Inclusionary zoning is a good policy if you want housing to be more expensive and less common.
The literature on this has tended to point in one direction: inclusionary zoning is a bad idea.
The literature on this has tended to point in one direction: inclusionary zoning is a bad idea.
Every developer I've spoken to who has had to deal with it just tries to avoid falling into inclusionary zoning thresholds whenever they can.
The most common way they do that is by building fewer units to avoid a unit number threshold after which you have to build 'affordable'.
The most common way they do that is by building fewer units to avoid a unit number threshold after which you have to build 'affordable'.
As always with this topic, the best thing to do is just to build more.
Source: mercatus.org/research/polic…
Source: mercatus.org/research/polic…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
