The 𝐁𝐚𝐭𝐭π₯𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐧𝐳𝐒𝐀𝐞𝐫𝐭 was a defeat which plunged the Roman Empire into a civil war and brought it down to depths of despair never known before!

A tale of disaster and betrayal…

[Thread]🧡 Image
At the beginning of the 11th Century, the Roman Empire was at the height of its medieval power thanks to the indomitable spirit and military capability of Basil II BoulgaroktΓ³nos who extended the empire’s borders on all fronts. Image
However, the empire began to face new threats in Italy and on its Balkan borders around the middle of the century under Emperor Constantine IX which coincided with the coming of the Seljuk Turks who broke into the empire under Alp Arslan when they invaded Iberia in the 1060s! Image
π„π§π­πžπ« π‘π¨π¦πšπ§π¨π¬

Romanos Diogenes, a renowned general, took power in 1068 after the death of Constantine X who ruled that his own son should succeed him. Romanos’ succession enraged the Doukas family whose anger would have dire consequences for the new emperor. Image
By 1068 much of Cappadocia had been overrun by the Turks, culminating in the sack of Ceasarea, but Romanos had resolved to turn them back and restore order to the empire.

He led a successful campaign in 1068 and 1069 chasing the Turks from one place to another over Anatolia Image
Affairs elsewhere, including Norman advances in Italy and their imminent capture of Bari, took his attention from the Turks in 1070 but in 1071 he was ready to set out against them once again. Image
The Roman Army was in a sorry state by the time Romanos became emperor and had a serious discipline problem. It took considerable effort to deal with mutineering mercenaries. His own actions, including bringing a large baggage train on campaign also did not endear him to the men Image
Romanos thought Alp Arslan was much farther away then he was and assumed he could quickly capture Manzikert. However, Alp Arslan was close by and knew exactly where the Romans were.

Romanos made the fatal decision to split his forces and send half to retake the fort at Khliat.

What happened to those men is not known for sure. However it is thought that either Alp Arslan swept down and destroyed them or that their commander Tarchaneiotes led them away at the sight of the mighty army mustered by Alp Arslan.Image
With half his army gone, Romanos pushed on and captured Manzikert, oblivious to the doom that awaited him.

The next day scouts reported that the Turks had retreated and Romanos sent a small force of cavalry toward them, still ignorant of the size of the Turkic army. Image
The men he sent were routed and Romanos drew up his army and sent his left wing forward which was surrounded and forced to retreat. The Turks then hid in the hills that night, making another attack impossible.

The next day his Turkic mercenaries defected. Image
Peace envoys were sent to Romanos with terms that he rejected in favour of settling the problem of the Turkic presence in the Empire for good.

He sent out scouts to recall Tarchaneiotes and the rest of his army. No word came back, and Romanos advanced again without them. Image
He made the grave error of leaving the rear of his army under the command of Andronikos Doukas, a member of the Doukas family, who still resented the Romanos’ succession. Image
The Turkic horse archers advanced in a crescent formation with the centre drawing back farther to draw in the Romans whose flanked were now susceptible to arrow fire while the Turks simply disengaged whenever the Romans attempted to force them to stand and fight. Image
When Romanos ordered his forces to withdraw, Andronikos Doukas betrayed his emperor and refused to cover the withdrawal and instead marched the rear of the army back to the camp near Manzikert.

The Turks exploited the confusion and stormed the Roman lines, routing the right wing.Image
The left wing of the army under Nikephoros Bryennios held out for longer but was eventually routed.

All that remained was the emperor commanding the centre of the army, including the famously steadfast Varangian guard Image
In his last stand, Romanos is recorded to have β€˜launched himself into the thick of the battle. He knocked down several very valiant fighters and caused disarray in their ranks!’ Image
They fought valiantly, refusing to retreat until they were eventually surrounded. Romanos was wounded and taken prisoner and the professional core of the army was destroyed.

The battle was over, but the disaster was just beginning to unfold.

When Romanos was brought before Alp Arslan it is said that he refused to believe a man in such a state could be the emperor.

He placed his boot on his neck and forced him to kiss the ground. Then he offered the previously rejected peace terms and released the forlorn emperor.Image
The Doukas family seized upon the defeat of Romanos. Andronikos had marched from Manzikert to Constantinople to launch a coup in favour of his cousin, now hailed as Emperor Michael VII.

