Published today, an important paper proposes a framework dividing total fertility rate into two component parts:
TFR = Total Maternity Rate (TMR) x Children per Mother (CPM)
This lens shows that virtually all recent declines in fertility were due to increasing childlessness. 🧵
Demographer @StephenJShaw realized that these two components of TFR, the total maternity rate (or equivalently, the childless rate) and children per mother move quite independently of each other.
That means one gets much more information from looking at both parts together. 2/6
Unsurprisingly, both lower rates of motherhood and smaller family sizes are contributors to the crisis of low birthrates.
But both factors matter since the policies helping people reach parenthood may be very different from the ones supporting or encouraging larger families. 3/6
Shaw finds that among developed countries, those with the lowest fertility rates, namely Korea, Japan, Spain and Italy all have much higher rates of childlessness, suggesting that has been a major cause of ultra-low fertility. 4/6
At the same time, the US has had better fertility than other advanced countries in large part because lower rates of motherhood have been compensated for by steadily increasing family sizes.
In the US, a pronatal culture of big families helped counteract rising childlessness! 5/6
Shaw's work is the culmination of many years of research as he analyzed a staggering amount of data, covering some 314 million mothers across 33 higher-income countries! 6/6
All of China has low birthrates, but northeastern China has the lowest fertility of any region in the world, lower than South Korea. Why?
It was in these regions that the one-child policy was most rigorously enforced, completely wiping out natalism from the culture. 🧵
China's One Child Policy is gone now, and since July 2021, all birth limits have been removed.
But while the OCP was in force, millions of pregnant Chinese women experienced the tragic brutality of forced abortion, which I explored in this thread (2/5):
But why did population control hit harder in the northeast than elsewhere in 🇨🇳?
First, NE China urbanized earlier and population controllers were more powerful in cities.
Second, most people in NE China worked for state-owned enterprises, putting them directly under the CCP. 3/5
Colombia recorded only 445,000 births in 2024, way below UN projections of 701,000 births, for an official fertility rate of just 1.06 births per woman, and just 0.84 in Bogotá. (The true rate may be a little higher with unregistered births.)
Why such a dramatic collapse? 2/10
The biggest cause is the disappearance of marriage.
The rate of marriage in Colombia plunged to just 1.4 per 1000 people in 2022 according to OECD statistics, lowest in the world. (The US which has also seen a big drop still has a marriage rate 4 times as high at 6.0.)
3/10
On this Father's Day, let's think of young guys and the future.
How can young men, most of whom really want children one day, boost their odds of achieving fatherhood?
🧵!
Perhaps the first thing for young men to focus on is gaining income and building a career.
There is a strong positive relationship between a man's income and the number of children he will have.
This was true in the past and it is still true today, all over the world. 2/9
Part of this of course is that higher earning men are more attractive to women.
But even for among married men, studies find that when men earn more, they tend to have more children.
This isn't just some relic of the past. It is even more true for younger men! 3/9
UPenn economist @JesusFerna7026 just gave an important talk called The Demographic Future of Humanity.
Key points: (1) Birth data is much worse than the UN reports, (2) UN projections are absurdly rosy, (3) Economic growth will be low, and (4) Immigration cannot fix this.
🧵
First, Fernández-Villaverde notes that in country after country, the UN's birth figures are far higher than what those countries officially report.
For example, the Colombian government reports births 25% lower than what the UN claims. In Egypt and Türkiye, the gap is ~12%. 2/8
On top bad birth data, the UN's population projections are absurdly optimistic. In most countries birthrates have been dropping like a rock. Yet the UN projects birthrates will bounce right back up.
There is no evidence for this. The causes of low birthrates haven't reversed. 3/8
Resisting Birthrate Decline Through Culture: How one part of Japan bucks the trend
Japan's woes are well known, its population long in decline, it's economy stagnating.
Yet one prefecture continues to grow, not through policy but through a pronatal culture.
🧵, please share!
For more than forty years, Okinawa has had far higher fertility than any other prefecture (Stone, 2024).
But Okinawa's fertility used to be lower than the 🇯🇵 average (map by @yz7sha).
How did Okinawa manage to develop a pronatal culture, so different from the rest of Japan? 2/9
The story starts after World War II.
Unlike the United States or most countries that participated in the war, Japan never had a postwar baby boom, and a 2016 paper explains why.
Facing defeat and a loss of resources, Japan embarked on a crash program of population control. 3/9
A wonderful paper by Spears et al. showed that population reduction would have almost no impact on climate change.
Why? The main reason is that a baby born today will emit much less carbon than someone born a generation ago, and their children will emit even less carbon. 🧵
Most previous forecasts of how population would impact climate assumed that carbon emissions would continue at the same rate indefinitely.
But per-capita carbon consumption has been falling sharply and will fall even faster in the future as renewable energy takes over. 2/4
Meanwhile, because of population momentum, total population takes decades to change meaningfully.
By the time depopulation kicks in, per capita carbon emissions will be much lower than they are today, and so the climate impacts of population by then will be much lower. 3/4