15 August: The Truth Behind India’s Independence - Who Really Gave Us Freedom?
Read this Article :
Intro: More Than a Flag, More Than a Holiday
Today is 15th August.
Independence Day.
India’s most emotional day.
The day when we got swatantrata after almost 1000 years of invasions, slavery, looting, pain, and humiliation.
But ask yourself honestly -
Do we really know who gave us freedom?
Was it just Gandhi’s non-violence and Nehru’s speeches?
Or is there a bigger, deeper truth we were never told?
This article will open that truth - with facts, with feeling, with full respect to all those who fought, bled, and died so that we could breathe as a free nation today.
#IndependenceDayIndia
India’s Slavery: Not Just 200 Years, But Almost 1000
We must first understand:
- 1192 AD: Muhammad Ghori defeated Prithviraj Chauhan - start of Islamic invasions
- 700 years: Delhi Sultanate, Mughals, Tipu Sultan, etc - temples destroyed, Hindus converted
- 1757 onwards: British colonial rule started after Battle of Plassey
- 1858–1947: Official British Raj
So, India didn’t suffer just under British - but also under Islamic rulers before that.
Every invader came with the aim to break Bharat’s soul, not just take its wealth.
The Real Freedom Fighters: Who Actually Fought?
Our textbooks mostly talk about 3 names:
- Mahatma Gandhi
- Jawaharlal Nehru
- Congress party
But was that the whole truth? Not at all.
Let’s talk about real freedom warriors, some forgotten, some deliberately erased:
1. Revolutionaries Who Sacrificed Everything
These weren’t peaceful protestors.
They took up arms against the British - knowing they might die.
- Bhagat Singh
- Hanged at just 23.
- Fought for real Azadi, not compromise.
- Called Gandhi’s approach “slow poison”.
- Chandrashekhar Azad
- Swore never to be captured alive - and kept that vow.
- Rajguru, Sukhdev
- Died shouting “Inquilab Zindabad”.
- Ramprasad Bismil, Ashfaqullah Khan
- Gave life in the Kakori conspiracy against British trains.
- Annie Besant, Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak
- Gave voice to “Swaraj is my birthright”.
- Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose
- Formed Azad Hind Fauj.
- Took help from Axis powers to militarily fight the British.
- His slogan: “Give me blood, I will give you freedom.”
These bravehearts did not wait for British “approval” - they wanted to kick them out.
2. Indian National Army (INA) - Netaji’s Army
This is perhaps the most ignored yet most powerful chapter.
- Bose formed the INA with Indian POWs in World War II.
Marched from Singapore to Manipur with the aim to reach Delhi.
- INA had Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs - united by patriotism, not politics.
- British intelligence later admitted:
“The fear of a military uprising due to INA pressure was a major reason Britain left India.”
Even British PM Clement Attlee (1947) admitted in an interview:
“Gandhi’s movement had minimal impact. The real pressure came from the INA and revolts in Indian Navy and Army.”
This truth is conveniently hidden from history books.
3. Naval Mutiny of 1946 - Final Blow to British
- 18 February 1946: 20,000+ Indian Navy soldiers revolted in Mumbai.
- They took over ships, raised Indian flags, shouted Jai Hind and Inquilab Zindabad.
- Spread to Bombay, Karachi, Madras.
- Army, Air Force, and common people supported them.
British realized:
“We can’t trust Indian forces anymore. If there’s a full revolt, we’ll be thrown out.”
This directly led to British decision to leave.
But ask yourself - how many students are taught this in school?
Gandhi-Nehru Narrative: Half the Truth?
Let’s be fair.
Gandhi:
- Brought masses into the freedom struggle.
- Preached non-violence.
- But he also called off movements after British violence.
- Remained silent on hanging of Bhagat Singh.
- Opposed Subhash Bose’s aggressive stand.
Nehru:
- Chosen as PM by Gandhi - despite Sardar Patel winning internal vote.
- More focused on diplomacy than ground action.
- Allowed partition and failed to protect lakhs of Hindus who were killed or displaced.
They played a part - but they were not the only ones.
And surely not the only heroes.
