Lavrov: We see a clearer understanding in the U.S. that the roots of the crisis must be addressed, rather than repeating slogans about an immediate ceasefire while pumping Ukraine with weapons, as Macron proposed. 1/
Lavrov: It’s good that these absolutely reckless and confrontational positions in favor of prolonging the war find no support in the current U.S. administration.
Which seeks to get to the essence of the problem and eliminate the root causes. 2/
Lavrov: As for reports that the UK, France, and Germany want to develop collective security guarantees — we support such guarantees if they are truly reliable.
A good example is the Ukrainian initiative in Istanbul in April 2022. 3/
Lavrov: Ukrainian delegation then proposed core principles to end hostilities and secure a stable settlement:
1. Ukraine renounces NATO or any other military blocs. 2. Ukraine confirms neutral and non-nuclear status. 4/
Lavrov: Ukraine proposed — and our delegation agreed — to design security guarantees with all permanent UN Security Council members: Russia, China, the U.S., France, Britain, and others like Germany and Turkey. 5/
Lavrov: That proposal meant guarantees would be equal.
Security of all sides, including Ukraine’s neighbors, would be ensured on a fair, balanced, and indivisible basis. 6/
Lavrov: Russia supported this and was ready to proceed.
The draft was initialed, and we were ready to sign a formal treaty. 7/
Lavrov: But Boris Johnson, then UK PM, came to Kyiv and forbade his protégés from signing anything, demanding continuation of the war.
Without that, much could already have been achieved for a lasting settlement. 8/
Lavrov: We cannot accept attempts to design collective security without Russia. That will not work.
Russia is not inflating its demands, but we will defend our legitimate interests firmly. 9/
Lavrov: The West, above all the U.S., understands perfectly well that serious talks on security without Russia are a dead end. 10X
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Zelenskyy: This month Ukraine raised $1.5B from EU partners to buy U.S. weapons - Patriots, HIMARS, missiles. (Pearl program).
Rutte: 2 layers of security guarantees:
1. A strong Ukrainian army after peace.
2. Guarantees by the U.S. and Europe. (Not like Budapest or Minsk) 1/
Zelenskyy: We have no agreements with Russians.
We agreed with President Trump, and he is the only person who can stop Putin in my view.
I don’t want to set conditions that could later be used as obstacles to end the war.
2/
Zelenskyy: Ukraine needs $1–1.5B monthly for Pearl program. Domestic drone industry has $6B gap. Drones are weapon No.1, reducing losses and holding the front.
Rutte: NATO’s 5% GDP defense spending deal will also finance weapons for Ukraine.
Bolton: People discuss an Article 5-like guarantee for Ukraine since NATO is ruled out by Russia and Trump. It says members act as they deem appropriate, very vague. Could mean force, or just a note. If language satisfies Ukraine, question remains: will forces back it up? 1/
Bolton: Merz faces pressure from AFD and Social Democrats. Deploying forces looks warlike, but key is how they fit into the security guarantee. Germany has sent troops to UN missions. Peacekeepers only observe and report, like Rwanda, not fix the situation. 2/
Bolton: Lavrov said security guarantees should involve the 5 permanent UN Security Council members, including Russia and China. Moscow proposed this before in Turkey. Many see it as legitimacy, unlike in the US. Russians may use it as cover for their aims. 3/
Giorgia Meloni proposes a NATO-light guarantee for Ukraine. If Russia attacks again, allies must decide within 24 hours on military and economic aid, reports Bloomberg.
Modeled on NATO’s Article 5, but without membership, using Italy’s 2024 security pact with Kyiv as blueprint.
1/
At the Aug 18 White House meeting, Trump, Zelensky, and EU leaders agreed on firmer guarantees.
Trump ruled out U.S. troops but suggested air support. France and the UK are weighing troop deployments as part of wider security guarantees.
2/
Italian Defense Min. Crosetto: NATO would be a “superior deterrent,” but individual nations could commit if NATO won’t.
Meloni first pitched NATO-style guarantees in March 2025. She now positions herself as bridge between Trump and Europe.
3/