Tatarigami_UA Profile picture
Aug 12 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Please refer to my note from four days ago - this is critical. In both 2014 and 2015, Russia launched major offensives ahead of negotiations to gain leverage. The current situation is serious, but far from the collapse some suggest. So, what is actually happening on the ground? Image
2/ A collapse, in military terms, means a loss of command and control, a breakdown in battlefield awareness, and an inability to regroup, withdraw in an organized fashion, or coordinate with units. To the best of my knowledge, none of these conditions are currently present.
3/ The situation more closely resembles events of May 2024, when Russian forces slipped through unprepared Ukrainian defenses along the border and advanced nearly 10 kilometers. That incursion was eventually contained and remained a localized pocket.
4/ At this moment, there is insufficient information to determine whether Ukrainian forces have the resources to contain Russian forces. The Russian grouping assembled in the Pokrovsk direction reportedly numbers more than 100,000 troops, raising the risk of further expansion.
5/ The sequence is simple: identify a weak point in the enemy’s defenses, penetrate it, widen the breach, and then deploy exploitation forces into the operational space to achieve operational goals via manoeuvre. Currently, the Russians have located and penetrated a weak point.
6/ They must still expand the breach and commit their exploitation forces. Only then would this qualify as an operational breakthrough and, if subsequent manoeuvres succeed and evolve into a collapse of defences, resulting in chaos and loss of unit cohesion.
7/ To summarize, the situation could undeniably deteriorate to a catastrophic level, with far worse consequences, a plausible scenario given the lead-up to negotiations. That said, we are not there yet, and the coming days will show whether this penetration can be contained.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tatarigami_UA

Tatarigami_UA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tatarigami_UA

Aug 11
A few more notes on Pokrovsk. Penetrations and developing envelopments rarely begin with a local commander’s decision. They stem from deeper problems on strategic level - starting with a shortage of manpower, itself the result of ineffective recruitment and a lack of trust:
2/ If units are only 25% manned but spread out as if they were fully staffed, and if there aren’t enough drones or trained pilots, then blaming a battalion or brigade commander is nothing more than scapegoating.
3/ Holding drills near the border or front lines under enemy drone surveillance, resulting in missile strikes, digging trenches in open fields, and similar acts of negligence all erode trust in leadership and, ultimately, weaken mobilization.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 11
Desertions, AWOLs, manpower shortages, and recruitment struggles are often linked to the Ukrainian army. And rightly so - I’ve spoken about these issues at length. But the situation on the Russian side is also worsening. This issue deserves wider attention, so here’s a 🧵thread:
2/ First, while Russia continues to receive a steady flow of recruits, only a part of them can be considered true volunteers. What’s actually happening is a form of hidden mobilization that has not only persisted but accelerated in recent months. Let's talk about it in detail
3/ In the past, Russia resorted to recruiting prisoners to get more people. That approach has shifted. Now, individuals arrested on suspicion of various crimes are offered the chance to sign a contract with the MoD on the spot - often as a way to avoid criminal investigation.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 11
As Moscow tries to spotlight Ukraine’s recruitment issues, the Kremlin is taking unprecedented steps to fill its own ranks. Here are key developments from the past two weeks:

1/ Russia’s electronic draft registry and Unified Military Register are now live and ramping up activity
2/ The Ministry of Defense has begun notifying residents of Perm of their inclusion in the Unified Military Register. Similar notices had previously been reported by residents of Saint Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Tyumen, Chuvashia and the Kaluga region.
3/ According to the “Idite Lesom” project, a Tver region resident eligible for conscription received two notifications: a draft notice to show up at the military enlistment office, and message confirming a deadline and restrictions, including a travel ban.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 10
A month ago, I wrote that the situation in Pokrovsk had become critical - for the second time since 2024. This time, however, our forces have been unable to stabilize the front. The loss of Pokrovsk is a matter of time, though claims that Russians have breakthrough are inaccurate
2/ The recent incursions by small Russian units deeper beyond Pokrovsk are largely the result of porous defenses, which allow limited infiltration but do not enable these forces to establish meaningful control over the area. At least for now
3/ The situation is developing unfavorably, but it is not unexpected. Russian forces have concentrated their largest grouping of troops along the Pokrovsk front and retain sufficient resources to sustain an intense offensive.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 9
This map, created by analyst and mapper Clément Molin, shows a network of visible, (some are concealed and not mapped), fortifications stretching to the edges of Donetsk Oblast. Ukraine is unlikely to give this up without a fight, in exchange for promises broken in the past. Image
2/ I believe there is room for compromise from both sides that could lead to some form of agreement. However, any deal in which Ukraine gives up territory in exchange for promises would be one-sided, worsening Ukraine’s position while solely improving Russia’s
3/ A final peace deal would almost certainly leave both sides dissatisfied. As I have written before, the reality on the ground is that neither side can fully achieve its goals in the near term. Our Constitution prohibits the de jure cession of territory without a referendum
Read 4 tweets
Aug 9
Sternenko’s fund regularly raises money for Shahed interceptor drones, costing about $2,100 each. With $50 million, over 23,800 drones could be delivered: a low-cost production with high potential impact. Yet EU bureaucracy and short-sightedness remain major obstacles:
2/ Whether it’s small-drone production, interceptors, or UGVs, Ukraine has the industrial capacity, expertise, and experience. The main bottleneck is funding. Often, Europe tries to help Ukraine while also addressing its own needs, such as building new factories on EU soil
3/ That’s not wrong in itself, but it takes time. Ukraine doesn’t have 3 - 5 years to wait for new production to reach the necessary scale under the “help Ukraine” banner. I’ve supported such projects because they should be mutually beneficial. But they can’t be exhaustive
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(