JeremiahBullfrog3 Profile picture
Aug 21 5 tweets 6 min read Read on X
Research on the Story and Prevalence of Child Removal into Foster Care

The story shared— involving parental drug and alcohol addiction, infidelity leading to family separation, physical and emotional abuse, exposure to inappropriate adult behaviors, child abandonment, runaway at age 11, homelessness at 13, involvement in gangs for survival, sexual assault, and lifelong mental health impacts like unresolved trauma and estrangement from siblings— aligns with many documented experiences of children from dysfunctional or “broken” homes in the United States. Such narratives are unfortunately common, often stemming from intergenerational cycles of poverty, substance abuse, neglect, and domestic instability. Research indicates that these factors frequently result in children being removed from their homes and placed into foster care or, in cases where the system fails to intervene early, leading to homelessness or street involvement.
According to national data, neglect is the leading cause of child removal, accounting for about 63% of foster care placements in recent years, while parental drug abuse contributes to around 32-36% of cases. Overall, substance abuse (including drugs and alcohol) is a factor in up to 39% of removals. Between 2000 and 2023, approximately 5.9 million children entered foster care in total, with over 1.6 million entries explicitly because of parental drug abuse; the proportion rose from 15% in 2000 to a peak of 36-39% around 2017-2021, before slightly declining to 32% by 2023. In 2023, 175,283 children entered foster care, with neglect at 63% and parental substance abuse at 32% as primary reasons. Children under age 5 are particularly vulnerable, comprising the fastest-growing group in foster care, often due to parental addiction.
Stories like this are not outliers; they reflect systemic patterns. For instance, nearly 60% of youth identified as homeless have histories of foster care, abuse, or domestic violence. Media and personal accounts often highlight abuse in broken homes leading to foster placement or runaway scenarios, with some children experiencing further trauma in foster care itself. The child welfare system handles millions of reports annually, and nationally, poverty-related neglect (not always intentional abuse) drives most removals—up to 80% in some areas. Long-term effects mirror the described lifelong pain: increased risks of mental health issues, substance abuse, incarceration, and unstable relationships for those from such backgrounds.
The Problem: Child Removal from Broken Homes into Foster Systems
The core issue is that broken homes—characterized by substance abuse, neglect, physical/sexual abuse, and family dissolution—frequently lead to child removal as a protective measure, but the foster care system itself is often inadequate or harmful. In 2023, 175,283 children entered foster care due to maltreatment. While removal aims to prevent further harm, it can exacerbate trauma through instability, sibling separation, and potential abuse in foster placements. Critics describe the U.S. foster system as “broken,” with too many children entering unnecessarily (e.g., due to poverty mislabeled as neglect) and insufficient support for biological families. This results in poor outcomes: foster youth are more likely to face homelessness, teen pregnancy, juvenile justice involvement, and long-term emotional scars compared to peers who remain in supported homes. Additionally, the system disproportionately affects low-income and minority families, perpetuating cycles of separation without addressing root causes like addiction or economic hardship.
Solutions: Preventing Removal and Alternatives to Foster Care
The solution lies not in polite reforms or half-measures, but in a brutal reckoning with a corrupt system that devours children for profit while masquerading as humanitarian aid. Billions of taxpayer dollars are funneled into a shadowy cartel—led by groups like Refugee Council USA (RCUSA) and its ten resettlement agencies—that treats vulnerable kids as inventory in a multibillion-dollar pipeline of exploitation, trafficking, and disappearance. This isn’t compassion; it’s a lobbying machine that profits from the lifelong damage of broken homes, foster failures, and refugee chaos, leaving 2,300 children missing every single day in the U.S. and hundreds of thousands unaccounted for in a web of neglect, abuse, and outright vanishing. Automatic removals and foster placements aren’t protection—they’re the cartel’s revenue stream, perpetuating cycles of trauma where kids “age out” into homelessness, addiction, incarceration, or worse, all while executives pocket six-figure salaries and boards stacked with Wall Street titans, former officials, and political insiders hedge bets with bipartisan donations to keep the spigot open.
True change demands fierce, unrelenting involvement from every citizen: no more passive awareness, no more “wait and see” while children are warehoused in converted Walmarts, handed to unvetted sponsors who turn out to be traffickers, or shuffled through foster homes rife with abuse. We must expose this cartel—RCUSA, IRC, HIAS, LIRS, USCCB, CWS, and their ilk—as the predators they are, laundering federal contracts into lobbying slush funds that block oversight and expand the crisis. Support initiatives like Project Milk Carton, which maps the governance, finances, donations, and lobbying of this machine to bring sunlight to the shadows and demand accountability for every lost child. Without mass awareness and action—petitions to state AGs for audits, FOIAs for contract transparency, community watch groups tracking placements—nothing changes. The cartel thrives on silence; shatter it.
Key approaches, infused with this urgency, include:
• Family Preservation Programs: These must be weaponized against the cartel’s incentives, providing intensive, short-term services (e.g., counseling, parenting education, substance abuse treatment, and economic support) to keep children safely at home and starve the removal pipeline. Programs like Intensive Family Preservation Services have reduced out-of-home placements by addressing root issues like addiction and neglect, but they need aggressive funding shifts away from foster contracts. The federal Family First Prevention Services Act (2018) funds community-based prevention, but it’s toothless without public pressure to redirect billions from cartel shelters to in-home mental health, substance abuse treatment, and parenting support. States like Indiana show it works when implemented post-abuse, but demand nationwide audits to ensure funds don’t loop back to profiteers.
• Separating Poverty from Neglect and Economic Empowerment: Harsh truth: Many removals are poverty traps mislabeled as neglect, feeding the cartel’s foster and UAC warehouses. Solutions demand flexible funds for rent, food, job training, and financial literacy to empower families and slash unnecessary entries—because every kid removed is a payday for agencies like Southwest Key or BCFS. Expose and defund the overlap where poverty becomes profit.
• Substance Abuse Interventions Without Automatic Removal: Parents battling addiction are prime targets for the cartel’s child-grab; rethink policies with family drug courts and in-home support to keep families intact, preventing foster entry and boosting recovery. Studies prove it works, but lobbyists block it to protect contracts.
• Kinship Care as an Alternative: Ditch stranger placements for relatives in kinship foster care, which delivers better outcomes—higher employment, education, lower re-abuse, and stability—while being cheaper and culturally sensitive. It’s a direct hit to the cartel’s institutional profits.
• Broader System Reforms: Train foster parents rigorously, promote community adoption over cartel shelters, and evaluate prevention with independent oversight—no more foxes guarding henhouses. Large-scale evidence shows supported families outperform foster care, reducing lifelong scars, but it requires dismantling RCUSA’s influence through exposed donations and lawsuits.
Effectiveness hinges on ruthless implementation: States with flexible funding and early interventions see drops in removals and better well-being, but only if we force transparency via tools like USAspending.gov and FEC records. Ultimately, shift from reactive exploitation to proactive family strengthening—but that demands your involvement now. Support Project Milk Carton to amplify awareness and dismantle this machine. We Won’t Stop TILL this Problem IS ERADICATED: The lobbying machine that profits from children while calling itself humanitarian.

