McFaul in Foreign Affairs: Trump mixed talks on a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire, land swaps and security guarantees into one package and got nowhere.
The only workable order is to: first, secure US–European guarantees for Ukraine, then Zelenskyy and Putin should meet on borders. 1/
Putin will not end the war without holding Ukrainian territory. Zelenskyy can't cede land without risking removal from office.
The only viable compromise is de facto occupation: Russia keeps what it holds, Ukraine commits to reunify only by peaceful means. 2/
Zelenskyy can only risk that deal with hard insurance. NATO is blocked.
The substitute is a US–European pact: arm Ukraine to be Europe’s strongest army, pledge collective defense, and base troops and aircraft in Poland and Romania. 3/
Russia cannot join these talks. Including Moscow would repeat the Budapest Memorandum of 1994, when Ukraine surrendered its nuclear arsenal for worthless promises.
Security must be guaranteed by Washington and Europe alone. 4/
The US founded NATO without Stalin’s approval and admitted West Germany without Khrushchev’s.
Clinton expanded NATO without Yeltsin’s consent. Bush brought in the Baltics despite Putin’s objections. Russia’s approval has never been required. 5/
If Zelenskyy gives land first, Putin will restart the war to press for more.
If Ukraine receives credible guarantees first, territorial talks can follow without undermining its survival. The woking order: guarantees before borders. 6X
WSJ: Putin wants to secure full control of Donetsk region through peace talks with Trump rather than battlefield conquest, which could take 4.4 more years.
[He also has failed to take it in 11 years since 2014] 1/
Seizing all 4 southeastern regions would cost Russia 2M killed and wounded troops, UK military intelligence. 2/
Controlling Donetsk would move Russia's front line beyond Ukraine's fortified cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, opening flatter terrain toward the Dnipro River. 3/
Applebaum: The Trump-Putin meeting achieved nothing. No serious negotiations, no Ukrainians involved, no ground discussion.
Russians regained legitimacy — Trump a big TV moment.
No deal, no progress made — just media amplifying Trump’s narrative. 1/
Applebaum: Putin has never said he wants the war to end or recognizes Ukraine’s sovereignty. People repeat Trump administration imaginary futures — wishful thinking.
Ukrainians would like war to be over, but Trump lies all the time. 2/
Applebaum: Americans put no pressure on Russia — militarily or economically. No progress toward peace.
Meeting Putin is fine, but Trump’s approach was misleading, giving the impression of achievement when it was just a PR stunt. 3/
Two-thirds of Americans are pessimistic about a Russia-Ukraine peace deal - Gallup poll. But 52% still want the US to back Ukraine until it reclaims territory, even if war drags on.
And 46% say Washington isn’t doing enough — the highest in 3 years. 1/
By party, 78% of Democrats, 69% of independents, and 57% of Republicans are pessimistic about peace talks. Only 31% of Americans overall are optimistic. 2/
On strategy, 80% of Democrats want the U.S. to keep backing Ukraine until it regains lost land. 69% of Republicans favor ending the war quickly, even if Ukraine concedes territory. Independents are split. 3/
Hodges: It’s inexplicable why Trump won’t pressure Putin or say “get troops out of Ukraine.”
Administration's approach was doomed from start — they don’t care or understand why war began, or why Ukrainians fight. Vance called it “nitpicky detail,” so no real solution comes. 1/
Hodges: I would not count on Trump for intelligence or air support. US will regret not working with allies. Saying “Europe, your problem” is a bad move.
Europe is our biggest trading partner. More Europe acts alone, less US can influence what happens. 2/
Hodges: Russia is in real trouble economically, reports show it can’t keep this going. We must ensure Ukraine can defend itself.
Security guarantee means investing in Ukraine’s defense industry, which is already growing during war. This is where we can do a lot to help. 3/
Flamingo missile’s untested performance and high cost raise doubts about its ability to deliver the strategic impact Ukraine needs.
Yet, Ukraine has shown it can rapidly develop weapons threatening Russia, showcasing remarkable wartime innovation, The Economist. 1/
Ukraine revealed the Flamingo cruise missile with a 3,000 km range and 1+ ton payload. Developed in just 9 months by a team with no prior defense experience, officials say they were initially skeptical but “stunned” on seeing the missile firsthand. 2/
The Flamingo began as a “napkin scribble” in late 2024 after the US denied Zelenskyy’s request for Tomahawks. Inspired by V-1 and Strizh designs, its engine sits above the body.
A similar “FP5” appeared at a UAE show, link to Fire Point unclear. 3/
RKK Energia, Roscosmos’ flagship founded by Sergei Korolev, faces possible closure — Moscow Times.
Crippled by multimillion debts, mismanagement, and sanctions, once world-leading space industry is collapsing, mirroring the broader decline of its tech power. 1/
CEO Maltsev says the legacy of Korolev, Mishin, Glushko, and Semenov has been “squandered.” He admits all major projects missed deadlines and urges an end to “lying to ourselves and others.”
He warns RKK Energia may face closure, unable to function or even pay salaries. 2/
Saving RKK Energia is a “miracle-level task” needing strict discipline. The firm lost 10.5B rubles in a decade, with debt hitting 168.4B by June 30, 2025 — up 25B since January.
Russia’s space crisis worsened after war sanctions drove away nearly all foreign customers. 3/