Weightlifting is the heart hack no one ever told you about.
Two 20-minute sessions a week can slash your risk of heart attack and stroke by up to 70%—yet most people still skip it.
It doesn’t just build muscle, it literally reshapes your heart to grow stronger and more resilient under stress.
So why hasn’t this breakthrough become front-page news?
🧵 THREAD
Aerobic workouts, or cardio, have long been viewed as key to heart health. However, weight or resistance training also delivers surprising heart benefits.
Clinical guidelines now recommend resistance training as part of both the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease.
“Even doing resistance training just twice a week, for 15 to 20 minutes a session, can make a big difference,” Amanda Paluch, a physical activity epidemiologist and kinesiologist, told The Epoch Times.
Yet fewer than a third of U.S. adults do enough.
How Resistance Training Supports Your Heart
“Like skeletal muscles, the heart is also a muscle and can respond and adapt to resistance training,” Shannon Lennon, a professor of exercise physiology with expertise in cardiovascular health at the University of Delaware, told The Epoch Times.
When lifting heavy weights, chest pressure rises, and blood returning to the heart is temporarily reduced. This can cause a short-term drop in cardiac output.
Consequently, the heart adapts by thickening the walls of the left ventricle, the main pumping chamber. This thickening strengthens the heart, makes it more able to handle the stress of lifting, and helps it function well even under heavy strain.
Research shows that resistance training can improve many cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure, cholesterol, and metabolic function.
Resistance training can lower resting blood pressure, especially in people with mild to moderate hypertension. Even a modest drop—such as 3 mmHg in systolic blood pressure—can reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death.
Lennon added that resistance training also improves vascular function, enhancing the ability of blood vessels to dilate and improving blood flow.
Resistance training improves cholesterol by raising high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 8 percent to 21 percent, lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol 13 percent to 23 percent, and reducing triglycerides 11 percent to 18 percent.
While lifting weights may not lead to major weight loss on the scale, it helps preserve muscle, boost resting metabolic rate, and reduce visceral fat—an important factor in preventing metabolic syndrome. In fact, gaining just 1 kilogram of muscle increases resting energy expenditure by about 21 calories per day.
Low- to moderate-intensity resistance training also reduces oxidative stress and has anti-inflammatory effects—two processes deeply involved in the development of cardiovascular disease.
These heart benefits help explain why just one to three resistance training sessions per week, lasting under an hour, can lower the risk of cardiovascular events by 40 percent to 70 percent, even without additional aerobic exercise.
When combined with aerobic exercise, the benefits are even greater.
Cardio Versus Resistance Training
Resistance training doesn’t act on the heart and blood vessels in the same way as aerobic exercise.
With aerobic exercise, such as running or cycling, the heart chamber becomes larger rather than thicker. A larger chamber improves cardiovascular efficiency—the heart can pump more blood per beat.
Aerobic exercise burns more calories. During aerobic activity, blood is redirected from less active organs to the working muscles to meet rising oxygen demands. This boosts oxygen consumption and heart rate, resulting in greater energy expenditure.
Resistance training burns fewer calories in the moment but builds muscle, which raises long-term energy expenditure.
A little about us: We’re a team of journalists and researchers on a mission to give you REAL and honest information about your health.
Side effects of reading our posts may include: critical thinking.
Follow us for more daily threads—backed by hard data.
—> @EpochHealth
Get the Prescription Right
Both types of exercise are effective in their own right, but when combined—known as combination training—they offer even greater advantages.
According to a 2023 American Heart Association statement on resistance training, combination training produces larger improvements in heart health and is linked to a 40 percent to 46 percent lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death, compared with 18 percent to 29 percent for resistance or aerobic training alone.
For optimal heart health, aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity each week, or a mix of both. Add in resistance training on at least two days per week.
To maximize resistance training’s cardiovascular benefits, it must be applied thoughtfully, taking into account the right intensity, frequency, and format for each person.
The general guideline is to target all major muscle groups at least twice per week. Use 60 percent to 80 percent of one-repetition maximum—the heaviest weight you can lift once with proper form. Do eight to 12 repetitions for each exercise, completing one to three sets.
A variety of equipment can be used, including machines, free weights, resistance bands, or bodyweight. Training sessions may follow a station format (completing all sets of one exercise before moving on) or a circuit format (rotating through different exercises with one set per station).
Gradually increase training by adding sets or repetitions, raising the load, or shortening rest periods. This supports muscle growth and helps prevent injury, especially in people with cardiovascular disease.
