🧵

1. Bec Freedom, who’s one of the organisers behind the 31 August “anti immigration” rally claims she’s not a racist & that any recordings of her making statements to the contrary have been taken out of context

Let’s see if Bec’s claims stack up!
2. Here’s Bec sharing the tweet of a neo-Nazi, promoting her rally on 31 August Image
Image
3. I asked Bec why she was re-tweeting the post of a neo Nazi and she replied with this: Image
4. But the video by the neo Nazi described the need for “white people to take Australia back” and Bec thanked the neo Nazi for his video, saying it was a “great video” Image
5. Has this been taken out of context? Image
6. And this? Image
7. What about this? (For context, the National Workers Alliance are neo-Nazis, just like the NSN) Image
8. So do you think Bec’s comments from a Spaces chat about about trying to recruit “normal Australians” to agree with Neo Nazis have been taken out of context?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️

Vaxatious Litigant 💉⚖️👨‍⚖️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ExposingNV

Jul 1
1. A Pauline Hanson fan’s hope for a High Court showdown has ended before it even began!

The self represented litigant tried (& failed) to get the High Court to declare 18C invalid & overturn Pauline Hanson’s Federal Court loss

🧵
2. Heidi Ward filed a writ naming the Cth, Federal Court & Senator Mehreen Faruqi as defendants. She wanted to overturn decision in Faruqi v Hanson, declare s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act invalid & have Faruqi ruled ineligible to sit in Parliament Image
3. Because her proposed writ was so obviously lacking in legal basis, she needed the High Court’s permission just to file it!

(This only happens when an application on its face is lacking in merit!) Image
Read 9 tweets
Dec 20, 2024
🧵1. Earlier this year, conservative US commentator Candace Owens was denied a visa to Australia on grounds she has “capacity to incite discord”

She’s now challenging that decision in the High Court of Australia!

In this thread I explain what her case is all about! Image
2. This case is very different to Djokovic’s legal challenge over the Minister for Home Affairs’ decision to deny him a visa. In that case, Djokovic essentially challenged the WAY the Minister made his decision to deny him a visa
3. HERE, Candace is challenging the LEGISLATION that gives the Minister the power to deny her a visa!
Read 16 tweets
Dec 13, 2024
🧵
1. The no longer suspended doctor Bay vs AHPRA & the Medical Board.

In this thread, I summarise the court’s decision: why Bai is no longer suspended, why his Constitutional argument failed, and what the possible future brings for Dr Bay Image
2. This case was an application for “judicial review” by Dr Bay. He applied to the QLD Supreme Court for a review of the following 2 decisions of the Medical Board: the decision to suspend him & the decision to investigate his conduct
3. What is judicial review? It’s the power of a Court to review decisions of government agencies or public bodies. The role of the Court is to determine if the decision was properly made – the focus is on the law & how the decision was made, not the MERITS of the decision
Read 29 tweets
Dec 11, 2024
🧵
1. What happens when lawyers behind a failed lawsuit against Pfizer & Moderna accuse the presiding judge of bias because the judge happened to have a science degree & a cousin who once supported medical research?

A judicial smackdown of course! Image
2. Background to this drama:

Controversial doctor Julian Fidge decided to sue Pfizer & Moderna, claiming their COVID vaccines were genetically modified organisms & illegally unlicensed under the Gene Technology Act
3. Justice Rofe of the Federal Court dismissed the case summarily, on the basis that Fidge lacked “standing” to bring the proceedings. Fidge used the same lawyers who’d once represented the Australian Vaccination-risks Network (cont)
Read 32 tweets
Nov 22, 2024
🧵
1. Three doctors who were suspended for issuing fake COVID vax exemptions have attempted to overturn their suspensions in the High Court of Australia! The High Court refused to let the self-represented doctors file their application, on grounds it was an abuse of process
2. Doctors Mark Hobart, Valerie Peers & Denes Boros sought to commence proceedings in the High Court against the CEO of AHPRA and the Chair of the Medical Board
3. Each doctor had been suspended during the height of the pandemic, pursuant to the Board’s “immediate action” powers. Each doctor was suspended for similar reasons: allegedly issuing fake COVID vax certificates & promoting misleading info about COVID vaccines Image
Read 10 tweets
Oct 24, 2024
🧵Moira Deeming v John Pesutto

Part 2 of Day 3 of Closing Submissions and Final Day of Hearing!

#DeemingvPesutto
"Silence all stand!"

I always get such a shock when that announcement comes on
Read 84 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(