Make sure you read and understand this article 👇👇👇 more to come…..
Follow this account, @P_MilkCarton
Visit ProjectMilkCarton.web.app

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JeremiahBullfrog3

JeremiahBullfrog3 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ansgar_3

Aug 8
IF WE DON’T WHO WILL

Imagine this:
A 14-year-old boy laughs while typing on his computer.
But hidden in those messages? A predator grooming him. This is the heartbreaking reality in our video “If We Don’t, Who Will” Watch and share to save lives. @P_MilkCarton

Your child is being groomed when you’re not paying attention. Mom walks by without a glance, Dad’s in the garage with friends. Distractions are everywhere, but so are the dangers. Online predators thrive on our unawareness.

He runs away, thinking he’s meeting a friend his age. But it’s a trap—an older man waiting. He senses danger, tries to flee, but a car pulls up… and he’s gone. Kidnapped into the nightmare of trafficking.

Back home, parents are comfy on the couch, texting and laughing. They feel safe. But their son is now chained, abused, sexually assaulted, forced into slave labor and sex work. Years pass, the pain never stops. They search endlessly, guilt-ridden, wondering if he’s alive.

Life goes on around them—kids swinging in parks. But those swings empty as more children vanish. Police are overwhelmed, doing what they can. Then, a young man arrested for trafficking and drugs… it’s their son, now a perpetrator himself. The cycle continues.

@Amerifuture @ShepherdsWatchF @GUARDATOfficial
Break the cycle! Our video ends with shocking stats: Every year, 4.2 million youth (ages 13-25) experience homelessness in the US, many as runaways vulnerable to traffickers. Nearly 1 in 3 runaway youth engage in survival sex.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10474560/Image
Online grooming is exploding: In 2024, reports of online enticement to the NCMEC CyberTipline reached 546,000, a 192% increase from 2023. According to recent research, 15.6% of US youth experience online child sexual abuse. Globally, more than 300 million children worldwide are victims of some type of online sexual exploitation and abuse annually. In the US, child sex trafficking affects thousands of children, with NCMEC receiving over 27,800 reports in 2024, and approximately 43% of victims knowing their trafficker prior to becoming a victim, often including family members or friends.

missingkids.org/gethelpnow/cyb…

congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

nysenate.gov/newsroom/press…

justice.gov/d9/2023-06/202…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 2
🙏 “THIS IS BIBLICAL: The Serpent’s Cult—How Psyops, Satanism, and Splintered Faiths Became the Devil’s Digital Army”

A spiritual warfare exposé tracing PSYOP doctrine from Aquino to TikTok, from cult temples to classrooms, from altars to algorithms. 🛐

These scriptures collectively emphasize the need for discernment, understanding God's Word, and relying on divine strength to identify and oppose harmful influences. 