The Price of Freedom: Countless Forgotten Martyrs
- Lakhs of Hindus killed in partition riots
- Kashmiri Pandits attacked even during independence
- Temples destroyed, Gurudwaras attacked, women raped in 1947 violence
- Till today, there’s no memorial for Hindu partition victims
- Those who took up arms are missing from textbooks
We remember Gandhi’s spectacles, but not Bismil’s poetry before the gallows.
We study Nehru’s speeches, but not Bose’s war calls.
This is not accident.
It is narrative control.
So Who Gave Us Real Independence?
Let’s answer honestly:
- Yes, Gandhi created moral pressure.
- But Bose’s INA broke the British military spine.
- The Naval revolt of 1946 made them fear an Indian armed uprising.
- Revolutionaries lit the fire of courage.
- Millions of ordinary Indians - peasants, students, mothers, sadhus - participated.
India got freedom not just through petitions…
India got freedom through blood, fire, sacrifice, and rebellion.
And that is the truth.
Don’t Celebrate Blindly, Celebrate Truthfully
Independence Day is not just for flag hoisting, songs, and sweets.
It’s a day to:
- Remember forgotten warriors
- Question half-history
- Teach the real struggle to the next generation
- Protect the dharmic soul of Bharat
- Ensure that this freedom is never lost again
Bharat didn’t get freedom. Bharat took it back.
With pain. With pride.
🙏 Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why Every Hindu Must Visit Kashi, Ayodhya & Kedarnath At Least Once in Life
#longthread 🧵
Every Hindu may not be rich.
Every Hindu may not be a scholar.
But every Hindu has one thing inside them - shraddha (faith).
And some places in Bharat are not just places.
They are energy points of our civilisation.
They are living proof that Sanatan Dharma is still breathing.
And three such places are:
Kashi. Ayodhya. Kedarnath.
If you’re Hindu - you must go there at least once in your life.
Not for tourism.
But to feel who you really are.
1. Kashi - The city that never dies
Kashi (Varanasi) is not just an old city.
It is called Avimukta Kshetra - the land never abandoned by Bhagwan Shiva.
Saints have said:
“Cities may fall, rivers may dry, empires may collapse…
But Kashi will remain - till the end of time.”
Why?
Because Kashi is not built on land.
It is built on tapasya, mantras, ashes, and surrender.
Thousands of cremations happen here daily. But nobody cries.
Because people believe - if you die in Kashi, Shiva whispers the name of Ram in your ear and gives you moksha.
Walking on the ghats, you don’t feel fear.
You feel truth.
One dip in Ganga here… and you don’t just clean your body - you clean your karma.
Go to Kashi.
Not to post a selfie, but to see where death becomes devotion.
2. Ayodhya - Not just Ram’s birthplace, but yours too
Ayodhya is not a political place.
It is not a “disputed land” as newspapers called it for years.
It is the birthplace of Maryada Purushottam Bhagwan Shri Ram - the ideal son, king, husband, warrior, and human.
For centuries, Hindus dreamed of visiting Ram Janmabhoomi.
But for 500 years — the temple was broken, and a structure stood in its place.
Still… we waited.
We cried.
We fought.
We donated.
We prayed.
Today, when you step into the new Shri Ram Mandir, you’re not just entering a temple.
You’re entering a 400-year-old dream come true.
And when you see Ram Lalla standing tall again -
something inside you will melt.
Go to Ayodhya.
To thank Ram.
And to remind yourself - that Hindu patience is powerful, but Hindu awakening is unstoppable.
Shri Krishna Janmashtami - What is it and why it matters?
#longthread 🧵
Not just about sweets, flutes and midnight songs.
It’s about dharma, love, justice, and cosmic leadership - all born in the most unexpected way.
Intro: A dark jail. A chained couple. A baby is born.
At midnight, in silence, while the whole world sleeps - a divine force takes birth.
Not in a palace. Not in luxury.
But in prison. Under fear. In total darkness.
This is not just a myth. This is a reminder.
That when evil becomes too strong, and dharma is crying for help —
Bhagwan does not send someone else. He comes Himself.
Across Bharat, today, millions of homes are lighting diyas, preparing bhog, fasting, singing kirtans - because tonight is Janmashtami, the birth of Shri Krishna.
But this day is more than celebration.
