There’s signal in skin in the game. Across decades, founder/family influenced companies have outperformed by 300–400 bps annually, and founder CEOs tend to invest more in innovation and long term bets, advantages that compound.
So I screened for: Founder/insider ownership >10% (or clear voting control) + accelerating (or reaccelerating) revenue.
Here are 7 I like now, I’ll drop 3 more if this hits 500 likes. Let’s go👇🧵
2/ $APP - AppLovin (adtech engines running hot)
Rev growth re-accelerated: +71% YoY in Q1’25 => +77% YoY in Q2’25 as AXON flywheel and ML bidding drove pricing & win rates. That’s step function momentum at scale.
Alignment: Co-founder/CEO Adam Foroughi is a reported 10% owner and (with a director) holds all Class B (20 votes/share).
Concentrated control = tight execution.
With model driven ad yield compounding and a founder who can move fast without a proxy fight, this is what durable operating leverage looks like.
3/ $ZETA - Zeta Global
Co-founder/CEO David Steinberg & affiliates control 54% of voting power. Founder truly in the driver’s seat.
Q1 set the table, mgmt guided Q2 to +30–31%…then delivered Q2’25 rev $308M (+35% YoY) and raised FY’25 (rev, EBITDA, FCF). “Beat and raise” streak intact.
This is the “replacement cycle” trade in marketing clouds: identity + AI + owned data taking share from legacy suites. Founder control matters as $ZETA leans into buybacks and opex discipline while pushing platform wins (OneZeta). If macro wobbles, the guidance raise is your tell on pipeline visibility.
Rev growth inched up: +16% YoY (Q1’25, $855M) => +17% (Q2’25, $998M) with MAUs at 578M.
Scale + intent = better ROAS
Co-founder Ben Silbermann holds mid single digit equity (5.5%), but dual class structure preserves high voting influence relative to his economic stake. Insider block remains under 11%, yet control dynamics still favor founders.
$PINS is morphing into shoppable search. If conversion ads keep compounding, margins follow.
Rev growth re-accelerated: +29.6% YoY (Q1’25) => +38.2% YoY (Q2’25), with Shopee + SeaMoney both inflecting.
Founder/CEO Forrest Li retains 60%+ voting power via super-voting stock.
When a founder can throttle profitability vs. growth without second guessing, the company can hunt share when rivals blink.
6/ $SOUN - SoundHound AI (voice AI monetization finally shows up)
Rev growth exploded: Q2’25 +197% YoY to $42.7M, with FY’25 guide raised ($160–178M). That’s commercialization, not vibes.
Founders hold super-voting Class B (10 votes/share) and collectively 48% of voting power, real control.
Automotive + enterprise voice is a grind until scale hits, then margins inflect as models/partnerships amortize.
7/ $SHOP - Shopify (taking more of the GMV wallet)
Rev growth tick up: +26% YoY in Q1’25 to +31% YoY in Q2’25; mix shift (payments, capital, logistics-lite, ads) is widening take-rate.
Founder Tobi Lütke holds 40% voting power via the 2022 “founder share”, long runway, long leash.
Pricing power and attach rate beats volume in software Commerce; founder control lets $SHOP keep shipping where public company committees hesitate.
8/ $RDDT — Reddit
Revenue is actually accelerating.
- Q1’25: $392.4M, +61% YoY
- Q2’25: $500.0M, +78% YoY; GAAP net income $89M; Adj. EBITDA $167M; gross margin 90.8%. Q3 guide: $535–$545M revenue.
That’s clean acceleration with operating leverage. Retail interest isn’t hypothetical. They run an open IR subreddit (r/RDDT) and take questions directly from the community around earnings, rare access that keeps retail engaged and sticky around the story.
Founder control is real, not vibes. CEO/co-founder Steve Huffman holds majority voting power via Class B (10 votes/share) plus voting agreements with key early holders. The company confirms he can vote 74% of outstanding voting power; dual class explicitly preserves founder control.
Why this basket?
Alignment means fewer strategy U turns and faster product cadence.
Acceleration is the market’s favorite language, multiple expansion rides alongside revenue growth (and reverses just as violently when it stalls).
Founder control (via ownership or votes) lets management optimize for NPV, not next quarter.
If this thread clears 500 likes, I’ll drop 3 more with numbers + diligence notes.
Incentives first. Everything else later.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
David Gardner’s Rule Breaker Investing is one of the best investing books I’ve read in a long time. It’s hard to find books that actually add value—most of them are, frankly, shit.