Revelation 12:9

9. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

2 Corinthians 11:13-15

13. For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ.

14 . And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

15. It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.

Matthew 7:15-20

15. “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.

16. By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?

17. Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.

18 . A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.

19. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

20. Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.

Romans 16:17-18

17. I urge you, brothers and sisters, to watch out for those who cause divisions and put obstacles in your way that are contrary to the teaching you have learned. Keep away from them.

18. For such people are not serving our Lord Christ, but their own appetites. By smooth talk and flattery they deceive the minds of naive people.

James 4:7

7. Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

Romans 12:21

21. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.

Before you read any further, it is important to read this and pray, as evil exists in our world as we know it and has infiltrated every aspect of our lives, and our children have become the target. ~JeremiahBullfrog

Ephesians 6:10-18

10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.

11. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.

12. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

13. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

14. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;

15. And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;

16. Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.

17. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:

18. Praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints;

John 8:32

32. And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Let’s start with a detailed timeline of
Lieutenant Colonel Michael

Here’s a detailed and sourced profile of Lieutenant Colonel Michael Angelo Aquino, focusing on his U.S. Army Reserve service, his involvement in psychological operations (PSYOP), and the controversial claims surrounding “Project Monarch” and many other “accusation”

Military Career & Psychological Operations

Michael A. Aquino (born October 16, 1946 in San Francisco; died September 1, 2019) served in the U.S. Army specializing in psychological warfare (PSYOP). He joined in 1968, served in Vietnam, and rose to Lieutenant Colonel in military intelligence, retiring from active duty in 1994 with a Meritorious Service Medal.

He authored the influential 1980 doctrinal paper From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory, in collaboration with Colonel Paul Vallely. This proposed expanding psychological operations to a strategic, global “MindWar” concept.

Aquino obtained advanced degrees, including a Ph.D. in political science (1980) from UC Santa Barbara and an M.P.A. in National Resources Management (1987) from George Washington University and the U.S. Army’s Industrial College of the Armed Forces.

The Temple of Set & Occult Leadership

After serving in Vietnam, Aquino left the Church of Satan (which he had joined in 1969) due to disagreements with Anton LaVey. He then founded the Temple of Set in 1975 and became its High Priest, establishing a more occult-intellectual tradition called Setianism .

The Temple of Set still exists today, with Aquino acknowledged as a central figure in its doctrinal formation and organization.

Project “Monarch” Allegations

Various fringe conspiracy sources claim Aquino directed “Project Monarch”, alleged to be a secret trauma-based mind-control program linked to MK-Ultra. These allegations portray it as a pseudo–CIA operation targeting victims for coercive programming .

However, no mainstream or officially documented evidence supports that Aquino had any formal role in such a program. The Project Monarch narrative remains within conspiracy and paranormal literature, not corroborated by credible official sources.

Controversies & Investigations

Aquino faced public scrutiny in the Satanic Panic era. In 1986–87, he was accused of sexual abuse linked to a San Francisco military childcare center. Investigations found insufficient evidence, charges were never filed, and the allegations were widely considered unfounded. Subsequently, his full-time reserve contract was terminated in 1990. He remained in the reserves until formally retiring in 1994.

The broader claims linking him to high-profile conspiracies, such as elite satanic networks or Franklin scandal ring allegations by John DeCamp, are unsubstantiated and were pressed forward without legal outcomes. Investigations repeatedly found no credible evidence

Key Takeaways
•Michael Aquino was a real U.S. Army officer, well‑educated and specializing in psychological warfare and intelligence.
•Later, he channeled his interests into occultism, founding the Temple of Set and authoring esoteric and strategic writings.
•Project Monarch remains a speculative conspiracy without credible documentation or verification.
•The 1980s molestation allegations involved serious accusations, but investigations found no evidence to support them; Aquino was never charged. Due to Lack of evidence although the allegations were credible.