It is remembrance.
Read slowly 👇
1. What is Janmashtami in Sanatan Dharma?
“Janma” means birth.
“Ashtami” is the 8th day of the lunar fortnight.
Krishna was born on the Ashtami of Bhadrapad month, in the Rohini Nakshatra, during the midnight hour - a time ruled by chaos and fear.
He came to bring balance.
In Sanatan Dharma, Krishna is the 8th avatar of Vishnu, the one who plays, fights, loves, guides, and protects.
He is not distant. He is among us.
He lives in stories, songs, and hearts - not just in temples.
Janmashtami marks the birth of courage inside fear, the birth of light inside darkness.
2. Why was Krishna born in a jail?
Because that is where dharma was imprisoned.
His parents, Devaki and Vasudev, were chained by Devaki’s own brother - Kansa, the cruel king of Mathura.
A voice had warned Kansa that Devaki’s 8th son would destroy him.
So he killed 6 babies. The 7th - Balaram - was mysteriously transferred to another womb.
The 8th was Krishna.
The moment he was born - chains broke, guards fell asleep, doors opened, and nature itself made the path clear.
Because when Bhagwan decides to walk the earth -
no prison can hold him.
The Truth Behind “Jihadi Mindset” and Why It’s the Greatest Danger to Bharat
A Thread 🧵
We are told again and again:
“Don’t generalise.”
“Every community has good and bad people.”
“Not all Muslims are terrorists.”
“Hate has no religion.”
Yes, that’s true.
But we need to ask the real question now:
What is this mindset that keeps producing terrorists, riots, hate speeches, and attacks on temples - again and again - for 1400 years, in every country, in every age?
That mindset has a name.
It is not a religion. It is not a community. It is a way of thinking.
That mindset is called the Jihadi Mindset.
And today, it is the biggest internal threat to Bharat, even more than China, poverty, or unemployment.
What is the Jihadi Mindset?
The jihadi mindset is not just about violence.
It’s about mental programming - where a person truly believes that:
- Their religion is the only truth
- Everyone else is wrong and must be converted or eliminated
- The world must follow their law (Sharia), by choice or by force
- Dying for this cause guarantees heaven
- Killing non-believers (kafirs) is not a sin, it is a service to God
This mindset is spread through certain madrasas, Friday sermons, radical literature, Telegram groups, and now, even Instagram reels.
It doesn’t come from poverty.
It comes from a system of ideological brainwashing.
This Is Not a New Problem - It’s a 1000-Year-Old Strategy
Jihad didn’t start yesterday. It didn’t start with ISIS or Taliban.
It started the day India was first invaded by Islamic rulers.
In 1192, when Muhammad Ghori defeated Prithviraj Chauhan, the real purpose wasn’t just political conquest. It was religious.
And since then:
- Mahmud of Ghazni looted Somnath 17 times - not just for gold, but to insult idol worship.
- Aurangzeb destroyed thousands of temples, banned Hindu festivals, imposed jizya tax on Hindus for being non-Muslim.
- Tipu Sultan converted thousands of Hindus and Christians by force.
- Moplah Jihad in Kerala (1921) saw thousands of Hindus murdered, women raped - all in the name of Khilafat.
The ideology behind all this was not “bad people.”
It was a systemic belief that non-Muslims have no right to exist freely.
This is the same ideology that led to Partition - not just for a separate country, but for an Islamic state - Pakistan.
Aurangzeb: India’s Hitler - The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know
#longthread 🧵
Intro :
If Adolf Hitler represents the darkest period of Europe’s history, then Aurangzeb Alamgir represents one of the darkest chapters in Indian civilization.
But here’s the shocking part:
Whereas Hitler is condemned, Aurangzeb is glorified by many in India - in textbooks, media, and elite spaces.
How did we come to glorify a man who killed his own family, destroyed over 60,000 temples, tortured saints, banned Hindu festivals, and waged a civilizational war on Bharat?
Let’s explore the full truth.
Who Was Aurangzeb?
•Born: 3 November 1618
•Died: 3 March 1707
•Reign: 1658 – 1707 (49 years)
•Father: Shah Jahan
•Siblings: Dara Shikoh, Murad, Shuja
Aurangzeb was the sixth Mughal emperor.
