🧵 Re-Evaluating ULTY Performance Since the New Strategy: NAV Decline Since 7/21/25 (Post-New Strategy Peak) & 10-Year DRIP Projections
ULTY's March 2025 strategy revamp (direct holdings, protective puts, credit spreads) aimed to stabilize the fund amid high yields. But with NAV declining ~9.5% since July 21, 2025 (from ~$6.33 to $5.73 as of Aug 19), is it working? Let's re-evaluate performance, causes of the slide, and run updated 10-year projections for $100K with 100% DRIP starting July 25, 2025, in bull, stagnant, and bear markets. Hypotheticals based on data 👇
1/9. The Strategy Change: What Happened in March 2025?
Pre-March: ULTY used synthetic positions, leading to heavy NAV erosion (~70% drop from launch Feb 2024 at $20 to ~$7 by March).
Post-Change: Shifted to direct ownership of 15-30 high-vol U.S. stocks (e.g., NVDA, MSTR), added OTM puts for downside cushion (~5-10%), credit call spreads for moderate upside capture, and flexible call writing. Weekly distributions started.
Goal: Boost income (~85% yield) while reducing erosion risks.
2/9. Performance Re-Evaluation: Total Return Since March
From March 10 to Aug 19, 2025 (~5.5 months):
- Total Return (price + reinvested divs): ~27.7% (outpaced Nasdaq 100's 18.4%).
- Price Return: ~ -15% (NAV from ~$6.79 Mar 6 to $5.73).
- Annualized Return: ~60% (total, driven by divs). Vol ~33%; Sharpe ~1.10 (good for short period).
Revamp succeeded in boosting total returns via better protection, but NAV erosion (~34% ann. rate) persists due to distros.
3/9. The NAV Decline Since July 21, 2025: Causes & Context
Since July 21 (NAV $6.33) to Aug 19 ($5.73): -9.5% (~2.4% weekly).
Causes:
- Distributions: Weekly ~$0.10/share ex-div drops (ROC reduces basis, not loss).
- Market/Vol Weakness: Tech dips (NVDA etc.), low vol reduces premiums.
- Strategy: Full downside in bears (puts limited cushion).
- Broader: Election/rate vol, AI slowdown.
Context: Slower than pre-revamp (~70% drop in year), but ongoing—total return positive ~5-7% since July 21. Worry if erosion > yields long-term.
4/9. 10-Year Projection Setup: $100K with 100% DRIP from July 25, 2025
Start: July 25 NAV ~$6.25 → 16,000 shares.
Assumptions (updated from recent 85% yield, ~34% ann. erosion since March):
- Annual model (real weekly); DRIP compounds.
- Bull: 70% yield (vol sustains),
-10% NAV change (gains offset).
- Stagnant: 60% yield,
-15% NAV change.
- Bear: 50% yield, -25% NAV change (vol thin, downside hits).
Model: Annual compounding (real weekly); yield from current ~85%, erosion from ~34% ann. since March.
Bull: Strong vol/gains reduce erosion.
Stagnant: Base case.
Bear: Vol dries, downside hits.
Risks: Assumptions vary; new fund history limited. DRIP offsets erosion via shares.
9/9. TLDR: ULTY since March 2025: Total return ~27.7% (strong), but NAV down ~15.6% from erosion/distros. Decline since July 21 (~9.5%) ongoing but slowed post-revamp. $100K DRIP from July 25 could grow to $1.1M (bear), $6.4M (stagnant), $12.4M (bull) over 10 years—yield powers despite slide.
📖 For Educational Purposes Only
🚨 Not Financial Advice
👉 Do Your Own Research
I drop educational threads daily. If value, ❤️ or 🔁 helps spread knowledge!
ULTY re-eval? Below!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Why ULTY Must Distribute All Cash Before End of October: Educational Explainer & Shareholder Impact
YieldMax ETFs like ULTY operate on a fiscal year ending October 31, requiring them to distribute all net income & gains by then to maintain RIC status & avoid fund-level taxes. But what does this mean for holders? Let's break it down 👇
1/7. Fiscal Year Basics for ETFs Like ULTY
ULTY (and other YieldMax funds) has a fiscal year from Nov 1-Oct 31. As a Regulated Investment Company (RIC), it must distribute at least 90% of taxable income (dividends, interest, cap gains) annually to pass through taxes to shareholders & avoid 21% corporate tax.
"Distribute all cash": Refers to excess net income/gains not yet paid out via regular distributions—ensures compliance by fiscal year-end (Oct 31).
Not unique to ULTY—standard for many ETFs/mutual funds with Oct fiscal ends.
2/7. Why This Requirement Exists
RIC rules (IRC Subchapter M) mandate distributions to qualify as pass-through—taxes hit shareholders, not fund. Undistributed income would be taxed at fund level, reducing returns.
For ULTY: Generates income from option premiums/stock dividends—must payout 90%+ by Oct 31 (or Dec 31 for calendar spillovers).
YieldMax confirms in filings: Distros variable, based on realized income/gains.
