📢Economic Growth, Stocks' Return, and Global Debasement - The Long-Term Evidence 📢
Who has grown the fastest in the past 20 years, who has delivered the best returns, and is there a relation?
The answers might surprise you 👇👇
First, there is little relation between economic growth and stocks' return, even over 20 years
GDP growth explains just 15% of stocks' returns
Stocks' returns are driven by margins, dividends, and changes in multiples
Broadly speaking, the BRICS create GDP, the US delivers capital gains, and Europe produces neither
Second, only two stock markets (barely) outperformed gold in the past 20 years: the US and Taiwan, mostly due to the AI / semi bull market.
Gold has returned 10.7% PA (in USD) since 2005. The combination of soaring gold and a strong USD was too hard to beat for most international stocks.
For the past 20 years, most stocks could not keep up with monetary debasement, despite high nominal gains
Four patterns emerge
- China, India, Indonesia and Singapore balanced high growth with only modest debasement of their stocks vs gold
- Most EMs (Poland, Chile, Korea, Brazil) had decent growth but bad stocks' returns in gold
- Switzerland and the US were the most successful DMs: decent growth and good stocks' returns (due to the Mag 7 in the US and the strong CHF for Switzerland)
- Italy, Japan, and the UK had poor growth and stocks' return (growth looks a bit better on a per capita basis)
Lessons for investors
➡️ The "Stocks for the long run" case is mostly a US-centric nominal argument, benefitting from one exceptional market in an exceptional century.
Stocks do not beat gold in most countries
➡️ GDP growth is not enough! Margins and multiples matter more. I am especially concerned about the large growth premium currently baked into India and US stocks
➡️ Currencies matter: the best-performing markets (the US, Taiwan, Switzerland, China) all had rising currencies
➡️Look for cheap equity indices with depressed margins and potential for currency appreciation for the next 10 years: I would pick Brazil, China, and Korea
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Fed's preferred inflation measure, core PCE, rose at an annualized 5.1% last month, its highest growth in a year
Just a month ago, the futures market priced SEVEN cuts in 2024! And yet, the rebound of inflation was predictable
Extracts from my report "Life Finds a Way" 👇
In the deflationist view, inflation is the CPI, and what gets measured is what matters.
In the narrow world of the owners’ equivalent rent, the retained earnings method, and hedonic adjustments, inflation was a one-time accident caused by COVID and supply chain disruptions.
For example, the fact that the BLS measures of shelter costs lag behind market-based measure by 10 to 20 % does not matter because few people bought homes in the past year and many leases have not been repriced
THE FED HAS NOT WON THE BATTLE AGAINST INFLATION - 🧵
Powell will likely claim victory against inflation today: core CPI ex. shelter ran at 1.6% in the past 6 months, and may fall further in Jan
Yet, the consensus for the immaculate disinflation rests on a flawed premise
Shelter should be disinflationary in 2024, right?
The idea is that the CPI rents & OER lag actual prices by 12-16 months and should cool off as the impact of 2022 housing downturn passes through
But which downturn? The Zillow rent Index never fell on YoY basis
The same goes for home prices: the Case Shiller never really went dropped on YoY basis, and prices are rising or flat 6 of the 10 metro areas in the past three months
(... and these are the cities which WFH workers left due to with poops, drugs, and crime issues!)