He overthrew and imprisoned his own father Shah Jahan and executed his three brothers, especially Dara Shikoh - a Sufi-sympathetic, Sanskrit-reading, tolerant prince.
Unlike Akbar, who tried diplomacy with Hindus, Aurangzeb was a fanatical Islamist, guided by the orthodox Sunni Hanafi school of Islam and texts like Fatawa-e-Alamgiri (Islamic Sharia code compiled under his rule).
Jihad in the Name of Islam
Aurangzeb openly declared that the Mughal Empire was to become a “true Islamic state.”
“It is my duty to enforce the laws of Islam and destroy falsehood.” - Aurangzeb, farman to governors
He launched massive religious cleansing campaigns, especially against Hindus and Sikhs.
Gita Banned, Bible Allowed - Equality or a Quiet Hypocrisy?
Read this Article :
A Scene That Shouldn’t Exist
Picture this.
In a government school classroom, the teacher announces:
“From now on, Bhagavad Gita lessons will no longer be part of the syllabus.”
Some students look confused. Some don’t care.
But a few hours later, in the same building, another class begins - Moral Science.
Here, the students read out verses from the Bible.
The teacher explains their meaning, encourages discussion, and praises the moral lessons inside.
You stand outside that classroom, eyebrows raised.
The question bursts in your mind:
Why is one scripture banned in the name of secularism, while another is welcomed as moral education?
The Gita - More Than a Hindu Scripture
Before we go further, let’s clear one myth.
The Bhagavad Gita is not a book of blind rituals or sectarian preaching.
It is a philosophical dialogue - 700 verses of pure guidance for life, spoken on the battlefield of Kurukshetra between Krishna and Arjuna.
It doesn’t tell you which god to worship - it tells you how to live.
It speaks of:
- Doing your duty even when you feel weak.
- Facing failure without losing yourself.
- Making decisions when morality and pressure clash.
- Rising above ego, fear, and selfishness.
Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, and even Western thinkers like Aldous Huxley found personal strength in it.
Yet today, in some Indian schools, the Gita is labelled “religious” and removed from the syllabus.
Bible in Schools - The Different Treatment
Now, compare this to the Bible’s presence in many schools - especially in missionary institutions and even some private schools with a Christian ethos.
Here, Bible readings are often part of:
- Morning assemblies
- Moral science classes
- Special festive programs
For non-Christian students, it is usually framed as “moral lessons” or “character building” - not as religious preaching.
And most parents accept it, even if they follow other faiths, because it is taught in a general, value-oriented way.
Here’s the contradiction:
If Bible verses can be seen as “universal moral guidance” in schools, then why can’t the Gita’s verses be treated the same way?
If one can inspire without “converting”, why is the other accused of “communal influence”?
Twitter Suspends Sanatan Voices, But Lets Jihadi Trends Rise - Why This Silence?
Read this Article :
They say Twitter is a free platform.
A space for debate, for dialogue, for discussion.
But what kind of platform silences peaceful Sanatan voices,
while letting hashtags that openly threaten Hindus go viral?
What kind of “freedom” lets anonymous Jihadi accounts post death threats,
but flags Dharmic accounts for posting shlokas, facts, or history?
This article is not just about Twitter.
It’s about how digital spaces are being tilted, slowly, against one civilisation -
And most people don’t even realise it’s happening.
Let’s break it down point by point.
1. Sanatan accounts get shadowbanned for quoting scriptures.
Accounts posting Bhagavad Gita shlokas, historical facts about temple destruction, or even tweets like “Jai Shri Ram” have often reported sudden drops in reach.
No abuses. No hate. No crime.
Still - they get flagged.
Still - they get “sensitive content” warnings.
Still - their visibility dies without notice.
But what’s dangerous in saying “I’m proud to be Hindu”?
Since when did identity become hate?
2. Multiple Hindu creators have been suspended without clear reasons.
From spiritual teachers to political commentators - many accounts with Sanatan leanings have been deplatformed or silenced with vague excuses like “platform policy violation.”
But the same platforms allow openly abusive accounts to trend slogans like:
- “Sar tan se juda”
- “Gustakh-e-Nabi ki ek saza”