🧵 Building a Portfolio with ULTY for Ultra High Income: Best Funds to Pair & Why
ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF) delivers massive yields (~85% annualized as of Aug 2025) via options on volatile stocks, but alone it's high-risk. Pairing with complementary funds diversifies while chasing ultra income (50%+ total yield). Let's educate on strategy, top pairs, & a sample build 👇
1/8. Why Build Around ULTY? Core Strengths & Needs
ULTY shines for income: Weekly distros from covered calls/spreads/puts on 15-30 high-vol names (e.g., NVDA, MSTR). YTD total return ~13%, but vol ~30% & NAV erosion risks.
Pair to: Mitigate risks, blend yields, add stability. Goal: Ultra high income (50-100% portfolio yield) via diversified options/dividends. Avoid over-exposure to vol.
Diversify across strategies: Covered calls, single-stock yields, broad dividends.
2/8. Key Principles for Pairing Funds
- High Yield Focus: Aim 20-100% yields for "ultra" income.
- Diversification: Mix sectors (tech, broad, value).
- Risk Balance: Offset ULTY's vol with stable options (e.g., JEPI) or broad (YMAX).
- Correlation: Low to ULTY for hedge (e.g., inverse if available, but focus income).
- Total Return: Yield + growth/erosion.
🧵 Sharpe Ratio of $ULTY Since Strategy Change: Educational Analysis & Calculation
The Sharpe ratio measures risk-adjusted returns—key for volatile ETFs like $ULTY. Post-March 2025 revamp (direct holdings, puts, spreads), has it improved? Let's explain, calculate since then (Mar 1-Aug 9, 2025), & compare. Data as of Aug 10, 2025 👇
1/7. What is Sharpe Ratio?
Sharpe = (Portfolio Return - Risk-Free Rate) / Volatility (std dev of returns). Higher >1 = good risk-reward.
🧵 SCHD vs VOO vs ULTY: Battle of Dividend, Growth, & High-Yield ETFs – Which Fits Your Portfolio?
In a volatile 2025 market, these ETFs shine differently: SCHD for steady dividends, VOO for broad growth, ULTY for ultra income via options. Let's compare strategies, yields, risks, & performance to help you choose 👇
1/8. SCHD: The Dividend Stalwart
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index—100 high-quality, dividend-paying U.S. stocks (e.g., HD, MRK) screened for consistency & strength.
Focus: Income + stability. ~100 holdings, large-cap bias.
AUM: ~$69B. Expense: 0.06%. Yield: ~3.95%. YTD Return: ~1.59% (as of early Aug 2025).
Best for: Retirees/income seekers wanting low vol.
2/8. VOO: The Market Mirror
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) passively tracks S&P 500—500 largest U.S. stocks (e.g., AAPL, MSFT) for broad exposure.
Focus: Long-term growth mirroring U.S. economy. Tech-heavy (~30%).
🧵 Likelihood of $ULTY Reverse Split: Addressing a Common Investor Fear
With $ULTY's NAV stabilizing around $6 post-March 2025 strategy tweaks, fears of a reverse split persist. But is it likely? Short answer: Low probability (~5-10%) in the near term. Let's break down the myth, mechanics, & data 👇
1/7. What is a Reverse Split & Why Fear It?
A reverse split (e.g., 1-for-10) combines shares to boost price (e.g., $2 to $20), reducing outstanding shares proportionally. No value change—your stake stays the same.
Fear: Signals weakness, triggers selling, or hurts liquidity. For ETFs, it's often to meet exchange rules ($5+ price) or attract institutions.
But: Not always bad—can stabilize perception. $ULTY hasn't split yet.
2/7. Why ETFs Like YieldMax Might Consider It
YieldMax has done it before: $TSLY 1-for-2 in 2024 when NAV dipped low.
Triggers: NAV < $5 (broker margin risks, listing issues), erosion from high yields, or to reset optics.
For $ULTY: High distros (~85% ann.) cause ex-div drops, but post-2025 changes (puts, spreads) minimize erosion—NAV ~$6 stable.
🧵 Busting the Myth: Can $ULTY Really Go to Zero? A Common Misconception Debunked
High-yield ETFs like $ULTY (YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy) boast 60-80%+ yields, but skeptics fear NAV erosion will drive it to zero. Spoiler: That's a huge misconception. The odds are near-zero. Let's educate on why 👇
1/7. The Misconception: "High Yields = Unsustainable Decay to Zero"
Many think $ULTY's distributions (often 100% Return of Capital or ROC) eat away at principal until nothing's left. This stems from confusing ROC with "destructive" payouts in failing funds.
Reality: ROC is just a tax label for option premiums—deferring taxes, not signaling failure. It's sustainable as long as volatility persists for premiums.
Pre-2025, NAV dipped from high distros, but post-strategy tweaks (direct holdings, puts), it's stabilized ~$6.
2/7. What Could Actually Make an ETF Go to Zero?
ETFs rarely hit zero—only in extreme cases like:
- Total asset wipeout (e.g., fraud, bankruptcy of all holdings).
- Leveraged/inverse funds in prolonged adverse markets (e.g., volatility spikes).
- But even then, most close orderly, redeeming at remaining NAV.
Per experts: Covered call ETFs like $ULTY aren't leveraged; they hold real stocks/options. Zero chance? Near impossible without market apocalypse.