McFaul in Foreign Affairs: Trump mixed talks on a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire, land swaps and security guarantees into one package and got nowhere.
The only workable order is to: first, secure US–European guarantees for Ukraine, then Zelenskyy and Putin should meet on borders. 1/
Putin will not end the war without holding Ukrainian territory. Zelenskyy can't cede land without risking removal from office.
The only viable compromise is de facto occupation: Russia keeps what it holds, Ukraine commits to reunify only by peaceful means. 2/
Zelenskyy can only risk that deal with hard insurance. NATO is blocked.
The substitute is a US–European pact: arm Ukraine to be Europe’s strongest army, pledge collective defense, and base troops and aircraft in Poland and Romania. 3/
Russia cannot join these talks. Including Moscow would repeat the Budapest Memorandum of 1994, when Ukraine surrendered its nuclear arsenal for worthless promises.
Security must be guaranteed by Washington and Europe alone. 4/
The US founded NATO without Stalin’s approval and admitted West Germany without Khrushchev’s.
Clinton expanded NATO without Yeltsin’s consent. Bush brought in the Baltics despite Putin’s objections. Russia’s approval has never been required. 5/
If Zelenskyy gives land first, Putin will restart the war to press for more.
If Ukraine receives credible guarantees first, territorial talks can follow without undermining its survival. The woking order: guarantees before borders. 6X
Security guarantees for Ukraine are a chimera. The best way to protect Ukraine is to help it win - more arms, money and sanctions on Russia, writes Christian Caryl in FP.
Real guarantees would mean tens of thousands of Western troops in Ukraine. No country will send them. 1/
NATO needed 50,000 soldiers to secure Kosovo in 1999, a territory smaller than Connecticut.
Ukraine is 55 times larger. Any real guarantee would require a force of hundreds of thousands — a scale Europe cannot and will not provide. 2/
The Budapest Memorandum of 1994 already showed what paper promises mean. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for “assurances.” Russia tore them up in 2014 and again in 2022. 3/
Rutte: Russia and China expand militaries fast with little transparency. Their industries produce weapons to secure influence and undermine order.
Russia will roll out 1,500 tanks, 3,000 vehicles, hundreds of Iskanders this year. China already has the world’s largest navy. 1/
Rutte: Russian military build-up shows they prepare for long-term confrontation. But Europe and America will turn the tide in defence production. NATO agreed to invest 5% GDP. Germany plans €153B by 2029, doubling spending in 8 years. 2/
Rutte: Deterrence comes from capability to fight, not 5%. Rheinmetall is important. This factory plans 350,000 shells a year.
This year, plants in Germany, Spain, Hungary, South Africa and Australia will produce 700,000 artillery rounds. 3/
Russian drones are flying over Germany to surveil U.S. and allied supply routes to Ukraine, NYT says.
Concentrated in Thuringia, Russian UAVs map weapons corridors.
Officials warn Moscow seeks to disrupt aid through future sabotage operations. 1/
Intelligence may aid Kremlin sabotage and support Russian troops in Ukraine. U.S. and German officials discussed plots, leading to May arrests of 3 Ukrainians.
Russian sabotage in Europe has sharply declined in 2025 after peaking in 2024. 2/
Russian attacks in Europe surged 4x in 2022–23 and 3x in 2023–24, but fell to just 4 incidents in early 2025. The drop is linked to tighter European security and Ukraine peace talks.
Gen. Grynkewich credited “robust law enforcement efforts” for curbing sabotage. 3/
Ukraine’s 1st Deputy Foreign Minister, Kyslytsa: Trump’s leadership forced Putin to at least consider negotiations.
His media caricature doesn't match reality.
In person, he appeared physically strong, cognitively sharp, and able to run multiple conversations at once. 1/
Kyslytsa: In 2022 global support for Ukraine was driven by shock and emotion.
By 2025 it’s structured: over 30 states form a coalition that delivers both political backing and practical military aid through a system that works daily, not just symbolic declarations. 2/
Kyslytsa: Ukraine rejects Russia and China as guarantors of its safety. Past experience proves their role is destructive.
Real guarantees must come only from states that respect international law and can enforce it politically, militarily, and institutionally. 3/
Bloomberg: Trump hit India with 50% tariffs at midnight, punishing Modi for buying Russian oil.
Tariffs strike 55% of exports to the US, crippling labor-intensive industries like textiles, footwear, and jewelry, while sparing electronics and pharma. 1/
The US canceled a trade mission set for Aug 25-29, wrecking hopes of a fall deal promised during Modi’s February White House visit.
As talks collapse, India turns to BRICS: Modi heads to China next week, while trade with Russia is set to jump 50% to $100B. 2/
Trump ties trade to geopolitics, claiming he brokered a ceasefire after May’s India-Pakistan clashes — a story Modi rejects.
Citigroup sees tariffs cutting 0.6-0.8 pp from GDP, though exports are just 2% of output. Modi bets on tax reform and aid to cushion the blow. 3X
Bessent: Europe must step up. They buy refined products from Russian oil yet won’t threaten tariffs on India.
Only Canada backed Graham’s bill for high secondary tariffs at the G7. This war is in Europe’s backyard — they must share the burden, not leave it to the U.S.
1/
Bessent: Frozen Russian assets are part of negotiations with Putin. We shouldn’t seize them immediately — they’re leverage. In talks, some or all may go to Ukraine’s rebuild.
2/
Q: India vows retaliation after Trump’s 50% tariff over Russian oil. Thoughts?
Bessent: Trump and Modi have good ties, but India stalled tariff talks since Liberation Day. I expected a deal by May-Jun. Instead, they drag talks while profiteering on Russian crude.