Arpit Gupta Profile picture
Aug 12 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Gita Banned, Bible Allowed - Equality or a Quiet Hypocrisy?

Read this Article :

A Scene That Shouldn’t Exist

Picture this.
In a government school classroom, the teacher announces:

“From now on, Bhagavad Gita lessons will no longer be part of the syllabus.”

Some students look confused. Some don’t care.
But a few hours later, in the same building, another class begins - Moral Science.
Here, the students read out verses from the Bible.
The teacher explains their meaning, encourages discussion, and praises the moral lessons inside.

You stand outside that classroom, eyebrows raised.
The question bursts in your mind:
Why is one scripture banned in the name of secularism, while another is welcomed as moral education?
The Gita - More Than a Hindu Scripture

Before we go further, let’s clear one myth.
The Bhagavad Gita is not a book of blind rituals or sectarian preaching.
It is a philosophical dialogue - 700 verses of pure guidance for life, spoken on the battlefield of Kurukshetra between Krishna and Arjuna.

It doesn’t tell you which god to worship - it tells you how to live.
It speaks of:
- Doing your duty even when you feel weak.
- Facing failure without losing yourself.
- Making decisions when morality and pressure clash.
- Rising above ego, fear, and selfishness.

Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, and even Western thinkers like Aldous Huxley found personal strength in it.
Yet today, in some Indian schools, the Gita is labelled “religious” and removed from the syllabus.
Bible in Schools - The Different Treatment

Now, compare this to the Bible’s presence in many schools - especially in missionary institutions and even some private schools with a Christian ethos.

Here, Bible readings are often part of:
- Morning assemblies
- Moral science classes
- Special festive programs

For non-Christian students, it is usually framed as “moral lessons” or “character building” - not as religious preaching.
And most parents accept it, even if they follow other faiths, because it is taught in a general, value-oriented way.

Here’s the contradiction:
If Bible verses can be seen as “universal moral guidance” in schools, then why can’t the Gita’s verses be treated the same way?
If one can inspire without “converting”, why is the other accused of “communal influence”?
Where the Bias Comes From

This double standard isn’t an accident. It’s a result of three deep-rooted issues:

1. Colonial Hangover

During British rule, Indian knowledge systems were downgraded as “myths” or “superstitions”, while Western religious and philosophical works were seen as “education”.
That mentality never completely left the system - it’s still in parts of our education policy and bureaucracy.

2. Fear of Offence

Schools and politicians fear being labelled “majoritarian” or “communal” if they promote anything connected to Hindu culture.
Ironically, promoting minority religious texts doesn’t trigger the same political panic.

3. Misinterpretation of Secularism

India’s Constitution says all religions are equal in the eyes of the state.
But in practice, secularism is often twisted into:

“Avoid majority culture, showcase minority culture - that way, no one can accuse us of bias.”
Which, ironically, is bias.
The Real Loss - Students Pay the Price

This selective approach doesn’t just create unfairness - it robs students of valuable learning.

Without the Gita, students miss out on:
- Mental Strength Training: Arjuna’s fear and self-doubt mirror what students feel before exams, competitions, or life decisions.
- Clarity in Chaos: Krishna’s calm logic teaches how to think clearly under pressure.
- Emotional Balance: Win without arrogance, lose without depression - a life skill no math textbook can teach.

Think about it - our youth are drowning in anxiety, depression, and confusion. And here we are, throwing away one of the most effective mental health guides ever written because someone might get “offended”
The Equality Test

If we truly believe in equality, then we must apply one simple rule:
- Either all sacred books are taught as literature/philosophy with focus on values,
- Or none are taught in schools.

What we cannot accept is this:
- Bible = Moral Education
- Gita = Religious Preaching

That is not secularism. That is selective morality - and it smells of hypocrisy.
The Bigger Cultural Question

A nation’s strength lies not just in its economy or military, but in how deeply its citizens understand their roots.
If tomorrow’s Indians can quote Shakespeare and Bible verses but hesitate when asked, “What did Krishna tell Arjuna?”, then we have failed as a society.

The Gita belongs to no single religion. It belongs to anyone who has ever felt lost, afraid, or stuck at a crossroads in life.
Banning it is not a win for secularism - it is a loss for humanity.
The Oxygen Analogy

If the Bible in a classroom is “guidance”, then the Gita is oxygen -
and no sane person bans oxygen.

It’s time to stop being afraid of our own heritage.
It’s time to teach our children all the world’s wisdom, including the one that was born right here.
Because if we keep cutting our roots, one day we will wake up and realise -
we are standing, but we are not grounded.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ag_arpit1

Aug 7
Twitter Suspends Sanatan Voices, But Lets Jihadi Trends Rise - Why This Silence?

Read this Article :

They say Twitter is a free platform.
A space for debate, for dialogue, for discussion.

But what kind of platform silences peaceful Sanatan voices,
while letting hashtags that openly threaten Hindus go viral?

What kind of “freedom” lets anonymous Jihadi accounts post death threats,
but flags Dharmic accounts for posting shlokas, facts, or history?

