APΞ 🇺🇸🦍 Profile picture
Aug 21 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🧵 Re-Evaluating ULTY Performance Since the New Strategy: NAV Decline Since 7/21/25 (Post-New Strategy Peak) & 10-Year DRIP Projections

ULTY's March 2025 strategy revamp (direct holdings, protective puts, credit spreads) aimed to stabilize the fund amid high yields. But with NAV declining ~9.5% since July 21, 2025 (from ~$6.33 to $5.73 as of Aug 19), is it working? Let's re-evaluate performance, causes of the slide, and run updated 10-year projections for $100K with 100% DRIP starting July 25, 2025, in bull, stagnant, and bear markets. Hypotheticals based on data 👇
1/9. The Strategy Change: What Happened in March 2025?

Pre-March: ULTY used synthetic positions, leading to heavy NAV erosion (~70% drop from launch Feb 2024 at $20 to ~$7 by March).

Post-Change: Shifted to direct ownership of 15-30 high-vol U.S. stocks (e.g., NVDA, MSTR), added OTM puts for downside cushion (~5-10%), credit call spreads for moderate upside capture, and flexible call writing. Weekly distributions started.

Goal: Boost income (~85% yield) while reducing erosion risks.
2/9. Performance Re-Evaluation: Total Return Since March

From March 10 to Aug 19, 2025 (~5.5 months):

- Total Return (price + reinvested divs): ~27.7% (outpaced Nasdaq 100's 18.4%).
- Price Return: ~ -15% (NAV from ~$6.79 Mar 6 to $5.73).
- Annualized Return: ~60% (total, driven by divs). Vol ~33%; Sharpe ~1.10 (good for short period).

Revamp succeeded in boosting total returns via better protection, but NAV erosion (~34% ann. rate) persists due to distros.
3/9. The NAV Decline Since July 21, 2025: Causes & Context

Since July 21 (NAV $6.33) to Aug 19 ($5.73): -9.5% (~2.4% weekly).

Causes:

- Distributions: Weekly ~$0.10/share ex-div drops (ROC reduces basis, not loss).
- Market/Vol Weakness: Tech dips (NVDA etc.), low vol reduces premiums.
- Strategy: Full downside in bears (puts limited cushion).
- Broader: Election/rate vol, AI slowdown.

Context: Slower than pre-revamp (~70% drop in year), but ongoing—total return positive ~5-7% since July 21. Worry if erosion > yields long-term.
4/9. 10-Year Projection Setup: $100K with 100% DRIP from July 25, 2025

Start: July 25 NAV ~$6.25 → 16,000 shares.

Assumptions (updated from recent 85% yield, ~34% ann. erosion since March):
- Annual model (real weekly); DRIP compounds.
- Bull: 70% yield (vol sustains),
-10% NAV change (gains offset).
- Stagnant: 60% yield,
-15% NAV change.
- Bear: 50% yield, -25% NAV change (vol thin, downside hits).

No taxes (ROC defers); projections illustrative.
5/9. Bull Market Projection: High Vol, Upside Capture Yields strong, erosion minimal.

End: ~$12.4M. Image
6/9. Stagnant Market Projection: Steady Vol, Mild Erosion Balanced, yields dominate erosion.

End: ~$6.4M. Image
7/9. Bear Market Projection: Low Vol, Heavy Erosion Yields drop, downside amplifies.

End: ~$1.1M. Image
8/9. Why These Projections & Realism

Model: Annual compounding (real weekly); yield from current ~85%, erosion from ~34% ann. since March.

Bull: Strong vol/gains reduce erosion.

Stagnant: Base case.

Bear: Vol dries, downside hits.

Risks: Assumptions vary; new fund history limited. DRIP offsets erosion via shares.
9/9. TLDR: ULTY since March 2025: Total return ~27.7% (strong), but NAV down ~15.6% from erosion/distros. Decline since July 21 (~9.5%) ongoing but slowed post-revamp. $100K DRIP from July 25 could grow to $1.1M (bear), $6.4M (stagnant), $12.4M (bull) over 10 years—yield powers despite slide.