A common rule of thumb is the 2-for-2 rule: If a person can complete two extra repetitions for two consecutive sessions, the load can be increased.
Not Just for the Young
It’s a common misconception that resistance training is only suitable for young or physically fit people, or that it’s risky for those with heart problems. That’s not the case.
“Resistance training becomes even more important as we age and begin to lose muscle,” said Paluch, lead author of the 2023 American Heart Association statement on resistance training.
Although resistance training was once discouraged for patients with heart failure—due to concerns about its effect on heart remodeling—it has now been shown not to cause adverse structural changes. As a result, it is routinely included in cardiac rehabilitation programs.
That said, speaking with your physician is essential before beginning a resistance training program.
High-intensity training should be avoided in those with unstable coronary syndromes, such as unstable angina or recent heart attacks, decompensated heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmias, severe hypertension, or aortic dissection—a life-threatening tear in the wall of the body’s main artery.
Overall, for people with heart conditions, starting with low intensities, using proper technique, and progressing gradually is key. Monitoring for symptoms and avoiding breath-holding during lifts—which can spike blood pressure—are also important for exercising safely, Paluch said.
Thanks for reading! If you found this valuable, here's a special deal:
Unlock our ENTIRE library of @EpochHealth articles for just $1/week—plus unlimited access to everything else on our site.
Millions struggle with kidney stones every year. Diet, dehydration, and genetics usually take the blame.
But scientists just found something hiding in your body that plays an even bigger role.
It’s not what you think. And it could change how we prevent kidney stones forever.
🧵 THREAD
The urinary tract microbiome, also known as the urobiome, is home to various microorganisms. Researchers from Mahidol University in Thailand found that certain bacteria within the urobiome play crucial roles in promoting or preventing kidney stone formation.
The discovery sheds new light on this painful condition that affects approximately 10 percent of the U.S. population.
The study, published in the journal Microbiome, showed that Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) helped prevent the formation of calcium crystals that cause kidney stones. In contrast, Escherichia coli (E. coli) promoted kidney stone formation.
“The urinary tract of healthy individuals is known to harbor several bacterial genera,” the authors wrote, citing Lactobacillus. “Alterations in such bacterial community or urinary microbiome have been reported in many kidney diseases, including KSD [kidney stone disease].”
Contrasting Actions of 2 Key Bacteria
Researchers investigated how L. acidophilus, commonly found in the urine of healthy individuals, might prevent kidney stone formation. They compared its effects with E. coli, known to promote stone development.
The study examined their interactions with calcium oxalate crystals—a common component of kidney stones.
Oxalate, which is obtained through the diet, typically binds with calcium from food and exits through the bowels. In other words, if oxalate binds with calcium in the gut, it’s not a problem. But excess oxalate in the diet, without calcium, can be absorbed into the bloodstream, where it binds with calcium in the urine, forming calcium oxalate kidney stones that can’t exit the body easily.
A new scoring system shows many plant proteins fall short, lacking the essential amino acids your body needs to function.
Meanwhile, milk, eggs, and whey score so high they exceed human needs—fueling stronger muscle, sharper energy, and better health.
The problem? Food companies don’t have to disclose any of this.
So which proteins truly deliver—and which ones don’t?
🧵 THREAD
Sam was lifting weights five days a week. He was determined to build muscle strength and sculpt what he called his “Dad bod” as he approached his 50th birthday.
However, the results of his efforts at the end of the first month left him frustrated despite all of his hard work.
A gym trainer asked him about his diet. Their conversation revealed that the missing detail was the right amount of protein for Sam’s age and goals. He was eating the same proteins he had as a younger man and expected the same muscle gains from them.
The reality is that it is harder to build muscle as we age, and resistance training is only half of the equation.
The quality of protein in any food depends on two key factors: the ratio of all amino acids it contains and how well your body can break down and absorb them.
Amino acids are the building blocks for everything biological—from cellular health and DNA function to brain, gut, and organ health.
Of the 20 amino acids, nine are “essential,” meaning the body can not produce them and must acquire them from food.
A high-quality protein source contains all nine in the right amounts, and is easy to absorb— something that depends partly on your digestive strength.
A Forgotten Antibiotic Just Shook Up the Lyme Disease Debate
In a pair of new studies, one overlooked drug eliminated Lyme bacteria at doses 100x lower than standard antibiotics—without wrecking the gut microbiome.
Even more surprising? It might prevent infection entirely.
And it's already FDA-approved.