The true disaster of Manzikert was not the defeat itself but the war with resulted from it. Image
Romanos raised an army to defend his throne but was defeated by Andronikos Doukas and retreated to the fortress of Adana. From there, knowing his cause was lost, he sent a large shipment of gold to Alp Arslan in attempt to save the peace he had agreed and prevent further war. Image
He surrendered after Doukas promised him that he could resign to a monastery unharmed.

But Doukas lied.

Romanos was seized and blinded. Image
Attaleiates wrote β€˜when he arose, his eyes were drenched with blood, a pathetic and pitiable sight that made everyone who saw it cry uncontrollably’. He was sent into exile without much needed medical attention.

Before dying from an infection caused by the poorly carried out blinding, Romanos received one last insult.

A letter arrived from Michael Psellos, a courtier and supporter of the Doukas faction.

In the letter he congratulated Romanos on the loss of his eyes.Image
The fallout from the betrayal of Romanos Diogenes and the ensuing war gave the Turks free reign in Anatolia which they utilised to conquer it almost entirely.

The heartland of the empire was gone.

For the time being the empire was reduced to a mere Balkan state. Image

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with πŸ› π’π­πžπ―πžπ§ πŸ›

πŸ› π’π­πžπ―πžπ§ πŸ› Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nonregemesse

Aug 25
The Spanish Armada sent to conquer England in 1588 is well known!

But did you know there were three more Spanish Armadas in 1596, 1597, and 1601?

[Thread]🧡 Image
β€’ ππ€π‚πŠπ†π‘πŽπ”ππƒ! β€’

When Queen Mary I died, many Catholics in England wanted her 1st cousin once removed, the Catholic Mary Queen of Scots to succeed her instead of Elizabeth. This was also the desire of the Catholic powers of Spain and France.

Elizabeth became Queen of England in 1558 and Mary became Queen of France in 1559, a marriage arranged by her incredibly powerful French relatives.

When she was widowed, Mary eventually returned to Scotland and was deposed by a Protestant faction and replaced with her infant son, James, whose regent was Mary’s Protestant half-brother.

When she fled from Scotland to England, she was detained by Elizabeth who eventually executed her for her alleged involvement in a plot to kill Elizabeth before a Catholic invasion.Image
β€’ 𝐓𝐇𝐄 π…πˆπ‘π’π“ π€π‘πŒπ€πƒπ€! β€’

β€’ πŸπŸ“πŸ–πŸ– β€’

The continental Catholic reaction to Mary’s execution was furious.

Philip II, King of Spain and former King of England through his marriage to Queen Mary, invaded in response to Mary’s execution and Elizabeth’s support for the Dutch rebellion against Spanish rule in the Netherlands.

The story of the first Spanish Armada is well known. The large Spanish fleet of 137 ships and 55,000 men arrived in the Channel only to be harried by the smaller and more manoeuvrable English merchant ships.

Sir Francis Drake sailed his ship Revenge up to the Nuestra SeΓ±ora del Rosario and captured it at night, forcing the surrender of Pedro de ValdΓ©s, the commander of the Squadron of Andalusia.

Then fire shops savaged the Spanish fleet at Calais and ultimately the Spanish sailed home but were forced to sail around Britain en route to Spain and lost more ships in the process.Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 22
I first learned about Skara Brae about 15 years ago and it has fascinated me ever since.

Stone-walled houses with a sewerage system built five thousand years ago in a settlement way up on an island north of Scotland?

Simply amazing.

[Thread]🧡 Image
Located in the Bay of Skaill on the Orkney Islands, Skara Brae was discovered in 1850 but a full excavation did not take place until much later, after the site was plundered for an unknown quantity of artefacts and damaged by storm. Image
Image
Skara Brae consisted of seven or eight semi-subterranean houses built in hollows in the ground and reinforced and walled by red sandstone found on the island which can fracture into slabs when worked.

The houses had cupboards built into the walls for storage, and a hearth in the centre of the house surrounded by furnitureImage
Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 20
In AD 1090,

During a riot, a man named Conan Pilatus conspired to deliver Rouen over to William Rufus, the king of England.

It did not go well for him.

[Thread]🧡 Image
William the Conqueror had three surviving sons; Robert Curthose, William Rufus, and Henry Beauclerc.

The unprecedented nature of his conquest of England meant that he had to decide what to do with his smaller ancestral Dukedom of Normandy and his much larger and richer kingdom of England.

When he died in 1087, he left Normandy to his eldest son Robert Curthose, and England to his second son, William Rufus. To his youngest son Henry Beauclerc, he left a large sum of money.Image
Robert Curthose as Duke of Normandy, began gathering Norman lords to his side for a war with William as he clearly felt that as the oldest son he deserved England.

