BREAKING: The U.N. on October 8th is planning to elect by acclamation an official rep of the Islamic Regime of Iran to its U.N. Human Rights Council advisory committee.
We are calling on @antonioguterres, @volker_turk, and all member states to denounce and oppose this travesty.
2/ Electing any rep of the murderous IRGC regime to a UN human rights body is a travesty.
Here, it's even worse. Under UNHRC Res. 6/102, candidates must have high moral standing, Independence, and impartiality.
Afsaneh Nadipour is an enemy of human rights. Consider: 🧵
3/ Iran's UNHRC candidate Afsaneh Nadipour is an enemy of women's rights. During the Woman, Life, Freedom protests, she defended the murderous regime. She said support for the courageous women protesters was “disingenuous and politically motivated.” tehrantimes.com/news/480477/Ir…
4/ As Iranian ambassador, Denmark summoned Afsaneh Nadipour after her embassy pressured Iranian women living there to accept divorce terms drawn up by Mosque Imams. If a woman remarried, she would lose custody of her children.
5/ During the time Iran's UNHRC candidate Afsaneh Nadipour served the regime in The Netherlands, they murdered two dissidents there: Ali Motamed in 2015, and two years later, Ahmad Mola Nissi. theguardian.com/world/2019/jan…
6/ MP @UlysseEllian addressed the same UN Human Rights Council. Citing these two murders, he urged the UN to “expose Iran’s strategy of hiring assassins to strike fear into anyone who dares to oppose them.” Now they're going to elect an IRGC accomplice.
@UlysseEllian 7/ But she is representing the regime. Electing the Islamic Republic of Iran to protect women’s rights is like putting Dracula in charge of the blood bank. It sends a message that the UN has contempt for women’s rights victims worldwide. It's a dark day for human rights.
@UlysseEllian 8/ Beyond the symbolism, electing an IRGC rep only further undermines the world's top human rights body.
Advisory Committee members provide human rights expertise to the Council, which is supposed to help victims.
And Afsaneh Nadipour is an enemy of human rights.
9/ Check out her CV: Afsaneh Nadipour has served the murderous regime for 33 years — including as an assistant to Minister of Propaganda Javad Zarif.
Afsaneh Nadipour served a regime that commits gross and systematic persecution of women, in both law and in practice.
Afsaneh Nadipour served Iran’s fundamentalist mullahs who force women to cover their hair, with many arrested and attacked daily under the misogynistic hijab law.
Afsaneh Nadipour served a regime that requires a woman to receive permission from her father to get married. The legal age for a girl to marry in Iran is 13—with even younger girls allowed to marry with paternal and judicial consent.
Afsaneh Nadipour served Ayatollah Khamenei’s regime which imprisons courageous women’s rights activists for the crime of peacefully demanding their human dignity.
Why, then, is the UN electing one of the world’s worst oppressors of women as a world judge on human rights?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
AP Exclusive: Humanitarians at Médecins Sans Frontières sexually exploit Sudanese underage girls in refugee camps, systematically targeting vulnerable victims of war. Internal report, buried for 11 months, suggests there was organized sexual trafficking. apnews.com/article/chad-s…
2/ Staff at Doctors Without Borders were engaged in “pattern of abuse and sexual exploitation , in some cases targeting underage girls or trading food or jobs for sex with refugees, according to a confidential internal memo obtained by The Associated Press.”
3/ The internal report was from July 2025, yet only reported today by Associated Press. It found 59 allegations of abuse and said 18 staff members were dismissed and barred from future employment. “Findings only scratch the surface, as many women were hesitant to speak openly.”
2/ “Among Arabs and their supporters, it is sometimes said that Arabs cannot be anti-Semites since they themselves are Semites. This statement is meaningless. Anti-Semitism has never been concerned with anyone but Jews, and there is in any case no such thing as a Semite. Like the Aryan, he is a myth, and part of the same mythology.”
— Bernard Lewis nybooks.com/articles/1986/…
3/ “A common answer, given by or on behalf of Arabs, is that they cannot be anti-Semitic, since they themselves are Semites. The logic of this would seem to be that while an edition of Hitler's Mein Kampf published in Berlin or in Buenos Aires in German or Spanish is anti-Semitic, an Arabic version of the same text published in Cairo or Beirut cannot be anti-Semitic, because Arabic and Hebrew are cognate languages.” ms.z-library.sk/book/wRN3b8oYj…
2: Palestinian women take part in 5-kilometer Palestine Marathon along the coastal road near Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip, May 8, 2026. (AP Photo/Abdel Kareem Hana)
2/ Mengele, under the alias Helmut Gregor, flew from his refuge in Argentina to Switzerland in 1956 to spend a skiing holiday in Engelberg with his future wife Martha, his widowed sister-in-law, and his son Rolf, the only child from his previous marriage to Irene Schönbein.
3/ Josef Mengele and his son Rolf during a skiing holiday in Engelberg, Switzerland, in 1956. @Weltwoche
Previous photo: Cover of the illustrated magazine Bunte from June 27, 1985.
.@MarkJCarney Prime Minister, why did you appoint a Governor-General who admitted herself that as U.N. human rights chief she gave a free pass to the worst tyrannies, saying she was “constrained by the reality of the organization's power centers, including China and Russia”?
2/ In fact, as U.N. high commissioner from 2004-2008, Louise Arbour turned a blind eye to billions of victims in 153 countries, including of regimes in Algeria, Bangladesh, Belarus, North Korea, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Vietnam & Yemen.
3/ UN Watch's Aug. 2008 report revealed that in her official statements over a two-year period, Arbour criticized China only once—and that she never said a single word on Russia. Instead, she posed for pictures taking flowers from Vladimir Putin, legitimizing his brutal regime.
DAY OF INFAMY: New video shows the moment when Canada, Australia, UK, France, Germany, Netherlands, Finland, Norway, Austria and Switzerland joined the consensus decision to nominate Iran—and when they were repeatedly invited to object. They chose silence.
I regret that some democracies now suggest they never endorsed Iran for this UN committee that soon meets to address women's rights.
Ask your MP and foreign minister:
1. Yes or no, did our government join ECOSOC's April 8 consensus nomination of the Islamic Republic of Iran?
2. Yes or no, did the United States take the floor in that meeting to disassociate from the consensus nomination of Iran, stating that the regime threatens its neighbors, infringes on the Iranian people’s ability to exercise their basic human rights, and is thus unfit to serve?