Now if you a re like me, this has lead me to question this a little deeper 🤔

Let’s get into it ……Image
Controversies and Investigations Involving Michael Aquino

Presidio Day-Care Abuse Allegations (1986–1987)

In the late 1980s, Lt. Col. Michael Aquino became entangled in the “Satanic Panic” era hysteria through allegations of child abuse at the Presidio of San Francisco Army base’s daycare center. In November 1986, the San Francisco Police (SFPD), the FBI, and the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division (CID) began investigating reports that a daycare employee, Gary Hambright, had molested children at the Presidio Child Development Center. law.justia.com/cases/federal/…

In August 1987, one of the alleged child victims – the three-year-old daughter of an Army chaplain – became frightened upon seeing Aquino and his wife Lilith at the base’s post exchange and referred to them as “Mikey” and “Shamby,” implicating them (along with “Mr. Gary” Hambright) in abuse at “Mr. Gary’s house” . This prompted authorities to expand the investigation to include Aquino and his wife as possible suspects

Investigative Findings: Multiple law enforcement agencies probed these accusations over the next several years:
•San Francisco Police Department: The SFPD found insufficient evidence to support the allegations against Aquino. By September 1988, the SFPD discontinued its investigation of Michael and Lilith Aquino “for lack of sufficient evidence,” and no local charges were filed . In other words, police could not substantiate the claims made by the children or witnesses. An August 1988 Los Angeles Times report likewise noted that the case against Aquino had been closed due to a lack of evidence .

Federal Investigators (FBI): The FBI had jurisdiction since the alleged crimes occurred on a U.S. Army base. FBI agents participated in the inquiry, interviewing victims and Army personnel. However, federal authorities never brought any charges against Aquino. Investigators ultimately determined there was no prosecutable case against him. In fact, a later review by writer Mitch Horowitz noted that official investigators discovered the Aquinos “were not even in San Francisco” during the time when the abuse was said to have occurred – they were living in Washington, D.C. for a military graduate program . mitch-horowitz-nyc.medium.com/the-long-stran…

This alibi further undercut the allegations, and the FBI did not pursue Aquino further once the evidence proved untenable.
•Army CID: The Army’s CID continued an internal investigation even after civilian authorities had dropped the case. In August 1989, CID completed a Report of Investigation (ROI) that formally “titled” Michael Aquino as a subject in the child-abuse investigation (meaning his name was listed in the report’s title block as a suspect) . Notably, the Presidio’s staff Judge Advocate reviewed the evidence and opined there was probable cause to list several serious offenses (indecent acts with a child, sodomy, conspiracy, kidnapping, etc.) under Aquino’s name. case-law.vlex.com/vid/aquino-v-s…

Crucially, however, no court-martial or military charge was ever brought. The CID report itself concluded the investigation should be closed because “all further leads involved adults who refused to cooperate, and the applicable three-year statute of limitations had expired in June 1989.” In other words, by mid-1989 the case had reached a dead end: key witnesses did not come forward, and the window for prosecuting the 1986–87 offenses under military law ran out. Aquino vehemently denied all accusations and even filed a sworn counter-complaint accusing the chaplain (the child’s father) of misconduct for making the abuse report – a move that led the Army to briefly investigate Aquino for false statements (no action was taken on that) . Ultimately, the CID closed its case with no charges, though it left Aquino’s name on the investigative record as an accused party (a point of contention in later years).Image
Read 24 tweets
Jul 21
QAnon as a Hybrid Disinformation and Domestic Narrative Control Operatio

‼️ Deliver The Truth No Matter The Cost‼️

QAnon emerged in late 2017 as an anonymous online persona (“Q”) claiming inside knowledge of a “plan” by patriotic insiders to defeat a corrupt elite cabal. Over the next three years, this phenomenon grew from fringe message boards to a wide social media audience, spreading cryptic posts (“Q drops”) that followers interpreted as prophetic clues . The origins of QAnon remain ambiguous – forensic analyses suggest at least two individuals were behind Q’s early and later posts , yet no law enforcement agency has definitively identified its creators. What is clear is that the narrative spread rapidly, captivating tens of thousands with its promise of a hidden plan and coming “Storm.” By 2020, QAnon had infiltrated mainstream political discourse and even inspired public office seekers , illustrating its remarkable reach.

QAnon served a dual and troubling function.
First, it operated as a tool of psychological manipulation, encouraging believers to “Trust the plan” and passively await salvation by hidden forces . This pacified genuine anti-corruption and anti-elite activism, neutralizing would-be populist movements with reassuring slogans instead of mobilization.

Second, the most outlandish QAnon content rife with baseless allegations of satanic pedophile cabals and fantastical conspiracies provided a convenient justification for authorities to increase surveillance and censorship. Federal agencies and private groups pointed to QAnon-driven extremism as a rationale for enhanced domestic monitoring, social media deplatforming, and the marginalization of legitimate investigative journalism as “conspiracy theory.” For example, the FBI in 2019 warned that “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists” like QAnon could pose a terrorist threat , and in 2020 the House passed a bipartisan resolution formally condemning QAnon’s “baseless” theories . These responses, while ostensibly addressing public safety, also set the stage for broader suppression of dissent under the guise of combating “extremist disinformation.”

