Instead, Karoline Leavitt BURNED their FAKE narratives at the stake—OBLITERATING months of lies about Trump’s peace push in Ukraine.
“This is why Americans’ trust in the mass media is at its lowest point in five decades.”
And that was just her opening shot…
🧵 THREAD
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt kicked off the press briefing with a bang.
From the moment she stepped behind the podium, it was clear…this wasn’t going to be business as usual.
Leavitt came ready to hold both the media and their Democrat allies accountable for the months of lies, smears, and distortions surrounding President Trump’s push for peace in Ukraine.
She didn’t ease into it.
She started by driving the final dagger into Joe Biden’s failed presidency….pointing to the comment that changed everything.
She said it loud so that this time, it would be impossible for the media to ignore.
“President Putin publicly confirmed what President Trump has said all along: The war between Russia and Ukraine never would have started in the first place if President Trump were in office.”
Then came the gut punch.
“This was always obvious to any person with a shred of common sense.”
Leavitt walked the press through a brief but devastating history lesson:
“Just look at what took place during the last four administrations.”
“Under George W. Bush, Russia invaded Georgia.”
“Under Barack Obama, Russia took Crimea.”
“Under Joe Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine.”
“But under President Trump, Russia did not invade or take anything.”
The contrast couldn’t be clearer.
Then, she looked the press dead in the eye and aimed directly at the very pundits seated in front of her.
It was an indictment, straight to their faces.
Leavitt unleashed a flamethrower on the media’s coverage of Trump’s foreign policy.
Piece by piece, she dismantled the narrative they’ve pushed for six months.
“One thing that has absolutely not changed is the media’s negative and downright false coverage of President Trump and his foreign policy accomplishments.”
“From the beginning of this entire process, much of the left-wing media has been actively rooting against the president of the United States in the pursuit of peace.”
She called out how absurdly they responded to Trump’s diplomacy:
“Initially, the media ridiculously claimed that President Trump was somehow beholden to Russia for even agreeing to have a face-to-face discussion with President Putin inside of the United States.”
“The media said President Trump was making a great mistake by legitimizing Putin. They were aghast that President Trump would treat another world leader like a world leader.”
Then came the swipe at the so-called experts who have FAILED at every step of the way, [cough, cough—John Bolton].
“All week and following those historic U.S.–Russia bilateral talks, we listened to CLUELESS pundits on television trying—but failing—to claim that the president had failed.”
“The so-called experts in the foreign policy establishment, whose record is nothing but endless wars, trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars, and dead Americans, have the nerve to try and lecture President Trump—who has solved SEVEN global conflicts in seven months.”
Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see.
→ @VigilantFox
She wasn’t finished…not even close.
The statistic she was about to drop, hit like a hammer.
“This is why Americans’ trust in the mass media is at its lowest point in five decades.”
Leavitt explained how the media’s behavior wasn’t just shameful and reckless.
It was directly undermining the president’s diplomacy itself.
She used the word ‘sabotage’.
“Diplomacy is a delicate process.”
“Instead of reporting the facts about what is happening here at this White House and what is happening between this president and other leaders around the world, many outlets in this room continue to try to actively undermine the president and sabotage efforts toward peace.”
“That is why I felt the need to set the record straight.”
But Leavitt was about to transcend generalities.
She went after individual pundits sitting right in the briefing room in, just feet in front of her.
One by one, they tried to challenge her and each time, she met them head-on.
First up: Rachel Scott from ABC News.
Scott tried to poke holes in Trump’s peace efforts, asking:
“As of now, there is no ceasefire in place. We’ve seen Russia continue its attacks on Ukraine. What indications is the president getting from Putin that he wants to have this meeting with Zelenskyy soon?”
Leavitt didn’t even blink. She answered simply:
“Uhhh, because he spoke to him DIRECTLY, yesterday.”
Scott tried to recover: “And—and he expressed that—sooner rather than later?”
But Leavitt shut it down instantly.