📖 For Educational Purposes Only
🚨 Not Financial Advice
👉 Do Your Own Research

I drop educational threads daily. If value, ❤️ or 🔁 helps spread knowledge!

ULTY re-eval? Below!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with APΞ 🇺🇸🦍

APΞ 🇺🇸🦍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PatrioticApe

Aug 19
🧵 Why ULTY Must Distribute All Cash Before End of October: Educational Explainer & Shareholder Impact

YieldMax ETFs like ULTY operate on a fiscal year ending October 31, requiring them to distribute all net income & gains by then to maintain RIC status & avoid fund-level taxes. But what does this mean for holders? Let's break it down 👇
1/7. Fiscal Year Basics for ETFs Like ULTY

ULTY (and other YieldMax funds) has a fiscal year from Nov 1-Oct 31. As a Regulated Investment Company (RIC), it must distribute at least 90% of taxable income (dividends, interest, cap gains) annually to pass through taxes to shareholders & avoid 21% corporate tax.

"Distribute all cash": Refers to excess net income/gains not yet paid out via regular distributions—ensures compliance by fiscal year-end (Oct 31).

Not unique to ULTY—standard for many ETFs/mutual funds with Oct fiscal ends.
2/7. Why This Requirement Exists

RIC rules (IRC Subchapter M) mandate distributions to qualify as pass-through—taxes hit shareholders, not fund. Undistributed income would be taxed at fund level, reducing returns.

For ULTY: Generates income from option premiums/stock dividends—must payout 90%+ by Oct 31 (or Dec 31 for calendar spillovers).

YieldMax confirms in filings: Distros variable, based on realized income/gains.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 17
🧵 Building a Portfolio with ULTY for Ultra High Income: Best Funds to Pair & Why

ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) delivers massive yields (~85% annualized as of Aug 2025) via options on volatile stocks, but alone it's high-risk. Pairing with complementary funds diversifies while chasing ultra income (50%+ total yield). Let's educate on strategy, top pairs, & a sample build 👇
1/8. Why Build Around ULTY? Core Strengths & Needs

ULTY shines for income: Weekly distros from covered calls/spreads/puts on 15-30 high-vol names (e.g., NVDA, MSTR). YTD total return ~13%, but vol ~30% & NAV erosion risks.

Pair to: Mitigate risks, blend yields, add stability. Goal: Ultra high income (50-100% portfolio yield) via diversified options/dividends. Avoid over-exposure to vol.

Diversify across strategies: Covered calls, single-stock yields, broad dividends.
2/8. Key Principles for Pairing Funds

- High Yield Focus: Aim 20-100% yields for "ultra" income.
- Diversification: Mix sectors (tech, broad, value).
- Risk Balance: Offset ULTY's vol with stable options (e.g., JEPI) or broad (YMAX).
- Correlation: Low to ULTY for hedge (e.g., inverse if available, but focus income).
- Total Return: Yield + growth/erosion.

Rebalance quarterly; use DRIP for compounding.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 11
🧵 Sharpe Ratio of $ULTY Since Strategy Change: Educational Analysis & Calculation

The Sharpe ratio measures risk-adjusted returns—key for volatile ETFs like $ULTY. Post-March 2025 revamp (direct holdings, puts, spreads), has it improved? Let's explain, calculate since then (Mar 1-Aug 9, 2025), & compare. Data as of Aug 10, 2025 👇
1/7. What is Sharpe Ratio?

Sharpe = (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Volatility (std dev of returns). Higher >1 = good risk-reward.

- Return: Excess over rf (e.g., 5% T-bills 2025).
- Vol: Measures swings—annualized.

For ULTY: High vol (~30% ann.) from stock picks, but strategy buffers.

Use monthly/daily for short periods like 5 months.
2/7. Why Focus on Post-Strategy Change?

Pre-March: Synthetic positions, heavy erosion—Sharpe low (~0.34 all-time).