He began garrisoning troops in Norman castles and also exploited rivalries and tensions in Rouen.

Conan Pilatus was a wealthy burghur and part of the anti-ducal faction. He accepted a bribe from King William to turn over the city to him.Image
Read 7 tweets
Aug 20
Shark attacks are usually seen as a more recent phenomena, but sharks have been attacking humans for as long as humans have been venturing into the sea!

This is a thread on ancient and medieval shark attacks!

[Thread]🧡 Image
Shark attacks were rarely recorded in the distant past, but the earliest known shark attack comes from ancient Japan!

Dated to around 1370–1010Β BC, the burial remains of one individual show signs of a hideous shark attack.

He was buried at the Tsukumo site near Japan’s Seto Inland Sea where modern attacks are recorded.

The victim had β€˜at least 790 perimortem traumatic lesions characteristic of a shark attack, including deep, incised bone gouges, punctures, cuts with overlapping striations and perimortem blunt force fractures’

Most, but not all of his body were recovered:Image
β€’ Herodotus β€’

Herodotus wrote that in 492 BC, Mardonius, a commander under the Persian King Darius, was sent to attack the Greeks.

Unfortunately for Mardonius, his fleet was β€˜caught in a violent northern gale when it rounds the Athos promontory. Three hundred ships are smashed up, and twenty thousand men are devoured by sea monsters.’

Naturally, it is unlikely that the numbers here are correct, but it clearly indicates a shark attack.The 8th century BC vessel shows sailors being attacked by fish, and probably, a shark
Read 7 tweets
Aug 18
In AD 1141,

At the battle of Lincoln, King Stephen was betrayed, outnumbered and surrounded, but would not yield!

He β€˜kept his ground like a lion, standing alone in the field, grinding his teeth and foaming at the mouth like a boar!’

[Thread]🧡 Image
King Henry I was the son of William the Conqueror and the third Norman king of England.

When his only legitimate son died in the infamous White Ship disaster, he was left with only one legitimate heir; his daughter Matilda.

Being as powerful as he was, he compelled his nobles to swear allegiance to her as his successor, but when he died, Stephen of Blois, his nephew, sailed to England before Matilda and claimed the throne and was crowned king.

Matilda, supported by her illegitimate half-brother Robert, Earl of Gloucester, waged war on Stephen for her birthright!Image
In this period, commanders were wary of pitched battles, and warfare was dominated by sieges.

Ranulf of Chester defected to Matilda’s side and sought to take Lincoln castle.

Ranulf arranged for wife to visit the wife of the constable of Lincoln castle and escorted her with a handful of his household knights, dressed in civilian clothing.

Once inside they seized weapons held inside the castle, overwhelmed the guards and opened the gates to Ranulf’s men!Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 14
Crusading is often thought of as mostly a French and German affair, but from the start there was a much less known English tradition of crusading!

This is a thread on the Englishmen who took the cross and journeyed to the Holy Land to fight for God and Jerusalem!

[Thread]🧡 Image
The First Crusade was called in AD 1095 as a result of the total collapse of order in Anatolia that followed the deaths of two powerful Turkic rulers and the danger that represented to Christians living in the east and Christian pilgrims travelling to Jerusalem.

After the runaway success of the First Crusade, the Kingdom of Jerusalem was established and made up of Jerusalem and several other cities that were captured in the Levant.

As the Muslim powers in the region began to attack and reconquer territory from the Christians, more crusades were launched to defend the borders of the Christian realm and retake what had been lost!Image
β€’ The First Crusade β€’ AD 1096–1099

In 1095, England had only recently been conquered by the Normans and so English soldiers most likely went with their new Norman lords on the First Crusade!

The multi-ethnic composition of the First Crusade was arrested by Fulcher of Chartres

β€˜Whoever heard of such a mixture of languages in one army. There were Franks, Flemings, Frisians, Gauls, Allobroges, Lotharingians, Alemmani, Bavarians, Normans, English, Scots, Aquitanians, Italians, Dacians, Apulians, Iberians, Bretons, Greeks and Armenians.’

However, the Norman and Anglo-Norman lords with connections to England who went on crusade like Ralph de Gael, Ivo de Grantmesnil, or Eustace of Boulogne had more prominent ties to Normandy than England at the time, and it is likely that the Englishmen mentioned in the chronicles were soldiers brought from their estates rather than prominent figures.Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(