If Muslims were treated like Christians, parts of Britain would likely be on fire by now.
A look at the quiet "war" authorities are waging against British Christians.
Thread 🧵
Back in May, The Telegraph published a curious report about a group of Christians in south-west London. It didn’t make much of a splash online, but it marked a shift in the way our authorities are dealing with religious advocacy.
The Labour-run Rushmoor Borough Council had attempted to secure an injunction to ban Christians not just from preaching in two local town centres, but from praying and handing out leaflets altogether.
Their justification? The preachers were “offensive” and had caused “alarm and distress” to passers-by.
Under the terms of the drafted injunction, Christians would have been banned from praying for anyone “without their prior permission,” handing out leaflets or Bibles, and even placing hands on someone during prayer with consent.
This included bans on approaching people to discuss Christianity and preaching sermons deemed “hostile” towards anyone with a protected characteristic, such as age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy, race, religion or belief, sex, or sexual orientation.
It marked yet another moment where authorities prioritised emotion over a basic human right, placing supposed “distress” above freedom of expression—an arguably childish impulse, born under the rubric of modern progressivism.
An injunction is a civil court order that can compel someone to stop doing something. Unlike Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs), which councils can issue directly to curb “nuisance”, injunctions must be granted by a judge.
Rushmoor Council, under Labour leader Gareth Williams, opted for the latter, attempting to weaponise legislation to silence preachers in a way we haven’t quite seen before.
If a judge had granted the injunction, Christians in breach of the order could have been jailed for up to 2 years.
Such paradoxically nannying yet bullying conduct hasn’t been exclusive to Labour Party politicians either...
Last month, the Kingsborough Centre, a Pentecostal church, successfully overturned Conservative-led Hillingdon Borough Council’s PSPO that had criminalised much of its outreach activity.
In 2023, Hillingdon Council and its leader Ian Edwards imposed a PSPO in Uxbridge town centre. The order banned religious groups from preaching with amplification, handing out leaflets, and even displaying Bible verses in public.
Breaching a PSPO is a criminal offence. It can result in arrest, a £100 on-the-spot fine, and even prison time if someone refuses to pay (at which point the fine can rise to £1,000).
Perhaps the kicker is that they can last for 3 years and be extended indefinitely.
When ministers introduced PSPOs in 2014 under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act, many justified them citing problems with street drinking, dog fouling, and aggressive begging.
What they didn’t say was that local authorities would later use it to suppress religious expression and censor speech in public spaces.
And all of this is happening against a backdrop of what some have called blatant “two-tier justice”.
Take 60-year-old miner John Steele. Last month, police arrested him after he asked a Muslim woman a question about the Quran and domestic violence.
In March last year, Avon and Somerset Police arrested Dia Moodley for “religiously aggravated harassment without violence” after he spoke of the moral differences between Christianity and Islam in response to a question from a Muslim man.
In June 2021, police arrested David McConnell under Section 4A of the Public Order Act 1986 for “insulting” a member of the public in Leeds city centre. He had “misgendered” a biological male who identified as a trans woman.
Some other Christian arrests to consider: Hatun Tash, Ian Sleeper, Angus Cameron, John Dunn, Shaun O’Sullivan, David Lynn, Mike Overd, Don Karns, Mike Stockwell, AJ Clarke, and Hazel Lewis—all occurring in the last few years...
But the ordeal Northamptonshire Police subjected Conservative councillor Anthony Stevens to, however, really puts the prosecution into context.
In August 2023, police arrested Anthony at his home, in front of his family, not for something he said, but for something he retweeted.
The post concerned a video criticising how police treated Christian street preacher Oluwole Ilisanmi, who was arrested by Sir Sadiq Khan’s Metropolitan Police in Southgate, London, in 2019.
Indeed, the palpable imbalance, of course, extends to central government.
Nick Tolson, a former government faith adviser, said in an interview last year that:
In other words, if there’s an act of vandalism committed against a Christian church it is not assumed to be driven by hate. Compare that to an act of vandalism against a Mosque, and it is.
It is a worldview often underscored by mainstream coverage—just look at how the BBC reported vandalism on a churchyard and mosque earlier this year. These stories were published two months apart.
Full breakdown—of course, with source links so you can check the dets yourself:
Last summer, he became one of Starmer’s fast‑tracked protestors, jailed for words posted online.
What followed was a story of evidential flaws, prison mistreatment, and a near‑suicide.
Here’s what happened.
Thread 🧵
When father and husband Stuart Burns took to Facebook to air his frustrations over the state of affairs in Britain last summer, little did he know his entire life would be upended.
Within days, he found himself arrested, remanded, and hauled in front of judge facing potential prison time. But instead of doing what so many did, Stuart fought back. He refused to plead guilty.
It's been exactly 465 days since Sir Keir Starmer and The Labour Party won the general election...
Since then, it's been one scandal after another. Some say he should have resigned by now.
Here's a look at those scandals.
Thread 🧵
Winter Fuel Payments
In July 2024, Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced plans to scrap Winter Fuel Payments.
These are the benefits that help thousands of pensioners heat their homes over winter.
They were said to be "tough but necessary" measures.
During the election campaign, Starmer pledged to protect “pensioner incomes.”
Prejudicing Southport Cases
In August 2024, Starmer smeared the Southport protestors and rioters alike as “far right” before many had even been charged—let alone entered pleas or gone to trial.
No thorough police investigation had yet taken place to determine motive.
He later warned the public not to speculate on Southport child murderer Rudakubana’s motives for fear of "prejudicing" the trial.
By his own standards, he arguably prejudiced the very cases he insisted be fast-tracked and harshly punished in order to "deter".
Days ago, she made some curious remarks about Sharia courts.
To many, they were concerning enough but she also happens to be our Courts Minister.
Thread 🧵
Labour MP Sarah Sackman was appointed Minister of State for Courts and Legal Services in December 2024.
She's currently responsible for court reform, legal aid, and miscarriages of justice, among other policy areas. She supports the Justice Secretary, now David Lammy, in overseeing key aspects of the UK’s justice system.
There’s something Starmer isn’t telling us about his digital ID plans…
And it all centres around a little-known system called One Login.
Thread 🧵
From the level of outcry yesterday, it’s safe to say that many are aware of Starmer’s scheme to impose mandatory digital ID, dubbed BritCard, on every working person in the UK—citizen and foreigner alike.
For context, BritCard was initially advanced by Labour Together, the think tank Morgan McSweeney ran before becoming Starmer’s chief of staff.
We need to talk about the judge who spared a Muslim man prison time after he attacked someone with a knife...
Turns out, he has an interesting history.
Thread 🧵
The judge who spared a Muslim man, Moussa Kadri, that attacked a protestor as he burned a copy of the Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London is facing accusations of “two-tier justice”.
In February, Kadri, 59, was filmed slashing at Hamit Coskun, 51, with a bread knife and telling hum, “this is my religion… I’m going to kill you”, before kicking him multiple times on the floor in February.
This case hasn't received much coverage but it should have...
This is Greg Hadfield.
He is a retired ex-Times journalist.
Now, the British State is coming after him—and it once again concerns X posts.
Thread 🧵
Yesterday, The Press Gazette revealed that Hadfield will go to trial over for drawing attention to an "obscene" X message posted by the account of Ivor Caplin.
Hadfield has been charged under Section 127 of the Communications Act 2003. The law criminalises the sending of “offensive, indecent, obscene or menacing” messages via public communications networks.