Post

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Aug 8, 2025 • 17 tweets • 10 min read • Read on X

Scrolly

BREAKING: Another COVID “conspiracy theory” just came true.

A Special HHS Adviser confirmed it, and you could see the pain written all over his face.

This explains why RFK Jr. effectively shut down all mRNA vaccine funding.

🧵 THREAD

HHS Secretary RFK Jr. dropped a mega bombshell on Tuesday when he announced that BARDA will be CANCELING 22 mRNA vaccine development contracts, saving taxpayers about $500 million in the process.

He declared, “mRNA technology poses MORE risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.”

Now, we have a clearer picture as to why he made that bold statement.

Thursday, on Steve Bannon’s War Room, HHS Special Adviser Dr. Steven Hatfill revealed that RFK Jr. pulled mRNA funding after the data showed getting vaccinated was MORE dangerous than COVID itself.

In other words, the “cure” was WORSE than the disease.

Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”

He explained that when meta-analyses were conducted, the results would consistently show “NO BENEFIT TO RISK RATIO for taking a messenger RNA vaccine.”

Dr. Hatfill added that the shots send a “sudden flood” of mRNA into the body, which overwhelms the cells and creates “BIOLOGICAL HAVOC.”

With pain written all over his face, he concluded, “IT HAD TO BE STOPPED.”

No one says something that grave unless the data is absolutely damning.

In another series of explosive statements, Dr. Hatfill attested that the vaccine manufacturers never did their due diligence to ensure their shots were safe and “essentially ran the pandemic response.”

“Nobody stood up to them. Nobody questioned them… Pfizer wanted a [75]-year moratorium on the clinical trial data, which from the start showed these never prevented infection or disease transmission,” he explained, adding, “There’s no good clinical data to ever show it reduced the severity of disease.”

“The vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and we’re not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount,” Dr. Hatfill lamented.

“They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

Dr. Hatfill’s statements are backed up by damning study after study.

In 2022, the same year Dr. Hatfill said the data began piling up, Joseph Fraiman and colleagues published a reanalysis of the Pfizer and Moderna trials, showing that the number of serious post-vaccine adverse events far EXCEEDED the number of hospitalizations prevented.

Pfizer trial:

• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 10.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated compared to placebo.

• Hospitalizations prevented: 2.3 per 10,000.

Moderna trial:

• Adverse Events of Special Interest: 15.1 extra cases per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo.

• Hospitalizations prevented: 6.4 per 10,000

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36055877/reana…

In fact, Fraiman and colleagues published another study showing that in order to prevent one COVID‑19 hospitalization over a 6‑month period among young adults (18-29), over 30,000 of them would need to receive a third (booster) mRNA dose.

For each hospitalization prevented, the analysis estimated that at least 18.5 serious adverse events would occur.

jme.bmj.com/content/50/2/1…

But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

I turned to epidemiologist @NicHulscher, who lives and breathes this research.

He’s been digging into the data non-stop and basically knows the numbers by heart.

I’ll let him break down the receipts that back up Dr. Hatfill’s claims:

Senior HHS Advisor Dr. Steven Hatfill just said mRNA shots induce “BIOCHEMICAL HAVOC.”

He’s likely referring to the new study that found mRNA shots induce severe, long-lasting genetic disruption linked to cancer and chronic disease.

Using high-resolution RNA sequencing on blood samples, they discovered that COVID-19 “vaccines” SEVERELY disrupt expression of THOUSANDS of genes—triggering mitochondrial failure, immune reprogramming, and oncogenic activation that can persist for MONTHS to YEARS post-injection.

Differential gene expression analysis compared mRNA-injured patients (cancer, adverse events) to 803 healthy controls — revealing widespread transcriptomic CHAOS.

preprints.org/manuscript/202…

Dr. Hatfill said the data had accumulated to the point where large studies could be conducted. He’s right. The two LARGEST COVID-19 “vaccine” safety studies in HISTORY—covering 184 MILLION people—prove mRNA shots are NOT SAFE for human use.

📍 Faksova et al. (n=99M) (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38350768/)

➊ Myocarditis +510% (dose 2)

➋ Brain/Spinal Cord Inflammation +278% (dose 1)

➌ Brain Clots +223% (dose 1)

➍ Guillain-Barré +149% (dose 1)

📍 Karimi et al. (n=85M) (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11…)

➊ Heart Attack +286% (dose 2)

➋ Stroke +240% (dose 1)

➌ Coronary Artery Disease +244% (dose 2)

➍ Cardiac Arrhythmia +199% (dose 1)

Dr. Hatfill said, “It was more dangerous to take a vaccine than it was to contract COVID-19 and be hospitalized with it.”

Nearly 1,000 peer-reviewed references across 3 landmark studies (1, 2, 3) by Mead et al. PROVE the catastrophic risks of the COVID-19 “vaccines” FAR outweigh their imaginary, theoretical benefits:

🔻 The shots didn’t save lives — they caused catastrophic harm

Autopsy evidence, reanalyzed trial data & real-world outcomes show no mortality benefit. Early treatment saved lives — not rushed genetic injections.

🔻 The risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits

Central conclusion of all 3 papers: catastrophic harm across multiple systems makes the current risk-benefit calculus indefensible.