This article is not just about Twitter.
It’s about how digital spaces are being tilted, slowly, against one civilisation -
And most people don’t even realise it’s happening.

Let’s break it down point by point.
1. Sanatan accounts get shadowbanned for quoting scriptures.

Accounts posting Bhagavad Gita shlokas, historical facts about temple destruction, or even tweets like “Jai Shri Ram” have often reported sudden drops in reach.

No abuses. No hate. No crime.

Still - they get flagged.
Still - they get “sensitive content” warnings.
Still - their visibility dies without notice.

But what’s dangerous in saying “I’m proud to be Hindu”?
Since when did identity become hate?
2. Multiple Hindu creators have been suspended without clear reasons.

From spiritual teachers to political commentators - many accounts with Sanatan leanings have been deplatformed or silenced with vague excuses like “platform policy violation.”

But the same platforms allow openly abusive accounts to trend slogans like:
- “Sar tan se juda”
- “Gustakh-e-Nabi ki ek saza”

And when reported, these are often marked:

“No violation found.”

Why this double standard?
Read 12 tweets
Aug 7
Karma becomes a joke in Western media - Why are Indians still silent?

#longthread 🧵

They turned “Karma” into a meme.
A joke. A punchline. A sarcastic emoji.
And we? We didn’t correct them.
We laughed. Reposted. Used it in reels.

In Hollywood movies, Karma is revenge.
In songs, Karma is betrayal.
In gossip shows, Karma is mockery.

But Karma is none of these.

It’s not just a word. It’s Sanatan Dharma’s spiritual spine.
It’s the law of justice, energy, and rebirth.

If we let them twist it,
one day our children will laugh at it too -
without ever knowing what it truly meant.

This thread is not about outrage.
It’s about awakening.👇
1. Karma is not punishment. It is purification.

Western media shows Karma as a slap from the universe.
Someone cheats - they get hurt. Someone lies - they fall.
“Karma,” they say, with a smirk.

But Sanatan never taught revenge.
Karma is the law of self-correction.
It’s not meant to hurt, but to heal your soul.

In every life, your soul is trying to reach truth.
When you hurt others, you delay your own growth.
When you act with compassion, you move closer to moksha.

Karma is not a force that punishes.
It’s a light that purifies.

They made it about “getting what you deserve.”
We know it’s about “becoming what you’re meant to be.”
2. Karma is not about revenge. It is about inner responsibility.

In the West, they show Karma like it’s a hitman.
“You did this, now the universe will hit back.”
But Sanatan Dharma teaches something much deeper -
You are not being punished, you are simply living out your own vibrations.

Every act you do, consciously or unconsciously, shapes your next step.
Karma doesn’t come to ‘teach you a lesson’ - it comes to help you remember your path.
It doesn’t harm. It humbles.
It doesn’t attack. It awakens.

We must stop calling it justice of the angry universe.
It is the law of self-created truth.
Your inner world becomes your outer life - that is Karma.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 6
New Age Conversion via Influencers - A Hidden Weapon

Read this Article :

There was a time when missionaries knocked on doors with Bibles in hand.
There was a time when loud preaching happened in tribal belts and slums.
There was a time when conversion looked like force, money, and tricks.

But that time is gone.

Today, conversion wears a new face - young, polished, soft-spoken, and “modern”.
It hides in Instagram reels.
It speaks through YouTube motivation talks.
It smiles in WhatsApp groups.
It uses words like “healing”, “love”, “peace”, “universal faith” - but slowly… it disconnects you from Sanatan Dharma.

This is the new age of conversion.
No violence. No shouting.
Just psychological and emotional manipulation.

And it’s more dangerous than ever.
How it starts

The conversion doesn’t begin with religion.
It begins with emotion.

A 19-year-old student is depressed.
A housewife feels ignored.
A Dalit man is angry about caste insult.
A tribal family is struggling to feed children.

They go online.
They search for answers.
They find someone saying:
- “God loves you.”
- “Are you feeling empty?”
- “Come, let’s pray together.”
- “Your old ways didn’t work. Try something new.”

And slowly, Sanatan looks like the past.
This new voice looks like light.

That’s how it begins.
Who are the influencers?

These are not pastors wearing robes.
These are:
- YouTubers who used to post self-help but now talk about Jesus.
- Instagram creators who say “All religions are same”, but only promote Christianity.
- Motivation coaches who invite youth to “healing retreats” and end with gospel prayers.
- Women vloggers who do cooking, then share how Jesus helped their family.
- Pages that post quotes in Hindi, but always point to church-based healing events.

These influencers do not say “convert”.
They just create doubt about Hinduism.
And then offer answers through their own version of “truth”.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 6
Why Western Platforms Ban Hindu Content as “Dangerous”?

Read this Article :

Even truth, when spoken by a Hindu, gets flagged.

A child saying “I love my Dharma” is called communal.
A YouTube video explaining the Gita is demonetised.
A post about a Hindu temple is labelled “hate speech”.
But a person mocking Sanatan openly? No problem.

We’re told:
“Freedom of speech exists.”
But somewhere between algorithms and global politics, freedom for Hindus disappears.

