1) On March 6th 2009 then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton famously used a prop, "a reset button", to announce a new approach toward relationships between the United States and Russia. Clinton presented the button to her counterpart, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
2) In an attempt to break the ice with Lavrov, Clinton handed him a makeshift "reset" button wrapped in a ribbon at the start of their meeting. Laughing, she told the foreign minister that "we want to reset our relationship" and "we will do it together."
Lavrov promised to keep the button on his desk, but pointed out that the Russian word written on it, "peregruzka," meant "overload" -- not "reset."
3) At the time many people warned the Obama Administration was taking a very naïve position if they collectively thought the Russians would in any way align with U.S. interests.
The reasoning for the caution was simple.
For two decades the general Russian political class had felt "the West" in a general sense, and the U.S. in particular, had been dancing in the end zone about the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Regardless of whether or not the Obama administration wanted to admit there was a resentment in place, it factually existed.
Then something funny happened... The U.S Embassy "cable leak" scandal.
4) Within the Cables, and directly following Clinton's visit to Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, the Clinton cables showed the USA position.
Russia and its intelligence agencies are using mafia bosses to carry out criminal operations, with one cable reporting that the relationship is so close that the country has become a "virtual mafia state".
The extraordinarily close relationship between Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, and Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian prime minister, which is causing intense US suspicion. Cables detail allegations of "lavish gifts", lucrative energy contracts and the use by Berlusconi of a "shadowy" Russian-speaking Italiango-between.
Yes, this was the background of the Russia-reset from Hillary Clinton. Duplicity thy name was... eh?
5) After a six-month stint in 2009 of global travel, a generally touchy feely apology tour, with reset buttons and photo-ops, the rest of the 09', 10' year was spent by Hillary Clinton travelling back to the same countries she previously visited and apologizing for the embarrassment within the wiki-leaks cables scandal.
Clinton spent almost all of 2010 going from country to country telling leaders she was sorry for making fun of them behind the scenes - and trying to reassure them the now outed private positions were wrong, and the more appropriate public positions were correct.
Understandably the Russians and everyone else just blew her off. Hillary made Obama foreign policy look stupid. Obama was not pleased.
That's the background for Obama soon thereafter not wanting to follow Clinton into the Libya fiasco.
6) Now keep in mind, this was followed by a completely botched disconnect with Egypt policy where Hillary was requesting regime change and Obama was publicly supporting President Mubarak.
Eventually they both decided to support the Muslim Brotherhood, and Mohammed Morsi, who instituted a devastating process of Sharia Compliant governance, disbanded the courts and judges and opened the jails.
Enter Egyptian General Fattah al-Sisi. Who took control of the situation and reinstituted stability in Egypt. Who did al-Sisi turn to for help?
Vladimir Putin.
Yes, Hillary Clinton destroyed Egyptian peace. al-Sisi restored Egypt peace, and Vladimir Putin stood to protect al-Sisi from the U.S. just in case.
7) So, Putin's reference when Kerry/Obama were stirring up trouble in Ukraine, was the visible result in Libya.
Only now, that "trouble" wasn't over there, it was right next door.
The rest is history.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ To give you an idea of the scope of influence of Mary McCord as a key corrupt and unlawful DC functionary, consider what we can document.
♦ McCord submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump campaign. Oct. '16
♦ McCord created the “Logan Act” claim used against Michael Flynn and then went with Sally Yates to confront the White House. Feb '17
♦ McCord then left the DOJ and went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on Impeachment Committee. '18
♦ McCord organized the CIA rule changes with Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. '18
♦ McCord led and organized the impeachment effort, in the background, using the evidence she helped create. '19
♦ McCord joined the FISA Court to protect against DOJ IG Michael Horowitz newly gained NSD oversight and FISA review. '19
♦ McCord joined the J6 Committee helping to create all the lawfare angles they deployed. '21
♦ McCord then coordinated with DA Fani Willis in Georgia. '21
♦ McCord was working with Special Counsel Jack Smith to prosecute Trump. '22
♦ McCord is now coordinating a Lawfare attack process against Donald Trump in term #2.
♦ McCord testified that AG Pam Bondi must recuse herself from investigating McCord. '25
♦ Joe Biden pardoned Mary McCord. '25
2/ DC – “Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and House Jan. 6 Select Committee has tapped Mary McCord, who once ran the Justice Department’s National Security Division, for representation in its fight to obtain former President Donald Trump’s White House records."
3/ .."I am exercising my authority under the Constitution to pardon General Mark A. Milley, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the Members of Congress and staff who served on the Select Committee, and the U.S. Capitol and D.C. Metropolitan police officers who testified before the Select Committee."...
3. July 2017 McCabe denies again; to Inspector General Horowitz.
July 2017 Lisa Page admits to Horowitz she was told to construct the Wall Street Journal story (Devlin Barrett, journalist). This conflicts with McCabe's repeated denials.
If the 2016 Intelligence Community Assessment and Joint Analysis Report were fabricated USIC intel in order to frame Donald Trump, then the JAR/ICA that led to the expulsion of 35 Russian assets was also a fabrication.
2) Using the Durham report, even the Wall Street journal said, […] “All of this suggests that the Mueller probe was as much a cover-up as an attempt to find evidence of collusion.”...
3) Yes. If the ICA/JAR were manipulated evidence (they were), and John Durham confirmed the Robert Mueller Trump-Russia collusion investigation was based on fraud (it was), then what does that say about the status of things?
2) Notice: “hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s attorney to SDNY”.
Pay super close attention. This is not an outcome of a New York Police Dept. raid on Anthony Weiner. This is Weiner’s attorney going to the U.S. attorney and voluntarily turning over emails. The emails were not turned over to the FBI in New York, the actual emails were turned over to the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District.
Key point here: Weiner’s attorneys turned over “emails”.
3) We already pieced this together 7 years ago.
Grassley needs to overlay the Strzok/Page text messages to the OIG report and the newly released "Clinton Annex."
SSCI Chairman Cotton is assembling his weapons right now, he has no choice - Cotton accepted the role. Tom Cotton is the "hand" of the Intelligence Community.
2) It's going to be bloody, brutal, vicious and one of the most consequential counter attacks in modern political history that few Americans will appreciate.
It's way over there.... on the beach.... far from view... far away from the crowd.... and it's going to be ugly.
3) She's doing this. But few, very few can actually see and understand what Tulsi is doing. I wrote the roadmap possibilities a year ago.
Compare what you see now, to this 👇. You will understand.
1) You guys know the background. You know the context. You know the history. You know all the nuances and Machiavellian manipulations that have brought us to this very specific moment.
2) Now, you are President Donald Trump and you are in a conversation with Vladimir Putin; a geopolitical ‘adversary’ whose current status was created by the same intelligence system operators that created your defined ‘enemy’ status within your own country. You and Putin were both targeted by the same intelligence system, the CIA.
3) Vladimir Putin does not view Americans as his enemy. Vladimir Putin views the CIA as his enemy.
President Putin is essentially ambivalent to your targeted position, but defines his adversary as your Central Intelligence Agency.
You want to cut the Gordian knot, change the geopolitical world, create a strategic alignment; but to do that you need Putin to accept you do not view him as the enemy. You also need to prove you have control over the apparatus he views as a threat.
How do you prove you have control over the agency?