A new preprint study shatters the idea that pediatric long COVID is just a mild or different version of the adult form.
It shows that children share the same core immune patterns - and, strikingly, some resemble those seen in chronic infections like HIV.🧵
The paper message is clear - pediatric LC is biologically defined immune dysfunction.
Children display
shifts in monocytes (↑ non-classical, ↓ CCR6),
T cell changes (↑ Tregs, ↓ central memory CD4, exhausted CD8),
exhausted B cells.
At the root lies a failure of antigen-presenting cells (monocytes & dendritic cells).
Normally, they carry viral information to T and B cells. But in LC, they express less CCR6/CCR7 - they can’t migrate properly to lymph nodes or activate adaptive immunity.
“Suppressed expression of CCR6 and CCR7… could impair antigen presentation and adaptive immunity.”
The consequence?
B cells don’t mount a strong antibody response.
Children with LC had significantly lower anti-RBD IgG and IgA titers, and their antibodies neutralized the virus less effectively.
The virus can persist in tissues, like the gut.
Meanwhile, T and NK cells become hyperactivated.
On the surface this looks like a strong immune defense. But in reality, it’s a dead end.
These cells show exhaustion markers (PD1, CD57, CD38, HLA-DR↑).
“Elevated expression of activation and exhaustion markers…”
A vicious cycle?
Persistence - activation - exhaustion - persistence again.
And here’s the striking part - the authors explicitly point to parallels with HIV.
“Elevated CXCR3 expression on CD8 TCM has also been reported in people living with HIV-1, suggesting a shared trait of chronic viral infections.”
The same is true for B cells.
Cluster 15 B cells show an exhausted-like phenotype -
“…commonly observed in chronic viral infections such as HIV-1.”
SARS-CoV-2 can imprint the immune system in children in ways that mimic chronic viral disease.
In pediatric LC, CD8 stem-cell like memory T cells (TSCM) decreased, while central memory T cells (TCM) increased.
And within TCM, there was a shift toward CXCR3+/CCR6+ cells - a phenotype of chronic stimulation.
The clinical point is sobering.
Weak antibodies + exhausted T/NK cells = a recipe for viral persistence.
When APCs don’t work (CCR6/CCR7↓), B cells never make high-quality antibodies.
The virus hides, the immune system pushes harder, and burns itself out.
The result?
A state of chronic immune imbalance.
Maybe less dramatic than HIV, but uncannily similar.
Pediatric LC emerges as a model of chronic viral immunopathology - not a psychological aftermath, but a biological condition with measurable immune signatures.
And perhaps we won’t need to argue about these parallels for long.
The authors themselves are already drawing them - between pediatric LC, adults with LC, and chronic infections like HIV.
Pujol et al., 2025. Pediatric Long COVID Is Characterized by Myeloid CCR6 Suppression and Immune Dysregulation. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Dobře si to přečtěte @szupraha @ZdravkoOnline @msmtcr @Hygiena_cz. LC je dnes nejčastější chronické onemocnění u dětí - překonává astma.
Tohle jsou následky vaší nečinnosti.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The study in Clinical Ophthalmology - LISTEN, 595 people with long COVID.
57% report new ocular symptoms - blurred vision, dry eyes, floaters or flashes. The headline isn’t really about the eyes🧵
The eyes here work more like a warning light than a site of primary damage. People who report ocular symptoms carry a heavier overall illness picture across the board.
The authors let a model find which symptoms best separate the two groups. Five came out on top - dizziness, cold intolerance, pressure at the base of the head, tinnitus, and tremor. Not one of them is ocular.
A German study followed 74 children and teens with severe long COVID for up to 3 years after infection, measuring their immune systems repeatedly. The finding worth unpacking - that immune picture kept shifting over time. It wasn't frozen in place.🧵
In the first year an antiviral signature dominated - signalling IFNα, IL-13, IL-33.
By years 1-3 that signature had dropped back to the levels seen in healthy kids. At first glance, that looks like recovery.
The profile moved, but the kids didn't get better. Across the entire follow-up, no group level improvement in physical or mental health. The immune system was remodelling itself - and clinically, nothing was happening. Remodelling isn't recovery.
New study out of Amsterdam UMC asks a question most Long COVID imaging papers don’t tackle at once - does inflammation in the brain actually track with how well different brain regions talk to each other? 45 people, roughly 27 months post-infection!🧵
TSPO PET is a scan that lights up wherever immune cells in the brain (microglia) are activated - basically a map of where inflammation is happening. This version is fully quantitative, with blood sampling during the scan, not a shortcut estimate.
The second scan, resting-state fMRI, measures which brain regions sync up while someone just lies there doing nothing.
Severe COVID at least temporarily (years) weakens the part of the immune system that keeps dormant and opportunistic pathogens in check. 3.6 mio dataset from Chile shows this on a textbook example - tuberculosis🧵
People hospitalized with COVID had more than an eightfold higher risk of TB flaring up over the following year.
That watch has a name - cell-mediated immunity. Dormant TB is kept walled off in a tiny lesion (granuloma) by a team of T cells, IFN-γ (inflammatory signaling molecule), macrophages.
COVID ages the brain. But we keep hitting the same wall - how do you prove it when the brain changes over years and we only have data spanning months?
A new study tried to get around that wall through a completely different door. Genetics.🧵
The logic is clever. Everyone gets their genes shuffled at random at conception - and some of that shuffle makes people more prone to severe COVID.
Nobody chose that susceptibility. It was dealt randomly, for life, long before any illness. That’s what makes it almost an experiment - one that isn’t tangled up by lifestyle or by the usual which came first problem.
If you wear a Fitbit or a smartwatch, you may have noticed your HRV drop and your resting heart rate climb after COVID. Data from 1,475 people in the RECOVER cohort now confirm that pattern objectively - from passively collected sensor data🧵
The study took passive wearable data from 1,475 people a median of ~21 months (!) after infection and matched it against a symptom questionnaire. The differences between groups are small but statistically solid.
What the wearable actually measures?
HRV = the variation in the gaps between beats - higher usually means a more flexible autonomic nervous system.
Resting heart rate = how fast your heart beats at rest. Both track with cardiac health at the population level.