theguardian.com/us-news/2022/j…

Our investigation highlights how an unaccountable influence network – spanning anonymous online actors, federal officials, government-aligned NGOs, and media outlets – weaponized the QAnon phenomenon in two directions. Internally, the movement deflected grassroots energy away from constructive political action, effectively keeping a segment of the populace occupied with elaborate but hollow “research” and slogans. Externally, the specter of QAnon was wielded to paint broad swaths of political dissent as dangerous conspiracy extremism, thereby legitimizing unprecedented campaigns of online censorship and surveillance . We find it telling that no serious federal inquiry was ever launched into who or what was actually behind QAnon’s inception. Instead, the narrative was implicitly treated as a useful foe, one that could be used to justify crackdowns while conveniently obscuring any role that intel or government-linked actors may have had in seeding or amplifying this disinformation. The lack of transparency and accountability regarding QAnon’s origins, combined with its tactical use to curtail rights, signals a grave oversight failure.

QAnon’s story is a cautionary tale of how hybrid disinformation can be leveraged to manipulate citizens and expand government power simultaneously. We recommend a series of reforms – from limiting outsized NGO influence on speech, to mandating disclosure of government partnerships in social media content moderation, to overhauling surveillance authorities – to ensure that nebulous online conspiracies can no longer be cynically exploited at the expense of Americans’ freedoms. This report seeks to document those risks and outline a path forward to prevent any similar “digital mass panic” operation from undermining our democracy in the future.
Background: Emergence and Structure of QAnon (2017–2020)

QAnon’s inception dates to October 28, 2017, when an anonymous poster using the moniker “Q Clearance Patriot” began a thread on the 4chan forum titled “Calm Before the Storm” . The individual (or group) behind “Q” claimed to be a high-level U.S. government insider with access to classified information, including an alleged secret plan by President Trump and military intelligence to dismantle a global cabal of corrupt elites. Q’s early posts falsely asserted, for example, that Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and that massive unrest would ensue . None of these predictions materialized, yet the cryptic messages sparked a keen following. In late 2017 and early 2018, Q continued to post “drops” on 4chan and later on 8chan (an imageboard known for minimal moderation) once the original forum became overcrowded . Each Q drop consisted of short, enigmatic phrases, leading questions, or slogans. Followers coalesced into online communities to decode these clues, treating them as a giant crowdsourced puzzle. Adopting the self-designation of “bakers” assembling Q’s “crumbs,” adherents wove elaborate theories to reconcile Q’s hints with real-world events .

By design, QAnon’s narrative structure was both grandiose and open-ended. It presented a powerfully dualistic myth: on one side, a nefarious “Deep State” cabal engaged in child exploitation and treason; on the other, righteous patriots in the government working behind the scenes to defeat evil. Q promised that at an imminent reckoning (referred to as “The Storm”), the cabal would be unmasked and justice served in dramatic fashion. Crucially, Q framed all developments as part of a master plan. To sustain believers’ faith in an eventual victory, Q employed recurring catchphrases such as “Trust the plan,” “Enjoy the show,” and “Nothing can stop what is coming.” These mantras were repeated constantly in Q drops.

The messages reassured followers that “everything [is] going as planned, that Trump [is] in control, and that all his adversaries [will] end up in prison” . This rhetoric had a calming, almost sedative effect on Q’s audience: no matter how chaotic current events seemed, devotees were told that a benevolent outcome was preordained.

Public engagement with QAnon often took on the character of an interactive game or religious prophecy. Adherents congregated on Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, sharing research and spreading Q’s slogans into mainstream circulation by mid-2018 . Memorable phrases like “Where we go one, we go all” (abbreviated “WWG1WGA”) became rallying cries both online and at real-world political rallies, appearing on t-shirts, flags, and placards.

A protest sign referencing QAnon slogans at a demonstration in Olympia, Washington (May 2020). QAnon messaging, such as the phrase “Where we go one, we go all,” spread from obscure imageboards to the physical world as followers displayed them at rallies and events.

From 2018 through 2020, QAnon’s reach broadened significantly, aided by world events and social media algorithms. The movement adeptly latched onto contemporary fears. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, QAnon channels incorporated pandemic-related conspiracy theories (anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine, anti-5G) to recruit from health and new age communities .

QAnon supporters also piggybacked on genuine concerns about child trafficking by hijacking hashtags like #SaveTheChildren, thereby attracting people initially unaware of QAnon’s fantastical core claims.

