I'm sure there are a lot of people, who think they are committed to climate action, who think I am being totally unrealistic, saying we need to stop burning fossil fuels.
1/🧵
Firstly, we've had 33 years since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, to be systematically phasing out fossil fuel burning and not developing any more reliance on them. Not suddenly stopping, we've had 33 years to do it gradually.
2/
Let's look at the usual arguments, that we need to carry on with the mass burning of fossil fuels, to maintain a civilized lifestyle. I have addressed this on countless previous occasions.
3/
Less than 18% of the global population, own a car, and only a similar amount fly, with only a few percent flying regularly. In other words, only a relatively small proportion of the global population rely on large scale burning of fossil fuels to maintain their lifestyles.
4/
However, most of that 20% who do need a lot of fossil fuel burning, to maintain their lifestyles, only use moderate amounts of fossil fuels. It's actually the top 10%, really top 1%, top 0.1% responsible for most fossil fuel burning to maintain their lifestyles.
5/
The richest 1% have over twice the carbon emissions of the bottom 66%. In other words, this scale of fossil fuel burning, hasn't been to preserve the lifestyles of most, it's actually the top few percent, the top 1%. Pure selfishness, by the greediest.
In other words, the refusal to phase out most fossil fuel burning, isn't to preserve the lifestyles of most people, but to preserve the greedy, selfish lifestyles of the top 1%. By no coincidence, every person in a major decision-making position, is in the top 1%.
7/
My views on this are not simplistic or unrealistic. It's just that richest people in the world, don't think they need to curtail their greedy lifestyles, even if they're going to collapse our civilization, that will result in billions starving to death. They are psychopathic.
8/
We are consigning our future generations, to a horrific future of mass starvation, just to let a tiny proportion of the global population, lead greedy, selfish and extravagant lifestyles.
Yes, I have a simplistic view as regards the selfish and evil behaviour of the top 1%.
9/
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the last 10-20 years, there's been a huge increase in renewable energy, and a huge rise in EVs. Yet emissions are rising, because more fossil fuels than ever are being burned. Energy demand for things like AI and global economy growth, is increasing.
2/
There seems to have been this naive belief, that if we just create more renewable energy, and put most EVs on the road, this will result in a switch from fossil fuels, and emissions will be greatly reduced. I don't believe those pushing this, actually believe it themselves.
3/
All my life, I have been accused of seeing things too simplistically. No, I'm actually an expert problem solver.
To solve a problem, you have to refine a problem, to its very basics, and if you fail to do address that, then ultimately, you won't solve the problem.
1/🧵
Our modern culture, is nearly all derived from that of several European colonial powers, who developed a certain rapacious mindset and went onto to colonize the world. I'm looking at you Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, and Holland.
2/
At the heart of this rapacious mindset, was just seeing everything, people, the natural world and its resources, as just commodities to be exploited for profit.
Other cultures ruled by powerful individuals, did this to an extent, but not on this scale, and focus.
3/
"The UK is using Brexit to weaken crucial environmental protections"
This raises serious questions about Keir Starmer's opposition to rejoining EU, and whether he is being controlled or constrained by powerful vested interests.
From since well before the Brexit vote, I made it very clear on the Guardian comments sections, that what motivated those funding the Brexit campaign, was primarily removing EU environmental regulations i.e. to weaken them, to profit from it.
2/
The Tories lied about Brexit, falsely claiming that these EU water, air and other environmental regulations, would just be copied and pasted into UK law. This didn't happen as claimed, and environment regulations, were being covertly weakened.
3/
"How can England possibly be running out of water?"
This crisis, this emergency, connected to the climate and ecological crisis, is primarily a crisis of leadership. Our modern politicians/governments, are totally unfit to lead/govern.
Our fake leaders, because they are not real leaders, but corporate and oligarch shills, are fixated on only one thing, economic growth, which primarily benefits the very rich, at the cost of the longer term viability of our societies/civilization. They don't care about that.
2/
All this has been very foreseeable. In 2013, former Environment Minister, Richard Benyon wrote about it, and said in 2012, when he was minister, just before the 2012 Olympics, that we were weeks from a national water shortage emergency.
Can I make something clear about this thread. I was primarily talking about people in positions of great power, who are never held to account, or examined closely.
I gave an example of 2 mundane fraudsters, simply to illustrate that such people exist. It wasn't about them.
1/🧵
The problem we have, is that it has almost never happened, where a senior political fraudster, has been totally unmasked, in the manner of these 2 common fraudsters I used to illustrate, how totally disingenuous people, do exist.
2/
Let me give an example. Donald Trump, trying to get Barack Obama, Joe Biden and the Clintons prosecuted. If Trump was honest, and he is certainly not, he'd want to make dishonesty and lying in public office, seriously illegal.
3/
We need to have a discussion about disingenuous people, in positions of power, and disingenuity, in general.
Understanding this, is central to understanding why the world is in such a mess, and why we have such bad leadership.
1/🧵
If you look up the term disingenuous in a dictionary, you find things like insincere, not frank or honest. This is far too mild for what I'm talking about, but there isn't really any other widely understood English term, that covers it.
I'm talking about total disingenuity, where the whole of how someone presents themselves, is completely false, and most of what they say, is dishonest and misleading, because really they're only interested in their own ambitions, and the ends justify the means.
3/