When international mail services to the US resume,
they're gonna be more like those to Brazil.
I have a lot of experience of sending small gifts to Brazil, so lemme explain how bad that gets.
(1/4) apnews.com/article/us-tar…
Trump has replaced the $800 "de minimis" exception which allows small gifts to travel painlessly with a $100 limit and a whole host of new rules.
Here's the current UK mail @RoyalMail state of play.
Brazil is similar (except $50 not $100), but even that ain't easy.
(2/4)
If I receive a personal package from Brazil, say around 2kg or less, using regular tracked airmail (about $25 US), it arrives like you'd expect. No drama. About five days.
FedEx is 2-3 days, $100+. No drama.
Sending the other way is a whole different story.
(3/4)
In practice, and I've done this many times, it takes two weeks to around two months.
If Customs is busy, or there's a holiday, or a strike, or the slightest excuse, it just waits there. Melting in the case of chocolate. For weeks.
Otherwise they levy essentially random charges.
Recently they insisted that a customs declaration (checked by the mail company in the UK) for three items totalling $45 in value meant three items at $45 (US) each, and a consequent tariff bill, per some crazy calculation, of $130 (US). Which needed to paid via their website, before anything moved.
As it happens, the recipient really wanted the stuff and after the first appeal failed decided to pay anyway and then try to get it back. They're now moving again, but haven't arrived yet. They were sent in July. The customs declaration was accurate and they didn't even open the parcel! But if it arrives next week then, at about 4-5 weeks, it will merely be AVERAGE delivery time based on my sample of at least a dozen occasions.
If you send things by FedEx or UPS, it's actually even worse. Because unless you have some commercial system that responds within minutes to the notification that a tariff has been charged and pays it, then they use it as an excuse to void their promise of delivery with three days. Even after the tariff gets paid, they then go into SLOW MODE.
You thought FedEx didn't have a slow mode? Welcome to Brazil.
Even after it was paid, it took them a further two weeks to deliver an item they had guaranteed would arrive in three days.
If you're lucky, a service like FedEx will just return the item to you, 2-3 days after collecting it, because they determined the paperwork was inadequate. Then, if you're smart, you'll decide not to bother sending it at all.
(5/4).
Needless to say I have a reasonable amount of experience sending items both to and from the US, and hitherto things have worked very smoothly - much like parcels from Brazil arriving in the UK. No drama.
But the US Federal Government is now adopting a way of thinking where every foreign arrival, human or brown-paper wrapped, is regarded with deep suspicion.
This is the way the Brazilian government view parcels (but not people - at least you can courier things yourself smoothly).
This is a massive step backwards and it going to mean a whole world of pain, most of all for Americans.
It is possible that America may manage to do things somewhat more efficiently than Brazil. But it will be bad.
If you think my descriptions of Brazil are hyperbolic and out of petty personal frustration, guess which country ranks number one in this list?
@Katauroraaa I'm specifically giving Brazil a really bad rating ,namely:
,
(no stars)
for customs drama when sending small personal items by mail.
Customs is fine for actual international travellers. I can't comment directly on large commercial shipments, but the reputation is bad.
@Katauroraaa However bad Brazilian customs are, both in inefficiency, general attitude of suspicion, and actual tariff levels charged,
levelling tariffs against Brazil *because they prosecuted Trump's buddies for doing coups*
is a whole new level of BAD.
You published this yesterday.
Let me give you two hints before I reveal the answer - one your rival found months ago.
Do you really think the governor of the PMA doesn't know? (Hint: no)
Do you think he'd tell you if Israel did it? (Hint: yes)
@HonestReporting
On April 16, @WSJ published this.
Questions?
@MaxNordau @spacelaserbonds
@WSJ @MaxNordau @spacelaserbonds The full @WSJ article is here, which tells us who is really short of cash. It's actually coherent, unlike the @nytimes article which makes very little sense at all.
Greetings and Salutations, @BBCWorld .
You have, once again, been bamboozled.
This⤵️ is part of the current leading item on your home page.
Dr Al-Deeb is an interesting guy.
(1/5)
@imshin @EFischberger @MarkZlochin @SchoolBondOtter @CAMERAorgUK bbc.co.uk/news/live/c0k7…
He has a tumblr account - where he posted last year that he had lost his job at Al-Shifa, but that you could help by providing funds for him to study abroad.
It also posted a lot of propaganda straight out of the Hamas PR office. And it's clearly the same guy.
(2/5)
His tumblr account has been quiet since December 31 2024. So maybe he got he got another job - the BBC claims he's at Al-Quds hospital - and no longer needs your money.
Let's see how his GoFundMe is doing. Money is still coming in, but slowly.
(3/5)
@EylonALevy @JMPSimor Because there was an explicit partition plan to the contrary which is explicitly cited (twice, moreover) in the text of the Israeli Declaration of Independence.
@EylonALevy @JMPSimor For the hard of understanding, of which there seem to be many, this doesn't answer the question of what the borders should be now.
It simply explains why the principle Mr Levy cited doesn't work. It's a status quo principle. You can't apply it decades later.
@EylonALevy @JMPSimor The Partition Plan, for what it's worth, as set out in 1947, doesn't work either. No one is seriously proposing it be applied now.
Amongst other things, neither the British nor any other external force is about to come in to take care of Jerusalem.
Rumble is in the news again because of JD Vance's stake in it. Time for a quick recap on how that stake is doing.
This is just terrible. They're not growing and they're losing a ton of money, entirely financed by a shrinking cash pile from investors.
Data is directly from their SEC filings. They had their IPO in 2022 and ought to be profitable (or clearly on the cusp of profitability) at this point.
Here's my take on the two biggest factors driving those numbers other than sheer incompetence and a terrible business model.
The most interesting part to me is this, which I've been watching for a while now. We get a new data point with Q2 results in 9 days.
In a shocking turn of events in which
an always-right person* turns out to be right
(sorry @AuhsdBond, me on this occasion)
a longer video clip shows Gideon "Victim" Falter
is not a victim of the police, but an aggressive asshole.
This guy isn't just some random passer-by. He's virtually made a career out of being confrontational.
If you do that, then sooner or later someone under a lot of stress is going to say something unfortunate, and he got the "I'm a victim"video clip he wanted.
But this is crazy.
There's one bit, already absurdly well-publicized, in which the police look bad and have already apologized twice - not good enough for him, despite the fact he wasn't harmed in any way - and the rest where he's behaving, as usual, like a Grade A Dickhead.
Until a rocket hit the hospital car park in the evening of October 17, he consistently claimed to be working at Al Shifa , the largest hospital in Gaza,
not the smaller hospital that was hit
which is two miles away.
(2/4)
And yet when the rocket hit the car park,
he was miraculously inside the hospital operating
theatre.
He described how the "ceiling collapsed",
"the wounded started walking towards" him
and he personally saw "hundreds of dead".
(3/4).