GOP governors are now OPENLY talking about redistricting to COUNTER Democrat gerrymandering SCHEMES.
Governor DeSantis says he even caught Obama trying to RIG Florida’s map.
Then he dropped the numbers that could CHANGE the Midterms:
“In 2018, there were 300,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans. Today there are 1.3 million more registered Republicans than Democrats.”
🧵 THREAD
No more sitting on the sidelines to get steamrolled by Democrats.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis joined Sean Hannity on Fox to talk about Florida’s potential redistricting plans.
But before the conversation even got to that, he went straight for the heart of Democrats’ playbook.
DeSantis EXPOSED a long-running, nationwide Democrat gerrymandering operation, dating back to the Obama days.
According to DeSantis, President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder oversaw a coast-to-coast effort to manipulate election maps during the last census.
It was so pervasive that it didn’t just solidify blue strongholds….he says they even tried to rig Florida’s congressional lines and he caught them.
“Obama and Holder gerrymandered BRUTALLY across the country in this decade’s census.”
“They actually even got into Florida and I had to veto the legislature’s map and I ended up proposing one which was a much fairer map and much better.”
He pointed to California as a case study in how the game is played.
On paper, the state uses an independent redistricting commission.
In reality, he says, it’s stacked with Democrats, liberal independents, and liberal Republicans.
The result….a heavily gerrymandered map and Governor Gavin Newsom is already looking to push it further.
Once the groundwork was laid, DeSantis turned to what Florida is doing now to address the gerrymandering problem.
He revealed he’s already working directly with Trump’s Commerce Department to secure the state an additional congressional seat…one he believes Florida should have received in the last census.
“Florida, we got shortchanged in the census.”
This alone could be HUGE.
The governor said that new population data clearly shows Florida’s growth was underestimated, and if the Commerce Department agrees, it would trigger an automatic redraw of congressional districts.
“That would obviously force us to have to redistrict. So we’re working with the Commerce Department to see how that’s going to shake out.”
But even if the new seat doesn’t happen, DeSantis beleives there’s still a strong case for a remap now.
“There’s some racial gerrymandering that’s still lingering that we have to correct, per our recent Florida Supreme Court decision.”
The bottom line is that Florida’s current maps don’t reflect the state’s explosive growth over the past five years.
“Florida in 2020 vs. Florida in 2025, you are talking about a BIG change.”
“Our districts are not properly apportioned and if we were to do new districts, it would be a much fairer representation for the people of Florida.”
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
Hannity pressed him on how many seats Republicans might stand to gain under fair maps, but DeSantis avoided putting a number on it.
“I don’t know because I think—Florida—our constitution limits, you can’t draw snake districts in Florida, they’ve got to be normal shaped, compact districts.”
Then came the number that grabbed Hannity’s attention and could have major implications for Congress.
It was a political WARHEAD that could land right before the midterms.
“But I will tell you this, when I got elected governor in 2018, there were 300,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans.”
“Today there are 1.3 million more registered Republicans than Democrats.”
It was SEISMIC.
The governor called the swing unprecedented.
Over his tenure, Florida has added millions of residents, and the voter registration balance has shifted from a slight Democratic edge to a commanding Republican advantage.
If Florida redraws its map before the midterms, that change could translate into multiple new GOP seats.
As the interview wrapped, DeSantis continued to hint that redistricting is coming…and that this time, Democrats won’t be the ones shaping the lines.
“If you look at a state like Florida, we’re a red state with a few blue dots. If you do fair maps, Republicans are going to do much better.”
He accused Democrats of a long-standing tactic: taking heavily blue cities and carving them into surrounding red areas to keep themselves competitive.
This is what they have always done.
Illinois is the most blatant example, where Chicago’s voters are stretched across far-flung districts to dilute Republican numbers.
“That’s what they did in Illinois. They take all these voters in Chicago and they draw districts stretching out all across the state.”
DeSantis says Florida has EVERY RIGHT to do a redraw based on its rapid growth and political shift.
“So Florida has gone VERY red during my tenure as governor. Our population has grown and we have every right to be able to do new districts.”
And the timing works in their favor.
“Now we don’t have—our primaries aren’t even till—they’re more than a year away.”
“This will probably be something that we will work with the legislature on in the spring and be able to deliver, I think, really strong maps.”
The message from DeSantis was now loud and clear: a major political shakeup could be coming, and Florida may be ground zero.
This is what Florida’s current congressional map looks like.
The state has 28 seats: 20 held by Republicans and 8 by Democrats.
If DeSantis follows through with a new redistricting plan, the impact could be GIGANTIC.
Not just in Florida, but in Washington.
A few flipped seats here could be the deciding factor in whether Republicans keep control of the House in 2026.
Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:
In 2016, Del Bigtree convinced a top infectious disease doctor to do something public health has avoided for decades: conduct a study comparing the health outcomes of vaxxed vs. unvaxxed children.
Dr. Marcus Zervos vowed to publish the results no matter what.
The results were devastating for the vaccinated, and Dr. Zervos ultimately chose not to publish the study.
When confronted about it, he said bluntly: “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders, a category that includes more than 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
The study’s conclusion was equally striking. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
When science uncovers an inconvenient result, it often gets buried, or the data is twisted until it produces the outcome “The Science” wants.
How do you think Vioxx, a migraine and arthritis pain drug, made it to market?
