Instead, Karoline Leavitt BURNED their FAKE narratives at the stake—OBLITERATING months of lies about Trump’s peace push in Ukraine.
“This is why Americans’ trust in the mass media is at its lowest point in five decades.”
And that was just her opening shot…
🧵 THREAD
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt kicked off the press briefing with a bang.
From the moment she stepped behind the podium, it was clear…this wasn’t going to be business as usual.
Leavitt came ready to hold both the media and their Democrat allies accountable for the months of lies, smears, and distortions surrounding President Trump’s push for peace in Ukraine.
She didn’t ease into it.
She started by driving the final dagger into Joe Biden’s failed presidency….pointing to the comment that changed everything.
She said it loud so that this time, it would be impossible for the media to ignore.
“President Putin publicly confirmed what President Trump has said all along: The war between Russia and Ukraine never would have started in the first place if President Trump were in office.”
Then came the gut punch.
“This was always obvious to any person with a shred of common sense.”
Leavitt walked the press through a brief but devastating history lesson:
“Just look at what took place during the last four administrations.”
“Under George W. Bush, Russia invaded Georgia.”
“Under Barack Obama, Russia took Crimea.”
“Under Joe Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine.”
“But under President Trump, Russia did not invade or take anything.”
The contrast couldn’t be clearer.
Then, she looked the press dead in the eye and aimed directly at the very pundits seated in front of her.
It was an indictment, straight to their faces.
Leavitt unleashed a flamethrower on the media’s coverage of Trump’s foreign policy.
Piece by piece, she dismantled the narrative they’ve pushed for six months.
“One thing that has absolutely not changed is the media’s negative and downright false coverage of President Trump and his foreign policy accomplishments.”
“From the beginning of this entire process, much of the left-wing media has been actively rooting against the president of the United States in the pursuit of peace.”
She called out how absurdly they responded to Trump’s diplomacy:
“Initially, the media ridiculously claimed that President Trump was somehow beholden to Russia for even agreeing to have a face-to-face discussion with President Putin inside of the United States.”
“The media said President Trump was making a great mistake by legitimizing Putin. They were aghast that President Trump would treat another world leader like a world leader.”
Then came the swipe at the so-called experts who have FAILED at every step of the way, [cough, cough—John Bolton].
“All week and following those historic U.S.–Russia bilateral talks, we listened to CLUELESS pundits on television trying—but failing—to claim that the president had failed.”
“The so-called experts in the foreign policy establishment, whose record is nothing but endless wars, trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars, and dead Americans, have the nerve to try and lecture President Trump—who has solved SEVEN global conflicts in seven months.”
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
She wasn’t finished…not even close.
The statistic she was about to drop, hit like a hammer.
“This is why Americans’ trust in the mass media is at its lowest point in five decades.”
Leavitt explained how the media’s behavior wasn’t just shameful and reckless.
It was directly undermining the president’s diplomacy itself.
She used the word ‘sabotage’.
“Diplomacy is a delicate process.”
“Instead of reporting the facts about what is happening here at this White House and what is happening between this president and other leaders around the world, many outlets in this room continue to try to actively undermine the president and sabotage efforts toward peace.”
“That is why I felt the need to set the record straight.”
But Leavitt was about to transcend generalities.
She went after individual pundits sitting right in the briefing room in, just feet in front of her.
One by one, they tried to challenge her and each time, she met them head-on.
First up: Rachel Scott from ABC News.
Scott tried to poke holes in Trump’s peace efforts, asking:
“As of now, there is no ceasefire in place. We’ve seen Russia continue its attacks on Ukraine. What indications is the president getting from Putin that he wants to have this meeting with Zelenskyy soon?”
Leavitt didn’t even blink. She answered simply:
“Uhhh, because he spoke to him DIRECTLY, yesterday.”
Scott tried to recover: “And—and he expressed that—sooner rather than later?”
But Leavitt shut it down instantly.
“He spoke to that directly yesterday, and the president put that in his statement that he gave to all of you, the news media—knowing you’d be asking—following that conversation in the effort of transparency.”
Scott was left speechless. It was swift but decisive.
It was a rough day for ABC News.
Scott didn’t even have time to process what had just hit her.
Next up was Shawn McCreesh from The New York Times.
McCreesh, who writes ENDLESS hit pieces attacking the president for every move he makes, tried to stir up more doubt…but this time, Leavitt didn’t let it slide.
He questioned Trump’s strategy for brokering peace...because journalists are much better at diplomacy than the president of the United States.
McCreesh: “If the point is to get anybody on the same page, why wouldn’t Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room? He said it would be ‘disrespectful’ to that, but why is that disrespectful?”
Leavitt had him pegged from the moment he opened his mouth.
“With all due respect, only a reporter from ‘The New York Times’ would ask a question like that, Shaun.”
It was a haymaker…and he knew it.
But Leavitt continued by giving McCreesh a quick lesson in how diplomacy actually works:
“The president met with all these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil.”
“In fact, there was so much progress in the readout given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America.”
“These leaders, who this war is in the backyard, are very grateful that the president took that call, and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia’s thinking on this.”
“Something that was not done by the previous administration at all.”
Masterclass.
Doubt Shawn was smiling for too long after that.
Last, but certainly not least, was Fox’s very own TDS-afflicted reporter, Jacqui Heinrich.
Leavitt made an example out of her, forcing her to face the truth in front of the ENTIRE press pool.
It’s worth noting: this is the same reporter who hinted that Trump’s historic Alaska summit had been a failure and claimed Putin “steamrolled” him just minutes after it had ended.
And let’s not forget—Heinrich is newly engaged to Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), co-chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus and one of only two Republicans who voted against Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Food for thought.
Heinrich started: “The president often says that this war would not have started if he were in office, and Putin confirmed that—”
But Leavitt cut her off mid-sentence.
“It’s true. Do you accept that as true? The European leaders do. And President Putin himself said that, by the way.”
Heinrich looked stunned.
She wasn’t used to anyone pushing back.
She scrambled to finish her question: “The question I have is what is the president going to do to ensure that the security guarantees last beyond him into the time where he is no longer president? Does that have to involve Congress?”
Leavitt didn’t even have to think about her response.
“He understands the need for that, which he spoke to yesterday. It’s why he’s engaging in so many talks, and so many conversations with both sides of this war.”
Then she delivered the closer:
“It’s why, on the way home from Anchorage, Alaska—very late at night when many of you on the press plane were sleeping—the president himself was still awake at 2AM talking to European leaders and NATO about how we can ensure lasting peace and bring this confrontation to an end.”
It was a subtle reminder with a firm message.
While you [the media] are asleep, the president is working behind the scenes to accomplish all that he has set out before him.
She tried to ask a follow up question, but Leavitt quickly moved on to another reporter’s question.
Game, set, match: Leavitt.
It was so over.
Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.