1//9 A thread on @BBCNews coverage of the murder of Al Jazeera journalist #AnasAlSharif & colleagues 🧵👇
Bulletins often opened with “#Israel says”. @cfmmuk found since his killing, “Israel says/claims” appeared 54 times in BBC TV & radio bulletins.
2/9 This isn’t just word choice. “#Israel says” puts an unverified claim — that #AnasAlSharif was a Hamas operative — first, before facts.
Context that he once worked in #Hamas-run media is added, but near Israel’s claim it risks implying past links justify killing him.
3/9 This @BBCNews par opens with “Israel says…”, leading with an unverified claim before facts, condemnations & legal context. Even with “little evidence” later, the first frame sets the tone—tilting the story toward the military narrative.
4/9 The @cfmmuk tracked the repetition: “Israel says”/“Israel claims” was in almost every bulletin mentioning #anasalsharif since his killing. Repetition cements the #IDF narrative in public memory.
5/9 The @BBCNews amplifies #Israeli claims about #AnasAlSharif’s past “Hamas links” but also says there’s little evidence & he’d criticised #Hamas.
Presenting unverified claims alongside facts without weighting risks blurring truth—especially in cases of killed #Journalists.
6/9 The @BBCNews relays #Israeli claims that #AnasAlSharif had a “dual role” as journalist & on a “terror list” without verification.
Such framing risks legitimising unproven allegations against a killed journalist & undermines reporting standards in conflict coverage.
7/9 The @cfmmuk @BBCNews #Gaza study found Israeli deaths got 33× more coverage per victim, & Israeli views voiced 2× as often. The “Israel says…” lead fits a pattern of foregrounding #Israeli narratives while muting #Palestinian voices & legal context.
9/9 Ethical reporting leads with facts, then context—not unverified claims. @Reuters says powerful actors may merit less space & warns against presenting allegations as fact. @BBCNews’ airing of Israeli claims on #AnasAlSharif fell short on both accounts
1/10 🧵After the Bondi Beach attack, #British TV coverage repeatedly blurred the line between terrorism & #Muslims whilst framing the attack around #Palestine solidarity & slogans like 'Globalise the #intifada.'
@cfmmuk examines some of these failures👇
#MediaBias #Gaza
2/10 The now predictable @TalkTV framed most of its discussions to “Muslim communities”, “Islamic culture” and “Muslim values”, shifting blame from a violent fringe group to #Muslims as a collective.
3/10 Some suggest #ISIS violence flows naturally from Islam . #Islam is framed as the problem not extremist ideology and described as "a cult" with #Muslims accused of having a code of protection. You couldn't say this about any other community on British TV. @Ofcom
1/10 In light of the hooliganism involving #MaccabiTelAviv supporters, a reminder of how some of the worst examples from UK media framing @WMPolice decision to ban away fans from the @AVFCOfficial game.
A thread of some examples from British based broadcasters. 🧵
@Ofcom ???
2/10 After suggesting that the notoriously violent #Maccabi fans weren't violent, @SkyNews presented Andrew Fox a well known propagandist for Israel, as a regular @AVFCOfficial fan.
Note how @Novara found how Fox was among those who suggested #Israel should target more journalists
3/10 GB News allowing a #Maccabi supporter to claim that 5-10 percent of #Birmingham's #Muslims are extremists?
No challenge to this unsubstantiated, random claim just a nodding head
3/7 "Allahu Akbar" means "God is greater" in Arabic. Muslims say it in prayer, celebration, and everyday life.
When a likely non-Muslim man says it during a violent act, it still seems to heighten media interest despite the man shouting many other slogans such as anti-Trump rhetoric.
📢 NEW REPORT:
A year-long analysis of BBC coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza reveals a pattern of bias, double standards & silencing of Palestinian voices.
Despite 34x more Palestinian deaths, Israeli fatalities received 33x more coverage per death.
Humanising stories:
BBC ran nearly the same number of victim profiles for Palestinians (279) & Israelis (201) — despite 34 times more Palestinian deaths.
📣 Emotive language like “slaughter” & “massacre” was used 4x more often for Israelis.
#MediaBias #BBCGazaCoverage @BBCNews
🎙️ Whose voices count?
The BBC interviewed:
🔹 2,350 Israelis
🔹 1,085 Palestinians
GB News reporting here on local opposition to a Muslim burial site being built in Farnham. The journalist focused the story on 'concerns around Muslim practices of body storage', as reported by "local press". These reports don't exist. Is GB News manufacturing moral outage?
The 1st interviewee, an activist in Farnham, dismissed GB News' line of questioning, referring instead to concerns around congestion and the environment, not body storage.
A 2nd interviewee was then brought on to discuss the "difference between a Muslim burial and a normal Christian one". The interviewee was then asked about "local concerns about [unrefrigerated] bodies" and whether it is "legal in the UK to store an [unrefrigerated] body for 24hr"