Live Law Profile picture
Aug 12 7 tweets 2 min read Read on X
#SupremeCourt hears writ petition filed by 'Foundation for Independent Journalism' (a non-profit which runs #TheWire) and The Wire's Founding Editor Siddharth Varadarajan challenging Section 152 of BNS (which is stated to have brough back the #sedition law)

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya BagchiImage
Sr Adv Nitya Ramakrishnan (for petitioners): This Court recently passed an order issuing notice on another petition challenging S.152...the new provision is vague but same in effect

J Bagchi: Is the potentiality of abuse a ground to declare a law unconstitutional? Show us an authority on that. There's difference between implementation and power to legislate

Ramakrishnan: Vagueness is an accepted ground

Court: There has to be a clear threat to national sovereignty, otherwise section is not attracted

Nityakrishnan: S. 152 a sheer expression without anything more.
J Kant: How can it be statically defined that what will be an act of endangering sovereignty? For instance, one can argue that political dissent can't endanger sovereignty...Inviting legislature to define 'endangering sovereignty' is a big danger

SG Tushar Mehta highlights that now there is a new explanation

J Kant: So now there's a negative explanation

#SupremeCourt #Sedition
Nityakrishnan: There's a proneness to misuse...targeting of media, the chilling effect

J Kant: Any provision in penal law can be misused...

Nityakrishnan: Present case, where I am seeking interim orders, is an example of misuse. Media people picked up...

#SupremeCourt #Sedition
SG: While referring to Constitution Bench, this court has observed that if fresh case is registered under S.124A IPC, aggrieved person can approach...merely because vires is challenged, it can't be used as anticipatory bail plea...

J Kant: Where someone has written an article, normally when media people are entangled...they would organize a programme, write an article...basically these are matters where you don't require custodial interrogation

#SupremeCourt #Sedition
SG: Anticipatory bail should be granted by which court? Should we classify media people as a separate class?

J Bagchi: That's not what is being sought. it's about balancing fundamental right to free speech with protection of public order

SG opposes interim relief.

#SupremeCourt #Sedition
Order: Issue notice. Tag with...Meanwhile, the members of petitioner-foundation and petitioner No.2 (The Wire Founding Editor-Siddharth Varadarajan) against whom FIR No.181/2025 has been registered on 11.07.2025 at PS Mori Gaon, Assam u/s 152, etc. of BNS may join investigation as and when required however no coercive action shall be taken against them.

#SupremeCourt #Sedition

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Live Law

Live Law Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LiveLawIndia

Aug 12
#SupremeCourt hears matter where the Court ordered that any application filed before any court seeking default bail on the basis of Ritu Chhabaria judgment should be deferred Image
SG : one Mr X files 32 petition saying husband is in jail allow me send home cooked food, then chabaria also says my husband is also in jail, therefore tag the matter, the issue in both is whether homecooked food be allowed
SG: this gets dismissed, he files an application- chargesheet is pending, the DB takes the view that once you file chargesheet even with 170(a), he will get default bail .....all over India people began filing default bail application- incomplete chargesheet entitled me for default bail
Read 12 tweets
Aug 12
#SupremeCourt to hear today petitions challenging the Election Commission of India’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in #Bihar.

Bench : Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Baghci.

Follow this thread for live updates.

#ElectionCommissionOfIndia #BiharSIR2025 Image
On July 28, the Court had refused to stop ECI from publishing draft electoral rolls for Bihar on August 1

On this date, Justice Kant said that ECI was merely scheduled to publish a "draft" list and that the Court can ultimately strike down the entire process if any illegality is found

The bench orally told ECI to consider at least the statutory documents of Aadhaar and EPIC

Justice Kant impressed upon ECI that instead of "en masse exclusion", there should be, "en masse inclusion"

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
On July 29, responding to the apprehensions that 65 lakh voters are going to be excluded from the draft list to be published by ECI, the Court orally said that if there is any mass exclusion, then it will step in.

#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR
Read 46 tweets
Aug 11
Former Chief Justice of India Justice Sanjiv Khanna to shortly deliver a lecture on "Judiciary and Media: Shared Principles-Similarities and Dissimilarities" at the Prem Bhatia Journalism Awards and Memorial Lecture organised by the Editors Guild of India. Image
Lecture begins.

J Khanna: Our institutions do not often share a platform. However we carry the same calling - a calling to act as a watchdog institution in the service of the common citizen. In essence we are both truth seekers though we follow different paths.
J Khanna: 75 years after India's independence the question isn't whether we have the freedom of thought and expression. The question is whether the freedom has grown more inclusive and more resilient. Has it widened its arc to accommodate new voices, deeper dissent, involving discourse. Has it responded meaningfully to the demand of the present day?
Read 45 tweets
Aug 11
#SupremeCourt hears Indian Medical Association's plea concerning misleading claims and advertisements against "Allopathic" medicine.

Bench: Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice KV Vishwanathan. Image
In March, the Court passed various directions to State governments for effective implementation of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954

livelaw.in/top-stories/mi…
J Nagarathna: now the original grievance has been addressed. So we will close the petition.

Advocate Archana Pathak Dave: I am seeking vacation of stay on omission of Rule 170.
livelaw.in/top-stories/su…
Read 15 tweets
Aug 11
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear petition filed by ex-Chhattisgarh CM #BhupeshBaghel challenging Sections 44, 50 and 63 of #PMLA and seeking interim reliefs in 5 cases being pursued by probe agencies in the state (including the Liquor 'Scam' case)

Bench: Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya BagchiImage
Hearing begins

Sr Adv Kapil Sibal (for Baghel): This pertains to Section 44 PMLA...apart from s.44, no other provision allows further investigation by ED officers...an explanation can't be the source of ED's power

ASG Raju appearing for respondent-authorities.

#SupremeCourt #BhupeshBaghel
Sibal: in practice, ED is filing subsequent complaints every few months before trial...that's why trials are not taking place...not because of us. Do they have the power to do that?

J Kant: Further investigation power is also beneficial to accused

Sibal: their practice vitiates purpose of the section

J Kant: object of power is not for unauthorized action. If it's exercised strictly...

#SupremeCourt #BhupeshBaghel
Read 7 tweets
Aug 11
#SupremeCourt hears the Suo Motu contempt proceedings initiated against the petitioner, the AOR and lawyers who filed a transfer petition in SC having 'scurrilous and scandalous' remarks against a sitting Telangana High Court Judge Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya Image
Counsel tender unconditional apology
CJI: we had dismissed the petition, however while dismissing the petition , we took note of the scurrilous remarks against the HC judge and issued notice to the AOR, lawyers . The CB of this court nagpur and other reported in 1954 noted
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(