Bitcoin hit $124,500 last week.
This morning it plunged to $112,300 — a 9.7% pullback.
One spark? Strategy’s equity guidance update: a catalyst for MSTR’s sharp drop and the broader treasury shakeout.
But is this a crack in the model, or the setup for S&P 500 rocket fuel? 🧵👇
The update was announced publicly by Saylor.
Here’s the part that caused the outrage:
Strategy “may issue equity to pay debt interest, fund preferred dividends, or when otherwise deemed advantageous.”
That single line reopened optionality and rattled confidence.
Why? Because mNAVs across treasury companies are collapsing.
When stocks trade at or below the value of their underlying Bitcoin, the whole leverage model looks fragile.
And traders are quick to ask: “Has the strategy broken?”
As valuations sank, some feared trading below 1x NAV was fatal.
Ben Werkman disagrees:
“I don’t believe trading below one times NAV is like the kiss of death in the Bitcoin treasury space… these valuations are gonna ebb and flow and sentiment’s gonna be a huge driver.”
Matt Cole says the short-term panic misses the point:
“We have a 10 to 15 year period of a digital gold rush. You want to accumulate as much Bitcoin as possible during that time… you don’t unwind a long-term thesis because you’ve seen one month traded at a discount.”
Enter Preston Pysh’s analogy:
Saylor hasn’t built a fragile structure.
He’s built a transmission.
Different gears for different environments — tightening or easing.
The goal: keep the machine moving forward and keep stacking Bitcoin in all conditions.
So yes, some traders lost trust in the guidance change.
But zoom out: Strategy holds $73B in Bitcoin. Its balance sheet can cover preferred dividend obligations for decades, even if BTC fell over 50%.
Hardly the picture of imminent collapse.
And here’s the bigger question:
Is this shakeout just the storm before Strategy’s potential inclusion in the S&P 500?
Ben Workman:
“Management needs optionality. If S&P 500 inclusion happens, you want the ability to take advantage of massive inflows.”
Remember to zoom out: Bitcoin is still up 615% in 32 months.
Sideways price action hardens support, resets leverage, and brings new capital.
As Pierre Rochard says:
“Sideways BTC is maintenance.”
Optionality ≠ betrayal.
Volatility ≠ failure.
The name of the game is Bitcoin accumulation in all environments.
If you want to build your own long-term Bitcoin strategy, Swan Private helps HNW investors, family offices & corporations do exactly that. swanbitcoin.com/private?utm_ca…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Allen Farrington just posted a killer thesis on NOSTR.
Many Bitcoiners argue stablecoins accelerate hyperbitcoinization.
Allen agrees—but not for the reasons you’ve heard.
His view flips the whole discussion on its head. 🧵👇
He starts by conceding what few Bitcoiners will:
Stablecoins have real product-market fit.
Today, only three crypto use cases truly work at scale:
• Bitcoin as savings tech
• Mining as monetizing energy
• Stablecoins as better fiat
Objection 1: Dollar hegemony.
The critique is that stablecoins keep the dollar’s dominance intact—propping up the very fiat system Bitcoin was built to replace.
If the goal is to end central bank money, why help build rails that make it stronger?
Bitcoin Treasury Companies: The Quiet Superweapon Reshaping Global Capital 🧵
To the untrained eye, Bitcoin treasury companies look like fiat-finance cosplay.
Leverage? Debt? Derivatives?
Sounds like Wall Street LARPing with Bitcoin branding.
Then Preston Pysh explained what they really are. Everything changed.
He didn’t just explain how they work.
He explained what they are.
Not scams. Not distractions. Not detours.
Bitcoin treasury companies are super spreaders - engineered to infect legacy capital markets with Bitcoin.
These aren’t get-rich-quick shells.
They’re transmission systems.
Multi-gear machines designed to accumulate BTC across every macro cycle:
• Loose credit? Issue debt.
• Tight credit? Raise equity.
• Always stack. Always adapt.
Saylor’s strategy isn’t improvisation - it’s mechanical design.