Post

More from @ag_arpit1

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 15

The Truth Behind “Jihadi Mindset” and Why It’s the Greatest Danger to Bharat

A Thread 🧵

We are told again and again:

“Don’t generalise.”
“Every community has good and bad people.”
“Not all Muslims are terrorists.”
“Hate has no religion.”

Yes, that’s true.

But we need to ask the real question now:

What is this mindset that keeps producing terrorists, riots, hate speeches, and attacks on temples - again and again - for 1400 years, in every country, in every age?

That mindset has a name.
It is not a religion. It is not a community. It is a way of thinking.

That mindset is called the Jihadi Mindset.

And today, it is the biggest internal threat to Bharat, even more than China, poverty, or unemployment.

What is the Jihadi Mindset?

The jihadi mindset is not just about violence.
It’s about mental programming - where a person truly believes that:
- Their religion is the only truth
- Everyone else is wrong and must be converted or eliminated
- The world must follow their law (Sharia), by choice or by force
- Dying for this cause guarantees heaven
- Killing non-believers (kafirs) is not a sin, it is a service to God

This mindset is spread through certain madrasas, Friday sermons, radical literature, Telegram groups, and now, even Instagram reels.

It doesn’t come from poverty.
It comes from a system of ideological brainwashing.

This Is Not a New Problem - It’s a 1000-Year-Old Strategy

Jihad didn’t start yesterday. It didn’t start with ISIS or Taliban.
It started the day India was first invaded by Islamic rulers.

In 1192, when Muhammad Ghori defeated Prithviraj Chauhan, the real purpose wasn’t just political conquest. It was religious.

And since then:
- Mahmud of Ghazni looted Somnath 17 times - not just for gold, but to insult idol worship.
- Aurangzeb destroyed thousands of temples, banned Hindu festivals, imposed jizya tax on Hindus for being non-Muslim.
- Tipu Sultan converted thousands of Hindus and Christians by force.
- Moplah Jihad in Kerala (1921) saw thousands of Hindus murdered, women raped - all in the name of Khilafat.

The ideology behind all this was not “bad people.”
It was a systemic belief that non-Muslims have no right to exist freely.

This is the same ideology that led to Partition - not just for a separate country, but for an Islamic state - Pakistan.

Read 12 tweets

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 14

Aurangzeb: India’s Hitler - The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know

#longthread 🧵

Intro :

If Adolf Hitler represents the darkest period of Europe’s history, then Aurangzeb Alamgir represents one of the darkest chapters in Indian civilization.

But here’s the shocking part:
Whereas Hitler is condemned, Aurangzeb is glorified by many in India - in textbooks, media, and elite spaces.

How did we come to glorify a man who killed his own family, destroyed over 60,000 temples, tortured saints, banned Hindu festivals, and waged a civilizational war on Bharat?

Let’s explore the full truth.

Who Was Aurangzeb?
•Born: 3 November 1618
•Died: 3 March 1707
•Reign: 1658 – 1707 (49 years)
•Father: Shah Jahan
•Siblings: Dara Shikoh, Murad, Shuja

Aurangzeb was the sixth Mughal emperor.
He overthrew and imprisoned his own father Shah Jahan and executed his three brothers, especially Dara Shikoh - a Sufi-sympathetic, Sanskrit-reading, tolerant prince.

Unlike Akbar, who tried diplomacy with Hindus, Aurangzeb was a fanatical Islamist, guided by the orthodox Sunni Hanafi school of Islam and texts like Fatawa-e-Alamgiri (Islamic Sharia code compiled under his rule).

Jihad in the Name of Islam

Aurangzeb openly declared that the Mughal Empire was to become a “true Islamic state.”

“It is my duty to enforce the laws of Islam and destroy falsehood.” - Aurangzeb, farman to governors

He launched massive religious cleansing campaigns, especially against Hindus and Sikhs.

Read 16 tweets

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 12

Gita Banned, Bible Allowed - Equality or a Quiet Hypocrisy?

Read this Article :

A Scene That Shouldn’t Exist

Picture this.
In a government school classroom, the teacher announces:

“From now on, Bhagavad Gita lessons will no longer be part of the syllabus.”

Some students look confused. Some don’t care.
But a few hours later, in the same building, another class begins - Moral Science.
Here, the students read out verses from the Bible.
The teacher explains their meaning, encourages discussion, and praises the moral lessons inside.

You stand outside that classroom, eyebrows raised.
The question bursts in your mind:
Why is one scripture banned in the name of secularism, while another is welcomed as moral education?

The Gita - More Than a Hindu Scripture

Before we go further, let’s clear one myth.
The Bhagavad Gita is not a book of blind rituals or sectarian preaching.
It is a philosophical dialogue - 700 verses of pure guidance for life, spoken on the battlefield of Kurukshetra between Krishna and Arjuna.

It doesn’t tell you which god to worship - it tells you how to live.
It speaks of:
- Doing your duty even when you feel weak.
- Facing failure without losing yourself.
- Making decisions when morality and pressure clash.
- Rising above ego, fear, and selfishness.

Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, and even Western thinkers like Aldous Huxley found personal strength in it.
Yet today, in some Indian schools, the Gita is labelled “religious” and removed from the syllabus.

Bible in Schools - The Different Treatment

Now, compare this to the Bible’s presence in many schools - especially in missionary institutions and even some private schools with a Christian ethos.

Here, Bible readings are often part of:
- Morning assemblies
- Moral science classes
- Special festive programs

For non-Christian students, it is usually framed as “moral lessons” or “character building” - not as religious preaching.
And most parents accept it, even if they follow other faiths, because it is taught in a general, value-oriented way.

Here’s the contradiction:
If Bible verses can be seen as “universal moral guidance” in schools, then why can’t the Gita’s verses be treated the same way?
If one can inspire without “converting”, why is the other accused of “communal influence”?

Read 8 tweets

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 7

Twitter Suspends Sanatan Voices, But Lets Jihadi Trends Rise - Why This Silence?

Read this Article :

They say Twitter is a free platform.
A space for debate, for dialogue, for discussion.

But what kind of platform silences peaceful Sanatan voices,
while letting hashtags that openly threaten Hindus go viral?

What kind of “freedom” lets anonymous Jihadi accounts post death threats,
but flags Dharmic accounts for posting shlokas, facts, or history?

This article is not just about Twitter.
It’s about how digital spaces are being tilted, slowly, against one civilisation -
And most people don’t even realise it’s happening.

Let’s break it down point by point.

1. Sanatan accounts get shadowbanned for quoting scriptures.

Accounts posting Bhagavad Gita shlokas, historical facts about temple destruction, or even tweets like “Jai Shri Ram” have often reported sudden drops in reach.

No abuses. No hate. No crime.

Still - they get flagged.
Still - they get “sensitive content” warnings.
Still - their visibility dies without notice.

But what’s dangerous in saying “I’m proud to be Hindu”?
Since when did identity become hate?

2. Multiple Hindu creators have been suspended without clear reasons.

From spiritual teachers to political commentators - many accounts with Sanatan leanings have been deplatformed or silenced with vague excuses like “platform policy violation.”

But the same platforms allow openly abusive accounts to trend slogans like:
- “Sar tan se juda”
- “Gustakh-e-Nabi ki ek saza”

And when reported, these are often marked:

“No violation found.”

Why this double standard?

Read 12 tweets

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 7

Karma becomes a joke in Western media - Why are Indians still silent?

#longthread 🧵

They turned “Karma” into a meme.
A joke. A punchline. A sarcastic emoji.
And we? We didn’t correct them.
We laughed. Reposted. Used it in reels.

In Hollywood movies, Karma is revenge.
In songs, Karma is betrayal.
In gossip shows, Karma is mockery.

But Karma is none of these.

It’s not just a word. It’s Sanatan Dharma’s spiritual spine.
It’s the law of justice, energy, and rebirth.

If we let them twist it,
one day our children will laugh at it too -
without ever knowing what it truly meant.

This thread is not about outrage.
It’s about awakening.👇

1. Karma is not punishment. It is purification.

Western media shows Karma as a slap from the universe.
Someone cheats - they get hurt. Someone lies - they fall.
“Karma,” they say, with a smirk.

But Sanatan never taught revenge.
Karma is the law of self-correction.
It’s not meant to hurt, but to heal your soul.

In every life, your soul is trying to reach truth.
When you hurt others, you delay your own growth.
When you act with compassion, you move closer to moksha.

Karma is not a force that punishes.
It’s a light that purifies.

They made it about “getting what you deserve.”
We know it’s about “becoming what you’re meant to be.”

2. Karma is not about revenge. It is about inner responsibility.

In the West, they show Karma like it’s a hitman.
“You did this, now the universe will hit back.”
But Sanatan Dharma teaches something much deeper -
You are not being punished, you are simply living out your own vibrations.

Every act you do, consciously or unconsciously, shapes your next step.
Karma doesn’t come to ‘teach you a lesson’ - it comes to help you remember your path.
It doesn’t harm. It humbles.
It doesn’t attack. It awakens.

We must stop calling it justice of the angry universe.
It is the law of self-created truth.
Your inner world becomes your outer life - that is Karma.

Read 17 tweets

Arpit Gupta

@ag_arpit1

Aug 6

New Age Conversion via Influencers - A Hidden Weapon

Read this Article :

There was a time when missionaries knocked on doors with Bibles in hand.
There was a time when loud preaching happened in tribal belts and slums.
There was a time when conversion looked like force, money, and tricks.

But that time is gone.

Today, conversion wears a new face - young, polished, soft-spoken, and “modern”.
It hides in Instagram reels.
It speaks through YouTube motivation talks.
It smiles in WhatsApp groups.
It uses words like “healing”, “love”, “peace”, “universal faith” - but slowly… it disconnects you from Sanatan Dharma.

This is the new age of conversion.
No violence. No shouting.
Just psychological and emotional manipulation.

And it’s more dangerous than ever.

How it starts

The conversion doesn’t begin with religion.
It begins with emotion.

A 19-year-old student is depressed.
A housewife feels ignored.
A Dalit man is angry about caste insult.
A tribal family is struggling to feed children.

They go online.
They search for answers.
They find someone saying:
- “God loves you.”
- “Are you feeling empty?”
- “Come, let’s pray together.”
- “Your old ways didn’t work. Try something new.”

And slowly, Sanatan looks like the past.
This new voice looks like light.

That’s how it begins.

Who are the influencers?

These are not pastors wearing robes.
These are:
- YouTubers who used to post self-help but now talk about Jesus.
- Instagram creators who say “All religions are same”, but only promote Christianity.
- Motivation coaches who invite youth to “healing retreats” and end with gospel prayers.
- Women vloggers who do cooking, then share how Jesus helped their family.
- Pages that post quotes in Hindi, but always point to church-based healing events.

These influencers do not say “convert”.
They just create doubt about Hinduism.
And then offer answers through their own version of “truth”.

Read 9 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Arpit Gupta

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @ag_arpit1

Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta

Arpit Gupta

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!