Why is this happening?
Why are Western social media platforms banning, limiting, and censoring Hindu voices in the name of “safety”?

Let’s understand.
1. Because Hindu identity doesn’t fit their Left-Liberal framework

In the Western world, if you say:
“I’m Christian” → Normal.
“I’m Muslim” → Protected.
“I’m Black/Queer/Atheist” → Celebrated.
But if you say:
“I’m Hindu and proud” → Problematic.

Because their worldview says:
→ Hindus are upper caste oppressors
→ India = caste, cows, and superstition
→ Ramayan is myth, not culture
→ Sanatan = majority = dangerous

So when a Hindu explains Dharma, culture, or truth…
It doesn’t match their framework.
So they label it “extremism”.
2. Because their content policies are not made by people who understand Sanatan

Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter - their policy teams sit in the US/UK.

They consult NGOs, “human rights” bodies, UN-based reports.
Guess who writes those reports?

The same groups that call Hindu festivals “environmental threat”,
That call Sadhus “fake godmen”,
That call Vedas “violent”,
That call Ghar Wapsi “forced conversion”.

So platforms act based on twisted narratives written by anti-Hindu lobbies.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 5
Bollywood turns Hindu kings into villains, Mughals into lovers – Why this distortion?

Read this Article :

A king who fought invaders is shown as cruel.
A ruler who looted temples is shown as romantic.
Hindu warriors are twisted. Mughal emperors are glorified.

This is not just cinema.
It is rewriting history - in front of our eyes.

Let’s talk about what’s really happening.
They don’t “just make films” - they shape memory

Most people don’t read history books.
They remember what they saw on screen.

And Bollywood knows it. That’s why they show:
- Akbar as peaceful
- Alauddin Khilji as a passionate lover
- Babur as a brave founder
- Aurangzeb as misunderstood

And at the same time…
- Rani Padmavati becomes a silent decoration
- Prithviraj Chauhan becomes a weak character
- Maharaja Suheldev is erased
- Shivaji is hardly shown at all

This is not coincidence.
It’s an agenda dressed as art.
Who gets called “great”?

Let’s look at the films and what they portray:
- Jodha Akbar: Shows Akbar as a secular, romantic king who respects Hindus.
But in reality, Akbar imposed Jizya tax on Hindus, had Hindu temples demolished, and started child marriage alliances to expand his power.

- Padmaavat: Shows Alauddin Khilji as wild and mad for love.
Truth: He raided temples, beheaded thousands, and led one of the bloodiest jihads into Hindu kingdoms.

- Mughal-e-Azam: A grand love story of Salim-Anarkali.
But real Salim (Jahangir) imprisoned Guru Arjan Dev and enforced Sharia.

But what about Hindu kings?

When Bollywood tries to show them, it ends up as:
- Comedy (Bhagwan Ram’s character in some recent OTT shows)
- Weak storytelling (Samrat Prithviraj)
- Full of historical errors (Adipurush)
- Or ignored altogether
Read 11 tweets
Aug 5
Hindu Organisations Need Approval. Madrassas Run Freely - How Is This Equal?

Read this Article :

Intro: The imbalance no one dares to talk about

In the world’s largest democracy, not all citizens are treated equally.
Not all religious groups have the same freedom.
And definitely, not all educational institutions follow the same rules.

Today, if a group of Hindus come together to start a pathshala, gurukul, or dharmic organisation — they must apply for government approvals, prove their curriculum is “secular”, register every activity, submit tax audits, and face media suspicion.

But in the same country, thousands of madrassas operate without any registration, without any inspections, and without following national education norms. Some openly preach religion 24x7. Some receive foreign funds. Some are built on encroached land. Yet, they are allowed to run - with zero fear and full protection.

How did this double standard become “normal”?
How did the very children of this soil, the Hindus, become second-class in their own homeland?

This isn’t just a policy issue.
It’s a dangerous imbalance - and it’s been building quietly for years.

Let’s understand this with truth, clarity, and courage.
When Hindu religious institutions are formed - whether it’s a Ramayan study circle or a small Sanskrit gurukul - the red tape begins. The moment it’s labelled “Hindu”, the system becomes cautious. Suddenly, there are questions:
- “What ideology are you spreading?”
- “Is it inclusive?”
- “Are you following RTE norms?”
- “Are you brainwashing kids?”

There are paperwork demands, trust deed scrutiny, land approval issues, and even harassment in some areas by local authorities.

But on the other side, madrassas can come up quietly in narrow lanes, in rented homes, in villages, on temple lands, or government land - and nobody raises a question. No official shows up. No inspection happens.

The imbalance is not hidden. It’s happening in open daylight.
In Uttar Pradesh, during Yogi Adityanath’s rule, a major survey revealed over 8,000 unregistered madrassas. That’s just in one state.

These madrassas:
- Had no educational board oversight
- Were teaching only religious texts
- Had no idea about science, history, or civics
- Some were even receiving funding from foreign countries

And yet - they had been running for decades.

Ask yourself: Would a Hindu gurukul be allowed to run like that for even one year?
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(