, double-digit growth came from small and medium businesses, which is still a small part of the book.
ICICI Bank's story doesn't change much. Corporate and retail growth was tepid, but SME-focused "business banking" grew 30% YoY. Kotak is a bit of an outlier, its consumer banking book grew 16%, total advances rose 14%, much faster than industry average.
If slowing credit growth wasn't enough, banks are now hurting with shrinking margins. Net Interest Margin for the entire system dropped to 3.24%, the lowest in at least two to three years. Why are margins falling? The answer is pretty intuitive.
Earlier this year, the RBI cut repo rates by a full 1%. Most loans today are linked to external benchmarks like the repo. That means banks were forced to lower lending rates almost immediately. But here's the catch, deposit rates didn't fall as fast.
So banks were still paying depositors almost the same high rate, while earning a lot less from borrowers. A perfect recipe for margin compression. Public sector banks saw bigger margin drops compared to private banks because they're lending to lower-yielding priority sectors.
There's another reason margins are under pressure, CASA (Current Account Savings Account) ratios are falling. People have been moving money out of savings accounts into higher-return options like term deposits or mutual funds. Banks are now relying more on expensive sources of funds.
After all that bad news on credit growth and margins, you might wonder, banks would have reported depressing profit growth rates. Honestly, the results would have been even worse, had it not been for treasury gains.
In Q1FY26, treasury income acted like a floatie keeping banks above water. On average, treasury income made up 0.40% of total assets, up from just 0.16% a year ago. For public sector banks, treasury income more than doubled, for private banks, it nearly tripled.
This windfall came because bond yields dropped sharply, the 10-year yield fell 0.33% in the June quarter. But this kind of income isn't sustainable. The RBI has now moved from "cutting" mode to "liquidity absorption" mode, translation, bond yields may not fall further.
So should you still bet on banks? Look, banks didn't report a disaster this quarter, but that's exactly why this quarter is so important. It looks fine on the surface, but under the hood, there may be serious cracks. This is the kind of quarter that keeps you guessing.
We cover this and one more interesting story in today's edition of The Daily Brief. Watch on YouTube, read on Substack, or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
India's about to witness its largest-ever REIT IPO. Knowledge Realty Trust is raising ₹4,800 crore from the public — making it the third-largest IPO of any asset class this year, ahead even of NSDL. But here's what makes REITs completely different creatures from regular stocks.🧵👇
A REIT gives investors a way to invest in big-ticket real estate without buying buildings or worrying about tenants ghosting on rent. Think mutual fund, but instead of pooling money for stocks, you're pooling money for real estate — office parks, malls, warehouses.
Here's the key difference: When you buy DLF stock, you're betting on their business — finding land, developing projects, selling at profit. You're taking on approval risks, execution risks, cash management, market timing. That's a lot of moving parts.
The diamond cartel might be dying. And the president of Botswana just pulled out a shovel.
He called De Beers “broke” and said, “maybe we should sell the diamonds ourselves.”
This is a head of state talking about a company his government literally co-owns.
And not just any company—De Beers, the world’s largest diamond company. The same company that once told the world: “A diamond is forever.”
For over a century, De Beers was the diamond cartel—controlling supply, setting prices, and calling the shots.
So when Botswana’s president announces that De Beers is broke, you pay attention.
But you might be wondering: what’s Botswana got to do with diamonds?
Nayara Energy, India's second-largest oil refinery, is in serious trouble. The Indo-Russian venture is caught in the crossfire of EU sanctions against Russia, and it's creating a cascade of problems that could reshape India's energy landscape.🧵👇
The crisis stems from Nayara's ownership structure. Back in 2017, debt-laden Essar sold its 98% stake in what was then Essar Oil to two entities - each getting 49.13%. One was Russia's Rosneft. The other was Kesani, jointly owned by Italian fund Maraterra and Russian fund UCP.
After the sale, Essar Oil became Nayara Energy. Today it owns a Gujarat refinery processing 20 million tonnes annually - that's 8% of India's refining capacity - plus 6,750 petrol pumps. But the Russian owners wanted out, struggling to repatriate profits due to sanctions.
There's a dark side to business news. Ever so often, the very people we trust to interpret the markets use their platforms for personal gain. They plant ideas, stir excitement, and cash in before anyone realizes what's happening.🧵👇
SEBI has trained its sights on a group of 'guest experts' on Zee Business. According to the regulator, these pundits were leaking their upcoming on-air stock recommendations before broadcast, letting certain shady operators make money through well-timed trades.
SEBI's recent order zeroed in on stock tips from guest experts featured on Zee Business between February and December 2022, and a series of suspicious trades that would follow. The regulator broke down the players into three distinct roles.
Tata Communications has received a ₹7,827 crore demand notice from the Department of Telecommunications for unpaid AGR dues. But here's what's puzzling: they don't sell SIM cards or prepaid plans. So why is a non-mobile operator caught in this telecom mess?🧵👇
To understand this, we need to go back to when Tata Communications wasn't even a Tata company. It started as VSNL (Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited) in the late 1980s - a government telecom giant with one specific job: handling India's international calls.
In the 1990s, if you made an overseas call from India, it probably went through VSNL. The company held a monopoly over India's international long-distance gateways - it was literally the only bridge between India and the world for telecom traffic.
India is about to witness a significant transformation in how electricity is bought and sold. Starting January 2026, electricity trading will see 'market coupling' - creating a single price across exchanges and ensuring buyers and sellers get the best possible prices.🧵👇
Most of India's electricity runs on rigid 10-25 year Power Purchase Agreements between generators and distribution companies. But there's also a short-term market operating like a regular market based on supply and demand - accounting for 15% of all electricity consumed.
This spot market represents 8% of total consumption - about 143 billion units worth thousands of crores in trading value. Without exchanges, buyers and sellers would have to hunt urgently for counterparties with no reference point for good pricing.