🧵 THREAD: Today I submitted 60 FOI requests to 14 UK government departments across 11 thematic areas — covering climate policy, surveillance, immigration, censorship, ideological training, and more.

All findings will be published in full.

Each request targets a critical area of modern governance — from climate data manipulation and digital surveillance to immigration enforcement, NGO influence, and ideological conditioning inside public institutions.

This is a broad-spectrum transparency campaign focused on exposing:

- Technocratic overreach

- Institutional bias

- Globalist policy alignment

- Withheld or suppressed public interest information

Requests have been organised by theme and will be published as responses arrive. Climate Data Integrity & Alarmism
(Met Office, DCMS, DESNZ, Ofcom, Treasury)

- Internal Met Office emails on redefining “heatwave” thresholds

- Forecast accuracy for “hottest day of the year” claims

- Government memos on “climate misinformation” in media

- Cost-benefit analysis of Net Zero insulation policy

- Internal concerns over affordability of gas boiler bans

- Forecast vs actual impact of energy price caps

- Land value tax proposals tied to climate or emissions policy

🧵THREAD: The British State’s History of Human Experimentation On Its Own Population

The UK government’s £50 million investment in solar geoengineering — a method to dim the sun to "cool the planet."

But to understand the concern, we must examine precedent. This isn’t the first time the British public has unknowingly been used in state experiments.

[1/13] The concept behind solar radiation management sounds like science fiction.

Dispersing particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from Earth. But it’s now a UK-funded reality.

However, more questions are arising from this — is this really new, or simply a continuation of hidden trials that have gone on for decades?

[2/13]

🧵THREAD: The WHO Pandemic Agreement has now passed.

There was no parliamentary vote, no public debate, and no referendum.

This thread explains what was agreed, how it happened, and why concerns about sovereignty, accountability, and global governance are growing.

[1/15] On 20th May 2025, WHO member states adopted the organisation’s first international Pandemic Agreement at the 78th World Health Assembly in Geneva.

The treaty was adopted by consensus, not a formal vote, which means that governments, including the UK, signalled approval without domestic scrutiny.

[2/15]

I’ve submitted multiple Information requests on key issues -- from government propaganda to immigration policy, meetings with Bill Gates & Larry Fink, corporate influence, media control, and AI development.

Here’s what we are waiting for 🧵 Government-Funded Anti-Migration Ads

The UK government launched advertising campaigns aimed at deterring Albanian migrants from coming to Britain. These campaigns portrayed the UK as an undesirable place for them to come.

- Who funded them?
- How much was spent?
- What impact did they have?

I’ve requested documents revealing the strategy behind this campaign, other anti-migration campaigns and whether the government believes it actually worked (it hasn't and the taxpayer is wasting more money).

I submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) regarding seed oils and human health.

The results? A concerning lack of research into their long-term effects.

Here’s what I found.
🧵 1/ 🧵 2/13

Seed oils are one of the most widely consumed fats in the modern diet.

Yet concerns remain over their potential role in inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease.

Has the UK government investigated the long-term health effects?

For the past week in New York and Philadelphia, I’ve been quietly blending in, asking Democrat voters a series of questions about election integrity —without revealing where I stand politically.

Here are five short takeaways from what I found… 🇺🇸🧵 1) Democrat voters are sympathetic to the press

With my English accent and explaining that I’m in the U.S. to ask questions about election integrity, Democrat voters were more willing to give unfiltered opinions on whether they see election fraud as a major issue.

Their trust in the media was striking. In contrast, Trump voters I spoke to were also eager to share their thoughts but were reluctant to go on camera, fearing it could jeopardize their jobs.