“He spoke to that directly yesterday, and the president put that in his statement that he gave to all of you, the news media—knowing you’d be asking—following that conversation in the effort of transparency.”
Scott was left speechless. It was swift but decisive.
It was a rough day for ABC News.
Scott didn’t even have time to process what had just hit her.
Next up was Shawn McCreesh from The New York Times.
McCreesh, who writes ENDLESS hit pieces attacking the president for every move he makes, tried to stir up more doubt…but this time, Leavitt didn’t let it slide.
He questioned Trump’s strategy for brokering peace...because journalists are much better at diplomacy than the president of the United States.
McCreesh: “If the point is to get anybody on the same page, why wouldn’t Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room? He said it would be ‘disrespectful’ to that, but why is that disrespectful?”
Leavitt had him pegged from the moment he opened his mouth.
“With all due respect, only a reporter from ‘The New York Times’ would ask a question like that, Shaun.”
It was a haymaker…and he knew it.
But Leavitt continued by giving McCreesh a quick lesson in how diplomacy actually works:
“The president met with all these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil.”
“In fact, there was so much progress in the readout given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America.”
“These leaders, who this war is in the backyard, are very grateful that the president took that call, and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia’s thinking on this.”
“Something that was not done by the previous administration at all.”
Masterclass.
Doubt Shawn was smiling for too long after that.
Last, but certainly not least, was Fox’s very own TDS-afflicted reporter, Jacqui Heinrich.
Leavitt made an example out of her, forcing her to face the truth in front of the ENTIRE press pool.
It’s worth noting: this is the same reporter who hinted that Trump’s historic Alaska summit had been a failure and claimed Putin “steamrolled” him just minutes after it had ended.
And let’s not forget—Heinrich is newly engaged to Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA), co-chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus and one of only two Republicans who voted against Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act.
Food for thought.
Heinrich started: “The president often says that this war would not have started if he were in office, and Putin confirmed that—”
But Leavitt cut her off mid-sentence.
“It’s true. Do you accept that as true? The European leaders do. And President Putin himself said that, by the way.”
Heinrich looked stunned.
She wasn’t used to anyone pushing back.
She scrambled to finish her question: “The question I have is what is the president going to do to ensure that the security guarantees last beyond him into the time where he is no longer president? Does that have to involve Congress?”
Leavitt didn’t even have to think about her response.
“He understands the need for that, which he spoke to yesterday. It’s why he’s engaging in so many talks, and so many conversations with both sides of this war.”
Then she delivered the closer:
“It’s why, on the way home from Anchorage, Alaska—very late at night when many of you on the press plane were sleeping—the president himself was still awake at 2AM talking to European leaders and NATO about how we can ensure lasting peace and bring this confrontation to an end.”
It was a subtle reminder with a firm message.
While you [the media] are asleep, the president is working behind the scenes to accomplish all that he has set out before him.
She tried to ask a follow up question, but Leavitt quickly moved on to another reporter’s question.
Game, set, match: Leavitt.
It was so over.
Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together!
If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack:
#10 – Karoline Leavitt calmly obliterates ABC reporter who tries to undermine Trump’s peace talks in Ukraine.
This was too easy for Leavitt.
ABC’s Rachel Scott got caught with her pants down when she asked, “As of now, there is no ceasefire in place. We’ve seen Russia continue its attacks on Ukraine. What indications is the president getting from Putin that he wants to have this meeting with Zelenskyy soon?”
Leavitt fired back: “Uhhh, because he spoke to him DIRECTLY, yesterday.”
Scott scrambled: “And—and he expressed that—sooner rather than later.”
That’s when Leavitt buried her:
“He spoke to that directly yesterday, and the president put that IN HIS STATEMENT that he gave to all of you, the news media, knowing you’d be asking, following that conversation in the effort of transparency.”
Leavitt’s calm reminder that Trump had already answered Scott’s gotcha question in writing turned her ambush into a humiliating self-own.
SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW
#9 - Trump explodes on Obama for handing Crimea over to Russia, says, “That was PURE and SIMPLE Obama’s fault” on air.