An estimated 100,000 people died before the manufacturer (Merck) finally decided it was too dangerous to keep prescribing.
And Vioxx wasn’t an isolated case.
Roughly 1 in 3 drugs approved by the FDA get pulled or receive a major safety warning LONG AFTER they get prescribed to millions of people.
If Vioxx could be approved without the danger being flagged during trials, what else is on the market today that people assume is safe?
Perhaps the most important question is: how do they get away with rigging these trials in the first place? 🧵
The medical establishment built its reputation on one phrase: the gold standard.
Randomized controlled trials were sold as the cleanest way to separate real medicine from wishful thinking.
But once a trial costs tens of millions of dollars, the question changes.
Who can afford to define what everyone thinks is the “truth”?
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can indeed be extremely useful.
They can detect small effects that individual doctors would never notice, like a slight increase in heart attacks or a modest reduction in symptoms across thousands of patients.
Clearly that has real value.
The problem begins when RCTs become the only evidence medicine is allowed to recognize.
Because once that happens, medicine stops asking a simple and important question: What actually helps patients?
Instead, it starts asking what can be patented, standardized, funded, pushed through regulators, published in major journals, and written into treatment guidelines?
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.” 🧵
Something strange has happened in modern medicine.
For decades, vaccine debates focused on obvious adverse events like allergic reactions or acute neurological injuries.
But a quieter question has lingered in medical literature: could vaccines sometimes cause subtle neurological changes that alter behavior, personality, or emotional development?
What happens when people report sudden personality shifts, or changes in emotional bonding, or even changes in sexual attraction following vaccination?
When signals appear, we’re suppose to pause and look a little deeper—not dismiss them because they’re uncomfortable.
But that’s exactly what society does when things like autism and gender identity are involved.
Are there links between vaccination, human connection, autism, and sexual orientation? If we don’t stop to ask these questions, we’ll never know the answers.
Researchers have historically focused on dramatic vaccine injuries like seizures or encephalitis while overlooking smaller neurological effects.
But something is quietly breaking human connection at the deepest level and we have to get to the bottom of what’s causing it.
Romantic partners feel distant.
Intimacy lacks real passion or spontaneity.
Emotional warmth is harder to find.
And gender confusion has exploded, especially in the young.
This isn’t random. It’s the result of neurological changes. And some of those changes may be triggered by mass vaccination.
For more than a century, evidence shows vaccines cause wide-ranging neurological and autoimmune disorders, including autism and middle ear infections.
Erica Drum was told her son Jackson would never breathe on his own again.
A hockey hit launched him headfirst into the boards. Broken neck & spine. Doctors said he’d be paralyzed for life.
Jackson is now walking and has recovered every fine motor skill he lost.
What happened?
His loving mother took a chance on a substance called DMSO. And what followed was nothing short of a miracle.
ERICA DRUM: “[Doctors] said there was no hope of recovery… He is vent-dependent, feeding tube-dependent. We were told he is never going to eat or drink or be able to breathe independently.”
“I had a friend, and she’s like, ‘Hey, I know of this thing [DMSO] that’s supposed to help spinal cord injuries, and it helps reduce the swelling.’ And I’m like, ‘Okay, well maybe we can try that.’ Because at this point, we didn’t have any options.”
“We decided to try [DMSO] topically. We bought like a little rollerball one… We started that on day four or five, and by day seven, I would poke his feet or his legs, and he would open his eyes [despite being on intense painkillers].”
“And then there was a PT working with him, and she felt his hip flexor fire. And they’re like, ‘Oh my gosh.’ He went from an Asia A to an Asia C, which usually is not supposed to happen.”
“You’re either a severe spinal cord injury with no sensation, nothing, like an Asia A. You don’t go from an A to a C. From there, he was Asia C. And I’m still rubbing this stuff on him every chance I get.”
“I mean, I would rub that thing on him probably ten times a day. What’s interesting is I was able to rub it on the left side of his body more than his right side. His left side is definitely stronger.”
“The right side is slowly coming back. His hand grip on this side was like 1 pound probably four months ago. And now it’s up to 20 pounds. He literally has every single fine motor skill. It’s a matter of us now strengthening them.”
“He hasn’t used his wheelchair in three weeks… We moved to the arm crutches. And now in therapy, he’s working on walking without the arm crutches.”
“We were like ventilator-dependent, medication-dependent… And now we’re down to just the baclofen.”
“My son is one of the only people I’ve met that does not have the nerve pain with his condition. So he is off of all nerve pain meds.”
Jackson’s doctors can’t explain how he went from a quadriplegic to a walking, self-sufficient person again.
But his mother attests it was the DMSO.
The thing is, Jackson isn’t the only person with a story like this. 🧵
Jackson’s story is an incredible example of exactly why DMSO is so hard to dismiss.
A nerve injury recovery that looks impossible on the surface starts to make more sense when you look at what DMSO appears to do inside damaged tissue.
It doesn’t behave like a normal painkiller.
It acts more like a cellular reset.
And once you see what it can do… you can’t unsee it.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”
“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”
“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.
The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”
Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.
And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵
Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.
When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.
Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.
But it is.
What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.
Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.
Take a moment to let that really sink in.
In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.
Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.
That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.
The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.
Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.
Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.
The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.
The website also highlights:
• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.
• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.
• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.
• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.
• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.
• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.
•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.
According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.