Post: Tactical tweaks aim better risk-adjusted (upside capture, downside cushion). Period: Mar 1-Aug 9, 2025 (~5 months, 110 trading days).

Data: Monthly returns for calc (daily ideal, but approx here).
Read 8 tweets
Aug 8
🧵 SCHD vs VOO vs ULTY: Battle of Dividend, Growth, & High-Yield ETFs – Which Fits Your Portfolio?

In a volatile 2025 market, these ETFs shine differently: SCHD for steady dividends, VOO for broad growth, ULTY for ultra income via options. Let's compare strategies, yields, risks, & performance to help you choose 👇
1/8. SCHD: The Dividend Stalwart

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index—100 high-quality, dividend-paying U.S. stocks (e.g., HD, MRK) screened for consistency & strength.

Focus: Income + stability. ~100 holdings, large-cap bias.

AUM: ~$69B. Expense: 0.06%. Yield: ~3.95%. YTD Return: ~1.59% (as of early Aug 2025).

Best for: Retirees/income seekers wanting low vol.
2/8. VOO: The Market Mirror

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) passively tracks S&P 500—500 largest U.S. stocks (e.g., AAPL, MSFT) for broad exposure.

Focus: Long-term growth mirroring U.S. economy. Tech-heavy (~30%).

AUM: ~$700B. Expense: 0.03%. Yield: ~1.20%. YTD Return: ~6.75%.

Best for: Hands-off investors seeking market returns.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 6
🧵 Likelihood of $ULTY Reverse Split: Addressing a Common Investor Fear

With $ULTY's NAV stabilizing around $6 post-March 2025 strategy tweaks, fears of a reverse split persist. But is it likely? Short answer: Low probability (~5-10%) in the near term. Let's break down the myth, mechanics, & data 👇
1/7. What is a Reverse Split & Why Fear It?

A reverse split (e.g., 1-for-10) combines shares to boost price (e.g., $2 to $20), reducing outstanding shares proportionally. No value change—your stake stays the same.

Fear: Signals weakness, triggers selling, or hurts liquidity. For ETFs, it's often to meet exchange rules ($5+ price) or attract institutions.
But: Not always bad—can stabilize perception. $ULTY hasn't split yet.
2/7. Why ETFs Like YieldMax Might Consider It

YieldMax has done it before: $TSLY 1-for-2 in 2024 when NAV dipped low.

Triggers: NAV < $5 (broker margin risks, listing issues), erosion from high yields, or to reset optics.

For $ULTY: High distros (~85% ann.) cause ex-div drops, but post-2025 changes (puts, spreads) minimize erosion—NAV ~$6 stable.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 4
🧵 Busting the Myth: Can $ULTY Really Go to Zero? A Common Misconception Debunked

High-yield ETFs like $ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy) boast 60-80%+ yields, but skeptics fear NAV erosion will drive it to zero. Spoiler: That's a huge misconception. The odds are near-zero. Let's educate on why 👇
1/7. The Misconception: "High Yields = Unsustainable Decay to Zero"

Many think $ULTY's distributions (often 100% Return of Capital or ROC) eat away at principal until nothing's left. This stems from confusing ROC with "destructive" payouts in failing funds.

Reality: ROC is just a tax label for option premiums—deferring taxes, not signaling failure. It's sustainable as long as volatility persists for premiums.

Pre-2025, NAV dipped from high distros, but post-strategy tweaks (direct holdings, puts), it's stabilized ~$6.
2/7. What Could Actually Make an ETF Go to Zero?

ETFs rarely hit zero—only in extreme cases like:

- Total asset wipeout (e.g., fraud, bankruptcy of all holdings).
- Leveraged/inverse funds in prolonged adverse markets (e.g., volatility spikes).
- But even then, most close orderly, redeeming at remaining NAV.

Per experts: Covered call ETFs like $ULTY aren't leveraged; they hold real stocks/options. Zero chance? Near impossible without market apocalypse.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(