It’s been 2 years since BA.2.86 first appeared (and I’m give the variant update to SAVE on Monday), so I thought I would do a little summary about this era of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. 1/
SARS-CoV-2 lineages come up with new constellations of mutations in 3 main ways. 1. Sequential acquisition of mutations during normal circulation. 2. Recombination. 3. Sweeping new lineages (almost certainly from persistent infections).
2/
BA.2.86 was one of the sweeping changes. When it first appeared in Israel I thought it was a persistent infection, most of which never spread. Then it appeared in Denmark too. 3/
However, our immunity was holding up. There was still a class of antibodies that did a pretty good job of neutralizing BA.2.86.
However, a single AA variation changed that.
The new lineage was designated JN.1 5/
JN.1 displaced all other lineages in the world within a few months.
There was a lot of convergent evolution in the JN.1 offspring (+F456L), but no single lineage became dominant until KP.3.1.1 about 6 months later. 6/
After KP.3.1.1 can the recombinant XEC.
XEC was a recombination of KP.3.1.1 with another JN.1, so KP.3.1.1. and XEC were very similar.
XEC slowly won out over KP.3.1.1, but never became world dominant. 7/
Next came LP.8.1, which was another JN.1 lineage that had been gradually evolving in SE Asia. It displaced XEC, but also did not become world dominant. 8/
Next came NB.1.8.1, which was derived from a recombinant of a JN.1 with an even older XBB recombinant.
Fun fact, most of the current NB.1.8.1 genome is derived from XBB and not JN.1. 9/
Finally, that brings us to XFG. XFG is a recombinant between LP.8.1 and another JN.1. XFG expanded more rapidly than most of the others, and is the first lineage to reach world dominance (it seems) in a year.
This is our US wastewater readout for XFG. Steadily growing, and appears to be over 60% of the US sequences. There is a corresponding surge (small one) in total virus, which likely is variant driven. 11/
There is an odd disconnect though. NB.1.8.1 remains completely dominant in Australia and China. 12/
I’m not sure what is next, but we are all still keeping an eye on BA.3.2. This sweeping lineage appeared a few months ago. It hasn’t pulled a ‘JN.1’ yet, but it has appeared on 4 continents.
We’ll be watching.
13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We found a new (I think) cryptic lineage this week.
I know I say this all the time, but this is really weird.
Warning, this thread is for nerds only.
1/
Here’s what we do. Every week we download all of the new sequences from SRA and run a bunch of screens to look for anachronistic or cryptic lineages.
This new one popped up in 3 different screens.
2/
A good way to spot anachronistic lineages is to look for sequences that have been deleted in contemporary lineages. The virus can only undo a deletion through recombination. If we find seqs that lack the deletions, they have to be old (or contaminated with something old).
3/
Here’s a forecast from a wastewater perspective (because sh*t don’t lie)
1/
Background. The 4 main kinds of influenza circulating among humans (in order of severity) are:
FluA H3N2
FluA H1N1
FluB
FluC (many don’t know this one)
2/
Last season, there was a pretty even split between H1N1 and H3N2, with a little bit of FluB late in the season. At least according to CDC patient data. 3/
This preprint just came out. @wchnicholas and team reconstructed and tested the NJ Spike and found that it has the tightest ACE2 binding of any SC2 Spike ever measured. 2/ medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
We first found the NJ variant in 2023 because this sewershed from NJ with 1.5 million people because it regularly had a sequence that was a reversion to the bat sarbeco sequence, which is common in cryptics. 3/
We are not the first group to do unbiased sequencing of wastewater to monitor circulating viruses, but I think we are the first to ever do it at this scale.
Weekly wastewater samples for 18 months, totaling over 85 Billion sequence reads.
2/
Among the ‘known’ viruses, there was a fairly even split between bacteria viruses (phages) and eukaryotic viruses.
This was just raw reads though, if you look at diversity there was considerably more species of phages. 3/
It looks like Coeur d’Alene, ID cryptic is gone for now, but it has still managed to answer a lot of lingering questions for me about SARS-CoV-2 evolution, and what to expect next.
Here's a whole genome summary and interpretation. 1/
For a long time cryptic lineages were all from pre-Omicron lineages.
I started wondering:
Will there be Omicron cryptics?
If so, will they have the same evolutionary trajectories as the pre-Omicron cryptics?
ID shows that the answer to both questions is yes.
2/
We don’t do a lot of whole genome sequencing, so I sent 3 samples to @dho lab, who got fantastic sequences for all 3.
These samples were virtually 100% cryptic, so we have nearly complete coverage of the genome for a change. 3/