Everyone has become a Fed watcher, but no one understands HOW the flows of capital are happening
As we move into Jackson Hole this week, we are very likely to see a shift in monetary policy, but the key will be understanding HOW this is transmitted into markets
🧵👇
If you understand the macro context for flows and how positioning is set up, then you will understand how Jackson Hole will be transmitted into markets.
This will frame all of the changes we see in interest rates, equities, and crypto.
First, we are in a period of time where growth AND inflation are accelerating.
The Atlanta Fed nowcast is running at 2.5% and long end rates have retraced the entire move they made from the NFP print.
The 3 month trend of NFP remains positive and we are adding jobs to the economy every single month. More jobs = more money being added to the underlying system.
Notice that UB has already retraced the entire rally from the NFP print. What does this mean? If we were truly at risk of a recession right now, UB would have made a new high or been flat, not retraced the entire move on such a violent NFP print.
The underlying data and market expectations are both confirming the views I have been laying out for a while: Inflation risk is greater than recession risk. You can see the full report here:
And notice that inflation swaps are sitting well above 3% with credit spreads at cycle lows. This means that inflation risk is clearly higher than recession risk right now. On top of this, the last PCE, CPI, and PPI inflation prints all came in above expectations.
But what is the Fed doing? They are still allowing 50bps of cuts get priced on the forward curve. This is why there is a positive liquidity impulse pushing asset prices higher
Here is the deal with the Fed right now, as long as inflation swaps are sitting above 3% and the Fed is allowing 50bps of cuts to be priced for this year, they are being to accommodative and actually increasing the probability of inflation and lowering the probability of a recession.
Everyone is so laser focused on the Sept cut happening or not that they are missing the fact that the larger context is one of the Fed being to accomadative.
This matters because if one of the major drivers of this rally has been driven by the Fed being to accommodative, what do you think happens when they shift their stance? All of the AI narratives and factor rotations will get smacked with macro volatility and cause a black hole in markets as people rush for the exit.
This is WHY Jackson Hole is such a critical step this week in the progression of the Fed's cycle.
The main idea is that the Fed is already operating in a tension where they are trying to manage the policy error they are making.
Like I said here, any error by the Fed will be priced by the long end of the curve and the currency. It doesn't matter who the Fed chair is; there are always constraints.
So we aren't seeing macro volatility and long end rates cause this credit cycle to collapse. HOWEVER, if Powell comes out to dovish or to hawkish in this meeting, it would be easy for either extreme to cause volatility to spike.
Think about it like this, if they try to recontextualize the monetary policy framework for more dovish decisions, this could actually cause long end rates to rise because it is to accomadative relative to the inflation risk we are seeing.
Inversely, a stance that is to hawkish could begin to reprice how the 2026 pricing of the forward curve. This has been one of the primary drivers in the weaker dollar. See the Z5Z6 sofr contract below overlaid with the DXY.
In simple terms, for the credit cycle to continue and not undergo a shock, they CANNOT have a dramatic change to their monetary policy framework. The thing is, Jackson Hole has consistently been a place where they reframe things. The wild card is the fact that Powell is going to get booted next year and so in one sense no one really cares what he has to say.
This goes back to understanding the actual constraints of the Fed and Powell. The Fed is NOT exerting its force in markets which is why the curve has been steepening as they fall behind.
So while everyone focuses on Powell, the more important thing will be watching for how theyre just keeping things constant and the larger macro constraints function.
Positioning in the forward curve is already pricing a relatively dovish outcome. All we need is the absence of change. If you have not read them yet, I wrote full reports on the forward curve and Jackson Hole here:
Everything is setting up for a larger macro move but for now, I remain bullish risk assets and bearish bonds until macro volatility spikes and begins to drag on risk assets. There will be a moment to exit the train but we are not there yet. Jackson Hole will be a critical signal in this progression.
You can find all of the free educational playbooks on interest rates, the credit cycle, and macro here:
We are seeing an incredibly aggressive compression in FX volatility as stocks bid and bonds face significant headwinds
This is directly linked with the credit cycle thesis I have been laying out
Let me break down 3 important things to watch for this 🧵
1) FX volatility is inherently linked with the VIX and MOVE Index.
Notice these move in lockstep which makes total sense because every asset is not only a view on the underlying security but also the currency its priced in.
Cuts or hikes by the Fed are not inherently bullish or bearish for the credit cycle
It is all about HOW these relate to underlying growth and inflation
If you can understand this relationship+positioning, you can know WHEN to exit the train before the bear market 🧵👇
I have been laying out the bullish view for equities for months now and have been running long trades in equities and Bitcoin. You can see the initial views and trades I laid out here:
There is this entire narrative that cuts by the Fed is bullish risk assets. This is fundamentally incorrect and not historically accurate. The full video where I explain the scenarios is below but here is the main idea: the Fed can cut or hike interest rates and equities/Bitcoin can rally or sell off depending on the underlying growth regime.
All markets are about supply and demand. When the Fed changes interest rates, this is only one side of the equation. The other side is how much money is in the system via growth and inflation.
The price action in stocks continues to confirm the macro regime I've laid out
1)The Credit Cycle is in full swing, causing melt-up mode
2)Inflation risk is greater than recession risk
All of this is coming to the macro end game moment where volatility shocks everyone 🧵👇
On the CPI print today, we are seeing stocks UP and bonds DOWN. Why? because we need to unwind all the bears who thought a single NFP print meant a recession.
As I laid out earlier this week, the play continues to be stocks bidding and bonds at risk of selling off
When stocks are bidding and bonds are selling, it is an indication that INFLATION RISK IS GREATER THAN RECESSION RISK. Everything for this idea was laid out in the interest rate report:
As we move into the CPI print this week, flows are going to adjust for higher inflation risk
The MAIN idea for the next month: Inflation Risk Is GREATER Than Recession Risk
This is a full breakdown of the context and flows into inflation prints this week 🧵👇
Consensus is expecting a 10bps acceleration in core CPI. What people continue to get wrong is that they think inflation is only tariff-driven and thereby transitory. This is creating a gap in markets where the Fed and other people are "looking through" inflation.
This action of "looking through" inflation and labeling it transitory is in itself an incorrect interpretation of the underlying dynamics AND increases the likelihood of inflation turning into a bigger problem.
All of us know that core goods have been accelerating for months now
The next move in interest rates will be a direct result of inflation risk and the credit cycle
Here is a full breakdown of WHERE we are with interest rates and whether cuts/hikes are bullish/bearish for equities and Bitcoin
🧵👇
The first point to understand is that rate cuts are not inherently bullish or bearish for risk assets. Anyone saying this is using recency/confirmation bias.
I laid out in this video that we can have cuts or hikes by the Fed and risk assets can move in either direction. What determines this? How the rate cuts and hikes related to underlying growth and inflation.
So in simple terms, if you know what the Fed is going AND where growth and inflation is, then you can know if equities and Bitcoin are likely to move higher/lower.