Thread by @BonkDaCarnivore

S&S study guide. Diary of a fugitive a 🧵: Dennis Keys aka Espaciodellaves:

Going to largely gloss over the early stages of his saga as I want to focus on the crimes, but let's just say Llaves has falsely accused at least 4 other people of being me in the last year (1/

At some point in june, Llaves incorrectly identified a man who isn't even an active X user as me. Other criminals like @timber001 and @BananaMediaX gleefully participated in publishing the private details and address of this man, flimsily justifying because "I'm mean" (2/

For the most part they were all just violating Colorado's strict privacy laws - criminal offenses, but not something any sheriff would put at the top of their heap. I took the steps of posting portions of my license to demonstrate I don't even have the same initials (3/

or birthdate (their victim was born in the 70's, the 3rd digit in my birthyear is an 8), but was otherwise content to let them proceed into what most people correctly identified as a blatant honeypot; I even got friends to create red herring accounts to lure them. Funny (4/)

However, on August 3rd, 2025, they took it too far. The person they had incorrectly identified as me was riding his motorcycle when a vehicle ran him off the road, injuring him. The driver referred to the victim as "Bonk", with the entire ordeal caught on a motorcycle cam (5/

The perpetrator of the attack fled the scene before police could arrive. The victim later stated in court he feared for his life because it was a rare occasion in which he was not armed to defend himself, but was able to identify the perpetrator (6/

On August 4th, a victim statement was made to the police in which he described the attack. After obtaining a copy of that police report, I made a paraphrased reading of the attack in a space on August 16th. A portion of that reading is here:

Despite making it clear I was reading a report written in the 1st person and was having to convert it to the 3rd person as I read it, Joe instead claimed that by me momentarily forgetting to convert to 3rd person and simply reading the report that I was "admitting I filed it" (8/

The police report, as mentioned, was written in 1st person perspective and I was just converting to reading it as written for a moment because it's unnatural to convert to 3rd person: (9/

On August 4th, the victim successfully demonstrated to the court 2 things: He had been harmed or threatened with harm, and that he was in imminent danger of further harm thanks to a video. A TRO containing no contact, staying physically away from, not mentioning online (10/

Not contacting through intermediaries, disrupting place of work, home or environment in any way, etc. was approved and signed by the Hon. Adam Hepp on August 4th with a mandatory in person hearing date scheduled for August 18th (11/

Keys was duly served the restraining order in the morning on August 6th, effectively preventing him from even saying the name of the victim in any way from that time, and enjoined from harassing him or posting about him (or anyone he CLAIMED the victim was) online (12/

Less than 2 hours after being served papers, Keys went onto Twitter and proclaimed the existence of any such order "fake" (remember this timestamp is Eastern time for me, so it would have been 12pm Llaves's time) (13/

Keys then went on to post about the victim against the restraining order over SEVENTY TIMES in the following 12 days (I'm not going to post these because it would be too much work to redact the victim's name). Each one of these posts constitute a violation of the order (14/

I will, however, do an interlude here to point out that Keys has been found to have violated X's @safety rules regarding posting personal information a gaggle of times previously. Here's a small sample size (15/

Further, on at least 3 occasions, Keys went and publicly mocked the existence of the TRO and the court's ability to do anything to him: (16/

Through a grant from Bonk, Inc, the victim in this case had a law firm hired to represent him for the restraining order hearing; Kyle Sawyer and Patricia Hill from the Sawyer Law Group. On August 17th, 1 day before the permanent restraining order hearing (17/

contacted the VICTIM'S attorney and pretended to be their actual client to get information about the victim's presentation plans, then claimed he was "confused" that it wasn't his lawyer. Keys hired no lawyer (18/

On August 18th, the victim and his counsel arrived at the courthouse for the hearing. Keys, knowing he would be remanded into custody if he appeared due to his many violations of the restraining order, the enhancement of the stalking charge, and not knowing the status of the(/19

aggravated vehicular assault, attempted vehicular homicide, and assault with a deadly weapon investigation ongoing against him, to say nothing of his mockery of the court on X, failed to appear. Even I - someone who's not a litigant in this case, showed up from 1900mi away (20/

At the hearing, further evidence was presented, including validation of multiple documents of proper service, injury, and active threat from Keys hanging over the victim and his continued violations of the order. Further, failure to appear was contempt of court.
(21/

The Hon. Hepp agreed that the restraining order needed to be made permanent, and referred the criminal violations to the sheriff's department to see to it Keys will eventually be made to face his crimes.
(22/

Note that the permanent restraining order mimics the TRO, which states that Keys is forbidden from initiating, taking part in, or enabling any contact against the victim (or anyone he believes to be the victim)
(23/

It's worth pointing out that Keys has further been stripped of his 2nd Amendment rights under both Federal laws as well as Arizona and Colorado law. Keys has at least 3 firearms per his admission (24/

Now, on to his nut huggers and the criminals cheering him on...(25/

In response to Keys's adverse ruling, the people who took such glee in doxxing some random guy immediately suddenly had a problem with what they considered doxxing. I'm only going to go with 2 examples out of about 9 I saw here, because reading these clowns loses brain cells

Ironically, in their rage over Llaves - a fugitive - being outed as such and critical information for those who might apprehend him being provided...they signal blasted the coordinates they were so concerned about. (27/

Remember, these were the same people who gleefully doxxed some random innocent person, thinking it was me. They call it a double standard because it 's twice as right, I guess.

But let's rewind a little bit. These people spent weeks claiming there was no restraining order. Then spent weeks claiming there was no court case. Then said there was no police report. Then said there was no accident at all. Then said there was no evidence.

Then said Llaves never violated the restraining order because he was never served. Then said he never violated it because he wasn't served until 2 days before the hearing. Then said He didn't have enough time to make it to the hearing (remember, there's proof above he (27/

was served on August 6th, 12 days before the hearing), then said there were no findings of criminality, then said there was no video of the crime, on and on and on. They just kept moving those goalposts.

All evidence above says everything they're saying is wrong. (28/

@threadreaderapp unroll