Bitcoin hit $124,500 last week.
This morning it plunged to $112,300 — a 9.7% pullback.
One spark? Strategy’s equity guidance update: a catalyst for MSTR’s sharp drop and the broader treasury shakeout.
But is this a crack in the model, or the setup for S&P 500 rocket fuel? 🧵👇
The update was announced publicly by Saylor.
Here’s the part that caused the outrage:
Strategy “may issue equity to pay debt interest, fund preferred dividends, or when otherwise deemed advantageous.”
That single line reopened optionality and rattled confidence.
Why? Because mNAVs across treasury companies are collapsing.
When stocks trade at or below the value of their underlying Bitcoin, the whole leverage model looks fragile.
And traders are quick to ask: “Has the strategy broken?”
As valuations sank, some feared trading below 1x NAV was fatal.
Ben Werkman disagrees:
“I don’t believe trading below one times NAV is like the kiss of death in the Bitcoin treasury space… these valuations are gonna ebb and flow and sentiment’s gonna be a huge driver.”
Matt Cole says the short-term panic misses the point:
“We have a 10 to 15 year period of a digital gold rush. You want to accumulate as much Bitcoin as possible during that time… you don’t unwind a long-term thesis because you’ve seen one month traded at a discount.”
Enter Preston Pysh’s analogy:
Saylor hasn’t built a fragile structure.
He’s built a transmission.
Different gears for different environments — tightening or easing.
The goal: keep the machine moving forward and keep stacking Bitcoin in all conditions.
So yes, some traders lost trust in the guidance change.
But zoom out: Strategy holds $73B in Bitcoin. Its balance sheet can cover preferred dividend obligations for decades, even if BTC fell over 50%.
Hardly the picture of imminent collapse.
And here’s the bigger question:
Is this shakeout just the storm before Strategy’s potential inclusion in the S&P 500?
Ben Workman:
“Management needs optionality. If S&P 500 inclusion happens, you want the ability to take advantage of massive inflows.”
Remember to zoom out: Bitcoin is still up 615% in 32 months.
Sideways price action hardens support, resets leverage, and brings new capital.
As Pierre Rochard says:
“Sideways BTC is maintenance.”
Optionality ≠ betrayal.
Volatility ≠ failure.
The name of the game is Bitcoin accumulation in all environments.
If you want to build your own long-term Bitcoin strategy, Swan Private helps HNW investors, family offices & corporations do exactly that. swanbitcoin.com/private?utm_ca…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bitcoin is creeping back toward $100K and most people aren’t ready.
The 4-year cycle narrative is fading.
Gold’s multi-year setup before its 2025 breakout reveals something critical.
The Iranian rial’s collapse reveals the end game.
2026 might get wild 🧵👇
Every cycle-trained Bitcoiner is asking the same question:
Is this just another bear market rally before the real crash?
That question made sense in a world of clean four-year rhythms.
But that world may already be gone.
The missing piece in 2025 wasn’t demand.
It was expectations.
No blow-off top.
No euphoric frenzy to punish.
Capital didn’t leave Bitcoin.
It paused.
A sitting head of state was removed overnight.
Control of energy, minerals, and infrastructure shifted in hours.
No war. No negotiation. No drawn-out collapse.
That’s not noise.
That’s the global power board moving.
Bitcoin exists for moments like this 🧵👇
This wasn’t about removing a dictator.
It was about securing leverage.
When monetary credibility weakens, systems don’t heal gracefully.
They consolidate control over what still enforces power.
In stressed monetary systems, power migrates.
Away from promises.
Away from paper claims.
Toward things that still enforce outcomes:
Four major institutions all moved toward Bitcoin immediately after the market forced out its weakest holders.
The timing wasn’t subtle.
What happened these last two weeks didn’t feel like random volatility.
It felt like the closing chapter of a classic Wall Street shakeout. 🧵👇
Start at the beginning:
A November dump big enough to flush leverage, trigger redemptions, and force weak hands out of the ETF complex.
Billions flowed out at the exact moment the market was most fragile.
That wasn’t the end of anything.
It cleared the runway.
Once the market was weakened, the November FUD sequence hit — right after the October stablecoin depeg softened the ground: