People can deny, deflect, and hope to trick voters into thinking everything is right because they're calling Hispanics Latino again instead of referring to them as Latinx or Brown Bodies, but that's not going to work.
The values are what's really off-putting to voters.
Plain language might be less infuriating, but it only makes insanity clearer.
"I want to take away the funding from your local police department"
hold up
"I want to abolish immigration enforcement"
wait, no
"I want bathrooms that aren't gated by sex"
Stay away from my kids!
I'm hopeful Democratic leadership will push back against its parties intellectual elites, Warrenites, highly-credentialed interns, and would-be bureaucrats sitting in GS-15 sinecures and academic ivory towers.
Oh, and I don't think anyone will fall for the bait-and-switch as often anymore.
People have seen enough of politicos saying ''defund the police' means 'reform the police to be nicer :)'' to realize that it's a lie and they really meant defunding the police.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Amy Wax got in trouble for remarking that she'd not seen a Black student in the top quarter of a Penn Law class.
Thanks to hacked Columbia data, we can see that she was...
Probably right!
In the decade before her statement, there were just two top-25% Black students.
It is *totally* plausible that she never met these students. And it's also plausible that she rarely saw Black students in the top *half*, because each year, the number of them was just 1-4.
But, despite being 8% of the class, they were ~40% of the bottom 10%-ranked students:
Note: Penn is on-par/slightly less elite than Columbia, so it's likely that the Black students there were somewhat *worse*, as the article notes, making her claims more likely.
This all comes from @zagrebbi's latest article. It's well worth a read!
Big day if you think Roe v. Wade was correctly decided.
My favorite part (note that I've only read 150 pages so far) was Thomas explaining that, no, the Founding g Fathers did not adopt the English feudal system.
This fact was clearly lost on the other side.
The Court's reliance on a random remark from a case that ultimately didn't even produce lasting changes raises the question of whether that sort of thing even matters.
Why shouldn't I cite the Dred Scott case as the law of the land?
- His license is suspended
- He was once a soldier for a Mafia family
- He's telling me about his time in Rikers
- He's showing me YouTube videos
- He's telling me his theories about Jews
He's telling me about gang wars he was in ad a kid.
He's wondering why all the Chinese girls are lined up - for an audition?
He says to go to Mother's Ruin for latin prostitutes.
All of this entirely unprompted.
"Yeah, these African guys, yeesh"
"I couldn't fuck that whore because I got the erectile dysfunction."