Now the question is… why hasn’t this been used all along?
🧵 THREAD
Scientists may be closing in on two major advances in the fight against Lyme disease: an overlooked antibiotic that eliminates the infection at exceptionally low doses and new insights into why symptoms often persist long after treatment.
In a pair of studies published recently in Science Translational Medicine, scientists showed that piperacillin—a Food and Drug Administration-approved antibiotic—cleared Lyme infections in mice at doses up to 100 times lower than those of doxycycline, the current first-line treatment.
Unlike doxycycline, piperacillin targets the Lyme disease bacteria specifically, sparing the gut microbiome from the disruption that typically accompanies doxycycline use.
Beyond Cholesterol Lies a New Approach to Heart Health
For decades, doctors believed lowering cholesterol was a key ingredient to better health.
Now, emerging science is telling a different story—and it challenges everything we thought we knew about cholesterol, and especially statins.
🧵 THREAD
Imagine a room full of your closest friends and family. The odds are that heart disease will affect at least one of them. Heart disease is the leading cause of death for both men and women in the United States, claiming a life every 33 seconds.
For decades, we have been told that lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol—so-called bad cholesterol—is the key to heart health. But with odds like that, something isn’t adding up.
“I think the current model is oversimplified and rather myopic,” Nick Norwitz, a Harvard medical student who holds a doctorate in physiology from Oxford, told The Epoch Times. “LDL is the most common biomarker now. There are better markers.”
Beyond LDL
You might have had your cholesterol checked and been told that everything looks normal. But those standard tests may only be telling part of the story. Traditional cholesterol tests, while still valuable, measure cholesterol amounts.
They miss important details about the quality and behavior of cholesterol particles and other key metabolic factors. This is why a “normal” cholesterol level isn’t always a guarantee of low risk. To understand your risk, you may need to dig deeper with advanced lipid testing.
Emerging research is painting a new picture: Focusing solely on “bad” cholesterol misses pivotal pieces of the puzzle. Factors such as the size and composition of particles of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol—the so-called good cholesterol—along with triglyceride levels and overall metabolic health, are equally, if not more, important in preventing heart disease.
This new understanding is reshaping how we assess heart health, shifting the lens to a more comprehensive, preventive, and personalized approach that prioritizes lifestyle changes such as diet and exercise, according to Norwitz.
Staying up late is wrecking your health in ways sleep can’t repair.
A massive study of 73,000 people shows that even with 7–8 hours of sleep, staying up late spikes your risk of diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure—and even cancer.
Your body isn’t designed to be awake at night, and the damage creeps in silently with every late bedtime.
But here’s what almost no one knows: scientists uncovered a little-known fix that night owls can’t afford to ignore.
🧵 THREAD
Joanna Bidwell likes to get some work done after midnight, then unwind by watching shows or scrolling on her phone. She sleeps well but struggles to get up early for work, often feeling like the first part of her morning is a foggy blur.
“It’s fine, I’ve learned to live with it and make up for lost time in the evenings,” she told The Epoch Times.
However, she recently started to wonder whether her sleep schedule might be doing more than just making mornings tough. “Could it be connected to my elevated blood pressure?” she asked.
You might think that it doesn’t matter whether you go to bed at 9 p.m. or midnight, as long as you get enough sleep—however, most people seem to fare better with earlier bedtimes and wake-up times.
Going to bed late can harm your physical health regardless of your natural sleep preference.
What to Know About mRNA After RFK Jr. Cancels Vaccine Contracts
The mRNA vaccine era may be ending.
RFK Jr.’s HHS just pulled the plug on nearly $500 million in mRNA vaccine contracts—after new evidence raised serious questions about the shots’ safety and effectiveness.
Here’s what they found.
🧵 THREAD
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in his department’s latest move against messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, has canceled contracts for vaccines and therapeutics that utilize the mRNA platform.
The mRNA, through an injection, typically in the upper arm, is delivered into the body, where it teaches cells to produce proteins.
With most mRNA vaccines, the modified mRNA is delivered with lipid nanoparticles. In the COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA instructs cells to make the same spike protein found in COVID-19.
The immune system recognizes the protein as foreign and produces antibodies to fight it.
“At the end of the process, our bodies have learned how to help protect against future infection,” the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says on its website.
When the vaccines were rolled out, vaccine companies and officials said that the mRNA quickly left the body, but that has proven to be incorrect. Studies have found mRNA in the blood about one month after vaccination and in lymph nodes two months after receipt.