By mid-2020, surveys indicated that a non-trivial share of Americans had been exposed to or even believed some elements of the QAnon narrative. The public engagement crossed into politics: that year roughly 90 candidates for U.S. Congress or state offices had made statements sympathetic to QAnon .
Timeline of Key Events (2017–2020): (See Appendix A for an expanded timeline.)
•Oct 2017: The first Q posts (“Q drops”) appear on 4chan, referencing “The Storm” and urging readers to trust an upcoming plan .
•Late 2017: Q’s conspiracy claims expand and migrate to 8chan, as an enthusiastic community of “anons” begins to form around decoding Q’s messages .
•2018: QAnon gains traction on major platforms. Slogans like “Trust the Plan” and “WWG1WGA” proliferate on Twitter and Facebook. Q encourages followers to view everyday news as coded proof of the plan’s progress, reinforcing passive trust .
•2019: Concerns about QAnon’s influence prompt law enforcement attention. In August, the FBI’s Phoenix field office issues an intelligence bulletin warning that “fringe conspiracy theories” including QAnon are likely motivating some domestic extremists, constituting a potential terrorist threat . Around the same time, 8chan (Q’s platform) is taken offline due to unrelated extremist content, temporarily interrupting Q’s posts.
•Oct 2019: 8chan rebrands as 8kun; QAnon content resumes on the new site. No official investigation is launched into Q’s identity despite its growing influence.
•2020: QAnon’s online footprint explodes. The movement adapts to COVID-19 and election-related narratives, spreading false claims about pandemic measures and voter fraud. Social media companies belatedly attempt crackdowns: Twitter announces a mass suspension of QAnon-related accounts in July 2020 . In October 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives (in a rare bipartisan vote of 371–18) passes H.Res. 1154 condemning QAnon and its conspiracy theories .
•Jan 6, 2021: The U.S. Capitol is attacked by a pro-Trump mob that includes prominent QAnon adherents. Iconography like QAnon shirts and signs are visible in the crowd, and a Q devotee (“QAnon Shaman”) becomes one of the most recognizable figures in the riot . Following the attack, major platforms (Twitter, Facebook, etc.) ban tens of thousands of QAnon-related accounts and groups in an unprecedented sweep.

Findings

After extensive review of open-source intelligence, social media data, and witness testimony, the Committee has arrived at several disturbing findings regarding QAnon’s role in neutralizing domestic activism and enabling state narrative control. The evidence suggests that QAnon was not merely an organic conspiracy theory that spiraled out of control, but rather that its content and trajectory were consciously exploited – and possibly even engineered – to serve the twin aims of pacifying a segment of the population and providing pretext for authorities to expand censorship and surveillance. Key findings are as follows:

1. “Trust the Plan” – QAnon’s Passive Slogans Neutralized Populist Activism.

QAnon’s core slogans explicitly discouraged independent citizen action, instead urging faithful patience. The phrase “Trust the plan,” ubiquitous in Q drops, exemplified how followers were dissuaded from engaging in protests or other grassroots efforts. The idea was that an internal team of “white hats” (good actors in government) was already handling the battle against the cabal, so the public’s role was simply to “enjoy the show” as events unfolded.
This cultivation of passive trust had profound demobilizing effects. Many Americans who might otherwise have organized against perceived elite corruption or government overreach were instead lulled into waiting on the sidelines for salvation that never came.
In effect, QAnon functioned as a mass pacification campaign. Historical parallels are stark: the Soviet “Operation Trust” of the 1920s, a counterintelligence scheme, likewise fed false hope to regime opponents to prevent them from taking action.
Soviet agents set up a fake anti-Bolshevik resistance and convinced real dissidents to “remain calm” and trust that an internal military plot was underway, thus neutralizing the opposition until it was too late.
Read 22 tweets
Jul 20
Buckle up this will be a long thread but, based on the pattern of documented events, congressional hearings, and investigative reporting — what initially appeared as isolated “disinformation countermeasures” can now be seen as part of a broad and coordinated influence operation, involving both foreign and domestic actors, that extended far beyond “Russiagate” or General Flynn.

What I am pointing to isn’t just a soft coup against President Trump’s first administration, it reflects the systematic weaponization of disinformation infrastructure to suppress dissent, manipulate public perception, and interfere in electoral processes on U.S. soil, in ways that arguably:

🚨 Violated Civil Liberties, Subverted Elections, and Obstructed Political Accountability

Let’s lay out the investigative framework to back that claim — with timelines, actors, tactics, and outcomes.
PHASE 1: Psychological Operations & Perception Shaping (2016–2018)

Russiagate becomes the justification. NGOs become the vehicle.
•NGOs like Alliance for Securing Democracy (Hamilton 68), New Knowledge, and Atlantic Council seeded “bot” and “Russian disinfo” narratives, many of which targeted MAGA users, Trump allies, and dissenting media.
•These claims were echoed by legacy media (CNN, MSNBC, NYT), citing NGO reports as objective intelligence.
•Platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Google began receiving input from these NGOs and U.S. intelligence agencies on what to suppress.

🧾 Proof: The Twitter Files revealed internal staff knew Hamilton 68 was falsely labeling Americans as Russian bots, but the lie persisted — because it supported a political narrative.