“Crimea is the apple of Ukraine, I mean, it’s so beautiful. And Obama gave it away.”
“Nobody ever mentions that. If I ever did that, the fake news would be writing about me day and night for years.”
“He gave it away.”
“He demanded that they let it go, and Russia came in and took it—like candy from a baby.”
“It was really Obama’s—not really—I mean that was pure and simple Obama’s fault, what a terrible thing he did to that country.”
#8 - A family in Texas is suing an AI chatbot after it told their 17-year-old autistic son to cut himself, engage in sexual activity, and kill his parents.
Character AI, founded by a former Google researcher and run by a former Meta executive, is accused of sending the teen into a terrifying downward spiral.
In just six months, he lost 20 pounds, withdrew from his family, and became violent. Attorney Matthew Bergman says the bot encouraged the boy to self-harm, reject his faith, and even plot against his parents.
“If an adult had said these things to a child, they’d be in prison,” he warned.
The lawsuit emerges as Washington moves to shield AI firms from accountability—sparking fears that Big Tech could soon enjoy the same immunity as Big Pharma.
If AI can corrupt children without consequence, what nightmare future are we allowing? Watch @zeee_media’s disturbing report to see what’s truly at stake.
Peace is now within reach—because one man REFUSES to quit.
The last Trump–Zelenskyy meeting ended in FIREWORKS.
But today, EVERYTHING changed.
Fresh off his historic summit with Putin in Alaska, Trump welcomed Zelenskyy to the White House—which ended in a move that could finally STOP the KILLING for good.
🧵 THREAD
The last meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy famously ended in a BLOW UP.
It was bad.
But today, when President Zelenskyy arrived at the White House, the tone was entirely different.
President Trump had just returned from a historic summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, where the first step toward peace had been laid.
He now had to get Zelenskyy on board.
The world was watching to see what would happen next.
At around 1PM, President Trump greeted his Ukrainian counterpart outside the White House.
This time, Zelenskyy was wearing a suit.
The two smiled as they shook hands.
When a reporter asked Trump what message he had for the people of Ukraine, he replied without hesitation:
“We love them!”
From the start, it was clear…this was a different atmosphere.
The leaders then walked into the White House together.
Peace talks were officially moving forward, and Trump hinted that the next step could be a trilateral meeting with Putin to finalize the deal.
Shortly after, the press was invited into the Oval Office.
Trump, Zelenskyy, and Vice President JD Vance were seated in the exact same spots as their contentious meeting back in February.
Trump broke the ice by thanking Zelenskyy for making the trip to Washington.
Then came the update.
“We have had a lot of good discussions, a lot of good talks,” Trump said.
“I think progress is being made, very substantial progress in many ways.”
Referencing the Alaska summit, he added, “We had a good meeting, as you know, just a short while ago with the president of Russia.”
“I think there is a possibility that something could come out of it, and today’s meeting is very important.”
It’s not every day a famous action star like Chris Pratt sits down with Bill Maher.
Pratt isn’t known for politics—he tends to stay neutral on purpose.
But this time, he said something Hollywood won’t like.
And when RFK Jr.’s name came up, Pratt couldn’t keep his secret about where he really stands.
🧵THREAD
Action star Chris Pratt isn’t known for making his political views public. But on Monday, during Bill Maher’s podcast, he dropped some major hints about where he stands politically.
Right before the 2024 election, Pratt wrote this column describing how he sees things from “both sides” and wishing for the division to end. In that piece, he didn’t endorse either candidate.
As expected, his refusal to take sides angered liberals. Columns surfaced mocking Pratt for being too “milquetoast” and lacking the “courage and principles to outright endorse Kamala Harris” like his father-in-law, Arnold Schwarzenegger, did.
Writer Mike Redmond concluded bluntly: “He doesn’t want her to win.” And it turns out, Mike might have been onto something.
Transhumanism isn’t progress—it’s eugenics in disguise.