What sets Gardner apart is he actually picked 100 baggers, unlike the others who dish out lessons but achieved nothing. Here are some of his 100 baggers: $TSLA $AMZN $NVDA $MELI $ISRG $NFLX
His rule is simple (as it should be). David Gardner’s Rule Breaker traits:
1) Top dog & first mover in an important, emerging industry 2) Durable competitive advantage (moat) 3) Strong past price appreciation 4) Excellent, founder-quality leadership/backing 5) Strong customer/consumer love (real evangelism) 6) “Too expensive” according to traditional/value media (often labeled overvalued)
Based on these traits, I looked for companies that check all the boxes under today’s conditions 🧵
1) Duolingo $DUOL — mobile, gamified learning at global scale
Top dog & first mover: World’s most-downloaded education app; first to scale freemium, gamified language learning to huge MAU/DAU.
Sustainable advantage: Brand + data + AI features (Duolingo Max) deepen engagement and moat.
Strong past price appreciation: 2025 prints ATHs on beats and raised guide.
Excellent management / founder-led: Co-founder/CEO Luis von Ahn still driving the AI-first strategy.
Strong consumer appeal: 10M+ paying subs; growth across DAU/MAU and subs in 2025 updates.
Considered “overvalued”: Frequently discussed as trading at a premium vs. traditional valuation lenses.
2) Tesla $TSLA — software-first EV & tech platform
Top dog & first-mover: First to scale long range, software centric EVs + OTA and the largest fast charge network. Ambition to scale Optimus is massive, but ‘first to scale humanoids’ is still a bet.
Sustainable advantage: Vertically integrated software/energy stack and massive Supercharger footprint.
Strong past price appreciation: A decade-long rocket; still capable of record delivery prints and sharp rallies.
Excellent leadership: Musk’s execution (with all the volatility) built the category defining brand.
Strong consumer appeal: Among the most recognized auto brands; loyalty/attention remain industry-leading even if off peaks.
Considered overvalued: Ongoing mainstream debate labels $TSLA pricey/overhyped vs. fundamentals.
The real cheat code is management that shrinks your share count, tucks in niche deals, and reinvests at 20%+ returns.
Meet the 10 Capital Allocation MVPs quietly compounding in plain sight.
10 operators compounding via buybacks + tuck-ins + >20% 3 yr ROIIC
Playbook > product.
1) $TDG — TransDigm
Mission critical aircraft parts with pricing power, sold into long lived platforms.
Why they’re MVPs: They stay relentlessly per-share focused and keep doing bolt ons (e.g., Simmonds Precision from $RTX). The edge is small, monopolistic niches + ruthless cash return discipline.
2) $HEI – HEICO
FAA-approved aftermarket aircraft parts + specialty electronics; the definition of “serial tuck-ins.”
Why they’re MVPs: Keep consolidating niche aero/defense electronics (e.g., Gables Engineering). Repurchases are opportunistic; compounding comes mainly from dozens of small, high ROIC buys.
3) $TDY – Teledyne
Sensors, imaging, and instrumentation (think cameras to sonar).
Why they’re MVPs: After digesting FLIR, they reloaded the cannon with a fresh $2B buyback authorization (Jul 25) and continue niche deals in sensing/imaging. The per share math matters again.
The real asymmetry is in SMID caps quietly scaling margins.
9 SMID caps that beat Q2 by a wide margin and showed revenue outgrowing opex / expanding operating margins (multi quarter trend in most cases).
Why it matters: this is where multiple expansion sticks, cash compounding is doing the heavy lifting, not vibes.
These are the under the radar rerate candidates 👇🧵
1/ $TMDX — TransMedics
What they do: organ-care systems (OCS) + a turnkey national organ procurement (“NOP”) logistics network.
Thesis: category creator with a network effect (clinics + pilots + aircraft). Mix shift to service/NOP throws off margin.
The print: Revenue $157.4M (+38% y/y); gross margin 61%; opex up 6% (60.0 vs 56.8), so operating income 3X to $36.6M; raised FY25 guide to $585–605M.
That’s real leverage and a guide up.
2/ $CELH — Celsius
What they do: zero-sugar energy + hydration; now includes Alani Nu.
Thesis: category share gainer + portfolio scale with Pepsi distribution; operating discipline funds marketing without breaking margin.
The print: Record revenue $739.3M (+84% y/y); Adj. EBITDA $210.3M (+109% y/y); NA revenue +87%; share up to 17.3% of US energy. Opex grew slower than sales (SG&A +107% largely from Alani Nu, vs revenue +84%) but EBITDA scaled faster, textbook leverage.