Lewis Brackpool Profile picture
Aug 22 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
NOW — I’ve obtained a Treasury briefing, prepared for Davos 2020, revealing how the UK government aligns itself with WEF priorities like “inclusive growth,” climate change policy and digitisation.

Whilst 5 years old, it’s important to view this and how it’s structured.

🧵(1/9) Image
This document was drafted for the Chancellor ahead of Davos. Though it remained a draft (the Chancellor didn’t speak), it sets out the UK’s positioning on global fiscal & monetary policy in the WEF’s own framing.

🧵(2/9) Image
The document contained biographies of other attendees including, the Secretary of the Treasury (USA), President of the European Central Bank and the Vice-Chancellor and federal minister of finance, Germany.

🧵(3/9) Image
Image
The Treasury emphasised “inclusive growth,” a WEF-framed concept often used to mean redistribution to offset ‘regional inequalities’.

The briefing pushes investment in infrastructure, R&D, and skills, while framing inequality as a global economic risk.

🧵 (4/9) Image
Climate change is presented not just as an environmental risk, but as a “real and tangible threat to the global economy.”

This was framed as an economic risk, binding climate policy directly to fiscal/monetary planning.

The UK pledged to push Net Zero and even highlighted its co-hosting of COP26.

🧵 (5/9)Image
The Treasury warned that automation could replace up to 14% of jobs in the next 15–20 years and significantly alter another 32%.

They positioned the UK as committed to “R&D investment and innovation-friendly regulation.”

🧵 (6/9) Image
The document urges using fiscal policy “space” to drive growth, encouraging governments to spend more on skills, infrastructure, and green investment.

UK fiscal policy was framed as a model because of “record low borrowing costs.”

Important to note this was pre-COVID and pre-COP26 yet, the Treasury was already embedding this agenda.

🧵 (7/9)Image
Image
The UK strongly backed WTO modernisation and “liberalisation of trade in services.”

This reflects the WEF’s globalisation agenda, removing barriers, promoting free trade, and deepening interdependence.

🧵 (8/9) Image
Image
This FOI shows:

- How UK policy was pre-aligned with WEF frameworks.

- How concepts like “inclusive growth,” “Net Zero,” and “digitalisation” were baked into UK briefings.

- The merging of fiscal/monetary strategy with global governance language.

The Treasury didn’t want this full document public.

🧵 (9/9)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lewis Brackpool

Lewis Brackpool Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Lewis_Brackpool

Aug 1
The Telegraph have just lifted my exclusive FOI scoop without a single mention or credit.

The Telegraph previously lifted one of my FOI exclusives and didn’t credit, I was just grateful the story got wider attention. But this is just becoming plagiarism.

On July 31st, I published official NHS data obtained via my FOI showing that over 920,000 full-health HC2 certificates had been issued to asylum seekers since 2020.

Now, The Telegraph have run the exact same figures, same framing, and same headline narrative without credit. Again.Image
30th of July* (2 days ago).

Sorry, my mind is fried.
Read 4 tweets
May 25
🧵 THREAD: Today I submitted 60 FOI requests to 14 UK government departments across 11 thematic areas — covering climate policy, surveillance, immigration, censorship, ideological training, and more.

All findings will be published in full.

Each request targets a critical area of modern governance — from climate data manipulation and digital surveillance to immigration enforcement, NGO influence, and ideological conditioning inside public institutions.

This is a broad-spectrum transparency campaign focused on exposing:

- Technocratic overreach

- Institutional bias

- Globalist policy alignment

- Withheld or suppressed public interest information

Requests have been organised by theme and will be published as responses arrive.Image
Climate Data Integrity & Alarmism
(Met Office, DCMS, DESNZ, Ofcom, Treasury)

- Internal Met Office emails on redefining “heatwave” thresholds

- Forecast accuracy for “hottest day of the year” claims

- Government memos on “climate misinformation” in media

- Cost-benefit analysis of Net Zero insulation policy

- Internal concerns over affordability of gas boiler bans

- Forecast vs actual impact of energy price caps

- Land value tax proposals tied to climate or emissions policyImage
Technocratic Urban Policy & Behavioural Engineering
(DLUHC, DfT, DEFRA, Cabinet Office, and Behavioural Insights Team)

- Urban planning documents linking climate targets to restricted zones or travel.