Dr. Henry Ealy warns what’s happening now mirrors the same ideology that fueled Hitler’s dream of a “superior race.”
And one bone-chilling quote from Bill Gates, and this agenda becomes impossible to ignore.
🧵 THREAD
Robert Kennedy Jr. may be leading MAHA, but its sister movement, MYHA, Make Yourself Healthy Again, is the one catching fire.
That momentum is about to take center stage at the Healing for the Ages annual fall conference—a powerful educational event where doctors show YOU how to heal yourself.
Doctors Henry Ealy, Bryan Ardis, and Jana Schmidt join us today to discuss.
Dr. Ardis kicked off the conversation with a bold statement: the upcoming Healing for the Ages conference just may be the most important thing he’s ever done.
“I don’t want to put down the birth of my children or my wedding day,” he joked, “but this is one of the most exciting days of my life.”
He said the October event won’t be feel-good fluff or recycled health advice. It’s going to deliver real tools people can use right now to take their health back—and he’s saving his most powerful revelations for the conference.
“These are things I have never presented before,” he said, “and I believe will be a great asset to every single human being on this planet every day moving forward.”
“You’ll find out why here later in this interview,” he added.
But what Big Pharma really hates is its ability to treat infections that antibiotics and antivirals can’t.
Like ivermectin, this forbidden remedy belongs in everyone’s medicine cabinet.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-transfo…
In the 1960s–80s, pharmaceutical companies poured money into DMSO research, and the results were jaw-dropping.
They found DMSO to be effective on viruses, bacteria, fungi, and parasites—with a safety profile better than many over the counter drugs.
The evidence was piling up. The FDA slammed on the brakes. Most medical research was banned.
The cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes crosses every political line.
For decades, leaders from both parties buried his secrets—not to protect him, but to protect themselves.
Behind closed doors, a blackmail machine trapped America’s most powerful figures in a web of silence.
The media had Epstein’s Black Book for years.
And they said nothing.
They waited until it was “safe” to speak.
By then, key witnesses were dead. The damage was irreversible.
So what evidence is so explosive that Congress pretends it doesn’t exist?
🧵 THREAD
Jeffrey Epstein's 2019 arrest uncovered hundreds of explicit images of likely underage girls and incriminating videos kept in a safe. Epstein's circle included powerful politicians, billionaires, celebrities, and even intelligence-linked figures.
Names that have come up include Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Bill Gates, Alan Dershowitz, and Les Wexner, just to name a few. A network of lawyers, media allies, staff, and pimps like Ghislaine Maxwell protected and enabled him.
Victims who tried to speak out were silenced. And journalists faced heavy pushback. Epstein's properties were wired with hidden cameras for blackmail, possibly tied to intelligence services. Those are the claims, but we're now being told that there's nothing to see here, just a bunch of child pornography downloaded by Epstein.
The administration's not only refusal to release these files, but lack of commitment to justice for Epstein's victims should raise questions for everyone. And for many, it is the line in the sand. Joining us today is journalist @nick__bryant, who is credited with exposing Epstein's black book and flight logs in 2015.
In 2002, while investigating a story on the occult, Nick Bryant uncovered something far darker. He stumbled upon a shadowy group called “The Finders,” whose members had been arrested in Florida with children. Reports described sexual abuse, bizarre rituals, and attempts to buy children overseas.
Then came the most chilling twist: a U.S. Customs officer investigating the case was told by D.C. police it had become a CIA “internal issue,” effectively shutting it down.
That discovery led him to another network, this one based in Omaha, Nebraska. Allegations included children flown across the country. Boys from Boys Town being exploited, and blackmail operations tied to intelligence circles. Bryant spoke with victims, sat down with a blackmail photographer, and obtained a list naming 60 abused children. Several suspicious deaths were linked to the ring.
The deeper he dug, the clearer the pattern became—these weren’t isolated scandals, but coordinated, protected trafficking networks operating inside the United States. His academic training kept him methodical, but the evidence was undeniable.
“All these kids were molested with impunity. Somebody has to do something about this.”