PHASE 2: COVID-19 & Suppression of Scientific and Political Dissent (2020)

The same censorship infrastructure was turned inward on Americans during the pandemic.
•Facebook and Twitter throttled doctors, scientists, and elected officials questioning lockdowns, masks, or vaccine mandates.
•Stanford’s Virality Project, working with NGOs and government partners, advised platforms to censor “true information” if it could cause vaccine hesitancy.
•The White House pressured Facebook and Twitter to ban or silence specific users, including Tucker Carlson and Alex Berenson.

🧾 Proof: Twitter Files #19 showed DHS, HHS, and NGOs participated in real-time censorship operations via “misinfo dashboards” and regular email chains.



PHASE 3: The 2020 Election Interference via the Hunter Biden Laptop Coverup

Same networks. Same tools. Explicit domestic suppression of critical election-impacting data.
•The New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story was suppressed by Twitter and Facebook days before the election.
•FBI’s Elvis Chan and others warned platforms of a potential “Russian disinfo dump” weeks in advance, despite already having the laptop since Dec 2019.
•The Atlantic Council and other NGOs, funded by Burisma and connected to Biden, were advising platforms during this period.
•51 former intel officials released a letter falsely labeling the laptop “Russian disinformation,” which was promoted by MSM — knowingly.

🧾 Proof:

•Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan the FBI warned them to suppress the story.
•The House Judiciary Committee’s Weaponization Subcommittee confirmed the FBI and DHS’s role in suppressing the story.

PHASE 4: 2024 Pre-Bunking & Behavioral Modification

Moving from censorship to preemptive psychological conditioning.
•NGOs like the Election Integrity Partnership, NewsGuard, and Global Disinformation Index (GDI) received federal funding to rank or blacklist conservative and populist outlets.
•CISA (Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency) was revealed to have coordinated with Stanford and NGOs to monitor social media content and preemptively “debunk” narratives about mail-in voting, Dominion, or ballot harvesting.
•Misinformation research at Harvard, Princeton, and Stanford helped build AI and behavior-based models to influence what Americans believed before they even saw a story.

🧾 Proof:

•Twitter Files and Missouri v. Biden case filings showed that CISA was deeply involved in real-time flagging of “dangerous” narratives — even when true.
•NewsGuard’s Pentagon contract and GDI’s NED/U.S. State Department funding are public records.

Let’s break this down by timeline 😎
Forensic Timeline of Coordinated Influence Operations (2016–2024)

This timeline documents U.S. and U.K. influence campaigns targeting domestic political figures and narratives from 2016 through 2024. It is organized chronologically by year, with each entry labeled by operation type (e.g., Social Media Censorship, Psychological Operations, Legal Warfare, Financial Deplatforming). Key entities (NGOs, think tanks, agencies, and platforms) are highlighted, and relationships between funders, platforms, media, and officials are noted. The information is drawn from investigative reports, leaked documents, Twitter Files disclosures, Congressional inquiries, and other primary sources, with an emphasis on Russiagate, COVID-19 narrative control, and election interference in 2020 and 2024. Each entry includes citations for evidentiary support, suitable for judicial or legislative scrutiny.

2016
•July 2016 – Legal Warfare (Russiagate Investigation Begins): The FBI, under the code name “Crossfire Hurricane,” opens a counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign’s Russia ties, heavily relying on unverified opposition research (the Steele dossier, compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele and funded by the Clinton campaign). A 2023 Special Counsel review found “neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community… possessed any actual evidence of collusion… at the commencement of the investigation,” and that the FBI showed a “significant reliance on leads provided or funded by Trump’s opponents” . cbsnews.com/news/john-durh…

This early reliance on politicized material to investigate a U.S. presidential candidate set the stage for the Russiagate narrative, blending law enforcement with political influence.
•November 2016 – Psychological Operation (PropOrNot Media Blacklist): In the wake of Trump’s victory, an anonymous group called PropOrNot published a report accusing more than 200 U.S. websites of spreading Russian propaganda . washingtonian.com/2016/12/07/was…

The Washington Post ran a headline on Nov. 24, 2016 amplifying PropOrNot’s claims (while granting the shadowy group anonymity). The list smeared a wide range of alternative and conservative outlets – even popular sites like Drudge Report – as “useful idiots” of the Kremlin . Amid public backlash and questions about PropOrNot’s “obviously reckless and unproven allegations” , the Post added an editor’s note distancing itself from PropOrNot’s charges, conceding it “does not itself vouch for the validity” of the group’s findings . This episode foreshadows later efforts to delegitimize dissenting U.S. voices by branding them as foreign disinformation, often via cutouts in academia or NGOs.
Read 25 tweets
Jul 19
Systematic Failures in Unaccompanied Children Processing Under the Biden Administration (2021-2024)