- Use of geofencing for traffic management or environmental enforcement.

- Government-backed campaigns to “nudge” the public on diet and climate.

- Behavioural incentives and compliance models tested in schools and NHS settings.Image
Read 13 tweets
May 23
🧵THREAD: The British State’s History of Human Experimentation On Its Own Population

The UK government’s £50 million investment in solar geoengineering — a method to dim the sun to "cool the planet."

But to understand the concern, we must examine precedent. This isn’t the first time the British public has unknowingly been used in state experiments.

[1/13]Image
The concept behind solar radiation management sounds like science fiction.

Dispersing particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from Earth. But it’s now a UK-funded reality.

However, more questions are arising from this — is this really new, or simply a continuation of hidden trials that have gone on for decades?

[2/13]Image
From the 1950s to the 1980s, the British government conducted secret chemical and biological warfare experiments — many of them on its own citizens.

Subjects were rarely informed.
Consent was virtually nonexistent.

The justification was for "National security reasons", and the cost was public health and civil trust.

[3/13]Image
Read 13 tweets
May 20
🧵THREAD: The WHO Pandemic Agreement has now passed.

There was no parliamentary vote, no public debate, and no referendum.

This thread explains what was agreed, how it happened, and why concerns about sovereignty, accountability, and global governance are growing.

[1/15]Image
On 20th May 2025, WHO member states adopted the organisation’s first international Pandemic Agreement at the 78th World Health Assembly in Geneva.

The treaty was adopted by consensus, not a formal vote, which means that governments, including the UK, signalled approval without domestic scrutiny.

[2/15]Image
The treaty is designed to address failings exposed by how countries "handled COVID-19."

It outlines legal commitments to:

– Share pathogen samples & genetic data
– Distribute vaccines & therapeutics “equitably”
– Strengthen international surveillance
– Comply with WHO-led emergency declarations
– Develop global digital health certification systems

[3/15]Image
Read 15 tweets
Feb 17
I’ve submitted multiple Information requests on key issues -- from government propaganda to immigration policy, meetings with Bill Gates & Larry Fink, corporate influence, media control, and AI development.

Here’s what we are waiting for 🧵 Image
Government-Funded Anti-Migration Ads

The UK government launched advertising campaigns aimed at deterring Albanian migrants from coming to Britain. These campaigns portrayed the UK as an undesirable place for them to come.

- Who funded them?
- How much was spent?
- What impact did they have?

I’ve requested documents revealing the strategy behind this campaign, other anti-migration campaigns and whether the government believes it actually worked (it hasn't and the taxpayer is wasting more money).Image
The Meeting between Bill Gates & Keir Starmer

Shortly before the Labour government announced its budget in 2024, Bill Gates met with Starmer and Rachel Reeves. Since my first request back in December, this request has been delayed for 3 months, citing that disclosing the information may 'affect the public policy-making process.'

- Was the Gates Foundation involved in shaping UK agricultural policy?
- Were land ownership and climate policies discussed?

My request seeks records of the meeting, where a response is expected by February 20th.Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 5
I submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) regarding seed oils and human health.

The results? A concerning lack of research into their long-term effects.

Here’s what I found.
🧵 1/ Image
🧵 2/13

Seed oils are one of the most widely consumed fats in the modern diet.

Yet concerns remain over their potential role in inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease.

Has the UK government investigated the long-term health effects? Image
🧵 3/13

On 14th January 2025, I sent an FOI request to the FSA, asking:

- Has the FSA funded or conducted research on seed oils and health?

- What studies exist on their impact on chronic disease?

- Are there internal reports on potential risks?

Their response raises serious questions.Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(