The Alaska “Trump–Putin meeting” rumor didn’t just appear.

It grew, split, and thickened into a fog.

That fog isn’t an accident. It's an ops.

In 1972, Ladislav Bittman — a Czech intelligence officer turned defector — wrote the manual for this kind of operation. Image
Source: The Deception Game (1972) — archive.org/details/decept…Image
Bittman defined disinformation as:

“…conceals its origin and aims to mislead… providing information — partly or wholly false — which will lead the target to conclusions desired by the originator.” (p. 49)

Not propaganda. Not random lying.

The "art of controlled distortion".
The philosophy boiled down to 7 principles:

1. Disinformation ≠ propaganda (p. 49)

2. Make the target “discover” your conclusion (p. 52)

3. Use it as a strategic state tool (p. 51)
4. Mix truth with falsehood (p. 49)

5. Conceal the origin (p. 49)

6. Plan, organize, evaluate (p. 51)

7. Embed over years until accepted as fact (p. 176)
Alaska case, Aug 8, 2025:

– “Trump to Meet Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15” — Alaska Public Media
– “Trump announces Aug. 15 meet-up… warns of land swap” — Al Jazeera

A vague launch paired with a provocative twist.

Principles: Mix truth with falsehood, Conceal origin.
Aug 9: the contradictions arrive.

– “Zelensky rejects any land cession” — Reuters
– “Trump envoy Witkoff misunderstood Putin’s demands” — Pravda UA (via Bild)

Principles: Plausibility from truth, Self-derived conclusion — the audience fills gaps on their own.
Aug 10: the fog peaks.

– “Russia cheers Alaska invite, no concessions” — Washington Post
– “Ukraine warns against being sidelined” — Time
– “Zelensky invitation ‘absolutely possible’” — Bild
– “Alaska governor praises strategic fit” — Newsweek

Principle: Strategic state tool — multiple narratives for multiple audiences.
Bittman’s point:

Contradictions aren’t mistakes — they’re fuel.

Every “clarification” resets the story clock.

Your attention is locked in, chasing the next version.

That’s planning, organization, evaluation in action.
And if it runs long enough?

“…the original fabrication becomes encrusted with so many layers of apparent confirmation that it is eventually accepted as an unquestionable fact.” (p. 176)

That’s when it moves into your mental furniture.

Living in your head.
Fog is the battlefield.

When we treat every version of the Alaska story as a new thing to solve, we help it live longer.

The point isn’t for you to know the truth.

The point is for you to live in the churn.
Sources:
The Deception Game —

Headlines: Alaska Public Media, Al Jazeera, Reuters, Pravda UA/Bild, Washington Post, Time, Newsweek.

#Disinformation #Trump #Putin #Ukraine #Alaskaarchive.org/details/decept…
Bittman’s playbook assumes you’re navigating by landmarks that can be moved.

A meeting date here.

A denial there.

An “absolutely possible” invitation the next day.

Every shift forces you to reorient — until you’re lost.
If you hold no fixed reference, you chase the churn.

If you do hold one, the fog looks different.

Example: “Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.”

Under that compass, every version of the Alaska story gets the same verdict when Ukraine’s absent — noise, not news.
That’s the part most people miss: the best defense isn’t finding “the real version” — it’s refusing to navigate on terms the fog provides.

Bittman knew the map could be rigged.

The way out is to bring your own.

Values matter more than you think.
“Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.”

So say we all #NAFO Image
To further support my point👇🙄 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦

Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴🇩🇪🇺🇲🇳🇱🇪🇺@🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DucuGavril

Aug 9
Do you have children? Grandchildren? Nieces? Nephews? Anyone under 10?

I do.

And here’s my argued warning of why you are—right now—helping kill them.

Not with your hands, but by falling for the deadliest weapon in the world today. Image
That weapon isn’t nuclear—it’s cognitive warfare.

It makes you cheer policies that will send the next generation to die.

You won’t see the manipulation.

You’ll call it “common sense” until the draft notice has their name.
Read 27 tweets
Aug 4
No, Russia didn’t hack voting machines in 2016.

It hacked something bigger—your perception.

This thread answers real questions, using only the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee’s 2019 report.

Recognize this building? No?

You should. It got us Trump.

Let’s clear this up: Image
Here’s what people still ask:

• How early did Russia start?
• What exactly did they do?
• Who were they pretending to be?
• Was it about electing Trump—or something else?
• How did they get so much reach?
Can we answer all of that? Sure we can...

But first, the source:

In 2019, the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report titled:

“Russia’s Use of Social Media” (Vol. 2)

Full PDF:
intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/…Image
Read 21 tweets
Aug 3
What you’re seeing today—disinformation, institutional decay, narrative collapse—isn’t new.

It’s the continuation of a strategy launched over a century ago.

Russia’s war on democracy didn’t start with Putin.

It started with the Tsars. Image
Since the early 1900s, Russian regimes have used the same method:

Undermine trust in liberal democracy
Exploit internal divisions
Flood the public square with lies, half-truths, and confusion

Different leaders. Same doctrine.
This isn’t collapse. It’s design.

And the sooner we understand the structure, the sooner we can resist it.

This is the history of that structure.
Read 23 tweets
Aug 1
Democracy doesn’t defend itself.

You have to do it.

Because the biggest threat today isn’t tanks or coups.

It’s percepticide and perspecticide—destroying what people see and what they believe is possible.

If you lose that, you’ve already lost the system. Image
Percepticide is the collapse of shared perception.

When reality fractures—thanks to disinformation, propaganda, and polarization—democracy can’t function.

People no longer agree on facts, on trust, or even on whether voting matters.
Perspecticide is the loss of moral and political imagination.

People stop believing things can be better.

They internalize domination, feel powerless, and surrender to strongmen who promise order.
Read 25 tweets
Aug 1
What if democratic decline isn’t just internal collapse—but a front in a hybrid war?

Autocracies like Russia and China have spent decades weakening democracies from within—without firing a shot.

To defend democracy, we first have to understand how it fails. Image
Today, democracies aren’t falling through coups. They’re eroding quietly.

Through legal changes, captured courts, corrupted discourse, and social fragmentation.

This isn’t dysfunction. It’s a tactic—weaponized by foreign and domestic actors alike.
To understand this process, look at the work of political scientist Johannes Gerschewski.

His research explains how autocracies endure, how democracies unravel, and what can be done to resist decline.

His models clarify what we're living through now.
Read 32 tweets
Jul 30
Everyone talks about Palestine like it’s just Israel vs. the Palestinians, with the West holding all the cards.

But here’s what few in the West understand:

Arab regimes—and former Soviet allies—have often blocked or undermined a Palestinian state.

But why and how? Image
In 1947, the UN proposed a two-state solution: one Jewish, one Arab.

Arab states rejected it.

Not just the Jewish state—they didn’t want an independent Palestinian state either.

They wanted the land divided among themselves.

📎 UN Res. 181 | Rubin (MERIA 1998)
After Israel’s creation in 1948:

Jordan annexed the West Bank (1950)

Egypt controlled Gaza

But no Arab state created a Palestinian state.

The “All-Palestine Government” in Gaza was blocked by Jordan and dissolved by 1959.

📎 Rubin, Palestine Studies
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(