This Thread examines systemic failures in the processing of unaccompanied children (UCs) at the U.S. border during the Biden administration (2021-2024), focusing on policies, inter-agency coordination, and oversight gaps that contributed to losing track of over 300,000 UCs. It highlights key structural issues, such as reliance on Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for Notices to Appear (NTAs), separation of roles under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) of 2008 and the Flores Settlement Agreement, lack of unified tracking, and the termination of the 2018 Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on information-sharing. All sources, including Office of Inspector General (OIG) reports, case studies, and additional findings, are documented for evidentiary purposes.
Executive Summary
The Biden administration’s handling of the border crisis resulted in unprecedented surges of UCs, with over 500,000 entering the system from 2021-2024. Systemic failures—rooted in policy reversals, resource shortfalls, and inter-agency silos—led to inadequate vetting, rushed releases, and minimal post-release monitoring, rendering approximately 323,000 UCs untraceable. This includes 291,000+ without NTAs and 32,000 who missed court hearings. oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/…

Key failures include DHS/ICE’s delays in issuing NTAs, HHS/ORR’s limited follow-up (e.g., undocumented 30-day calls in 22% of cases), and the March 2021 MOA termination under Acting HHS Secretary Norris Cochran and DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, directed by President Joe Biden, which hindered real-time data sharing on sponsor addresses and safety concerns. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

grassley.senate.gov/news/news-rele…

These gaps exposed UCs to risks like trafficking, exploitation, and unknown fates, as evidenced by OIG audits, congressional hearings, and case studies. Recommendations urge restored data-sharing, mandatory NTAs pre-release, and enhanced tracking.Image
Background
Under TVPRA (2008), HHS/ORR assumes custody of UCs within 72 hours of DHS apprehension, prioritizing welfare and release to sponsors without requiring NTAs upfront. The Flores Agreement (1997) mandates quick releases to avoid prolonged detention. From 2021-2024, border encounters surged (e.g., 147,000 UCs in FY2021, peaking at 152,000 in FY2023), overwhelming systems. immigrationforum.org/article/unacco…

newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigr…

Policy shifts, including the MOA termination, aimed to reduce sponsorship barriers but exacerbated tracking failures. congress.gov/118/meeting/ho…

Initial records in ORR’s UC Portal exist, but without enforcement linkages, UCs become uncontactable.Image
Read 11 tweets
Jul 17
🧵Stop Doing the Bidding for the Deep State and Pay Attention to the Actual Crime: NGOs and Intel Agencies Are Weaponizing Psychological Ops to Sow Division Against the America First Agenda

🚨 Yesterday during the DHS Oversight Hearing, Democrat Rep. Mr. Goodman and others strongly implied that President Trump is personally blocking the release of Epstein files… because he’s in them.

👀 Watch the attach video that shows just how everyone screaming for the release of the Epstein Files allowed for the weaponization to derail actual investigations into crimes against Children!
@GenFlynn @MaryFlynnONeil1 @taraleerodas @SunTzusWar @boonecutler @briangamble_v1 @Crux41507251 @LizCrokin @LynzPiperLoomis

@RepClayHiggins @RepLuttrell
@RepBrecheen @RepMichaelGuest
@RepPfluger @RepGarbarino @RepMcCaul @RepMarkGreen

Thank you for taking action on this issue these NGOs are the Criminal elements to crimes against our great Nation!

Watch the full Hearing: youtube.com/live/BX0mimyt-…

Follow @ali_hopper @JarrodSadulski
Their Organization : x.com/guardatofficia…

Follow: @P_MilkCarton
Big updates coming to the Website soon projectmilkcarton2025.web.app

Follow: x.com/shepherdswatch…

Follow: x.com/amerifuture?s=…
Let me be clear:
There is NO evidence that President Trump is named in any unreleased Epstein files.

This isn’t oversight — this is optical warfare. This is a political op—an old playbook being used again to confuse Trump’s base and fracture America First unity.

This is why @POTUS made this statement and if you had been paying attention during his first administration you should be aware of the tactics and ashamed of yourselves. I’d go as far as to say some of you are aware and pushing the deep state agenda, but I digress!Image
This was NEVER a vote to release the files.
What Democrats brought to the floor was a procedural motion, not a bill for transparency.

They hijacked another bill to jam in an Epstein-related amendment knowing Republicans would block it to protect legislative process.

The motion Democrats introduced would have only allowed a floor vote — not released any files.

Republicans voted 211–210 to block that procedural trick, and Dems instantly turned around and screamed:

“See?! Republicans are hiding Epstein’s client list!!”

That’s an information op.

Even Speaker Mike Johnson, who has publicly supported transparency, blocked the vote — not because he wants to hide anything — but because this was a weaponized procedural ambush, not a good-faith effort.

Ask yourself:
Why didn’t Democrats introduce a clean bill?
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(