🔻 Massive injury: heart, brain, immune system, fertility, cancer

Harms include myocarditis, strokes, immunosuppression, infertility & aggressive tumor progression — driven by spike toxicity, LNP biodistribution & genetic contamination.

🔻 Urgent call for a global moratorium

All modRNA products must be withdrawn immediately, given the scale of harm.

With HHS finally beginning its offensive against deadly mRNA injections, one objective remains: IMMEDIATE MARKET WITHDRAWAL.

A MAJOR peer-reviewed study identified FIVE irrefutable grounds for the immediate market withdrawal of COVID-19 “vaccines”:

📢Widespread & Unified Calls for Market Withdrawal – More than 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 public health & physician organizations, 2 State Republican Parties, 17 GOP County Committees, and 6 global studies demand immediate removal.

⚰️ Excess Mortality – More than 12 studies and VAERS confirm mass COVID-19 'vaccination' led to a catastrophic number deaths -- up to 17 million.

⚠️ FDA Class I Recall Indicated – 37,544 VAERS-reported deaths exceed past vaccine recall limits by up to 375,340%.

📉 Negative Efficacy – 7 studies have demonstrated that COVID-19 'vaccination' increases your risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

🧬 DNA Contamination – 11 reports have found DNA contamination in COVID-19 vaccines, documented across multiple manufacturers, vaccine platforms, and geographic regions, with levels exceeding regulatory thresholds by up to 65,500%.

publichealthpolicyjournal.com/review-of-call…

Nic is right. Immediate market withdrawal is needed. It’s completely unethical to have a “vaccine” on the market that is not only ineffective, but MORE dangerous than the disease it is supposed to protect against.

Kennedy effectively canceled future mRNA vaccines by pulling the plug on government funding. The next logical step is to yank the shots. It will come with political backlash, but it’s the right thing to do.

As Dr. Hatfill said, “They [mRNA vaccine technology] had to come off the market. There was no choice. You want to make America healthy again? It had to be stopped.”

@NicHulscher Thanks for reading!

Huge thanks to @NicHulscher for teaming up with me on this piece. No one breaks down the data like he does.

If you’re not already following him, you’re missing one of the very best COVID truth accounts out there.

—> @NicHulscher

@NicHulscher Would you like to see more threads like this one, where I break down the videos and @NicHulscher backs it up with the raw data?

Maybe we could turn it into a semi-regular thing.

A little bit about me: I spent over a decade working as a licensed healthcare professional. But when the Biden administration rolled out its vaccine mandates, I couldn’t stay silent. My conscience simply wouldn’t let me.

That’s when I started this page.

Since then, I’ve shared thousands of clips featuring doctors and scientists who were brave enough to question the official COVID narrative.

Along the way, we’ve reached billions of views and helped millions of people understand the other side of the COVID story that the government didn’t want out.

If you’re looking for clear, honest information without corporate spin, you’re in the right place. Follow me for straight-to-the-point clips and threads that challenge the narrative.

Follow on 𝕏: @VigilantFox

@NicHulscher I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for sharing dangerous “COVID misinformation.”

Turns out, my reporting was true.

Sign up for my newsletter to see what other “conspiracy theories” come true next.

GET MY NEWS ALERTS HERE: .vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 19

In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.

Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.

The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.

When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”

Here’s what the study revealed:

• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.

• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).

• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.

• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.

• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.

• 4.5 times more speech disorders.

• Three times more developmental delays.

• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.

• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.

The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”

When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.

How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?

An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.

And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.

Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.

If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?

Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵

The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.

Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.

But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.

Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.

They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.

Clearly that has real value.

The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.

Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?

Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?

That shift changes everything.

Read 31 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 17

The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”

“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.

“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”

But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.

In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.

“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵

Something strange has happened in modern medicine.

For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.

But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?

What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?

When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.

But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.

Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.

Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.

But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.

Romantic partners feel distant.

Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.

Emotional warmth is harder to find.

And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.

This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.

For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.

Read 26 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 16

Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.

A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.

Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.

What happened?

His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.

ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”

“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”

“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”

“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”

“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”

“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”

“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”

“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”

“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”

“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”

Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.

But his mother attests it was the DMSO.

The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵

Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.

A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.

It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.

It acts more like a cellular reset.

And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-hea…

Read 25 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 15

It’s hard to believe this ever made TV news.

But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”

“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”

“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.

The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”

Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.

And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵

Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.

When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.

Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.

But it is.

What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.

Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.

Take a moment to let that really sink in.

In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.

Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.

That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

The most powerful healing molecule you’ve never heard of can cure common ailments faster than anything Big Pharma ever made.

It’s great for:
• Chronic pain
• Burns
• Sinus infections and more.

You’d think something this potent would cost thousands, but it only costs about $20 online.

Like ivermectin, this forbidden remedy belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-mixture…

DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) penetrates the body like nothing else. It passes through biological membranes without damaging them.

Once applied, it spreads everywhere. Depending on how you use it, it can deliver vitamins, herbs, or painkillers right where they’re needed.

It’s literally medicine’s missing transport system.

Read 29 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 13

We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.

We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.

Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.

And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.

The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.

We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.

Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.

So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.

The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.

The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.

Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.

Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.

The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.

The website also highlights:

• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.

• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.

• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.

• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.

• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.

• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.

•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.

This is where things start to look overwhelming.

According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.