This has been true for 25 years. While complacent centrists were celebrating Blairite Modernity, "progressive patriotism" and selective social liberalism, a backlash simmered that's now boiling over. People who wanted to say the P word and the N word and get rid of the other.
It sounds over simplistic. But there's *millions* of people who angrily resent being told not to think of people as other and not belonging. And they want to say slurs to people's faces. It's not different to what it was like in 2002. It's their level of confidence that's changed
And the new "your" party better get its skates on. Otherwise while they're still emailing the agenda for a special conference, there's going to be *thousands* of new racist councillors with "responsibility" for wards where houses and shops will be going up in flames every night.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People dewy eyed with "the UK used to be so good" nostalgia for 1985 when some rich guys did a show to try to get food and supplies to alleviate a famine as the UK government didn't give a shit because it was too busy waging class war on unions, inner city residents and hippies.
This latest bout of "I remember this and everything about the country was completely perfect, the best time in all history not like now" nostalgia for 1985 coming on one day after a different group of human goldfish were recalling the absolute bliss of life in 1996.
When civil war does break out in the UK it will be between people who insist their TV implanted false memories of the 80s & 90s were the greatest time in all human history and people who insist that the Kodacolour postcard high street of the 1950s was the height of civilisation.
Social Democracy had a tripartite training system that involved government/employers/unions. Unions got smashed, employers pulled out of most of their responsibilities and started demanding government repeatedly "reform" compulsory and lifelong learning to meet its needs only.
I mean, ok, that's a somewhat broad brush and generalising view but so is the nonsense that gets talked about "delivering skills" to meet "business needs" Which are hugely varied and ill served by government programmes in design, development, funding, delivery and pace of change.
But staying broad brush, basically government was told/told itself to stay out of economic policy and let markets and dominant fractions of Capital do it. So they've busied themselves, also under instruction, endlessly messing about with "education reform" policy for 40+ years.
My issue with this line is that while a lot of voters *do* want nationalisation, many don't look at the actual politics of self promoting King Actors like Farage, (or Johnson). They think he's a guy who'll do what other people won't and he'll do what they think needs to be done.
It's why Johnson was able to stage the ludicrous pantomime of "levelling up," which was against all his instincts and beliefs, because your aim is just to convince people - with your act, that they like - that you're the *type of leader* who will give them what they want.
The worst thing that will happen is what happens to all King Actor leaders, they'll get angry with you for not delivering what they think you should have, but they won't reflect on their failure to understand your ideology. Because it's their beliefs that will have been failed.
Food drops, the Berlin Airlift. These things used to be part of the discourse around civilian populations caught up in wars and disasters. Its a glaring absence from discussion. A world where Aid Workers are targetted for execution and "the international community" does nothing.
Hard not to draw comparisons with the 1930s. Organisations set up to act beyond national government self interest unable to act to save lives and forced to defend themselves from political attack from nation states within "the international community".
These are Fascist times.
UK government, not even one of the worst, if we glance to central Europe, signalling that Palestinians are not "people" just an adjunct to an administration it regards as "the enemy". If a UK citizen were to say the same of the dominant side in this conflict, they'd face arrest.
The "patriotic working classes" *wasn't* your base. It was the base of the Tory party. The Working Class Tory vote in those constituencies, which always existed and meant that even during Post War Social Democracy in the 50s and early 60s, Labour was out for 13 years.
Blue Labour are charlatans just as much as Reform. It could talk about (green, clean) industrial strategy to rebuild a productive base for regional development. It doesn't. It dangles the same promise to bring back an imagined mid 20th Century though "patriotism" and "tradition"
It could talk about the failure to transition the industries of the "traditional base in the North, the midlands, Wales etc" by adopting the Lucas plan, moving workers in engineering extractive and energy industries to Green/Social production. It doesn't. It talks coded racism.